Assessing concordance between patient preferences in advance care plans and in-hospital care
Nay Myo Oo A , Ian A. Scott A B C , Raquel Maggacis A and Nalaka Rajakaruna AA Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Level 5A, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia. Email: NayMyo.Oo@health.qld.gov.au; raquel.maggacis@health.qld.gov.au; nalaka.rajakaruna@health.qld.gov.au
B School of Clinical Medicine, University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: ian.scott@health.qld.gov.au
Australian Health Review 43(4) 425-431 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH18011
Submitted: 13 January 2018 Accepted: 20 May 2018 Published: 23 July 2018
Abstract
Objective The aims of this study were to assess: (1) concordance between patient preferences stated in advance care plans (ACPs) and hospital care over the subsequent 12 months; (2) change in preferences over time; (3) justifications for discordant care; and (4) effects of ACP completion on hospital utilisation.
Methods A retrospective study was conducted of 198 patients with an ACP form registered with an ACP registry and tagged with a hospital unique record number. Data collected from ACP forms and hospital records comprised ACP completion and revisions, care preferences, patient characteristics and hospital care. Instances of care discordant with preferences were analysed as Type A (no ascertainable justification) and Type B (direct patient request or appropriate clinical indications). In a survivor subset, hospital utilisation was compared before and after ACP completion.
Results Mean (± s.d.) patient age was 79.5 ± 11.8 years. Patients had a mean (± s.d.) of 5.5 ± 2.5 comorbidities and 90 (46.4%) died within the 12 months after ACP completion. Most ACPs (130; 65.5%) were completed during index hospitalisation and 13 (6.5%) underwent revision, on average, 6.8 months later, all related to rescinding request for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Hospital care was fully concordant for 154 (77.8%) patients, with 39 (22.2%) receiving 60 instances of discordant care (15 (25%) Type A, 45 (75%) Type B), mostly related to surgical procedures (20; 33%) and intravenous fluids or antibiotics (26; 43%). Patients receiving discordant care had higher mortality (77% vs 45%; P < 0.001) and more rapid response team activations (34% vs 13%; P = 0.001) at 12 months than patients with concordant care. Among the 108 confirmed survivors at 12 months after ACP completion, emergency department presentations and hospital admissions per patient had decreased by ≥50% (P < 0.001) and hospital days had decreased by 25% (P = 0.042) compared with the 12 months before ACP completion.
Conclusion Most patients completing an ACP received hospital care fully concordant with their stated preferences, with few revising their preferences over time. Discordant care mostly related to justified supportive treatments or surgical procedures. Among survivors, ACP completion was associated with decreased use of hospital care.
What is known about the topic? ACPs that list patient preferences and care goals relieve family and patient distress and uncertainty regarding future care decisions as death approaches, decrease unwanted medical interventions and hospitalisations, and are associated with more patients dying at home. However, uncertainty surrounds the extent to which in-patient care provided to patients’ concords with preferences stated in ACPs, which preferences are most adhered to, and whether preferences change over time, warranting revision of ACPs.
What does this paper add? This retrospective study of 198 patients completing an ACP, of whom almost half died within the following 12 months, showed that more than 75% received hospital care fully concordant with their stated preferences and, for decedents, most died at their preferred place of death. Relatively few patients changed their documented preferences over time, and all changes were for less use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Instances of discordant care mostly related to the administration of supportive treatments or surgical procedures and most were justified on the basis of patient request or appropriate clinical indications. Among 108 survivors, the number of emergency department presentations and hospital admissions per patient at 12 months after ACP completion was half those seen in the 12 months before ACP completion, whereas hospital days per patient decreased by 25%.
What are the implications for practitioners? Encouraging patients with progressive chronic disease to complete an ACP reduces their risk of receiving care they do not want, reflected in decreased use of hospital care. Preferences stated in ACPs are mostly stable over time and, if changed, tend to become more conservative in terms of CPR. Conversely, preferences stated in the ACP do not, as circumstances change, bind patients or clinicians to withholding care that relieves symptoms or prevents major morbidity in the short term.
Additional keyword: in-patient care.
References
[1] Scott IA, Mitchell GK, Reymond EJ, Daly MP. Difficult but necessary conversations. The case for advance care planning. Med J Aust 2013; 199 662–6.| Difficult but necessary conversations. The case for advance care planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Rietjens JA, van der Heide A. The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review. Palliat Med 2014; 28 1000–25.
| The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Houben CHM, Spruit MA, Groenen MTJ, Wouters EFM, Janssen DJA. Efficacy of advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014; 15 477–89.
| Efficacy of advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Martin RS, Hayes B, Gregorevic K, Lim WK. The effects of advance care planning interventions on nursing home residents: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016; 17 284–93.
| The effects of advance care planning interventions on nursing home residents: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Bischoff KE, Sudore R, Miao Y, Boscardin WJ, Smith AK. Advance care planning and the quality of end-of-life care in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013; 61 209–14.
| Advance care planning and the quality of end-of-life care in older adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Fischer S, Min SJ, Cervantes L, Kutner J. Where do you want to spend your last days of life? Low concordance between preferred and actual site of death among hospitalized adults. J Hosp Med 2013; 8 178–83.
| Where do you want to spend your last days of life? Low concordance between preferred and actual site of death among hospitalized adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Tang ST, Mccorkle R. Determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death for terminally ill cancer patients. J Palliat Care 2003; 19 230–7.
[8] Biola H, Sloane PD, Williams CS, Daaleman TP, Zimmerman S. Preferences versus practice: life-sustaining treatments in last months of life in long-term care. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2010; 11 42–51.
| Preferences versus practice: life-sustaining treatments in last months of life in long-term care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Morrison RS, Chichin E, Carter J, Burack O, Lantz M, Meier DE. The effect of a social work intervention to enhance advance care planning documentation in the nursing home. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53 290–4.
| The effect of a social work intervention to enhance advance care planning documentation in the nursing home.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Hickman SE, Nelson CA, Moss AH, Tolle SW, Perrin NA, Hammes BJ. The consistency between treatments provided to nursing facility residents and orders on the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment form. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011; 59 2091–9.
| The consistency between treatments provided to nursing facility residents and orders on the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment form.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Lee MA, Brummel-Smith K, Meyer J, Drew N, London MR. Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST): outcomes in a PACE program. Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48 1219–25.
| Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST): outcomes in a PACE program. Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Lum H, Obafemi O, Dukes J, Nowels M, Samon K, Boxer RS. Use of medical orders for scope of treatment for heart failure patients during postacute care in skilled nursing facilities. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2017; 18 885–90.
| Use of medical orders for scope of treatment for heart failure patients during postacute care in skilled nursing facilities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Richardson DK, Fromme E, Zive D, Fu R, Newgard CD. Concordance of out-of-hospital and emergency department cardiac arrest resuscitation with documented end-of-life choices in Oregon. Ann Emerg Med 2014; 63 375–83.
| Concordance of out-of-hospital and emergency department cardiac arrest resuscitation with documented end-of-life choices in Oregon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Hammes BJ, Rooney BL, Gundrum JD. A comparative, retrospective, observational study of the prevalence, availability, and specificity of advance care plans in a county that implemented an advance care planning microsystem. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58 1249–55.
| A comparative, retrospective, observational study of the prevalence, availability, and specificity of advance care plans in a county that implemented an advance care planning microsystem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Auriemma CL, Nguyen CA, Bronheim R, Kent S, Nadiger S, Pardo D, Halpern SD. Stability of e.nd-of-life preferences. A systematic review of the evidence. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174 1085–92.
| Stability of e.nd-of-life preferences. A systematic review of the evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Hickman SE, Keevern E, Hammes BJ. Use of the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program in the clinical setting: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015; 63 341–50.
| Use of the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program in the clinical setting: a systematic review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Hickman SE, Hammes BJ, Torke AM, Sudore RL, Sachs GA. The quality of physician orders for life-sustaining treatment decisions: a pilot study. J Palliat Med 2017; 20 155–62.
| The quality of physician orders for life-sustaining treatment decisions: a pilot study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Scott IA, Rajakaruna N, Shah D, Miller L, Reymond E, Daly M. Normalising advance care planning in a tertiary hospital general medicine service: an exploratory study. Aust Health Rev 2016; 40 391–8.
| Normalising advance care planning in a tertiary hospital general medicine service: an exploratory study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Patrick DL, Pearlman RA, Starks HE, Cain KC, Cole WG, Uhlmann RF. Validation of preferences for life-sustaining treatment: implications for advance care planning. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127 509–17.
| Validation of preferences for life-sustaining treatment: implications for advance care planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Hopping-Winn J, Mullin J, March L, Caughey M, Stern M, Jarvie J. The progression of end-of-life wishes and concordance with end-of-life care. J Palliat Med 2018; 21 541–5.
| The progression of end-of-life wishes and concordance with end-of-life care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
