Exploring the Coordination Chemistry of Some Organometallic Mercury Derivatives of 4-Ethynylpyridine
Li Liu A B , Cheuk-Lam Ho B and Wai-Yeung Wong B C DA Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for the Synthesis and Application of Organic Functional Molecules, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China.
B Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Baptist University, Waterloo Road, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
C Centre for Advanced Luminescence Materials, Hong Kong Baptist University, Waterloo Road, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
D Corresponding author. Email: rwywong@hkbu.edu.hk
Australian Journal of Chemistry 60(6) 429-434 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH07104
Submitted: 12 April 2007 Accepted: 1 May 2007 Published: 18 June 2007
Abstract
Two new heterotrinuclear organorhenium(i) mercury(ii) derivatives of 4-ethynylpyridine [Re(CO)3Cl(NC5H4C≡CHgMe)2] 1 and [Re(CO)3Cl(NC5H4C≡CHgC≡CC5H4N)2] 2 were prepared in good yields by the reaction of Re(CO)5Cl with a methylmercury(ii) derivative of 4-ethynylpyridine 1a and its inorganic mercury(ii) derivative, bis(4-pyridylethynyl)mercury 2a, respectively. The structures of these mixed-metal complexes were established by spectroscopic (FT-IR, NMR, and FABMS) techniques and their photophysical properties were examined in both fluid and solid phases.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (project no. HKBU 2021/06P) and Hong Kong Baptist University for financial support.
[1]
(a) H. Lang,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 547.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
in press
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |