The Reactivity of Diorganotellurium Oxides Towards Phenol and o-Nitrophenol. Hypervalent and Secondary Bonding of Four Different Product Classes
Jens Beckmann A C , Jens Bolsinger A and Andrew Duthie BA Institut für Chemie und Biochemie, Freie Universität Berlin, Fabeckstrasse 34/36, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
B School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Waurn Ponds, Vic. 3216, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: Beckmann@chemie.fu-berlin.de
Australian Journal of Chemistry 61(3) 172-182 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH07329
Submitted: 16 September 2007 Accepted: 8 February 2008 Published: 26 March 2008
Abstract
The reaction of the diorganotellurium oxides R2TeO (R = Ph, p-MeOC6H4, p-Me2NC6H4) with phenol and o-nitrophenol produces diorganotellurium hydroxy phenolates, R2Te(OH)OPh (1, R = Ph; 2, R = p-MeOC6H4; 3, R = p-Me2NC6H4), diorganotellurium bis(phenolates) R2Te(OPh)2 (4, R = Ph; 5, R = p-MeOC6H4; 6, R = p-Me2NC6H4), tetraorganoditelluroxane bis(o-nitrophenolates), (R′O)R2TeOTeR2(OR′) (7, R = p-MeOC6H4; 8, R = p-Me2NC6H4; R′ = o-NO2C6H4), and a hexaphenyltritelluroxane bis(o-nitrophenolate) (R′O)Ph2TeOTePh2OTePh2(OR′) (9, R′ = o-NO2C6H4), respectively. The redistribution reactions of R2Te(OPh)2 (4, R = Ph; 5, R = p-MeOC6H4; 6, R = p-Me2NC6H4) with the corresponding diorganotellurium oxides R2TeO and diorganotellurium dichlorides R2TeCl2 (R = Ph, p-MeOC6H4, p-Me2NC6H4) give rise to the formation of moisture sensitive tetraorganoditelluroxane bis(phenolates) (PhO)R2TeOTeR2(OPh) (10, R = Ph; 11, R = p-MeOC6H4; 12, R = p-Me2NC6H4) and diorganotellurium chloro phenolates, R2Te(Cl)OPh (13, R = Ph; 14, R = p-MeOC6H4; 15, R = p-Me2NC6H4), respectively. The reaction of the diorganotellurium oxides R2TeO with the corresponding diorganotellurium dichlorides R2TeCl2 (R = Ph, p-MeOC6H4, p-Me2NC6H4) affords tetraorganoditelluroxane dichlorides ClR2TeOTeR2Cl (16, R = Ph; 17, R = p-MeOC6H4; 18, R = p-Me2NC6H4) as air-stable solid materials. The reactivity of 1–18 can be rationalized by the kinetic lability of the Te–O and Te–Cl bonds. Compounds 1–18 have been characterized by solution and solid-state 125Te NMR spectroscopy and 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 17, and 18 have also been analyzed by X-ray crystallography.
Acknowledgement
Mrs. Irene Brüdgam (Freie Universität Berlin) is thanked for the X-ray data collection. The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) is gratefully acknowledged for financial support.
[1]
(a) K. Lederer,
Ann. Chem. 1912, 391, 326.
|
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
|
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24]