Exploring the unique value of clinician scientist roles to the health services in which they are employed: a scoping review
Peter Buttrum A B * , Prudence Butler A B , Adrienne Young
B C , Diann Eley D and Shaun O’Leary A B
A
B
C
D
Abstract
This scoping review explored the unique value or impacts of clinician scientists (CSs) to the health services in which they work and metrics used to identify and measure this value.
Five databases, grey literature, and the internet were searched in April 2024 to identify articles that described and measured the value or impact of CSs within clinical health services. CSs were defined as having dual clinical and research qualifications and work duties. Articles were screened at title, abstract, and full text level against inclusion and exclusion criteria, before extracting data and analysing the included articles.
The search identified 5368 articles, with six eligible for inclusion. Articles were qualitative in nature (structured interviews or multiple case study reports) and had relatively few participants. The reported value or impacts included educating colleagues on research skills and processes, promoting evidence-based practice, fostering inter-institutional collaboration, and conducting clinically relevant research. No articles recommended a detailed suite of metrics as to how this value or impact could be measured.
There is limited literature describing the unique value or impact of CSs to the health services in which they work. While some articles described aspects of CS value, no articles provided metrics for how specific CS value could be measured.
Keywords: benefit, clinical academic, clinician researcher, clinician scientist, health services, impact, physician scientist, value.
References
1 Salge TO, Vera A. Hospital innovativeness and organizational performance: Evidence from English public acute care. Health Care Manage Rev 2009; 34(1): 54-67.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
2 Bennett WO, Bird JH, Burrows S, et al. Does academic output correlate with better mortality rates in NHS trusts in England? Public Health 2012; 126 Suppl 1: S40-3.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
3 Ozdemir BA, Karthikesalingam A, Sinha S, et al. Research activity and the association with mortality. PLoS One 2015; 10(2): e0118253.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
4 Harding K, Lynch L, Porter J, et al. Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev 2017; 41(1): 45-53.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
5 Boaz A, Hanney S, Jones T, et al. Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review. BMJ Open 2015; 5(12): e009415.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
6 Ginsburg D. The history and evolution of the ASCI: déjà vu all over again. J Clin Invest 2002; 110(12): 1-4.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
7 Kirkpatrick RH, Boyd JG. Physician Scientists Of Yesterday, Today And Tomorrow. Clin Invest Med 2021; 44(3): E72-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
8 Andriole DA, Wolfson RK. The physician–investigator workforce: Looking ahead. Acad Med 2021; 96(4): 486-9.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
9 Holcombe RF, Verschraegen CF, Chapman AE, et al. Status of the Clinician Investigator in America: An Essential Healthcare Provider Driving Advances in Cancer Care. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19(2): 122-5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
10 Burger R, Bolton WS, Mathew RK. Challenges and opportunities in academic neurosurgery. Br J Hosp Med 2021; 82(10): 1-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
11 National Health and Medical Research Council. Investigating clinician researcher pathways: Summary Report to the NHMRC Chief Executive Officer. Canberra; 2021. Available at https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/investigating-clinician-researcher-career-pathways
12 Baumal R, Benbassat J, Van JA. Reflections on the current and future roles of clinician-scientists. Isr Med Assoc J 2014; 16(8): 475-8.
| Google Scholar | PubMed |
13 Weggemans MM, Friesen F, Kluijtmans M, et al. Critical Gaps in Understanding the Clinician–Scientist Workforce: Results of an International Expert Meeting. Acad Med 2019; 94(10): 1448-54.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
14 Eley DS, O’Leary SP, Young A, et al. Is Australia’s clinician scientist capacity appropriate for addressing the next pandemic? Aust Health Rev 2021; 45(3): 308-10.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
15 Newington L, Wells M, Adonis A, et al. A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis exploring the impacts of clinical academic activity by healthcare professionals outside medicine. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21(1): 400.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
16 Mickan S, Coates D. Embedded researchers in Australia: Survey of profile and experience across medical, nursing and midwifery and allied health disciplines. J Clin Nurs 2022; 31(3–4): 417-26.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
17 Todd RF, III, Salata RA, Klotman ME, et al. Career outcomes of the graduates of the American Board of Internal Medicine Research Pathway, 1995–2007. Acad Med 2013; 88(11): 1747-53.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
18 Cato KD, Sun C, Carter EJ, et al. Linking to improve nursing care and knowledge: Evaluation of an initiative to provide research support to clinical nurses. J Nurs Adm 2019; 49(1): 48-54.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
19 Yang W, Rincon-Torroella J, Feghali J, et al. Impact of international research fellows in neurosurgery: results from a single academic center. J Neurosurg 2022; 136(1): 295-305.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
20 Thompson RW, Schucker B, Kent KC, et al. Reviving the vascular surgeon–scientist: An interim assessment of the jointly sponsored Lifeline Foundation/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute William J. von Liebig mentored clinical scientist development (K08) program. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45(6): A2-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
21 Butler D. Translational research: crossing the valley of death. Nature 2008; 453(7197): 840-2.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
22 Hendriks B, Simons A, Reinhart M. What are clinician scientists expected to do? The undefined space for professionalizable work in translational biomedicine. Minerva 2019; 57(2): 219-37.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
23 Barry M, De Groot E, Baggen Y, et al. Understanding the Broker Role of Clinician–Scientists: A Realist Review on How They Link Research and Practice. Acad Med 2019; 94(10): 1589-98.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
24 Arksey H. O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005; 8(1): 19-32.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
26 Munn Z, Peters MD, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018; 18(1): 143.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
27 Buttrum P, O’Leary S, Eley D, et al. Investigating the unique value of embedded Clinician-Scientists on health and medical services in which they are employed: A Scoping Review Open Science Framework Registries. Open Science Framework; 2022. Available at https://osf.io/jmwyp [14 October 2022].
28 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169(7): 467-73.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
30 Covidence. Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation. Melbourne; 2022. Available at www.covidence.org
31 Carroll C, Booth A, Leaviss J, et al. “Best fit” framework synthesis: refining the method. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13(1): 37.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
32 Andreassen P, Christensen MK. Science in the clinic: a qualitative study of the positioning of MD-PhDs in the everyday clinical setting. BMC Med Educ 2018; 18: 115.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
33 Bartelink M-LE, Baggen Y, Stevens DE, et al. Facilitators and barriers to brokering between research and care by senior clinical-scientists in general practice and elderly care medicine. Educ Prim Care 2019; 30(2): 80-7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
34 Coad J, Manning J, Mills E, et al. Capturing the real impact of clinical academics in practice. Int J Pract Based Learn Health Soc Care 2019; 7(2): 47-56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
35 Newington L, Alexander CM, Wells M. Impacts of clinical academic activity: qualitative interviews with healthcare managers and research-active nurses, midwives, allied health professionals and pharmacists. BMJ Open 2021; 11(10): e050679.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
36 Newington L, Alexander CM, Wells M. What is a clinical academic? Qualitative interviews with healthcare managers, research‐active nurses and other research‐active healthcare professionals outside medicine. J Clin Nurs 2022; 31(3–4): 378-89.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
37 van Dijk EE, Kluijtmans M, Vulperhorst JP, et al. Disseminated learning from clinician-scientists: a multiple case study in physiotherapeutic care. BMC Med Educ 2018; 18(1): 279.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
38 Newington L, Wells M, Begum S, Lavender AJ, Markham S, Tracy O, Alexander CM. Development of a framework and research impact capture tool for nursing, midwifery, allied health professions, healthcare science, pharmacy and psychology (NMAHPPs). BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23(1): 433.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
