Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Projecting the future: modelling Australian dialysis prevalence 2021–30

Dominic Keuskamp A B * , Christopher E. Davies A B , Georgina L. Irish A B C , Shilpanjali Jesudason A B C and Stephen P. McDonald A B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Australia & New Zealand Dialysis & Transplant Registry, South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

B Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

C Central Northern Adelaide Renal & Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

* Correspondence to: dominic@anzdata.org.au

Australian Health Review 47(3) 362-368 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22291
Submitted: 22 December 2022  Accepted: 22 April 2023   Published: 16 May 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of AHHA. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Objectives To project the prevalence of people receiving dialysis in Australia for 2021–30 to inform service planning and health policy.

Methods Estimates were based on data from 2011 to 2020 from the Australia & New Zealand Dialysis & Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry and the Australian Bureau of Statistics. We projected dialysis and functioning kidney transplant recipient populations for the years 2021–30. Discrete-time, non-homogenous Markov models were built on probabilities for transition between three mutually exclusive states (Dialysis, Functioning Transplant, Death), for five age groups. Two scenarios were employed – stable transplant rate vs a continued increase – to assess the impact of these scenarios on the projected prevalences.

Results Models projected a 22.5–30.4% growth in the dialysis population from 14 554 in 2020 to 17 829 (‘transplant growth’) – 18 973 (‘transplant stable’) by 2030. An additional 4983–6484 kidney transplant recipients were also projected by 2030. Dialysis incidence per population increased and dialysis prevalence growth exceeded population ageing in 40–59 and 60–69 year age groups. The greatest dialysis prevalence growth was seen among those aged ≥70 years.

Conclusion Modelling of the future prevalence of dialysis use highlights the increasing demand on services expected overall and especially by people aged ≥70 years. Appropriate funding and healthcare planning must meet this demand.

Keywords: ageing, chronic disease management, chronic kidney disease, dialysis, epidemiology, health services research, kidney failure, population health, registry.


References

[1]  Kidney Health Australia. National strategic action plan for kidney disease. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2019. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/national-strategic-action-plan-for-kidney-disease [accessed 8 August 2022].

[2]  Cass A, Chadban S, Gallagher M, Howard K, Jones A, McDonald S, et al. The economic impact of end stage kidney disease in Australia: Projections to 2020. Melbourne: Kidney Health Australia; 2010.

[3]  ACI Renal Network. NSW dialysis capacity audit 2014. Chatswood Agency for Clinical Innovation; 2014. Available at https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/resources/renal/dialysis-capacity-audits [accessed 20 October 2022].

[4]  Australia & New Zealand Dialysis & Transplant Registry. 45th annual report 2021 (data to 2020). Adelaide: ANZDATA; 2021. Available at https://www.anzdata.org.au/anzdata/publications/reports/ [accessed 12 May 2022].

[5]  Jassal SV, Watson D. Dialysis in late life: Benefit or burden. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4 2008–12.
Dialysis in late life: Benefit or burden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  McDonald SP, Marshall MR, Johnson DW, Polkinghorne KR. Relationship between dialysis modality and mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20 155–63.
Relationship between dialysis modality and mortality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR. Markov models in medical decision making: A practical guide. Med Decis Making 1993; 13 322–38.
Markov models in medical decision making: A practical guide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Projections of the prevalence of treated end-stage kidney disease in Australia 2012–2020. Cat. No. Phe 176. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.

[9]  Australian Bureau of Statistics. Population projections, Australia. Canberra: ABS; 2022. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/population-projections-australia/2017-base-2066 [accessed 12 May 2022].

[10]  Independent Health and Aged Care Pricing Authority. National hospital cost data collection. 2022. Available at https://www.ihacpa.gov.au/health-care/costing/national-hospital-cost-data-collection [accessed 3 August 2022].

[11]  Wyld MLR, Lee CMY, Zhuo X, White S, Shaw JE, Morton RL, et al. Cost to government and society of chronic kidney disease stage 1–5: A national cohort study. Intern Med J 2015; 45 741–7.
Cost to government and society of chronic kidney disease stage 1–5: A national cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Gorham G, Howard K, Cunningham J, Barzi F, Lawton P, Cass A. Do remote dialysis services really cost more? An economic analysis of hospital and dialysis modality costs associated with dialysis services in urban, rural and remote settings. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21 582
Do remote dialysis services really cost more? An economic analysis of hospital and dialysis modality costs associated with dialysis services in urban, rural and remote settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Murtagh FEM, Burns A, Moranne O, Morton RL, Naicker S. Supportive care: Comprehensive conservative care in end-stage kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 11 1909–14.
Supportive care: Comprehensive conservative care in end-stage kidney disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Howard K, Salkeld G, White S, McDonald S, Chadban S, Craig JC, et al. The cost-effectiveness of increasing kidney transplantation and home-based dialysis. Nephrology 2009; 14 123–32.
The cost-effectiveness of increasing kidney transplantation and home-based dialysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Marshall MR, Polkinghorne KR, Boudville N, McDonald SP. Home versus facility dialysis and mortality in Australia and New Zealand. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 78 826–36.e1.
Home versus facility dialysis and mortality in Australia and New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Chow J, Lau B, Gibb C. New ways to approach the recruitment crisis in renal nursing in New South Wales, Australia. J Ren Care 2008; 34 38–42.
New ways to approach the recruitment crisis in renal nursing in New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Polaschek N, Bennett PN, McNeill L. The Australian and New Zealand dialysis workforce study in the international context. J Ren Care 2009; 35 170–5.
The Australian and New Zealand dialysis workforce study in the international context.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Australian Organ and Tissue Authority. 2021 Australian donation and transplantation activity report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2022. Available at https://www.donatelife.gov.au/all-about-donation/statistics-in-australia [accessed 10 August 2022].

[19]  International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation. Database. Barcelona: IRODaT - DTI Foundation; 2023. Available at https://www.irodat.org/?p=database [accessed 21 February 2023].

[20]  McDonald S, McCredie M, Williams S, Stewart J. Factors influencing reported rates of treated end-stage renal disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2005; 12 32–8.
Factors influencing reported rates of treated end-stage renal disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Morton JI, McDonald SP, Salim A, Liew D, Shaw JE, Magliano DJ. Projecting the incidence of type 2 diabetes-related end-stage kidney disease until 2040: A comparison between the effects of diabetes prevention and the effects of diabetes treatment. Diabetes Care 2021; 44 1515–23.
Projecting the incidence of type 2 diabetes-related end-stage kidney disease until 2040: A comparison between the effects of diabetes prevention and the effects of diabetes treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Stewart JH, Disney APS, Mathew TH. Trends in the incidence of end-stage renal failure due to hypertension and vascular disease in Australia, 1972–1991. Aust N Z J Med 1994; 24 696–700.
Trends in the incidence of end-stage renal failure due to hypertension and vascular disease in Australia, 1972–1991.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  You J, Zhao Y, Lawton P, Guthridge S, McDonald SP, Cass A. Projecting demands for renal replacement therapy in the Northern Territory: A stochastic Markov model. Aust Health Rev 2018; 42 380–6.
Projecting demands for renal replacement therapy in the Northern Territory: A stochastic Markov model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |