Distribution of male and female procedural and surgical specialists in Australia
Elizabeth Turtle A D , Anna Vnuk B and Vivian Isaac CA Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.
B College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia. Email: anna.vnuk@jcu.edu.au
C Flinders University Rural Health South Australia, Flinders University, Renmark, SA 5341, Australia. Email: vivian.isaac@flinders.edu.au
D Corresponding author. Email: elizabeth.turtle@sa.gov.au
Australian Health Review 45(2) 235-240 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH19179
Submitted: 02 September 2019 Accepted: 14 February 2020 Published: 16 February 2021
Abstract
Objective This study examined the distribution of the sexes across Australian medical procedural specialties in 2017 and investigated the proportion of currently registered female specialists based on their graduation date from 1969 to 2008.
Methods A cross-sectional analysis of current Australian procedural and surgical specialists registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Registration Agency as of January 2017 was undertaken. Participants included 4851 surgical specialists (594 female, 4257 male) and 14 948 specialists in specialties with high levels of procedural clinical work (4418 female, 10 530 male). The number of male and female specialists across each procedural specialty and the medical school graduation date of current female specialists were analysed.
Results In 2017, female fellows represented only one in 10 surgeons and three in 10 procedural specialists. All surgical specialties are underrepresented by female specialists. Cardiology is least represented by female practitioners (one in 10), followed by intensive care and ophthalmology (two in 10). General surgery, otolaryngology and urology saw more female specialists with graduation dates between 1983 and 2003 compared with the other surgical specialties.
Conclusion The number of female practitioners registered as specialists is increasing, but they continue to be underrepresented at specialist level across many procedural and surgical specialties.
What is known about the topic? Although the number of female students entering medical school now outnumbers that of males, female practitioners remain underrepresented at the specialist level.
What does this paper add? Surgery continues to be underrepresented by female specialists, but general surgery, otolaryngology and urology have shown increases in females reaching specialist level. All procedural specialties have shown increasing numbers of female practitioners reaching the specialist level.
What are the implications for practitioners? All surgical specialties and nearly all procedural specialties need to adopt evidence-based practices to make their training programs both appealing and sustainable to female trainees in order to work towards achieving gender parity.
References
[1] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Medical labour workforce 2000. Catalogue no. AUS 33. 2003. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/workforce/medical-labour-force-2000/contents/table-of-contents [verified 12 June 2018].[2] Alers M, Pepping T, Bor H, Verdonk P, Hamberg K, Lagro-Janssen A. Speciality preferences in Dutch medical students influenced by their anticipation on family responsibilities. Perspect Med Educ 2014; 3 443–54.
| Speciality preferences in Dutch medical students influenced by their anticipation on family responsibilities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25395230PubMed |
[3] Buddeberg-Fischer B, Stamm M, Buddeberg C, Bauer G, Häemmig O, Knecht M, Klaghofer R. The impact of gender and parenthood on physicians’ careers – professional and personal situation seven years after graduation. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10 40
| 20167075PubMed |
[4] Alers M, van Leerdam L, Dielissen P, Lagro-Janssen A. Gendered specialities during medical education: a literature review. Perspect Med Educ 2014; 3 163–78.
| Gendered specialities during medical education: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24980516PubMed |
[5] Australian Medical Workforce Advisory Committee Toward gender balance in the Australian medical workforce: some planning implications. Aust Health Rev 2000; 23 27–42.
| Toward gender balance in the Australian medical workforce: some planning implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11256269PubMed |
[6] Liang R, Dornan T, Nestel D. Why do women leave surgical training? A qualitative and feminist study. Lancet 2019; 393 541–9.
| Why do women leave surgical training? A qualitative and feminist study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30739689PubMed |
[7] Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Surgical workforce projection to 2025: volume 1, the Australian workforce – briefing paper for the National Training Plan consultation process. 2011. Available at: www.surgeons.org/RACS-Surgical-Workforce-Projections-Report-to-2025-Australia [verified 24 September 2020].
[8] Troppmann KM, Palis BE, Goodnight JE, Ho HS, Troppmann C. Women surgeons in the new millennium. Arch Surg 2009; 144 635–42.
| Women surgeons in the new millennium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19620543PubMed |
[9] Lawal TA, Afolabi AO. Factors influencing the choice of surgery as a career by pre-registration interns. Afr Health Sci 2013; 13 814–19.
| 24250326PubMed |
[10] Jefferson L, Bloor K, Spilsbury K. Exploring gender differences in the working lives of UK hospital consultants. J R Soc Med 2015; 108 184–91.
| Exploring gender differences in the working lives of UK hospital consultants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25567767PubMed |
[11] Zhuge Y, Kaufman J, Simeone DM, Chen H, Velazquez OC. Is there still a glass ceiling for women in academic surgery? Ann Surg 2011; 253 637–43.
| Is there still a glass ceiling for women in academic surgery?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21475000PubMed |
[12] Hoff T, Scott S. The gendered realities and talent management imperatives of women physicians. Health Care Manage Rev 2016; 41 189–99.
| The gendered realities and talent management imperatives of women physicians.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25978004PubMed |
[13] Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Surgical workforce 2014 census report. 2001. Available at: https://www.surgeons.org/-/media/Project/RACS/surgeons-org/files/reports-guidelines-publications/workforce-activities-census-reports/2014-surgical-workforce-census-report.pdf?rev=be2d1ad7e5f641ba940b275d6079f55d [verified 24 September 2020].
[14] Mayer KL, Perez RV, Ho HS. Factors affecting choice of surgical residency training program. J Surg Res 2001; 98 71–5.
| Factors affecting choice of surgical residency training program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11397120PubMed |
[15] Burgos CM, Josephson A. Gender differences in the learning and teaching of surgery: a literature review. Int J Med Educ 2014; 5 110–24.
| Gender differences in the learning and teaching of surgery: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25341220PubMed |
[16] Hill E, Vaughan S. The only girl in the room: how paradigmatic trajectories deter female students from surgical careers. Med Educ 2013; 47 547–56.
| The only girl in the room: how paradigmatic trajectories deter female students from surgical careers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23662871PubMed |
[17] O’Connor MI. Medical school experiences shape women students’ interest in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474 1967–72.
| Medical school experiences shape women students’ interest in orthopaedic surgery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27084717PubMed |
[18] Healy NA, Cantillon P, Malone C, Kerin MJ. Role models and mentors in surgery. Am J Surg 2012; 204 256–61.
| Role models and mentors in surgery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22621833PubMed |
[19] Australian Medical Association (AMA). Managing the risks of fatigue in the medical workforce – 2016 AMA safe hours audit. 2017. Available at: https://ama.com.au/article/2016-ama-safe-hours-audit [verified 6 June 2018].
[20] Australian Government Department of Health. Cardiology 2016 factsheet. 2017. Available at: http://hwd.health.gov.au/webapi/customer/documents/factsheets/2016/Cardiology.pdf [verified 1 June 2018].
[21] Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS). Diversity and inclusion plan. 2016. Available at: https://ama.com.au/sites/default/files/documents/RACS_diversity_and_inclusion_plan.pdf [verified 24 September 2020].
[22] Smith F, Lambert TW, Goldacre MJ. Factors influencing junior doctors’ choices of future specialty: trends over time and demographics based on results from UK national surveys. J R Soc Med 2015; 108 396–405.
| Factors influencing junior doctors’ choices of future specialty: trends over time and demographics based on results from UK national surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26432808PubMed |
[23] Australian Government Department of Health. Medical Training Review Panel: seventeenth report. 2014. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/work-pubs-mtrp-17-toc [verified 6 June 2018].
