Synthesis and Copper(i) Complexation of 3,6-Di(2-pyridyl)pyridazine and 2,2′-Bipyridine Ligands Functionalized with a Dangling Iridium(iii) Complex
Veronica Marin A B , Richard Hoogenboom A B , Brian Moore A , Elisabeth Holder A B C and Ulrich S. Schubert A B DA Laboratory of Macromolecular Chemistry and Nanoscience, Eindhoven University of Technology, Den Dolech 2, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
B Dutch Polymer Institute, John F. Kennedylaan 2, 5612 AB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
C Current address: Functional Polymers Group and Institute for Polymer Technology, University of Wuppertal, Gaußstrasse 20, D-42097 Wuppertal, Germany.
D Corresponding author. Email: u.s.schubert@tue.nl
Australian Journal of Chemistry 60(4) 229-235 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH07015
Submitted: 20 January 2007 Accepted: 2 March 2007 Published: 26 April 2007
Abstract
The combination of multiple metal complexes into single heterometallic architectures is of interest to study energy and electron transfer processes. In this contribution, the synthesis and characterization of iridium(iii) complexes with pendant dipyridyl–pyridazine and bipyridine moieties are reported. The successful coupling of an amino-functional mixed ligand IrIII complex was performed by a carbamate linkage using carbonyl-diimidazole-activated ligands. Characterization by 1H NMR spectroscopy, MALDI-TOFMS, and elemental analysis proved the purity of the synthesized complexes. Further, the complexation of these ligands with copper(i) ions and the effect of complexation on the phosphorescence of the IrIII complex are discussed, whereby model complexation studies were performed to further understand the observed quenching behaviour.
Acknowledgments
This work forms part of the Dutch Polymer Institute (DPI) research program (project numbers 324 and 543). The authors acknowledge the Dutch Council for Scientific Research (NWO) for financial support.
[1]
J. B. Livramento,
E. Toth,
A. Sour,
A. Borel,
A. E. Merbach,
R. Ruloff,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1480.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |