Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Changes in surgical team performance and safety climate attitudes following expansion of perioperative services: a repeated-measures study

Brigid M. Gillespie A B C E , Emma Harbeck C , Evelyn Kang C , Catherine Steel D , Nicole Fairweather D and Wendy Chaboyer C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast campus, Qld, 4222, Australia.

B Gold Coast University Hospital and Health Service, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport Qld, 4215, Australia.

C National Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing, Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast campus, Qld, 4222, Australia. Email: e.kang@griffith.edu.au; w.chaboyer@griffith.edu.au; e.harbeck@griffith.edu.au

D Division of Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Qld, 4102, Australia. Email: Catherine.Steel@health.qld.gov.au; nfairweather.asa@gmail.com

E Corresponding author. Email: b.gillespie@griffith.edu.au

Australian Health Review 42(6) 703-708 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17079
Submitted: 13 March 2017  Accepted: 19 June 2017   Published: 10 August 2017

Abstract

Objective The aim of the present study was to describe process changes in surgical team performance and team members’ attitudes to safety culture following hospital relocation and expansion of perioperative services.

Methods The study was a naturalistic study using structured observations and surveys to assess non-technical skills (NTS; i.e. communication, teamwork, situational awareness, decision making and leadership) in surgery. This interrupted time series design used mixed-linear regression models to examine the effect of phase (before and after hospital relocation) on surgical teams’ NTS and their processes that may affect performance. Differences in self-reported teamwork and safety climate attitudes were also examined.

Results In all, 186 procedures (100 before and 81 after hospital relocation) were observed across teams working in general, paediatric, orthopaedic and thoracic surgeries. Interobserver agreement ranged from 86% to 95%. An effect of phase was found, indicating that there were significant improvements after relocation in the use of NTS by the teams observed (P = 0.020; 95% confidence interval 1.9–4.7).

Conclusions The improvements seen in surgical teams’ NTS performance and safety culture attitudes may be related to the move to a new state-of-the-art perioperative department.

What is known about the topic? Patient safety in surgery relies on optimal team performance, underpinned by effective NTS.

What does this paper add? The NTS of surgical teams may be improved through ergonomic innovations that promote teams’ shared mental models.

What are the implications for practitioners? Effective multidisciplinary teamwork relies on a combination of NTS and ergonomic factors, which inherently contribute to team performance and safety climate attitudes.

Additional keywords: culture, hospital expansion, human factors, non-technical skills, patient safety, ergonomics.


References

[1]  Sevdalis N, Undre S, McDermott J, Giddie J, Diner L, Smith G. Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments. World J Surg 2014; 38 751–758.
Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Flin R, O’Connor P, Crichton M. Safety at the sharp end: a guide to non-technical skills. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing; 2008.

[3]  Robertson ER, Hadi M, Morgan LJ, Pickering SP, Collins G, New S, Griffin D, McCulloch P, Catchpole KC. Oxford NOTECHS II: a modified theatre team non-technical skills scoring system [erratum published in PLoS One 2014; 9: e100111]. PLoS One 2014; 9 e90320
Oxford NOTECHS II: a modified theatre team non-technical skills scoring system [erratum published in PLoS One 2014; 9: e100111].Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Morgan L, Hadi M, Pickering S, Robertson E, Griffin D, Collins G, Rivero-Arias O, Catchpole K, McCulloch P, New S. The effect of teamwork training on team performance and clinical outcome in elective orthopaedic surgery: a controlled interrupted time series study. BMJ Open 2015; 5 e006216
The effect of teamwork training on team performance and clinical outcome in elective orthopaedic surgery: a controlled interrupted time series study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Gillespie BM, Gwinner K, Fairweather N, Chaboyer W. Building shared situational awareness in surgery through distributed dialog. J Multidiscip Healthc 2013; 6 109–18.
Building shared situational awareness in surgery through distributed dialog.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Brandis S, Fisher R, McPhail R, Rice J, Eljiz K, Fitzgerald A, Gapp R, Marshall A. Hospital employees’ perceptions of fairness and job satisfaction at a time of transformational change. Aust Health Rev 2016; 40 292–8.
Hospital employees’ perceptions of fairness and job satisfaction at a time of transformational change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Leape LL. Error in medicine. JAMA 1994; 272 1851–7.
Error in medicine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2Fot1Wjtw%3D%3D&md5=dd7126957d82509fdfb4b6b63f46742eCAS |

[8]  Reason J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate; 1997.

[9]  Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Neilands TB, Rowan K, Vella K, Boyden J, Roberts PR, Thomas EJ. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6 44
The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Sevdalis N, Davis R, Koutantji M, Undre S, Darzi A, Vincent C. Reliability of a revised NOTECHS scale for use in surgical teams. Am J Surg 2008; 196 184–90.
Reliability of a revised NOTECHS scale for use in surgical teams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Sexton JB, Makary M, Tersigni A, Pryor D, Hendich A, Thomas EJ, Holzmueller CG, Knight AP, Wu Y, Pronovost PJ. Teamwork in the operating room: frontline perspectives among hospitals and operating room personnel. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105 877–84.

[12]  Makary MA, Holzmueller C, Sexton B, Thompson D, Martinez E, Freischlag J, Ulatowski JA, Heitmiller ES, Rowen L, Pronovost PJ. Operating room debriefings. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2006; 32 407–10.
Operating room debriefings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Sexton J, Thomas E, Grillo S. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ): guidelines for administration. Technical Report 03–02. Houston, TX: University of Texas; 2003.

[14]  Lin FF, Foster M, Chaboyer W, Marshall A. Relocating an intensive care unit: an exploratory qualitative study. Aust Crit Care 2016; 29 55–60.
Relocating an intensive care unit: an exploratory qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Stephens T, Hunningher A, Mills H, Freeth D. An interprofessional training course in crises and human factors for perioperative teams. J Interprof Care 2016; 30 685–8.
An interprofessional training course in crises and human factors for perioperative teams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Kopelman Y, Lanzafame RJ, Kopelman D. Trends in evolving technologies in the operating room of the future. JSLS 2013; 17 171–3.
Trends in evolving technologies in the operating room of the future.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Xiao Y. Artifacts and collaborative work in healthcare: methodological, theoretical, and technological implications of the tangible. J Biomed Inform 2005; 38 26–33.
Artifacts and collaborative work in healthcare: methodological, theoretical, and technological implications of the tangible.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Taylor DL. Perioperative leadership: managing change with insights, priorities, and tools. AORN J. 2014; 100 8–29.
Perioperative leadership: managing change with insights, priorities, and tools.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J, Silber JH. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA 2002; 288 1987–93.
Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Li Y, Jones CB. A literature review of nursing turnover costs. J Nurs Manag 2013; 21 405–18.
A literature review of nursing turnover costs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Shaw J. Turnover rates and organizational performance: review, critique, and research agenda. Organ Psychol Rev 2011; 1 187–213.
Turnover rates and organizational performance: review, critique, and research agenda.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Bezemer J, Korkiakangas T, Weldon SM, Kress G, Kneebone R. Unsettled teamwork: communication and learning in the operating theatres of an urban hospital. J Adv Nurs 2016; 72 361–72.
Unsettled teamwork: communication and learning in the operating theatres of an urban hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Gillespie BM, Gwinner K, Chaboyer W, Fairweather N. Team communications in surgery – creating a culture of safety. J Interprof Care 2013; 27 387–93.
Team communications in surgery – creating a culture of safety.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Coa C, Taylor H. Effects of new technology on the operating room team. In: Khalid HM, Helander MG, Yeo AW, editors. Working with computing systems. Kuala Lumpur: Damai Sciences; 2004. pp. 309–312.