An Interpenetrating Coordination Polymer Containing Weak Hydrogen Bonds and Argentophilic Interactions
Martin B. Duriska A , Stuart R. Batten A B and David J. Price AA School of Chemistry, Monash University, Melbourne VIC 3800, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: stuart.batten@sci.monash.edu.au
Australian Journal of Chemistry 59(1) 26-29 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH05304
Submitted: 14 November 2005 Accepted: 15 December 2005 Published: 31 January 2006
Abstract
The structure of the coordination polymer [Ni(en)2][Ag(CN)2]2[Ag2(CN)2] (1; en = ethylenediamine) contains 2D (6,3) sheets in which trans-Ni(en)2{Ag(CN)2}2 moieties bridge between zigzag Ag(CN) chains. The sheets are puckered, and show 3-fold 2D → 2D parallel interpenetration. The structure also contains weak N–H···π(CN) and argentophilic Ag···Ag interactions between the 2D sheets.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Australian Research Council for an Australian Research Fellowship (SRB) and a Discovery Grant.
[1]
(a) B. F. Hoskins,
R. Robson,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1546.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14]
[15]