Public reporting of hospital performance data: views of senior medical directors in Victoria, Australia
Rachel Canaway A , Marie Bismark A , David Dunt A and Margaret Kelaher A BA Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia. Email: rachel.canaway@unimelb.edu.au; mbismark@unimelb.edu.au; d.dunt@unimelb.edu.au
B Corresponding author. Email: mkelaher@unimelb.edu.au
Australian Health Review 42(5) 591-599 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17120
Submitted: 9 May 2017 Accepted: 14 August 2017 Published: 9 October 2017
Abstract
Objective The aim of the present study was to better understand senior medical directors’ perceptions of public reporting of hospital performance data, how public reporting affects institutional behavioural change towards quality improvement and how it could be improved.
Methods Interviews were undertaken with 17 medical directors representing 26 metropolitan and regional public hospitals in Victoria, Australia, between June and August 2016. Data were analysed thematically.
Results Medical directors are well placed to comment on clinical and administrative aspects of quality, safety and performance monitoring in public hospitals. Their responses largely suggested that public reporting of hospital performance data in Australia is immature and not fulfilling its potential. There was little consensus among informants around what public reporting is, who it is for or its purpose. Although public reporting was considered to have important functions for hospitals and consumers, it was generally considered to lack robustness and have underutilised potential to inform consumers, build trust and drive quality and performance improvements within hospitals.
Conclusions The next steps needed to advance public reporting of hospital performance data in Australia include engaging clinicians and patients in selection and development of metrics, improving timeliness of reporting, and improving communication of information so that it is accessible and meaningful for different audiences.
What is known about the topic? Public reporting of hospital performance data is a mechanism increasingly used in the Australian health system, but it has attracted little research.
What does this paper add? This paper reveals a lack of shared understanding among medical directors in Victoria, Australia, on what public reporting of hospital performance data is, who it is for and its purpose. The paper highlights the potential importance of public reporting of hospital performance data for rural and regional healthcare consumers and how it may be strengthened.
What are the implications for practitioners? Stronger systems of public reporting of hospital performance data have the potential to increase consumer engagement and improve hospital performance, quality and safety. Awareness of the discourse around public reporting of hospital performance data can increase practitioners’ engagement in debate and development of reporting systems.
Additional keywords: hospital, public performance reporting, quality and safety.
References
[1] Fung CH, Lim YW, Mattke S, Damberg C, Shekelle PG. Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148 111–23.| Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Cacace M, Ettelt S, Brereton L, Pedersen J, Nolte E. How health systems make available information on service providers. Experience in seven countries. RAND Corporation; 2011. Available at: http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2011/RAND_TR887.pdf [verified 19 August 2016].
[3] Campanella P, Vukovic V, Parente P, Sulejmani A, Ricciardi W, Specchia ML. The impact of public reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16 296
| The impact of public reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Minami CA, Dahlke A, Bilimoria KY. Public reporting in surgery: an emerging opportunity to improve care and inform patients. Ann Surg 2015; 261 241–2.
| Public reporting in surgery: an emerging opportunity to improve care and inform patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Berwick DM, James B, Coye MJ. Connections between quality measurement and improvement. Med Care 2003; 41 I30–8.
| Connections between quality measurement and improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Contandriopoulos D, Champagne F, Denis JL. The multiple causal pathways between performance measures’ use and effects. Med Care Res Rev 2014; 71 3–20.
| The multiple causal pathways between performance measures’ use and effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Havery G, Walshe K. Realist synthesis: an introduction. ESRC Research Methods Programme, University of Manchester, RMP Methods Paper 2/2004. 2004. Available at: https://www.betterevaluation.org/sites/default/files/RMPmethods2.pdf [verified 5 September 2017].
[8] Melbourne Health. First in care: Melbourne Health quality of care report 2014/15. 2016. Available at: https://www.thermh.org.au/sites/default/files/media/documents/Melbourne%20Health%20Quality%20of%20Care%20Report%202014%20-%202015.pdf [verified 29 August 2017].
[9] Barwon Health. Quality of care: annual community magazine. Geelong: Barwon Health; 2015.Available at: http//www.barwonhealth.org.au/quality-of-care/86-quality-of-care-2015/file [verified 5 September 2017].
[10] Canaway R, Bismark M, Dunt D, Kelaher M. Perceived barriers to effective implementation of public reporting of hospital performance data in Australia: A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17 391
| Perceived barriers to effective implementation of public reporting of hospital performance data in Australia: A qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Department of Health and Human Services. Review of hospital safety and quality assurance in Victoria. Melbourne: Department of Health and Human Services; 2016. Available at: https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/hospitals-and-health-services/quality-safety-service/hospital-safety-and-quality-review [verified 22 September 2016].
[12] Duckett S, Cuddihy M, Newnham H. Targeting zero. Supporting the Victorian hospital system to eliminate avoidable harm and strengthen quality of care. Report of the Review of Hospital Safety and Quality Assurance in Victoria. Melbourne: Victorian Government; 2016.
[13] Victorian Government, Department of Health and Human Services. Better, safer care: delivering a world-leading healthcare system. Melbourne: Victorian Government; 2016.
[14] Leape L, Berwick D, Clancy C, Conway J, Gluck P, Guest J, Lawrence D, Morath J, O’Leary D, O’Neill P, Pinakiewicz D, Isaac T. Transforming healthcare: a safety imperative. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18 424–8.
| Transforming healthcare: a safety imperative.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MfgsVGgug%3D%3D&md5=0f0c4fcbbfb1dc851454e544d2622751CAS |
[15] Barello S, Graffigna G, Vegni E. Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature. Nursing Research and Practice 2012; 2012 905934
| Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013; 32 207–14.
| What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Lilford R, Mohammed M, Spiegelhalter D, Thomson R. Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma. Lancet 2004; 363
| Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Laschober M, Maxfield M, Felt-Lisk S, Miranda DJ. Hospital response to public reporting of quality indicators. Health Care Financ Rev 2007; 28 61–76.
[19] Hafner JM, Williams SC, Koss RG, Tschurtz BA, Schmaltz SP, Loeb JM. The perceived impact of public reporting hospital performance data: interviews with hospital staff. Int J Qual Health Care 2011; 23 697–704.
| The perceived impact of public reporting hospital performance data: interviews with hospital staff.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Lindenauer PK, Lagu T, Ross JS, Pekow PS, Shatz A, Hannon N, Rothberg MB, Benjamin EM. Attitudes of hospital leaders toward publicly reported measures of health care quality. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174 1904–11.
| Attitudes of hospital leaders toward publicly reported measures of health care quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Faber M, Bosch M, Wollersheim H, Leatherman S, Grol R. Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review. Med Care 2009; 47 1–8.
| Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Damman OC, Hendriks M, Rademakers J, Delnij DMJ, Groenewegen PP. How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews. BMC Public Health 2009; 9
| How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Hibbard JH, Peters E. Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. Annu Rev Public Health 2003; 24 413–33.
| Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Hibbard JH, Peters E, Dixon A, Tusler M. Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information: it isn’t just about literacy. Med Care Res Rev 2007; 64 379–94.
| Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information: it isn’t just about literacy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Hibbert P, Hannaford N, Long J, Plumb J, Braithwaite J. Final report: performance indicators used internationally to report publicly on healthcare organisations and local health systems. Sydney: Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales; 2013.
