How general practitioners perceive access needs of vulnerable patients and act to address these needs: a mixed-methods study in south-east Melbourne, Australia
Marina Kunin
A C , Jenny Advocat A , Suhashi M. Wickramasinghe A , Emilie Dionne B and Grant Russell A
A School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Building 1, Monash University, 270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, Vic. 3168, Australia. Email: jenny.advocat@monash.edu; smwic1@student.monash.edu; grant.russell@monash.edu
B St. Mary’s Research Centre, McGill University, 3830 Avenue Lacombe, Hayes Pavilion, Suite 4720, Montreal, QC, H3T 1M5, Canada. Email: emilie.dionne.comtl@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
C Corresponding author. Email: marina.kunin@monash.edu
Australian Health Review 44(5) 763-771 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH19186
Submitted: 16 August 2019 Accepted: 15 January 2020 Published: 18 September 2020
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to understand primary health care (PHC) access barriers for vulnerable people living in south-east Melbourne from the perspective of general practitioners (GPs) who work in the area and to outline strategies that GPs have used to address these barriers.
Methods A convergent mixed-methods design was used. Quantitative surveys were conducted with practice managers and GPs, and semistructured qualitative interviews were undertaken with GPs. Data were analysed using a thematic framework approach.
Results Each of the vulnerable groups frequently seen by GPs in south-east Melbourne is thought to encounter access barriers in one or more access domains. GPs reported: (1) improving transparency, outreach and information on available treatments to address limited health literacy; (2) using culturally sensitive and language-speaking staff to overcome cultural stereotypes; (3) making practice-level arrangements to overcome limited mobility and social isolation; (4) bulk billing and helping find affordable services to overcome financial hardship; and (5) building trusting relationships with vulnerable patients to improve their engagement with treatment.
Conclusion GPs understand the nature of access barriers for local vulnerable groups and have the potential to improve equitable access to primary health care. GPs need support in the on-going application and further development of strategies to accommodate access needs of vulnerable patients.
What is known about the topic? Access to primary health care (PHC) is integral to reducing gaps in health outcomes for vulnerable groups. Vulnerable groups often encounter challenges in accessing PHC, and GPs have the potential to improve PHC access.
What does this paper add? GPs thought that the vulnerable patients they frequently treat encounter barriers pertaining to both patient access abilities and service accessibility. They reported addressing these barriers by improving transparency, outreach and information on available treatments; using culturally sensitive and multilingual staff; making practice-level arrangements to overcome limited mobility and social isolation; bulk billing and helping find affordable services; and building trusting relationships with vulnerable patients.
What are the implications for practitioners? Understanding the nature of access barriers for local vulnerable groups and information on strategies used by GPs allows for the further development of PHC access strategies.
References
[1] Gulliford M, Figueroa-Munoz J, Morgan M, Hughes D, Gibson B, Beech R, Hudson M. What does ‘access to health care’ mean? J Health Serv Res Policy 2002; 7 186–8.| 12171751PubMed |
[2] Shi L. The impact of primary care: a focused review. Scientifica (Cairo) 2012; 2012 432892
| The impact of primary care: a focused review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24278694PubMed |
[3] Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 2005; 83 457–502.
| Contribution of primary care to health systems and health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16202000PubMed |
[4] Corscadden L, Levesque JF, Lewis V, Strumpf E, Breton M, Russell G. Factors associated with multiple barriers to access to primary care: an international analysis. Int J Equity Health 2018; 17 28
| Factors associated with multiple barriers to access to primary care: an international analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29458379PubMed |
[5] Levesque J-F, Harris MF, Russell G. Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int J Equity Health 2013; 12 18
| Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23496984PubMed |
[6] O’Donnell P, Tierney E, O’Carroll A, Nurse D, MacFarlane A. Exploring levers and barriers to accessing primary care for marginalised groups and identifying their priorities for primary care provision: a participatory learning and action research study. Int J Equity Health 2016; 15 197
| Exploring levers and barriers to accessing primary care for marginalised groups and identifying their priorities for primary care provision: a participatory learning and action research study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27912783PubMed |
[7] Cheng IH, Vasi S, Wahidi S, Russell G. Rites of passage: improving refugee access to general practice services. Aust Fam Physician 2015; 44 503–7.
| 26590497PubMed |
[8] Phillips CB, Travaglia J. Low levels of uptake of free interpreters by Australian doctors in private practice: secondary analysis of national data. Aust Health Rev 2011; 35 475–9.
| Low levels of uptake of free interpreters by Australian doctors in private practice: secondary analysis of national data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22126952PubMed |
[9] Cummings M, Kang M. Youth health services: improving access to primary care. Aust Fam Physician 2012; 41 339–41.
[10] Abbott P, Dave D, Gordon E, Reath J. What do GPs need to work more effectively with Aboriginal patients? Views of Aboriginal cultural mentors and health workers. Aust Fam Physician 2014; 43 58–63.
| 24563897PubMed |
[11] Larkins S, Sen Gupta T, Evans R, Murray R, Preston R. Addressing inequities in access to primary health care: lessons for the training of health care professionals from a regional medical school. Aust J Prim Health 2011; 17 362–8.
| Addressing inequities in access to primary health care: lessons for the training of health care professionals from a regional medical school.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22112705PubMed |
[12] Smith SM, O’Kelly S, O’Dowd T. GPs’ and pharmacists’ experiences of managing multimorbidity: a ‘Pandora’s box’. Br J Gen Pract 2010; 60 e285–94.
| GPs’ and pharmacists’ experiences of managing multimorbidity: a ‘Pandora’s box’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Furler J, Young D. Prevention and socioeconomic disadvantage. Aust Fam Physician 2005; 34 821–4.
| 16217565PubMed |
[14] Drahota A, Meza RD, Brikho B, Naaf M, Estabillo JA, Gomez ED, Vejnoska SF, Dufek S, Stahmer AC, Aarons GA. Community–academic partnerships: a systematic review of the state of the literature and recommendations for future research. Milbank Q 2016; 94 163–214.
| Community–academic partnerships: a systematic review of the state of the literature and recommendations for future research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26994713PubMed |
[15] Russell G, Kunin M, Harris M, Levesque JF, Descoteaux S, Scott C, Lewis V, Dionne É, Advocat J, Dahrouge S. Improving access for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions. BMJ Open 2019; 9 e027869
| Improving access for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31594885PubMed |
[16] Creswell J, Clark VP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2018.
[17] City of Greater Dandenong. Summaries of social information. n.d. Available at: http://www.greaterdandenong.com/document/10768/summaries-of-social-information-cgd [verified 2 July 2020].
[18] Department of Health, Primary Health Networks. Primary health network needs assessment reporting template: South Eastern Melbourne. 2019. Available at : https://www.semphn.org.au/SEMPHN_Core_Needs_Assessment_2019_SEMPHN_WEBSITE_VERSION.pdf [verified 2 July 2020].
[19] Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 1999; 34 1189–208.
| 10591279PubMed |
[20] Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13 117
| Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24047204PubMed |
[21] Rabiee F. Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proc Nutr Soc 2004; 63 655–60.
| Focus-group interview and data analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15831139PubMed |
[22] Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. pp. 173–94.
[23] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 4839.0 – Patient experiences in Australia: summary of findings, 2018–19. Canberra: ABS; 2019. Available at: https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/4839.0~2018-19~Main%20Features~Medical%20specialists~3 [verified 2 July 2020].
[24] Harris MF, Harris E, Roland M. Access to primary health care: three challenges to equity. Aust J Prim Health 2004; 10 21–9.
[25] Frenk J. The concept and measurement of accessibility. In: White KL, Frenk J, Ordonez C, Paganini JM, Starfield B, editors. Health services research: an anthology. Washington: Pan American Health Organization; 1992. pp. 842–55.
[26] Callander EJ, Corscadden L, Levesque J-F. Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure and chronic disease – do Australians forgo care because of the cost? Aust J Prim Health 2017; 23 15–22.
| Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure and chronic disease – do Australians forgo care because of the cost?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28442033PubMed |
[27] Kunin M, Gunatillaka N, Stuart D, Peek A, Lewis V, Russell G. Evaluation of an intervention in Victoria Australia to improve access to primary health care for vulnerable communities. In: RACGP, Proceedings of the GP17 Conference; 26–28 October 2017; Sydney, NSW, Australia. [Abstract]
[28] Victoria State Government, Department of Health. Access to specialist clinics in Victoria. 2013. Available at: https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/hospitals-and-health-services/patient-care/specialist-clinics/access-policy [verified 2 July 2020].
[29] Wasson JH, Sauvigne AE, Mogielnicki RP, Frey WG, Sox CH, Gaudette C, Rockwell A. Continuity of outpatient medical care in elderly men: a randomized trial. JAMA 1984; 252 2413–17.
| Continuity of outpatient medical care in elderly men: a randomized trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 6481927PubMed |
[30] Hjortdahl P, Laerum E. Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction. BMJ 1992; 304 1287–90.
| Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1606434PubMed |
