Emergency department care-related causal factors of in-patient deterioration
Kirollos Nassief A F G , Mark Azer B , Michael Watts C , Erin Tuala C , Peter McLennan A and Kate Curtis
C D E
A Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia. Email: petermcl@uow.edu.au
B South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Email: mark.azer@health.nsw.gov.au
C Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, NSW, Australia. Email: michael.watts@health.nsw.gov.au; erin.tuala@health.nsw.gov.au; kate.curtis1@health.nsw.gov.au
D Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
E Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Keiraville, NSW, Australia.
F Present address: South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
G Corresponding author. Email: kirollos.nassief@health.nsw.gov.au
Australian Health Review 46(1) 35-41 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH21190
Submitted: 31 May 2021 Accepted: 20 July 2021 Published: 24 December 2021
Journal Compilation © AHHA 2022 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to determine factors related to emergency department (ED) care causing in-patient deterioration.
Methods This retrospective cohort study examined in-patient records using the human factors classification framework for patient safety in a regional health service in New South Wales, Australia, between March 2016 and February 2017. Deterioration was defined as either the initiation of a medical emergency team call, cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to the intensive care unit.
Results Of the 1074 patients who deteriorated within 72 hours of admission via the ED, the care received in the ED was a contributing factor for 101 patients (9%). The most common human causal factors were poor communication between staff, medical management errors, delayed treatment, medical documentation errors, nursing management errors and unclear policies or guidelines. Communication issues occurred the most when patients had more comorbidities (P = 0.039) and were more likely to occur in the presence of a medical documentation error (odds ratio 4.4; 95% confidence interval 1.7–11.3). Unclear policies or guidelines as a factor was most frequent with a surgical diagnosis (34.5% vs 15.7% for surgical vs medical, respectively; P = 0.038) and in patients ≥80 years of age (30.0% vs 21.8% for age ≥80 vs <80 years, respectively; P = 0.027).
Conclusion Quality monitoring and interventions that consider human factors are required to address preventable in-patient deterioration.
What is known about the topic? The ED represents the hospital’s point of contact for potentially life-threatening conditions. Adverse event rates for emergency admissions are more than double those of non-emergency admissions. Patients are at particular risk of deterioration on discharge from the ED to the ward in the first 72 hours. Predicting which patients will deteriorate following transfer to the ward remains challenging, with care in the ED hypothesised to play a role.
What does this paper add? This paper reveals that in-patient deterioration relating to ED care could be reduced through the routine identification of causal factors within a human factors framework in any patient deterioration event and subsequent evidence-informed interventions to address these factors. It is also extrapolated that the implementation of any intervention should be informed by behaviour-change principles.
What are the implications for practitioners? It is implied that there is a need for the clarification and revision of policies and guidelines pertaining to the management of elderly patients, education regarding the critical importance of the often clinically masked vital sign deviations in younger patients and improved communication between staff, especially regarding patients with more comorbidities. Reviews of adverse events, such as patient deterioration, should incorporate a human factors analysis. Regular collation of data following adverse events should occur, with interventions considering all aspects of the factors that led to the event.
References
[1] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Emergency department care 2017–18: Australian hospital statistics. Health services series no. 89. Catalogue number HSE 216. Canberra: AIHW; 2018.[2] Fry M. Chapter 1: Emergency nursing in Australia and New Zealand. In: Curtis K, Ramsden C, Shaban R, Fry M, Considine J, eds. Emergency and Trauma Care: For Nurses and Paramedics. 3rd edn. Sydney: Elsevier Australia; 2019.
[3] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s health 2018: in brief. Catalogue number AUS 222. Canberra: AIHW. 2018.
[4] Griffin F, Resar R. IHI global trigger tool for measuring adverse events (second edition). IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2009.
[5] Harrison R, Walton M, Manias E, et al The missing evidence: a systematic review of patients’ experiences of adverse events in health care. Int J Qual Health Care 2015; 27 424–42.
| The missing evidence: a systematic review of patients’ experiences of adverse events in health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26424702PubMed |
[6] Considine J, Currey J. Ensuring a proactive, evidence-based, patient safety approach to patient assessment. J Clin Nurs 2015; 24 300–7.
| 24942476PubMed |
[7] Considine J, Jones D, Pilcher D, Currey J. Physiological status during emergency department care: relationship with inhospital death after clinical deterioration. Crit Care Resusc 2015; 17 257–62.
| 26640061PubMed |
[8] Considine J, Rhodes K, Jones D, Currey J. Systems for recognition and response to clinical deterioration in Victorian emergency departments. Australas Emerg Care 2018; 21 3–7.
| Systems for recognition and response to clinical deterioration in Victorian emergency departments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30998862PubMed |
[9] Lambe K, Currey J, Considine J. Frequency of vital sign assessment and clinical deterioration in an Australian emergency department. AENJ 2016; 19 217–22.
| Frequency of vital sign assessment and clinical deterioration in an Australian emergency department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27726973PubMed |
[10] Cioffi J, Conwayt R, Everist L, et al ‘Patients of concern’ to nurses in acute care settings: a descriptive study. Aust Crit Care 2009; 22 178–86.
| ‘Patients of concern’ to nurses in acute care settings: a descriptive study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19726207PubMed |
[11] Cioffi J, Salter C, Wilkes L, et al Clinicians’ responses to abnormal vital signs in an emergency department. Aust Crit Care 2006; 19 66–72.
| Clinicians’ responses to abnormal vital signs in an emergency department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16764154PubMed |
[12] Nash L, Tacey M, Liew D, et al Impact of emergency access targets on admissions to general medicine: a retrospective cohort study. Intern Med J 2013; 43 1110–6.
| Impact of emergency access targets on admissions to general medicine: a retrospective cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23941165PubMed |
[13] Perera ML, Gnaneswaran N, Roberts MJ, et al The ‘four-hour target’ and the impact on Australian metropolitan acute surgical services. ANZ J Surg 2016; 86 74–8.
| The ‘four-hour target’ and the impact on Australian metropolitan acute surgical services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26096442PubMed |
[14] Vincent J-L, Einav S, Pearse R, et al Improving detection of patient deterioration in the general hospital ward environment. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2018; 35 325–33.
| Improving detection of patient deterioration in the general hospital ward environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29474347PubMed |
[15] Curry JP, Jungquist CR. A critical assessment of monitoring practices, patient deterioration, and alarm fatigue on inpatient wards: a review. Patient Saf Surg 2014; 8 29
| A critical assessment of monitoring practices, patient deterioration, and alarm fatigue on inpatient wards: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25093041PubMed |
[16] Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, et al Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 173 676–82.
| Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21330339PubMed |
[17] Mitchell RJ, Williamson A, Molesworth B. Application of a human factors classification framework for patient safety to identify precursor and contributing factors to adverse clinical incidents in hospital. Appl Ergon 2016; 52 185–95.
| Application of a human factors classification framework for patient safety to identify precursor and contributing factors to adverse clinical incidents in hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26360210PubMed |
[18] Curtis K, Mitchell R, McCarthy A, et al Development of the major trauma case review tool. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2017; 25 20
| Development of the major trauma case review tool.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28241880PubMed |
[19] Mitchell R, Williamson A, Molesworth B. Identifying causal patterns and errors in adverse clinical incidents. Paper presented at Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2013: Proceedings of the International Conference on Ergonomics and Human Factors; 15–18 April 2013; Cambridge, UK.
[20] Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ 2000; 320 768–70.
| Human error: models and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10720363PubMed |
[21] Odell M, Victor C, Oliver D. Nurses’ role in detecting deterioration in ward patients: systematic literature review. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65 1992–2006.
| Nurses’ role in detecting deterioration in ward patients: systematic literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20568317PubMed |
[22] Curtis K, Tzannes A, Rudge T. How to talk to doctors – a guide for effective communication. Int Nurs Rev 2011; 58 13–20.
| How to talk to doctors – a guide for effective communication.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21281287PubMed |
[23] Sarcevic A. ‘Who’s scribing?’: documenting patient encounter during trauma resuscitation. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 10–15 April 2010; Atlanta, GA, USA.
[24] Fuller T, Fox B, Lake D, Crawford K. Improving real-time vital signs documentation. Nurs Manage 2018; 49 28–33.
| Improving real-time vital signs documentation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29287047PubMed |
[25] Meccariello M, Perkins D, Quigley LG, et al Vital time savings: evaluating the use of an automated vital signs documentation system on a medical/surgical unit. J Healthc Inf Manag 2010; 24 46–51.
