The new dynamics of residential aged care in Australia: continuity and change
Mark Cooper-Stanbury
A C and Anna L. Howe B
A Centre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia.
B Department of Sociology, Macquarie University, 25 Wally’s Walk, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia. Email: anna.howe@bigpond.com
C Corresponding author. Email: mcooperstanb@student.unimelb.edu.au
Australian Health Review 45(5) 638-646 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH20345
Submitted: 2 December 2020 Accepted: 2 February 2021 Published: 4 May 2021
Journal Compilation © AHHA 2021 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Objective This paper tests the hypothesis that increases in recorded dependency levels of permanent residential aged care clients are associated with reduced length of stay and higher turnover. A secondary objective is to compare the Aged Care Funding Instrument with its predecessor, the Resident Classification Scale, on a common schema.
Methods Administrative data for all Commonwealth-subsidised residential aged care services in Australia from 2008–09 to 2018–19 were obtained from the National Aged Care Data Clearinghouse. More than 750 000 episodes of permanent residential aged care were analysed. The categories from the two rating systems were mapped to a six-level schema, primarily based on the dollar value of the categories at the time of transition.
Results There was a strong trend towards higher dependency ratings across admissions, residents, and separations. However, contrary to expectation, measures of system activity showed a slowing of the system: length of stay increased and turnover decreased.
Conclusions The mapping of dependency rating schemes to a common rating enables the analysis of long-term trends in residential care dynamics. There is no evidence that the marked increases in reported dependency ratings led to accelerated system activity, consistent with an earlier study. This analysis forms a solid base for ongoing analysis of care appraisals in the context of a possible new rating scheme. It highlights the interplay between policy changes and provider behaviour, and the need for robust data to monitor care appraisals and system dynamics.
What is known about the topic? Residential aged care subsidies are determined by care needs in relation to assessed dependency levels, using the Aged Care Funding Instrument since 2008, and before that, the Resident Classification Scale. Between 2008–09 and 2018–19, there was considerable growth in residents classified at more dependent levels, and this would be expected to result in greater turnover in the system.
What does this paper add? This paper maps the rating schemes to a simplified, common rating that enables the analysis of long-term trends in residential care dynamics. It shows that the system is slowing, contrary to the trends expected if residents were more frail as the reported ratings imply. The paper examines possible explanations of these trends, and addresses policy implications.
What are the implications for practitioners? In the context of a potential new client-dependency classification, this study shows the importance of robust measures of the dynamics of the system—and the underlying data—vis-à-vis the means by which client dependency is assessed.
References
[1] Classification Principles. 1997, F2008C00139 (As amended 20 March 2008); 2008. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2008C00139 [verified 15 April 2021].[2] Department of Health. 2018–19 Report on the Operation of the Aged Care Act 1997. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2019.
[3] Department of Health and Ageing. 2008–09 Report on the Operation of the Aged Care Act 1997. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009.
[4] Andrews-Hall S, Howe A, Robinson A. The dynamics of residential aged care in Australia: 8-year trends in admission, separations and dependency. Aust Health Rev 2007; 31 611–22.
| The dynamics of residential aged care in Australia: 8-year trends in admission, separations and dependency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17973620PubMed |
[5] McNamee J, Poulos C, Seraji H, Kobel C, Duncan C, Westera A, et al. Alternative Aged Care Assessment, Classification System and Funding Models Final Report. Centre for Health Service Development, Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong; 2017.
[6] Aged Care (Residential Care Subsidy—Basic Subsidy Amount) Determination 2008 (No. 1), F2008L00818; 2008.
[7] Applied Aged Care Solutions. Review of the Aged Care Funding Instrument Report—Part 1: Summary Report. 2017. Available at: https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2019/11/review-of-the-aged-care-funding-instrument-acfi-review-of-the-aged-care-funding-instrument-acfi-part-1-summary-report_0.pdf [verified 1 December 2020].
[8] The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. Aged Care Amendment (Residential Care) Bill 2007: Explanatory Memorandum. 1997. Available at: https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/ems/r2735_ems_eaaa5530-17be-490a-bca7-0ba0affb73ae/upload_pdf/07040%20em.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf#search=%22acfi%20bills%20and%20legislation%22 [verified 15 April 2021].
[9] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Residential aged care in Australia 2007–08: A statistical overview. Canberra: AIHW; 2009.
[10] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. GEN data: Care needs of people in residential aged care: AIHW; 2020. Available at: https://www.gen-agedcaredata.gov.au/Resources/Access-data/2020/March/GEN-data-Care-needs-of-people-in-residential-care [verified 1 December 2020].
[11] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Residential aged care and aged care packages in the community 2011–12: AIHW; 2013. Available at: https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20140212010001/http://www.aihw.gov.au/aged-care/residential-and-community-2011-12/ [verified 1 December 2020].
[12] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Residential aged care and aged care packages in the community 2012–13: AIHW; 2014. Available at: https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/ 20141215042043/http://www.aihw.gov.au/aged-care/residential-and-community-2012-13/ [verified 1 December 2020].
[13] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. People leaving aged care (2016–17): AIHW; 2018. Available at: https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20190302222916/https://gen-agedcaredata.gov.au/Topics/People-leaving-aged-care [verified 1 December 2020].
[14] Gibson D. Who uses residential aged care now, how has it changed and what does it mean for the future? Aust Health Rev 2020; 44 820–8.
| Who uses residential aged care now, how has it changed and what does it mean for the future?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32819455PubMed |
[15] Rahman MM, Efird JT, Byles JE. Transitioning of older Australian women into and through the long-term care system: a cohort study using linked data. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19 286
| Transitioning of older Australian women into and through the long-term care system: a cohort study using linked data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31651250PubMed |
[16] Jorgensen M, Siette J, Georgiou A, Warland A, Westbrook J. Modeling the Association Between Home Care Service Use and Entry Into Residential Aged Care: A Cohort Study Using Routinely Collected Data. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2018; 19 117–21.e3.
| Modeling the Association Between Home Care Service Use and Entry Into Residential Aged Care: A Cohort Study Using Routinely Collected Data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28951018PubMed |
[17] Visvanathan R, Amare AT, Wesselingh S, Hearn R, McKechnie S, Mussared J, et al. Prolonged Wait Time Prior to Entry to Home Care Packages Increases the Risk of Mortality and Transition to Permanent Residential Aged Care Services: Findings from the Registry of Older South Australians (ROSA). J Nutr Health Aging 2019; 23 271–80.
| Prolonged Wait Time Prior to Entry to Home Care Packages Increases the Risk of Mortality and Transition to Permanent Residential Aged Care Services: Findings from the Registry of Older South Australians (ROSA).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30820516PubMed |
[18] Rahman MM, Byles JE. Older women’s patterns of home and community care use and transition to residential aged care: An Australian cohort study. Maturitas 2020; 131 28–33.
| Older women’s patterns of home and community care use and transition to residential aged care: An Australian cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31787144PubMed |
[19] Welberry HJ, Brodaty H, Hsu B, Barbieri S, Jorm LR. Impact of Prior Home Care on Length of Stay in Residential Care for Australians With Dementia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21 843–50.e5.
| Impact of Prior Home Care on Length of Stay in Residential Care for Australians With Dementia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32014354PubMed |
[20] Department of Health. Aged Care Funding Instrument (ACFI) Review Quarterly Reports 2020. Available at: https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/aged-care-funding-instrument-acfi-review-quarterly-reports [verified 1 December 2020].
[21] Aged Care Financing Authority. Submission to the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. 2019. Available at: https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/system/files/2020-09/AWF.500.00197.0002.pdf [verified 1 December 2020].
[22] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. GEN: Services and places in aged care: AIHW; 2020. Available at: https://www.gen-agedcaredata.gov.au/Topics/Services-and-places-in-aged-care. [verified 1 December 2020].
[23] Kobel C, Eagar K. Technical mapping between ACFI and AN-ACC. Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong; 2020. Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety: Research Paper 10.
[24] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Pathways to permanent residential aged care in Australia: a Pathways in Aged Care (PIAC) analysis of people’s aged care program use before first entry to permanent residential aged care in 2013–14. Cat. no. AGE 81. Canberra; 2017.
[25] Jukic M. Modelling residential aged care in Australia: entry and exit [dissertation]; 2017. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/210541 [verified 1 December 2020].
[26] Cooper-Stanbury M. Response to Program Design consultation paper: submission to the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. 2020. Available at: https://agedcare.royal commission.gov.au/system/files/submission/AWF.660.00088.0001.pdf [verified 1 December 2020].
