The Preparation of Solid-Supported Peptide Boronic Acids Derived from 4-Borono-l-phenylalanine and their Affinity for Alizarin
Peter J. Duggan A B D and Daniel A. Offermann CA School of Chemistry, Monash University, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia.
B CSIRO Molecular and Health Technologies, Bag 10, Clayton South VIC 3169, Australia.
C Centre for Green Chemistry, Monash University, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: peter.duggan@csiro.au
Australian Journal of Chemistry 60(11) 829-834 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH07143
Submitted: 2 May 2007 Accepted: 28 June 2007 Published: 1 November 2007
Abstract
A library of solid-supported pentapeptide diboronic acids, a ‘lysine series’ and an ‘arginine series’, has been efficiently prepared using N-Fmoc-4-pinacolatoborono-l-phenylalanine and standard solid phase peptide synthesis methods. A technique for measuring the affinity of the chromophoric diol, alizarin, to the solid-supported peptide boronic acids has been developed. Considerable variation in alizarin binding strengths, both within and between arginine and lysine series was observed, with association constants in the range 200–1100 M–1 being recorded. The selective binding characteristics of these boronic acid–peptide hybrids suggest their potential use in carbohydrate sensors and cell-specific diagnostics and therapeutics.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Professor Bradley Smith, University of Notre Dame, for much valuable advice provided throughout the course of this research, and Dr Ian James, formerly of Mimotopes, for assistance with peptide synthesis. The Australian Research Council and Monash University are thanked for funding.
[1]
[2]
H. Lis,
N. Sharon,
Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 637.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |