Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Informing telehealth service delivery for cardiovascular disease management: exploring the perceptions of rural health professionals

Lucy Kocanda https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2426-7100 A B C D F , Karin Fisher B , Leanne J. Brown B C D , Jennifer May B , Megan E. Rollo D E , Clare E. Collins D E , Andrew Boyle A C and Tracy L. Schumacher A B C D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. Email: andrew.boyle@newcastle.edu.au; tracy.schumacher@newcastle.edu.au

B Department of Rural Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Tamworth, NSW 2340, Australia. Email: karin.fisher@newcastle.edu.au; leanne.brown@newcastle.edu.au; jennifer.may@newcastle.edu.au

C Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia.

D Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. Email: megan.rollo@newcastle.edu.au; clare.collins@newcastle.edu.au

E School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

F Corresponding author. Email: lucy.kocanda@newcastle.edu.au

Australian Health Review 45(2) 241-246 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH19231
Submitted: 10 October 2019  Accepted: 12 May 2020   Published: 15 March 2021

Journal Compilation © AHHA 2021 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

Objective To explore the perceptions of rural health professionals who use telehealth services for cardiovascular health care, including the potential role of telehealth in enhancing services for this patient group.

Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten rural health professionals across a range of disciplines, including medicine, nursing and allied health. All study participants were based in the same rural region in New South Wales, Australia.

Results Participant responses emphasised the importance of including rural communities in ongoing dialogue to enhance telehealth services for cardiovascular care. Divergent expectations about the purpose of telehealth and unresolved technology issues were identified as factors to be addressed. Rural health professionals highlighted the importance of all stakeholders coming together to overcome barriers and enhance telehealth services in a collaborative manner.

Conclusion This study contributes to an evolving understanding of how health professionals based in regional Australia experience telehealth services. Future telehealth research should proceed in collaboration with rural communities, supported by policy that actively facilitates the meaningful inclusion of rural stakeholders in telehealth dialogue.

What is known about the topic? Telehealth is frequently discussed as a potential solution to overcome aspects of rural health, such as poor outcomes and limited access to services compared with metropolitan areas. In the context of telehealth and cardiovascular disease (CVD), research that focuses on rural communities is limited, particularly regarding the experiences of these communities with telehealth.

What does this paper add? This paper offers insight into how telehealth is experienced by rural health professionals. The paper highlights divergent expectations of telehealth’s purpose and unresolved technological issues as barriers to telehealth service delivery. It suggests telehealth services may be enhanced by collaborative approaches that engage multiple stakeholder groups.

What are the implications for practitioners? The use and development of telehealth in rural communities requires a collaborative approach that considers the views of rural stakeholders in their specific contexts. To improve telehealth services for people living with CVD in rural communities, it is important that rural stakeholders have opportunities to engage with non-rural clinicians, telehealth developers and policy makers.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular health, cardiovascular inequalities, CVD, e-health, health services, regional Australia, rural Australia, rural clinicians, rural communities, rural health professionals, telehealth, telemedicine.


References

[1]  National Rural Health Alliance. Cardiovascular disease in rural Australia. 2015. Available at: http://ruralhealth.org.au/sites/default/files/publications/cardiovascular-disease-fact-sheet-may-2015.pdf [verified 31 August 2020].

[2]  Alston L, Allender S, Peterson K, Jacobs J, Nichols M. Rural inequalities in the Australian burden of ischaemic heart disease: a systematic review. Heart Lung Circ 2017; 26 122–33.
Rural inequalities in the Australian burden of ischaemic heart disease: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27663928PubMed |

[3]  Pong RW, DesMeules M, Lagacé C. Rural–urban disparities in health: how does Canada fare and how does Canada compare with Australia? Aust J Rural Health 2009; 17 58–64.
Rural–urban disparities in health: how does Canada fare and how does Canada compare with Australia?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19161503PubMed |

[4]  Smith KB, Humphreys JS, Wilson MG. Addressing the health disadvantage of rural populations: how does epidemiological evidence inform rural health policies and research? Aust J Rural Health 2008; 16 56–66.
Addressing the health disadvantage of rural populations: how does epidemiological evidence inform rural health policies and research?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18318846PubMed |

[5]  Bourke L, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J, Taylor J. From ‘problem-describing’ to ‘problem-solving’: challenging the ‘deficit’ view of remote and rural health. Aust J Rural Health 2010; 18 205–9.
From ‘problem-describing’ to ‘problem-solving’: challenging the ‘deficit’ view of remote and rural health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21040082PubMed |

[6]  Bourke L, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J, Taylor J. Understanding rural and remote health: a framework for analysis in Australia. Health Place 2012; 18 496–503.
Understanding rural and remote health: a framework for analysis in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22418016PubMed |

[7]  Gessert C, Waring S, Bailey-Davis L, Conway P, Roberts M, VanWormer J. Rural definition of health: a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health 2015; 15 378
Rural definition of health: a systematic literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25879818PubMed |

[8]  Moffatt JJ, Eley DS. The reported benefits of telehealth for rural Australians. Aust Health Rev 2010; 34 276–81.
The reported benefits of telehealth for rural Australians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20797357PubMed |

[9]  Wade V, Stocks N. The use of telehealth to reduce inequalities in cardiovascular outcomes in Australia and New Zealand: a critical review. Heart Lung Circ 2017; 26 331–7.
The use of telehealth to reduce inequalities in cardiovascular outcomes in Australia and New Zealand: a critical review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27993487PubMed |

[10]  Bagot KL, Cadilhac DA, Kim J, Vu M, Savage M, Bolitho L, Howlett G, Rabl J, Dewey HM, Hand PJ, Denisenko S, Donnan GA, Bladinon CF, on behalf of the Victorian Stroke Telemedicine Programme Consortium. Transitioning from a single-site pilot project to a state-wide regional telehealth service: the experience from the Victorian Stroke Telemedicine programme. J Telemed Telecare 2017; 23 850–5.
Transitioning from a single-site pilot project to a state-wide regional telehealth service: the experience from the Victorian Stroke Telemedicine programme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29081268PubMed |

[11]  Bladin CF, Molocijz N, Ermel S, Bagot KL, Kilkenny M, Vu M, Cadilhac DA, on behalf of the VST program investigators. Victorian Stroke Telemedicine Project: implementation of a new model of translational stroke care for Australia. Intern Med J 2015; 45 951–6.
Victorian Stroke Telemedicine Project: implementation of a new model of translational stroke care for Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26011155PubMed |

[12]  Cadilhac DA, Moloczij N, Denisenko S, Dewey H, Disler P, Winzar B, Mosley I, Donnan GA, Bladin C. Establishment of an effective acute stroke telemedicine program for Australia: protocol for the Victorian Stroke Telemedicine Project. Int J Stroke 2014; 9 252–8.
Establishment of an effective acute stroke telemedicine program for Australia: protocol for the Victorian Stroke Telemedicine Project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24148281PubMed |

[13]  Gagnon M-P, Duplantie J, Fortin J-P, Landry R. Implementing telehealth to support medical practice in rural/remote regions: what are the conditions for success? Implement Sci 2006; 1 18
Implementing telehealth to support medical practice in rural/remote regions: what are the conditions for success?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16930484PubMed |

[14]  Bradford N, Caffery L, Smith A. Telehealth services in rural and remote Australia: a systematic review of models of care and factors influencing success and sustainability. Rural Remote Health 2016; 16 3808
| 27744708PubMed |

[15]  Abimbola S, Li C, Mitchell M, Everett M, Casburn K, Crooks P, Hammond R, Milling H, Ling L, Reilly A, Crawford A, Cane L, Hopp D, Stolp E, Davies S, Martiniuk A. On the same page: co-designing the logic model of a telehealth service for children in rural and remote Australia. Digital Health 2019; 5 1–7.
On the same page: co-designing the logic model of a telehealth service for children in rural and remote Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Greenhalgh T. How to improve success of technology projects in health and social care. Public Health Res Pract 2018; 28 e2831815
How to improve success of technology projects in health and social care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Wade VA, Eliott JA, Hiller JE. Clinician acceptance is the key factor for sustainable telehealth services. Qual Health Res 2014; 24 682–94.
Clinician acceptance is the key factor for sustainable telehealth services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24685708PubMed |

[18]  Greenhalgh T, Swinglehurst D, Stones R. Rethinking resistance to ‘big IT’: a sociological study of why and when healthcare staff do not use nationally mandated information and communication technologies. Health Services and Delivery Research 2014; 2
Rethinking resistance to ‘big IT’: a sociological study of why and when healthcare staff do not use nationally mandated information and communication technologies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Parker S, Prince A, Thomas L, Song H, Milosevic D, Harris MF, on behalf of the IMPACT Study Group. Electronic, mobile and telehealth tools for vulnerable patients with chronic disease: a systematic review and realist synthesis. BMJ Open 2018; 8 e019192
Electronic, mobile and telehealth tools for vulnerable patients with chronic disease: a systematic review and realist synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30158214PubMed |

[20]  Sangster J, Furber S, Allman-Farinelli M, Phongsavan P, Redfern J, Haas M, Church J, Mark A, Bauman A. Effectiveness of a pedometer-based telephone coaching program on weight and physical activity for people referred to a cardiac rehabilitation program. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2015; 35 124–9.
Effectiveness of a pedometer-based telephone coaching program on weight and physical activity for people referred to a cardiac rehabilitation program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25313450PubMed |

[21]  Barnason S, Zimmerman L, Schulz P, Pullen C, Schuelke S. Weight management telehealth intervention for overweight and obese rural cardiac rehabilitation participants: a randomised trial. J Clin Nurs 2019; 28 1808–18.
Weight management telehealth intervention for overweight and obese rural cardiac rehabilitation participants: a randomised trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30667588PubMed |

[22]  Widmer RJ, Collins NM, Collins CS, West CP, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Digital health interventions for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90: 469–80.

[23]  Merriel SWD, Andrews V, Salisbury C. Telehealth interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2014; 64 88–95.
Telehealth interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Bradford NK, Caffery LJ, Smith AC. Awareness, experiences and perceptions of telehealth in a rural Queensland community. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15 427
Awareness, experiences and perceptions of telehealth in a rural Queensland community.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26416464PubMed |

[25]  O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014; 89 1245–51.
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24979285PubMed |

[26]  Australian Health Policy Collaboration. Australia's health tracker by area. 2017. Available at: http://www.atlasesaustralia.com.au/ahpc/atlas/atlas.html?indicator=i27 [verified 31 August 2020].

[27]  Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2016 Census QuickStats: Tamworth. 2017. Available at: http://quickstats.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/quickstat/UCL112014?opendocument [verified 31 August 2020].

[28]  Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2016 Census QuickStats: Wee Waa. 2017. Available at: http://quickstats.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/quickstat/UCL115149?opendocument [verified 31 August 2020].

[29]  Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2016 Census QuickStats: Gunnedah. 2017. Available at: http://quickstats.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/quickstat/UCL114013?opendocument [verified 31 August 2020].

[30]  Hunter New England Local Health District. Telehealth: information for clinicians. n.d. Available at: http://www.hnehealth.nsw.gov.au/telehealth/Pages/Information-for-clinicians.aspx [verified 31 August 2020].

[31]  Sabesan S, Kelly J. Implementing telehealth as core business in health services. Med J Aust 2015; 202 231–3.
Implementing telehealth as core business in health services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25758684PubMed |

[32]  Gill M. A national telehealth strategy for Australia – for discussion. 2011. Available at: https://www.who.int/goe/policies/countries/aus__support_tele.pdf [verified 18 August 2020].

[33]  Saleebey D. The strengths perspective in social work practice: extensions and cautions. Soc Work 1996; 41 296–305.
| 8936085PubMed |

[34]  Cooperrider DL, Whitney D. Appreciative inquiry: a positive revolution in change. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.; 2005.

[35]  Fatehi F, Wootton R. Telemedicine, telehealth or e-health? A bibliometric analysis of the trends in the use of these terms. J Telemed Telecare 2012; 18 460–4.
Telemedicine, telehealth or e-health? A bibliometric analysis of the trends in the use of these terms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23209265PubMed |

[36]  Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, Burroughs H, Jinks C. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant 2018; 52 1893–907.
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29937585PubMed |

[37]  Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3 77–101.
Using thematic analysis in psychology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[38]  World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: Health Professions Networks, Nursing & Midwifery, Human Resources for Health; 2010. Available at: https://www.who.int/hrh/resources/framework_action/en/ [verified 19 November 2020].

[39]  White M, Winkworth G. A rubric for building effective collaboration: creating and sustaining multi service partnerships to improve outcomes for clients – concepts paper. 2012. Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5915469ebe6594c9ebc38030/t/59b2367a03596ecddfda38bf/1505204026738/CollaborationRubricConceptsPaper.pdf [verified 11 September 2020].

[40]  Way PL, Davidson PM, Winkworth G, White M. The pursuit of purposeful partnerships-making a health matrix successful. Asia Pac J Health Manag 2019; 14 i211
The pursuit of purposeful partnerships-making a health matrix successful.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[41]  Office of the National Rural Health Commissioner. Discussion paper for consultation: rural allied health quality, access and distribution: options for Commonwealth Government policy reform and investment. 2019. Available at: https://www.acn.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/NRHC-rural-allied-health-options-discussion-paper-2019.pdf [verified 31 August 2020].

[42]  Bagot KL, Moloczij N, Barclay-Moss K, Vu M, Bladin CF, Cadilhac DA, on behalf of the Victorian Stroke Telemedicine Programme Investigators. Sustainable implementation of innovative, technology-based health care practices: a qualitative case study from stroke telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2020; 26 79–91.
Sustainable implementation of innovative, technology-based health care practices: a qualitative case study from stroke telemedicine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30193566PubMed |