Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Should endometriosis be managed within a chronic disease framework? An analysis of national policy documents

Rebecca O’Hara A C , Heather Rowe A , Louise Roufeil B and Jane Fisher A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia. Email: heather.rowe@monash.edu; jane.fisher@monash.edu

B School of Psychology, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW 2795, Australia. Email: lroufeil@csu.edu.au

C Corresponding author. Email: beck.ohara@monash.edu

Australian Health Review 42(6) 627-634 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17185
Submitted: 7 August 2017  Accepted: 1 June 2018   Published: 10 August 2018

Journal Compilation © AHHA 2018 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to determine whether endometriosis meets the definition for chronic disease in Australian policy documents.

Methods A qualitative case study approach was used to thematically analyse the definitions contained in Australian chronic disease policy documents and technical reports. The key themes were then compared with descriptions of endometriosis in peer-reviewed literature, clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements.

Results The search yielded 18 chronic disease documents that provided a definition or characteristics of chronic disease. The thematic analysis identified key elements of chronic diseases pertaining to onset, causation, duration, treatment, disease course and impact (individual and societal). A comparison with endometriosis descriptions indicated that endometriosis meets five of the six chronic disease key elements.

Conclusion In Australia, long-term and complex conditions are managed within a chronic disease framework and include mechanisms such as chronic disease management plans (CDMPs) to assist with coordination and management of these conditions. Because endometriosis has most of the characteristics of chronic disease, it could potentially be reframed as a chronic disease in endometriosis clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements. Further, the use of CDMPs may provide a mechanism to promote individualised care and multidisciplinary management of this chronic, enigmatic and debilitating disease.

What is known about the topic? In Australia, long-term complex diseases can be managed within a chronic disease framework that include mechanisms for coordinated care such as CDMPs and team care arrangements. Endometriosis is described as an inflammatory, progressive, relapsing and, for some women, debilitating condition, but is rarely described as a chronic disease in the clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements available in Australia.

What does this paper add? Endometriosis shares most of the characteristics of a chronic disease so may benefit from chronic disease management systems such as CDMPs.

What are the implications for practitioners? CDMPs may be a useful mechanism to coordinate and improve the effectiveness of care for women with endometriosis who experience sustained symptoms of endometriosis.

Additional keywords: chronic conditions, chronic disease management plan, chronic illness, endometriosis treatment.

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines non-communicable diseases (also referred to as chronic diseases) as diseases that are not passed from person to person and are typically of a long duration and slow progression.1,2 In Australia, long-term, complex diseases can be managed within a chronic disease framework. This includes mechanisms for coordinating care, such as the chronic disease management plan (CDMP) and team care arrangement (TCA) for people with chronic disease who require ongoing care.3 To be eligible for a CDMP, a general practitioner (GP) must determine that the condition ‘has been (or is likely to be) present for six months or longer’3 and the patient would benefit from a structured approach to management. The use of a CDMP is not restricted to specific conditions provided patients meet the eligibility criteria above. A TCA can also be developed to support multidisciplinary care, allowing people with chronic disease to access five subsidised allied health services in a calendar year.4

CDMPs and TCAs have been implemented for patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes.57 Health service research has investigated the effects of these plans on care coordination, clinical outcomes and patient experiences.

In terms of care coordination for diabetes, Zwar et al.7 reported an increase in multidisciplinary care (care provided by at least two other providers, including one diabetes-specific provider) and of GP adherence to performing diabetes-specific checks per clinical guidelines for diabetes management when care plans were implemented. Wickramasinghe et al.6 also reported process improvements, including an increase in GPs conducting diabetes annual cycle of care checks.

Furthermore, for those with diabetes, an improvement in clinical outcomes, such as cholesterol, blood pressure and HbA1c, was reported among those receiving multidisciplinary care in the study by Zwar et al.7 Similar improvements in clinical outcomes, such as improvement in cholesterol, HbA1c and body mass index, were reported by Wickramasinghe et al.6

In terms of patient experience, a cluster randomised controlled trial involving 60 practices in Australia indicated that patients with a TCA assessed the quality of their care with their general practice clinic more favourably than those that did not have a TCA.5 Thus, there may be benefits to be realised for managing other complex and long-term conditions with the use of CDMPs.

Endometriosis is an inflammatory condition characterised by endometrial-like tissue growing outside the uterus, which can result in pain and adhesions.8,9 Endometriosis commonly grows on the pelvic organs and peritoneum, but has been found in other parts of the body, such as the lungs, diaphragm, kidney and navel.8,9 The gold standard for diagnosing endometriosis is through laparoscopy, with confirmation of the disease made through histological examination of specimens collected during the surgical procedure.10 There is no cure, so long-term management is required using medical (e.g. hormone treatment and analgesics) and/or surgical treatment (e.g. excision surgery), both of which focus on alleviating symptoms.11 Clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements describe endometriosis as common,11,12 enigmatic,11 relapsing11 and, for some women, debilitating.11

Although endometriosis is a persistent and long-term condition, to the authors’ knowledge endometriosis has not been formally identified as a chronic disease at the international, US, UK, Canada, New Zealand or Ireland policy level. The International Association for the Study of Pain includes endometriosis in the Classification of Chronic Pain Conditions (Codes 763.X8 and 795.X8).13 In the UK, women with endometriosis were eligible to participate in a chronic disease self-management program called the Expert Patient Program.14 This program is funded by the Department of Health and has been implemented in health organisations such as Endometriosis UK,15 community settings16 and across the National Health Service.14

In Australia, only one11 of the four guidelines and consensus statements available for clinical guidance labels endometriosis as a chronic disorder. The aim of the present study was to identify how chronic diseases are defined in Australian national policy documents and to examine whether endometriosis meets the criteria for chronic disease.


Methods

A qualitative case study approach was selected.17 This approach involves conducting an in-depth examination of a phenomenon (in this case chronic disease definitions) within its particular context (the Australian policy environment).18 A two-stage process was used in the study. First, a document analysis of Australian chronic disease strategies, frameworks, fact sheets and technical and monitoring reports containing definitions or characteristics of chronic disease was undertaken in order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of how chronic diseases are defined in the Australian policy environment. Second, the key themes derived from the analysis of chronic disease definitions were applied to endometriosis peer-reviewed literature, guidelines and consensus statements to assess whether endometriosis meets the criteria for chronic disease.

Chronic disease document analysis

This research was guided by Bowen’s definition for document analysis,19 which is to identify, select, appraise and analyse data from a defined set of documents. The steps undertaken in the document analysis process are summarised in Fig. 1.


Fig. 1.  Document analysis process, adapted from Bowen.19
F1

Step 1: search for chronic disease documents

A search was performed on the Australian Government Department of Health website (www.health.gov.au, accessed 17 August 2016) to identify documents associated with chronic disease published from 2000 to August 2016. This time period captures the release of the WHO global strategy for chronic disease and subsequent action plans, to which Australia is a member state. The term ‘chronic disease’ was searched in the following pages of the website: ‘Health topic quick view’, ‘A to Z topics’, ‘For consumers’, ‘For health professionals’ and ‘Publications’. Where documents were a part of a series, the most recent version was included. A manual search for additional definitions was conducted from documents identified through references or attached as links on the government website.

Step 2: title scan of chronic disease documents

The titles of documents were initially scanned with documents retained if they related to chronic disease (and excluded if they related to a specific disease, for example diabetes). A document record was developed to record the details of each document, including source, year, title and web link.

Step 3: content analysis to identify definitions

A content analysis of the documents was then performed to identify definitions of chronic disease in the full text of the included documents. A record of whether the document included a definition was recorded in the document record spreadsheet. For those documents that included a definition of chronic disease, the definition was copied verbatim from the document and recorded in a separate spreadsheet (definition extraction), along with the source, date and title of the document.

Step 4: thematic analysis of definitions

The definitions that were collated from Step 3 were then thematically analysed to identify key themes of chronic disease. This process involved reviewing the extracted definitions, identifying common characteristics of chronic disease, generating codes for these characteristics and grouping these codes into key themes.19

Application to descriptions of endometriosis

A search for endometriosis descriptions was undertaken in peer-reviewed research and endometriosis-specific guidelines and consensus statements. The endometriosis peer-reviewed research papers were identified through a Medline search of English language papers using the keyword term ‘endometriosis’ from 2000 to 2016. Endometriosis guidelines and consensus statements for Australia (available in August 2016) were obtained by searching the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons and Royal Australasian College of Physicians websites, and a Google search using ‘endometriosis’ AND ‘guidelines’, restricting the search to Australia. The Australian Clinical Practice Guideline portal was searched using the same terms.

The key themes derived from chronic disease definitions were then applied to descriptions of endometriosis in peer-reviewed research papers, clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements.


Results

The search yielded 20 chronic disease documents, 18 of which included a definition or characteristic of chronic disease. A summary of the documents included in the thematic analysis of chronic disease definitions is given in Table 1.


Table 1.  Summary of documents for analysis
AHMAC, Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council; AIHW, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; GP, general practitioner
Click to zoom

Chronic disease terms and definitions

Multiple terms are used to describe chronic disease, including chronic health conditions, chronic illness, chronic disease, non-communicable diseases and long-term health conditions.20,33 The most commonly used definitions were adapted from either the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), which identified common characteristics of chronic disease,21 or the Department Health definition, which is associated with funding for chronic disease management.3

Thematic analysis of chronic disease definitions

Six key themes were identified in the thematic analysis relating to onset, causation, duration, treatment, disease course and impact (Table 2).


Table 2.  Thematic analysis of chronic disease characteristics and application to endometriosis
Click to zoom

Onset

Due to the broad nature of diseases captured by the term ‘chronic disease’, there was variability in conceptualisations of onset and causation in the chronic disease documents (Table 2). Five indicated that chronic diseases typically involve a long latency period.21,23,24,26,34 Among the documents, two stated that chronic diseases could affect an individual at any age,20,21 whereas others noted a greater prevalence in older age.20,35

Causation

Similar to onset, there was variation in conceptualisation of cause of chronic diseases (Table 2). Many of the documents acknowledged that chronic diseases have complex causality (nine documents) and may be associated with multiple risk factors (11 documents). The AIHW acknowledged there may be uncertainty around causality and progression of the disease.21

Duration

Most of the documents indicated that chronic diseases have a long duration (16 documents; Table 2), whereas others used a minimum duration, for example ‘lasted or expected to last longer than six months’.3

Treatment

There was consensus among the national documents that a long-term approach was required to manage chronic diseases (Table 2).

Disease course

Most of the documents conceptualise chronic diseases as being persistent, including that they do not resolve spontaneously or have no cure. The progression of the disease may lead to a gradual deterioration in health,20,21,35 other complications21,22,25,26 or comorbid conditions.23 However, a chronic condition, although persistent, may not be the cause of death.23,25,27,31

Impact

Conceptualisations of the impact of a chronic disease varied depending on the condition. Some were associated with premature mortality, whereas others were associated with disability or impairment.22,26,30 Diverse individual and societal effects were described, including impairments, activity limitations or disability, reduced quality of life, economic costs, lost productivity, loss of independence and social effects, like isolation.

Application to endometriosis

The search yielded two clinical practice guidelines10,11 and two expert consensus statements12,36 provided as ‘useful clinical guidance’ by The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

The key themes were compared with descriptions of endometriosis in clinical practice guidelines, consensus statements and peer-reviewed literature to determine whether endometriosis meets the definition for chronic disease (Table 2).

Endometriosis met five of the six key themes of chronic disease: causation, duration, treatment, disease course and impact. In terms of causation, endometriosis aetiology is thought to be multifactorial,11,36 although it is still poorly understood. Endometriosis is a long-term and persistent illness, requiring ongoing management because there is currently no cure,11 which is consistent with the duration and treatment themes for chronic disease. The impact of endometriosis can be significant, particularly in relation to a woman’s work, family and social life, due to the varying symptoms that she may experience. Due to a lack of information regarding the onset of endometriosis in the literature, it was difficult to determine whether endometriosis addresses this key theme.


Discussion

This study identified key themes among chronic disease definitions in Australia and established that endometriosis meets the criteria for chronic disease in this context. The study was robust in using rigorous and replicable processes of document and thematic analyses. Nevertheless, we acknowledge the limitation that the use of documents as an information source in case studies of this type introduces potential bias in that only documents that were publicly available can be considered.19 To minimise this potential limitation and to capture a wider array of documents, other sources of information provided as references or links were scrutinised in order to obtain additional definitions of chronic disease.

The chronic disease document analysis highlighted that chronic disease is a broad term covering diverse health conditions.23,31 Overall, however, there are consistencies and the thematic analysis identified six definitional characteristics of chronic disease pertaining to onset, causation, duration, treatment, disease course and impact. The application of these themes to endometriosis identified that it shares five of the six key hallmarks of chronic disease. There is difficulty, based on the available literature, to assess whether endometriosis supports the theme associated with onset. It is acknowledged in the literature that some women present with symptoms in their teens, whereas for other women the symptoms associated with endometriosis may develop in later life.11,37,40 In addition, some women are asymptomatic, yet have been diagnosed with endometriosis at the time of laparoscopy.10,11 Despite meeting most of the chronic disease criteria, only one clinical guideline available for use in Australia labelled endometriosis as a chronic disorder.11

Recognising endometriosis as a chronic disease may offer benefits in terms of improving coordination of care and increasing access to services. Using an existing chronic disease management mechanism, such as CDMPs, may provide a structure for coordinating multidisciplinary care for women with endometriosis and can provide women with access to five subsidised allied health services per year. The use of these plans would align with recommendations in three of the four included endometriosis clinical practice guidelines or consensus statements, which highlight a need for a multidisciplinary care team.10,11,36 CDMPs and TCAs have been implemented for patients with diabetes in Australia and found to be associated with improvements in clinical processes, outcomes and perceived quality of care.57 Further research is recommended to evaluate the use of these plans for women with endometriosis, incorporating a cost–benefit analysis and physicians’ perspectives on using these plans to manage this condition

Despite the utility of CDMPs, it is acknowledged that there are some limitations with implementing CDMPs in Australia. The recent Parliamentary Inquiry into Chronic Disease Prevention and Management in Primary Health Care49 highlighted that there are still instances of fragmented service between GPs and allied healthcare providers in implementing these plans. In addition, there is no mechanism to differentiate between patients with simple versus complex cases of chronic disease. Finally, it was noted in the inquiry that the funding mechanism associated with CDMPs required review. The matters highlighted during the inquiry may be addressed as the government begins to operationalise the new framework for chronic disease management.

Classifying endometriosis as a chronic disease may provide other benefits, such as increased recognition of the disease among healthcare professionals, the general public and women’s support networks. Research suggests that the symptoms of endometriosis are often normalised and women’s concerns are often dismissed.46,50 Further, if endometriosis was classified as a chronic disease, this may provide additional funding opportunities through the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia because many of the research priority areas relate to chronic disease and associated risk factors.51 Further research is warranted to examine these concepts for chronic disease generally and for endometriosis specifically.


Conclusion

This study identified key themes from definitions and characteristics of chronic disease from Australian policy and associated documents. These characteristics were then applied to endometriosis informed by endometriosis guidelines, consensus statements and peer-reviewed literature. Endometriosis shared many of the characteristics of chronic disease in relation to its causation, duration, treatment, disease course and impact. Reframing endometriosis as a chronic disease in clinical practice guidelines and using existing chronic disease mechanisms (e.g. CDMPs) may support individualised management strategies for women with endometriosis. The use of these plans may assist with coordination of multidisciplinary care, which could contribute to better health outcomes among women with endometriosis.


Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.



Acknowledgements

Rebecca O’Hara is a PhD student at Monash University and is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.


References

[1]  World Health Organization (WHO). Noncommunicable diseases factsheet. Geneva: WHO; 2017. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs355/en/ [verified 18 December 2017].

[2]  World Health Organization (WHO). Noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: WHO; 2017. Available at: http://www.who.int/topics/noncommunicable_diseases/en/ [verified 18 December 2017].

[3]  Department of Health. Chronic disease management: provider information. Canberra: Australian Government; 2014. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/F0ABED13C55F6715CA257BF0001EDB18/$File/Fact%20Sheet%20-%20CDM%20-%20Provider%20Info.pdf [verified 21 July 2018].

[4]  Department of Health. Chronic disease management – individual allied health services under Medicare: patient information. Canberra: Australian Government; 2014. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/74EB0CF19603E7B7CA257BF0001FA204/$File/Fact%20Sheet%20-%20CDM%20-%20Individual%20Allied%20Health%20Services%20-%20Patient%20Info.pdf [verified 21 July 2018].

[5]  Harris MF, Jayasinghe UW, Taggart JR, Christl B, Proudfoot JG, Crookes PA, Beilby JJ, Davies GP. Multidisciplinary team care arrangements in the management of patients with chronic disease in Australian general practice. Med J Aust 2011; 194 236–9.

[6]  Wickramasinghe LK, Schattner P, Hibbert ME, Enticott JC, Georgeff MP, Russell GM. Impact on diabetes management of general practice management plans, team care arrangements and reviews. Med J Aust 2013; 199 261–5.
Impact on diabetes management of general practice management plans, team care arrangements and reviews.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Zwar NA, Shortus T, Hermiz O, Burns J, Comino EJ, Harris M. Do multidisciplinary care plans result in better care for patients with type 2 diabetes? Aust Fam Physician 2007; 36 85–9.

[8]  Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C, D’Hooghe T, Dunselman G, Greb R, Hummelshoj L, Prentice A, Saridogan E. ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 2698–704.
ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9]  Vermeulen N, De Bie B, Dunselman G. Information for women with endometriosis: patient version of the ESHRE guideline on management of women with endometriosis. Belgium: European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; 2014.

[10]  Dunselman GAJ, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D’Hooghe T, De Bie B, Heikinheimo O, Horne AW, Kiesel L, Nap A, Prentice A, Saridogan E, Soriano D, Nelen W. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2014; 29 400–12.
ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Leyland N, Casper R, Laberge P, Singh S. Endometriosis diagnosis and management: SOGC clinical practice guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010; 32 S1–S3.
Endometriosis diagnosis and management: SOGC clinical practice guideline.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Koch J, Rowan K, Rombauts L, Yazdani A, Chapman M, Johnson N. Endometriosis and infertility – a consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence). Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 52 513–22.
Endometriosis and infertility – a consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Merskey H, Bogduk N, editors. Classification of chronic pain. Washington D.C.: International Association for the Study of Pain; 2012.

[14]  Rogers A, Kennedy A, Bower P, Gardner C, Gately C, Lee V, Reeves D, Richardson G. The United Kingdom Expert Patients Programme: results and implications from a national evaluation. Med J Aust 2008; 189 S21

[15]  Music R. Endometriosis and self-management strategies. Women’s Health Med 2005; 2 38–9.
Endometriosis and self-management strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Barlow JH, Wright CC, Turner AP, Bancroft GV. A 12-month follow-up study of self-management training for people with chronic disease: are changes maintained over time? Br J Health Psychol 2005; 10 589–99.
A 12-month follow-up study of self-management training for people with chronic disease: are changes maintained over time?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Thomas G. How to do your case study: a guide for students and researchers. London: Sage Publications; 2011.

[18]  Yin R. Case study research design and methods. 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2009.

[19]  Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J 2009; 9 27–40.
Document analysis as a qualitative research method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council. National strategic framework for chronic conditions: second draft. Canberra: Australian Government; 2016. Available at: https://consultations.health.gov.au/population-health-and-sport-division/national-strategic-framework-for-chronic-condition/supporting_documents/Second%20draft%20National%20Strategic%20Framework%20for%20Chronic%20Conditions%20%20Online%20Public%20Consultation%20%20May%202016%20D16458639.PDF [verified 21 July 2018].

[21]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Chronic diseases and associated risk factors in Australia, 2001. Canberra: AIHW; 2002. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442467343 [verified 22 August 2016].

[22]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Chronic diseases and associated risk factors in Australia. Canberra: AIHW; 2006. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/8d7109d9-2a84-45b0-87d6-3efae9153832/cdarfa06.pdf.aspx?inline=true [verified 21 July 2018].

[23]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Premature mortality from chronic disease. Canberra: AIHW; 2010. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/ae1fb3d3-b3e3-41f2-a331-4e30d4383d4b/11897.pdf.aspx?inline=true [verified 21 July 2018].

[24]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Key indicators of progress for chronic disease and associated determinants: data report. Canberra: AIHW; 2011. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=10737419245 [verified 21 July 2018].

[25]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Contribution of chronic disease to the gap in adult mortality between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and other Australians. Canberra: AIHW; 2011. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/79b73a27-c970-47f0-931b-32d7badade40/12304.pdf.aspx?inline=true [verified 21 July 2018].

[26]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Risk factors contributing to chronic disease. Canberra: AIHW; 2012. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/74121d1b-69ca-4a34-a08a-51b741ea26b2/12724.pdf.aspx?inline=true [verified 21 July 2018].

[27]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s health 2014. Canberra: AIHW; 2014. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/d2946c3e-9b94-413c-898c-aa5219903b8c/16507.pdf.aspx?inline=true [verified 21 July 2018].

[28]  Department of Health. Chronic disease management: patient information. Canberra: Australian Government; 2014. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/F17F6787B14E6CF1CA257BF0001B0AEC/$File/Fact%20Sheet%20-%20CDM%20-%20Patient%20Info%20-%20Feb%202014.pdf [verified 21 July 2018].

[29]  Department of Health. Chronic disease management – individual allied health services under Medicare: provider information. Canberra: Australian Government; 2014. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/22F660E959ABF390CA257BF0001F3CF3/$File/Fact_Sheet_CDM_Individual_Allied_Health_Services_Provider_Info_Feb_14.pdf [verified 21 July 2018].

[30]  Department of Health. Flexible fund guidelines: chronic disease prevention and service improvement flexible fund. Canberra: Australian Government; 2014. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/08998D199BEAAADECA257BF0001C1177/$File/guide.pdf [verified 19 July 2018].

[31]  Department of Health. Chronic conditions. Canberra: Australian Government; 2015. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/chronic-disease [verified 22 August 2016].

[32]  Department of Human Services. Education guide – chronic disease GP management plans and team care arrangements. Canberra: Australian Government; 2016. Available at: https://www.humanservices.gov.au/health-professionals/enablers/education-guide-chronic-disease-gp-management-plans-and-team-care [verified 22 August 2016].

[33]  National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. A healthier future for all Australians: final report. Canberra: Australian Government; 2009. Available at: http://apo.org.au/system/files/17921/apo-nid17921-49176.pdf [verified 19 July 2018].

[34]  National Public Health Partnership. Blueprint for nation-wide surveillance of chronic diseases and associated determinants. Melbourne: National Public Health Partnership; 2006. Available at: http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/gov/20140213205348/http://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/pq-ncds-bluepr [verified 22 August 2016].

[35]  National Health Priority Action Council. National chronic disease strategy. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; 2006. Available at: http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/gov/20141215061219/http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/pq-ncds-strat [verified 22 August 2016].

[36]  Johnson NP, Hummelshoj L, World Endometriosis Society Montpellier Consortium Consensus on current management of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 1552–68.
Consensus on current management of endometriosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[37]  Ballweg ML. Big picture of endometriosis helps provide guidance on approach to teens: comparative historical data show endo starting younger, is more severe. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2003; 16 S21–6.
Big picture of endometriosis helps provide guidance on approach to teens: comparative historical data show endo starting younger, is more severe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[38]  Ek M, Roth B, Ekström P, Valentin L, Bengtsson M, Ohlsson B. Gastrointestinal symptoms among endometriosis patients – a case-cohort study. BMC Womens Health 2015; 15 59
Gastrointestinal symptoms among endometriosis patients – a case-cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[39]  Huntington A, Gilmour JA. A life shaped by pain: women and endometriosis. J Clin Nurs 2005; 14 1124–32.
A life shaped by pain: women and endometriosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[40]  De Graaff AA, D’Hooghe TM, Dunselman GA, Dirksen CD, Hummelshoj L, Simoens S. The significant effect of endometriosis on physical, mental and social wellbeing: results from an international cross-sectional survey. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 2677–85.
The significant effect of endometriosis on physical, mental and social wellbeing: results from an international cross-sectional survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[41]  Gao X, Yeh YC, Outley J, Simon J, Botteman M, Spalding J. Health-related quality of life burden of women with endometriosis: a literature review. Curr Med Res Opin 2006; 22 1787–97.
Health-related quality of life burden of women with endometriosis: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[42]  Simoens S, Dunselman G, Dirksen C, Hummelshoj L, Bokor A, Brandes I, Brodszky V, Canis M, Colombo GL, DeLeire T, Falcone T, Graham B, Halis G, Horne A, Kanj O, Kjer JJ, Kristensen J, Lebovic D, Mueller M, Vigano P, Wullschleger M, D’Hooghe T. The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 1292–9.
The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[43]  Cox H, Henderson L, Wood R, Cagliarini G. Learning to take charge: women’s experiences of living with endometriosis. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery 2003; 9 62–8.
Learning to take charge: women’s experiences of living with endometriosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[44]  Denny E. I never know from one day to another how I will feel: pain and uncertainty in women with endometriosis. Qual Health Res 2009; 19 985–95.
I never know from one day to another how I will feel: pain and uncertainty in women with endometriosis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[45]  Young K, Fisher J, Kirkman M. Women’s experiences of endometriosis: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2015; 41 225–34.
Women’s experiences of endometriosis: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[46]  Culley L, Law C, Hudson N, Denny E, Mitchell H, Baumgarten M, Raine-Fenning N. The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a critical narrative review. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 19 625–39.
The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a critical narrative review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[47]  Gilmour JA, Huntington A, Wilson HV. The impact of endometriosis on work and social participation. Int J Nurs Pract 2008; 14 443–8.
The impact of endometriosis on work and social participation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[48]  Peters KM, Wrigley P, Fraser IS. The cost of endometriosis in Australia. Poster Presentation at the 12th World Congress on Endometriosis, 30 April – 3 May 2014, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Vancouver: World Endometriosis Society; 2014.

[49]  House of Representatives Standing Committee on Health. Inquiry into chronic disease prevention and management in primary health care. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2016. Available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Health/Chronic_Disease/Report [verified 29 June 2017].

[50]  Moradi M, Parker M, Sneddon A, Lopez V, Ellwood D. Impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health 2014; 14 123
Impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[51]  National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). NHMRC corporate plan 2016–2017. Canberra: NHMRC; 2016.