Emergency department after-hours primary contact physiotherapy service reduces analgesia and orthopaedic referrals while improving treatment times
Judith Henderson A C , Ryan Gallagher
A , Peter Brown A , Damien Smith A and Kevin Tang B
A Physiotherapy Department, John Hunter Hospital, Lookout Road, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia. Email: ryan.gallagher@health.nsw.gov.au; peter.brown@health.nsw.gov.au; Damien.smith@health.nsw.gov.au
B Emergency Department, John Hunter Hospital, Lookout Road, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia. Email: kevin.tang@health.nsw.gov.au
C Corresponding author. Email: Judith.Henderson@health.nsw.gov.au
Australian Health Review 44(3) 485-492 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH18259
Submitted: 17 December 2018 Accepted: 23 August 2019 Published: 11 February 2020
Abstract
Objective The aims of this study were to identify: (1) whether an after-hours emergency department (ED) collaborative care service using primary contact physiotherapists (PCPs) improves treatment times for musculoskeletal and simple orthopaedic presentations; and (2) differences in orthopaedic referral rates and analgesia prescription for patients managed by PCPs compared with secondary contact physiotherapists.
Methods A prospective observational study was conducted of diagnosed, matched patients seen in a 4-day week after-hours ED primary contact physiotherapy service in a tertiary referral ED. Patients presenting with a musculoskeletal or simple orthopaedic diagnosis reviewed by a physiotherapist as either the primary or secondary physiotherapy contact between 1630 and 2030 hours from Saturday to Tuesday were included in the analysis. Outcome measures collected included ED length of stay, orthopaedic referrals in the ED, follow-up plan on discharge from the ED and analgesia prescriptions.
Results There were no adverse events, missed diagnoses or re-presentations for any patients managed by an ED PCP. Mean (± s.d.) treatment time for patients seen by an ED PCP was 130 ± 76 min, compared with 240 ± 115 min for those seen by a secondary contact physiotherapist (P < 0.001). There were significant differences between patients managed by PCP versus secondary contact physiotherapists, with decreases of 20.4% for referrals to orthopaedics in the ED, 21.2% for orthopaedic clinic referrals on discharge and 8.5% in analgesia prescriptions for patients managed by an ED PCP (P < 0.001). In addition to these reductions, there was a 17.5% increase in general practitioner referrals on discharge for patients managed by an ED PCP (P < 0.001).
Conclusion An after-hours ED physiotherapy service is a safe service that reduces ED treatment times, as well as analgesia prescriptions and orthopaedic referrals for patients managed by a PCP.
What is known about the topic? PCPs are capable of providing safe and effective care to patients in the ED who present with musculoskeletal complaints. Patients managed by physiotherapists as the primary contact require fewer X-rays and have reduced treatment times.
What does this paper add? Compared with previously published articles, this study demonstrates similar reductions in ED treatment times in an after-hours setting for patients managed by an ED PCP. However, this was achieved by physiotherapists who have less reported experience. Furthermore, this study found that management of patients by PCPs resulted in a reduction in the amount of analgesia prescribed and orthopaedic input required for these patients.
What are the implications for practitioners? PCPs can be trained to operate in the ED with minor or no prior ED experience while facilitating reductions in the amount of analgesia prescribed, orthopaedic referrals required (in ED and on discharge) and reducing treatment times for patients.
References
[1] Bird S, Thompson C, Williams KE. Primary contact physiotherapy services reduce waiting and treatment times for patients presenting with musculoskeletal conditions in Australian emergency departments: an observational study. J Physiother 2016; 62 209–14.| Primary contact physiotherapy services reduce waiting and treatment times for patients presenting with musculoskeletal conditions in Australian emergency departments: an observational study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27637771PubMed |
[2] Sutton M, Govier A, Prince S, Morphett M. Primary-contact physiotherapists manage a minor trauma caseload in the emergency department without misdiagnoses or adverse events: an observational study. J Physiother 2015; 61 77–80.
| Primary-contact physiotherapists manage a minor trauma caseload in the emergency department without misdiagnoses or adverse events: an observational study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25801363PubMed |
[3] McClellan CM, Cramp F, Powell J, Benger JR. Extended scope physiotherapists in the emergency department: a literature review. Phys Ther Rev 2010; 15 106–11.
| Extended scope physiotherapists in the emergency department: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] McClellan CM, Greenwood R, Benger JR. Effect of an extended scope physiotherapy service on patient satisfaction and the outcome of soft tissue injuries in an adult emergency department. Emerg Med J 2006; 23 384–87.
| 16627842PubMed |
[5] McClellan CM, Cramp F, Powell J, Benger JR. A randomised trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue injury management. BMJ Open 2012; 2 e001092
| A randomised trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of different emergency department healthcare professionals in soft tissue injury management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23144256PubMed |
[6] Taylor NF, Norman E, Roddy L, Tang C, Pagram A, Hearn K. Primary contact physiotherapy in emergency departments can reduce length of stay for patients with peripheral musculoskeletal injuries compared with secondary contact physiotherapy: a prospective non-randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy 2011; 97 107–14.
| Primary contact physiotherapy in emergency departments can reduce length of stay for patients with peripheral musculoskeletal injuries compared with secondary contact physiotherapy: a prospective non-randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21497244PubMed |
[7] Kilner E, Sheppard L. The ‘lone ranger’: a descriptive study of physiotherapy practice in Australian emergency departments. Physiotherapy 2010; 96 248–56.
| 20674658PubMed |
[8] Roberts R, Innes K, Walker S. Introducing ICD‐10‐AM in Australian hospitals. Med J Aust 1998; 169 S32–S35.
| 9830408PubMed |
[9] Australian College for Emergency Medicine National triage scale. Emerg Med 1994; 6 145–6.
[10] NSW Health. NSW Health service health professionals (state) award 2019. 2019. Available at: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/careers/conditions/Awards/health-professional.pdf [verified 22 November 2019].
[11] Ball ST, Walton K, Hawes S. Do emergency department physiotherapy practitioner’s, emergency nurse practitioners and doctors investigate, treat and refer patients with closed musculoskeletal injuries differently? Emerg Med J 2007; 24 185–88.
| 17351223PubMed |
[12] NSW Health. Emergency department care. 2019. Available at: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Performance/Pages/emergency.aspx [verified 22 November 2019].
[13] Council of Australian Governments. National health reform agreement. 2011. Available at: http://www.federalfinancialrelations.gov.au/content/npa/health/_archive/national-agreement.pdf [verified 22 November 2019].
[14] Richardson B, Shepstone L, Poland F, Mugford M, Finlayson B, Clemence N. Randomised controlled trial and cost consequences study comparing initial physiotherapy assessment and management with routine practice for selected patients in an accident and emergency department of an acute hospital. Emerg Med J 2005; 22 87–92.
| Randomised controlled trial and cost consequences study comparing initial physiotherapy assessment and management with routine practice for selected patients in an accident and emergency department of an acute hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15662054PubMed |
