Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Enhancing the capacity of the health workforce to deliver best practice diabetes care

Giuliana Murfet https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4486-388X A J * , Ashley H Ng B , Virginia Hagger https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3845-2814 C D , Susan Davidson E , Grace Ward F , Brett Fenton G and Bodil Rasmussen D H I
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.

B Department of Dietetics, Human Nutrition and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic., Australia.

C School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australia.

D Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic., Australia.

E Australian Diabetes Educators Association, Chifley, ACT, Australia.

F Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Engagement, Diabetes Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

G Diabetes Services, Central Coast Local Health District, Gosford, NSW, Australia.

H Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Nørregade 10, DK-1017 Copenhagen, Denmark.

I Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark.

J Present address: Diabetes Centre, Tasmanian Health Service, Burnie, Tas. 7250, Australia.

* Correspondence to: giuliana.murfet@ths.tas.gov.au

Australian Health Review 46(4) 496-500 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22040
Submitted: 25 February 2022  Accepted: 15 June 2022   Published: 19 July 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of AHHA. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Diabetes prevalence is increasing; the technologies and medicines used to manage diabetes have become more complex, and the specialist health workforce with qualifications in diabetes is insufficient. Generalist health professionals have limited diabetes knowledge, despite engaging with people with diabetes in healthcare daily. An innovative framework is needed to align with the Australian National Diabetes Strategy to build a competent, flexible and adaptive workforce to promote excellence in diabetes care. A three-staged modified Delphi technique was used to identify a consensus Capability Framework for Diabetes Care (the ‘Framework’). An implementation phase followed, involving representation from people with diabetes and key health professional organisations to co-design and implement the ‘Framework’. The ‘Framework’ can guide curricula at universities and TAFE institutes, and the professional development and practice of Australian nurses, allied health professionals, First Nations Australians health workers and practitioners, pharmacists, midwives and health assistants when delivering care to people living with diabetes. The ‘Framework’ defines nine core capabilities that healthcare providers require to deliver diabetes care effectively, underpinned by three sets of attributes for seven practice levels to enable the workforce. Information within the practice levels provides a nationally consistent approach to learning and training different healthcare providers in the essential elements of diabetes care. A ‘living’ evidence-based national ‘Framework’ for the whole health workforce and associated online resources will help promote a more responsive health workforce delivering better and more equitable diabetes care.

Keywords: capability framework, capacity-building, credentialled diabetes educators, diabetes, diabetes capabilities, diabetes educator, diabetes policy, diabetes strategy, health workforce, university curriculum.

Introduction

More than a quarter of Australians accessing healthcare services live with diabetes.1,2 Over 1.4 million Australians have diabetes, which is three times more prevalent among First Nations Australians.3,4 To advance diabetes management, the number and complexity of medicines and technologies used have increased exponentially.5,6 Simultaneously, medical shortfalls in areas of geographical remoteness and populations of extreme disadvantage persist.79

Australia has 1700 full-time equivalents (FTE) of diabetes-qualified healthcare professionals (HCPs), 1589 Credentialled Diabetes Educators and 736 diabetes educators; half work part-time or are aged over 50 years, and less than 20 are Indigenous HCPs.10,11 An ideal ratio is 2.75 FTE/1000 people with diabetes based on an Australian workforce model, calculating consultation time against diabetes clinical guidelines for 20 competencies.12 Double the current diabetes-specialist workforce (3850 FTEs) is necessary to meet the needs of people with diabetes, many of whom do not have access to diabetes-competent staff.13

Primary HCPs report inadequate skills, confidence, time or access to resources as common barriers to delivering person-centred diabetes care, often due to lack of preparedness from undergraduate degrees.1316 An inadequately diabetes-trained health workforce can lead to improper clinical care, longer hospitalisation, re-admission, and conflicting advice, leading to disengagement with health services, low health literacy and reduced self-care practices.1720 These consequences increase personal and financial burdens on people with diabetes and the health system.21,22

Standard approach to training the workforce in diabetes

Competency frameworks are task-focused tools to guide, assess and standardise HCPs’ practice in stable and predictable situations.23,24 Currently, national and international diabetes competency frameworks focus on separate health topic areas and individual health disciplines, leading to inconsistent training across professions and risk of reduced currency because of organisations’ diverse priorities in determining framework updates.13,2530

Competency frameworks are tied to one-dimensional views of learning, healthcare roles, and discipline requirements and do not recognise the benefits of autonomous practice that enable innovation, hindering expertise.16,24,31 In Australia, there is no diabetes framework to inform the entire workforce, nor are any frameworks, internationally or nationally, capability-based to accommodate dynamic healthcare changes.13 The lack of these frameworks compromises consistency in advice and clinical care delivered, limiting sustainable health workforce development.16,24


A capability approach to training the whole health workforce

An accessible and sustainable framework that evolved expediently with the evidence-base was needed to inform and train the whole health workforce in managing diabetes consistently, promoting engagement with health services, guiding clinical practice referral pathways, and accommodating the dynamic nature of healthcare.13,19,20,32,33 Importantly, it needed to increase equitable, safe diabetes healthcare to reduce the burden of diabetes and address health system challenges.32,34

Evidence from 64 studies indicated people with diabetes report receiving contradictory advice from HCPs and an Australian study linking Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and National Diabetes Services Scheme data found inequities in access to evidence-based diabetes medicines related to residing remotely.35,36 Ensuring that generalist HCPs are competent in diabetes care is crucial to maximise the health workforce’s effectiveness in meeting people’s needs and addressing remoteness-related inequities in healthcare.32,3740

Capability-based learning offers an innovative alternative to current frameworks.13,16 It is based on Sen’s capability approach, a moral framework describing how opportunities are made feasible and are constrained by internal (personal) and external (social and environment) factors.41,42 It encompasses competency and extends beyond technical skills, promoting self-efficacy supported by emphasising adaptability and lifelong learning.23,24,41

Sen’s capability approach, used in educational theory and practice, supports increased flexibility and responsiveness, translating into increased workforce capacity.13,23,41,42 For example, survey data from 307 research and development and manufacturing organisations found ‘employee autonomy’, mediated innovative performance and increased employees’ intrinsic motivation to share knowledge. Areas such as housing, education (e.g. health professionals, teaching, eHealth), and public service leadership policy have increased capacity by better meeting adult learners’ needs through aligning learning with human motivation differences.24,31,4145

Capable learners respond to changing clinical situations creatively and flexibly, which is essential as HCPs are likely to encounter people with diabetes at critical time-points in their life when experiencing adverse events.4547 These are opportunities for HCPs to support engagement with people with diabetes, e.g. when disengaged, young people with type 1 diabetes have a health-related turning point.47

A framework that increases the capability of non-medical HCPs to deliver diabetes care was identified by consensus via a 3-staged modified Delphi technique from a purposefully recruited diverse panel of Australian diabetes-experts with representation from all Australian healthcare sectors (see Supplementary material).13,16

Capability framework for diabetes care (the ‘Framework’)

The ‘Framework’ promotes adequate diabetes content and consistency in curricula in all Australian HCP degrees or courses. The intended outcome is a diabetes-literate workforce and training aligned with HCPs’ scope of practice; Table 1 highlights ways the ‘Framework’ prepares the workforce. The ‘Framework’ includes nine capabilities underpinned by three overarching attributes promoting agility and seven HCP practice levels aligned to an appropriate diabetes clinical competence stage and relevant training.13,16


Table 1.  Ways the Diabetes Capability Framework can be used to develop the health workforce.
Click to zoom

National implementation of the ‘Framework’ was imperative to improve consistency and equity in diabetes healthcare. Key stakeholders formed an Implementation Advisory Group, including people living with diabetes, and representatives from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workers and practitioners, nursing, midwifery, pharmacy and allied HCP organisations. The group advised on the ‘Framework’ implementation to embed it into professional education and practice.16 The ‘living’ (continually modified to align with emerging evidence) online ‘Framework’ will be launched in 2022: hosted on the Australian Diabetes Educators Association website. Health professionals can access evidence-based resources aligned to the ‘Framework’, mentoring and communication opportunities.16 The ‘Framework’ addresses the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care concerns, which suggested redistributing aspects of care to different HCPs. This will promote agility and collaborative, ongoing mentorship.13,16,46


Conclusions

The Delphi technique identified a novel way to prepare the Australian health workforce to deliver quality diabetes care. By identifying capabilities required at different practice levels within the health workforce, the ‘Framework’ delivers a comprehensive evidence-informed mechanism to build diabetes capacity that supports an agile and flexible workforce. The ‘living’ online ‘Framework’ is an innovative way to support practice and education sustainably and consistently, strengthening connections and mentorship within the workforce. Ongoing evaluation of the ‘Framework’s’ implementation and impact on workforce training is planned, including identifying culturally-specific mentoring required to serve First Nations Australians best.

Ethics approval

Ethics approval gained from the Tasmania Health and Medical Human Research Ethics Committee – Ethics approval number: 24606.


Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available online.


Data availability

The data used to generate the results in the paper are available in a PhD thesis available online at Deakin University, Burwood (Australia) at https://dro.deakin.edu.au/view/DU:30159402 or by contacting the corresponding author.


Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; or in the decision of results to publish.


Declaration of funding

The evaluation study is funded by a Australian Diabetes Educator Association – Diabetes Research Foundation Research Fellowship grant. The National Partnership Agreement on Improving Health Services in Tasmania (Tasmanian Wellness Project) funded a clinical scholarship to GM during 2019 PhD studies.


Author contributions

Conceptualisation: G. M. Methodology: G. M. Software: G. M. Validation: G. M., B. R., J. O., A. N., V. H., B. F., G. W., and S. D. Formal analysis: G. M. Secondary analysis and cross coding: B. R. and J. O. Implementation of framework: G. M., B. R., A. N., V. H., G. W., B. F., and S. D. Data curation: G. M. Writing – original draft preparation: G. M. Writing – review and editing, G. M., B. R., A. N., V. H., G. W., B. F., S. D. Supervision, B. R. and J. O. Project administration: G. M. Funding acquisition: G. M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.



Acknowledgements

The authors thank the 90 dedicated and passionate diabetes health professionals who volunteered from 2017 to 2020 to identify the Capability Framework for Diabetes Care. Also, G. M. extends her gratitude to her PhD primary supervisor, the late Emeritus Professor Trisha Dunning (Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia), and associate supervisors Dr Joan Ostaszkiewicz (National Aging Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia) and Professor Bodil Rasmussen for their ongoing wisdom and guidance. Additionally, the Expert Advisory Group and the Implementation Advisory Group are acknowledged as critical to the validating, co-designing and implementing the framework into the real world, including representation from consumers and health professionals and Indigenous partner organisations.


References

[1]  Bach LA, Ekinci EI, Engler D, Gilfillan C, Hamblin PS, Maclsaac RJ, Soldatos G, Steele C, et al. The high burden of inpatient diabetes mellitus: the Melbourne public hospitals diabetes inpatient audit. Med J Aust 2014; 201 334–338.
The high burden of inpatient diabetes mellitus: the Melbourne public hospitals diabetes inpatient audit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  National Health Performance Authority. Healthy Communities: Frequent GP attenders and their use of health services in 2012–13 (Technical supplement). Sydney: National Health Performance Authority; 2015. Available at https://apo.org.au/node/53739 [verified 12 February 2022]

[3]  Diabetes Australia. Australian diabetes map. Canberra: Diabetes Australia Limited; 2022. Available at https://www.ndss.com.au/about-the-ndss/diabetes-facts-and-figures/australian-diabetes-map/ [verified 12 February 2022]

[4]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health performance framework 2017 report: Northern Territory, (Cat. No. IHW 186). 2017. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/0e60dc3c-a582-4b7f-a4d1-1e623a91745e/aihw-ihw-186-2017-hpf-nt.pdf.aspx?inline=true [verified 10 February 2022]

[5]  Pease AJ, Andrikopoulos S, Abraham MB, Craig ME, Fenton B, Overland J, Price S, Simmons D, et al. Utilisation, access and recommendations regarding technologies for people living with type 1 diabetes: consensus statement of the ADS/ADEA/APEG/ADIPS Working Group. Med J Aust 2021; 215 473–478.
Utilisation, access and recommendations regarding technologies for people living with type 1 diabetes: consensus statement of the ADS/ADEA/APEG/ADIPS Working Group.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Australian Diabetes Society. Australian type 2 diabetes glycaemic management algorithm. 2021. Available at https://diabetessociety.com.au/position-statements.asp [verified 10 February 2022]

[7]  Department of Health. National medical workforce strategy: 2021-2031 - Investing in our medical workforce to meet Australia’s health needs. 2022. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/national-medical-workforce-strategy2021-2031 [verified 12 February 2022]

[8]  National Rural Health Commissioner. National Rural Health Commissioner – Final Report. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government; 2020. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/final-report-from-the-national-ruralhealth-commissioner-november-2017-to-june-2020 [verified 12 February 2022]

[9]  Maple-Brown LJ, Hampton D. Indigenous cultures in countries with similar colonisation histories share the challenge of intergenerational diabetes. Lancet Glob Health 2020; 8 e619–e620.
Indigenous cultures in countries with similar colonisation histories share the challenge of intergenerational diabetes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Australian Diabetes Educators Association. Annual Report 2020-2021. Canberra: Australian Diabetes Educators Association; 2021. Available at https://www.adea.com.au/about-us/annual-reports/ [verified 17 February 2022]

[11]  Australian Diabetes Educators Association. Workforce in diabetes education. Canberra: Australian Diabetes Educators Association; 2017. Available at https://members.adea.com.au/resources-2/workforce-in-diabetes-education/ [verified 17 February 2022]

[12]  Segal L, Leach M, May E, Turnbull C. Regional primary care team to deliver best practice diabetes care. Diabetes Care 2013; 36 1898–1907.
Regional primary care team to deliver best practice diabetes care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Murfet G. A consensus approach to building diabetes capabilities in the healthcare workforce. PhD thesis. Burwood, Australia, Deakin University; 2021 [Dataset]. Available at https://dro.deakin.edu.au/view/DU:30159402 [verified 12 February 2022]

[14]  Furler J, O’Neal D, Speight J, Manski-Nankervis J-A, Gorelik A, Holmes-Truscott E, Ginnivan L, Young D, et al. Supporting insulin initiation in type 2 diabetes in primary care: results of the Stepping Up pragmatic cluster randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ 2017; 356 j783
Supporting insulin initiation in type 2 diabetes in primary care: results of the Stepping Up pragmatic cluster randomised controlled clinical trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Phillips A. Practice nurses need better diabetes education to meet service and individual needs. Pract Nurs 2019; 30 555–557.
Practice nurses need better diabetes education to meet service and individual needs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Murfet G, Ostaszkiewicz J, Rasmussen B. Diabetes Capabilities for the Healthcare Workforce Identified via a 3-Staged Modified Delphi Technique. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 1012
Diabetes Capabilities for the Healthcare Workforce Identified via a 3-Staged Modified Delphi Technique.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Dhatariya K, Mustafa OG, Rayman G. Safe care for people with diabetes in hospital. Clin Med 2020; 20 21–27.
Safe care for people with diabetes in hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Drincic A, Pfeffer E, Luo J, Goldner W. The effect of diabetes case management and Diabetes Resource Nurse program on readmissions of patients with diabetes mellitus. J Clin Transl Endocrinol 2017; 8 29–34.
The effect of diabetes case management and Diabetes Resource Nurse program on readmissions of patients with diabetes mellitus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Hendrieckx C, Halliday J, Beeney L, Speight J. Diabetes and Emotional Health: A Practical Guide for Health Professionals Supporting Adults with Type 1 Diabetes or Type 2 Diabetes, 2nd edn. Canberra: National Diabetes Services Scheme; 2020. Available at https://www.ndss.com.au/health-professionals/resources/ [verified 12 February 2022]

[20]  Friis K, Hauge Pedersen M, Aaby A, Lasgaard M, Terkildsen Maindal H. Impact of low health literacy on healthcare utilization in individuals with cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes and mental disorders. A Danish population-based 4-year follow-up study. Eur J Public Health 2020; 30 866–872.
Impact of low health literacy on healthcare utilization in individuals with cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes and mental disorders. A Danish population-based 4-year follow-up study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Lee C, Colagiuri R, Magliano D, Cameron A, Shaw J, Zimmet P, Colagiuri S. The cost of diabetes in adults in Australia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2013; 99 385–390.
The cost of diabetes in adults in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian burden of disease study: impact and causes of illness and death in Australia 2015 and disease expenditure in Australia. 2019. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/burden-of-disease/burden-disease-study-illness-death-2015/summary [verified 10 February 2022]

[23]  Brunner M, McGregor D, Keep M, Janssen A, Spallek H, Quinn D, Jones A, Tseris E, et al. An eHealth capabilities framework for graduates and health professionals: Mixed-methods study. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 e10229
An eHealth capabilities framework for graduates and health professionals: Mixed-methods study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Wheelahan L. Rethinking skills development: Moving beyond competency-based training. The Oxford Handbook of Skills and Training. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. pp. 636–651. Available at https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199655366.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199655366-e-30 [verified 12 February 2022]

[25]  Aotearoa College of Diabetes Nurses. National Diabetes Nursing Knowledge and Skills Framework. 2018. Available at https://www.nzno.org.nz/groups/colleges_sections/colleges/aotearoa_college_of_diabetes_nurses/education#Framework [verified 10 February 2022]

[26]  Ryan D, Burke SD, Litchman ML, Bronich-Hall L, Kolb L, Rinker J, Yehl K. Competencies for Diabetes Care and Education Specialists. Diabetes Educ 2020; 46 384–397.
Competencies for Diabetes Care and Education Specialists.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[27]  TREND-UK. Integrated Career and Competency Framework for Adult Diabetes Nursing, 6th edn. London: Trend UK; 2021. Available at https://trenddiabetes.online/portfolio/an-integrated-career-and-competency-framework-for-adult-diabetes-nursing-6th-edition/ [verified 2 February 2022]

[28]  United Kingdom Clinical Pharmacy Association. An Integrated Career and Competency Framework for Pharmacists in Diabetes. 2018. Available at https://www.diabetes.org.uk/professionals/news--updates/integrated-career-framework [verified 10 February 2022]

[29]  McCardle J, Atkin L, Bowen G, Chadwick P, Game F, Fox M, Pankhurst C, Sharman D, et al. Capability Framework for Integrated Diabetic Lower Limb Care: A User’s Guide. London: OmniaMed Communications Ltd.; 2019. Available at www.diabetesonthenet.com [verified 10 February 2022]

[30]  Australian Diabetes Educators Association. The National Diabetes Nursing Education Framework. 2020. Available at https://www.ndss.com.au/about-diabetes/resources/find-a-resource/national-diabetes-nursing-education-framework/ [verified 2 February 2022]

[31]  Burcharth A, Knudsen MP, Søndergaard HA. The role of employee autonomy for open innovation performance. Bus Process Manag J 2017; 23 1245–1269.
The role of employee autonomy for open innovation performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[32]  Department of Health. Australian National Diabetes Strategy 2021-2030. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2021. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/australian-national-diabetes-strategy2021-2030 [verified on 17 February 2022]

[33]  Dunning T, Speight J. The referral: ‘Please fix this out of control, dementing aged diabetic’. Aust Nurs Midwifery J 2019; 26 41
The referral: ‘Please fix this out of control, dementing aged diabetic’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[34]  Department of Health. National Rural Health Commissioner ‐ Final Report. 2020. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/national-rural-health-commissioner-final-report [verified 12 February 2022]

[35]  Kousoulis AA, Patelarou E, Shea S, Foss C, Ruud Knutsen IA, Todorova E, Roukova P, Portillo MC, et al. Diabetes self-management arrangements in Europe: a realist review to facilitate a project implemented in six countries. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14 453
Diabetes self-management arrangements in Europe: a realist review to facilitate a project implemented in six countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[36]  Morton J, Ilomӓki J, Magliano D, Shaw J. The association of socioeconomic disadvantage and remoteness with receipt of type 2 diabetes medications in Australia: a nationwide registry study. Diabetologia 2020; 64 349–360.
The association of socioeconomic disadvantage and remoteness with receipt of type 2 diabetes medications in Australia: a nationwide registry study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[37]  Evans C, Pearce R, Greaves S, Blake H. Advanced clinical practitioners in primary care in the UK: A qualitative study of workforce transformation. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17 4500
Advanced clinical practitioners in primary care in the UK: A qualitative study of workforce transformation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[38]  Leary A, MacLaine K. The evolution of advanced nursing practice: Past, present and future. Nurs Times 2019; 115 18–19. Available at https://www.nursingtimes.net/roles/specialistnurses/evolution-advanced-nursing-practice-past-present-future-10-09-2019/

[39]  Phillips A. Invigorating diabetes care in a post-pandemic arena. Pract Nurs 2022; 33 S2–S3.
Invigorating diabetes care in a post-pandemic arena.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[40]  George JE, Larmer PJ, Kayes N. Learning from those who have gone before: strengthening the rural allied health workforce in Aotearoa New Zealand. Rural Remote Health 2019; 19 4878
Learning from those who have gone before: strengthening the rural allied health workforce in Aotearoa New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[41]  Robertson P. Towards a capability approach to careers: applying Amartya Sen’s thinking to career guidance and development. Int J Educ Vocat Guid 2015; 15 75–88.
Towards a capability approach to careers: applying Amartya Sen’s thinking to career guidance and development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[42]  Robeyns I, Morten F. The Capability Approach. In: Zalta E, editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; 2020. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/capability-approach/ [verified 14 February 2022]

[43]  Lawson J. Editorial: The application of the capabilities approach to the field of housing. Hous Theory Soc 2020; 37 255–256.
Editorial: The application of the capabilities approach to the field of housing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[44]  Australian Public Service Commission. Building capability: A framework for managing learning and development in the APS. 2018. Available at https://www.apsc.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/learning-and-development [verified 1 June 2022]

[45]  O’Connell J, Gardner G, Coyer F. Beyond competencies: using a capability framework in developing practice standards for advanced practice nursing. J Adv Nurs 2014; 70 2728–2735.
Beyond competencies: using a capability framework in developing practice standards for advanced practice nursing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[46]  Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Safety and quality of healthcare. 2020. Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/safety-and-quality-of-health-care [verified 10 February 2022]

[47]  Ng AH, Crowe TC, Ball K, Rasmussen B. Transitional needs of Australian young adults with type 1 diabetes: Mixed methods study. JMIR Diabetes 2017; 2 e29
Transitional needs of Australian young adults with type 1 diabetes: Mixed methods study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |