Elective admission policies in New South Wales public hospitals
Jael Wolk and Peter Baume
Australian Health Review
21(3) 6 - 16
Published: 1998
Abstract
Objective: To assess the existence and content of elective admission policies in New South Wales acute public hospitals.Methods: A questionnaire was sent to managers of all acute public hospitals (n=76).Copies of elective admission policies were sought from respondents. Results wereanalysed with EpiInfo 5.01b and policy content by thematic analysis.Results: Survey response was 91% (69/76). Policies existed in 71% (49/69) of hospitals. Of these, 96% (47/49) disseminated their policy, with 23% (11/47)disseminating it at least annually, 41% (19/47) only when updated, and 32% (15/47) infrequently, with one policy being new (2%) and one hospital not statingits frequency (2%). Policy compliance was assessed in 86% (42/49) of hospitals andguidelines reviewed periodically in 92% (45/49) of hospitals. Twenty per cent(10/49) of the policies had been developed since a departmental instruction of May 1994. Of the 20 acute hospitals with no policy, 75% (15/20) were rural and 85%(17/20) thought they should have a policy. Analysis of policy content revealed emphases on resource availability and clinical need as determinants of elective admission, aninstitutional rather than a patient focus, and a high level of senior nurse managerinvolvement in admission decisions in rural hospitals.Conclusions: Despite a specific departmental instruction, nearly one-third of hospitals still had no admission policy 18 months later. This could be indicative of miscommunication between hospitals and NSW Health or perceived irrelevance ofdepartment guidelines by hospital managers. Existing policies were mostlyinstitutionally focused and dominated by perceived resource limitations. NSW Health might consider other medico-social factors and manager involvement in future policy development.https://doi.org/10.1071/AH980006
© AHHA 1998