Comparison of policies for recognising and responding to clinical deterioration across five Victorian health services
Julie Considine A B C H , Anastasia F. Hutchison A B D , Helen Rawson A B E , Alison M. Hutchinson A B E , Tracey Bucknall A B F , Trisha Dunning A B G , Mari Botti A B D , Maxine M. Duke A B and Maryann Street A B CA School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia.
Email: a.hutchinson@deakin.edu.au; helen.rawson@deakin.edu.au; alison.hutchinson@deakin.edu.au;
tracey.bucknall@deakin.edu.au; trisha.dunning@deakin.edu.au; mari.botti@deakin.edu.au;
maxine.duke@deakin.edu.au; maryann.street@deakin.edu.au
B Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia.
C Eastern Health, 5 Arnold Street, Box Hill, Vic. 3125, Australia.
D Epworth HealthCare, 89 Bridge Road, Richmond, Vic. 3121, Australia.
E Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Australia.
F Alfred Health, Commercial Road, Prahran, Vic. 3004, Australia.
G Barwon Health, P.O. Box 281, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia.
H Corresponding author. Email: julie.considine@deakin.edu.au
Australian Health Review 42(4) 412-419 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16265
Submitted: 18 November 2016 Accepted: 12 April 2017 Published: 25 May 2017
Abstract
Objectives The aim of the present study was to describe and compare organisational guidance documents related to recognising and responding to clinical deterioration across five health services in Victoria, Australia.
Methods Guidance documents were obtained from five health services, comprising 13 acute care hospitals, eight subacute care hospitals and approximately 5500 beds. Analysis was guided by a specific policy analysis framework and a priori themes.
Results In all, 22 guidance documents and five graphic observation and response charts were reviewed. Variation was observed in terminology, content and recommendations between the health services. Most health services’ definitions of physiological observations fulfilled national standards in terms of minimum parameters and frequency of assessment. All health services had three-tier rapid response systems (RRS) in place at both acute and subacute care sites, consisting of activation criteria and an expected response. RRS activation criteria varied between sites, with all sites requiring modifications to RRS activation criteria to be made by medical staff. All sites had processes for patient and family escalation of care.
Conclusions Current guidance documents related to the frequency of observations and escalation of care omit the vital role of nurses in these processes. Inconsistencies between health services may lead to confusion in a mobile workforce and may reduce system dependability.
What is known about the topic? Recognising and responding to clinical deterioration is a major patient safety priority. To comply with national standards, health services must have systems in place for recognising and responding to clinical deterioration.
What does this paper add? There is some variability in terminology, definitions and specifications of physiological observations and medical emergency team (MET) activation criteria between health services. Although nurses are largely responsible for physiological observations and escalation of care, they have little authority to direct frequency of observations and triggers for care escalation or tailor assessment to individual patient needs. Failure to identify nurses’ role in policy is concerning and contrary to the evidence regarding nurses and MET activations in practice.
What are the implications for practitioners? Inconsistencies in recommendations regarding physiological observations and escalation of care criteria may create patient safety issues when students and staff work across organisations or move from one organisation to another. The validity of other parameters, such as appearance, pain, skin colour and cognition, warrant further consideration as early indicators of deterioration that may be used by nurses to identify clinical deterioration earlier. A better understanding of the relationship between the sensitivity, specificity and frequency of monitoring of particular physiological observations and patient outcomes is needed to improve the predictive validity for identification of clinical deterioration.
References
[1] Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). National safety and quality health service standards . Sydney: ACSQHC; 2012. Available at: http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications/national-safety-and-quality-health-service-standards/ [verified 1 October 2016].[2] Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). National consensus statement: essential elements for recognising and responding to clinical deterioration. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2010. Available at: http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/national_consensus_statement.pdf [verified 1 August 2016].
[3] Sprogis S, Currey J, Considine J, Baldwin I, Jones D. Physiological antecedents and ward clinician responses prior to medical emergency team activation. Crit Care Resusc 2017; 19 50–6.
[4] Bingham G, Fossum M, Barratt M, Bucknall T. Clinical review criteria and medical emergency teams: evaluating a two-tier rapid response system. Crit Care Resusc 2015; 17 167–73.
[5] Jones DA, DeVita MA, Bellomo R. Rapid-response teams. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 139–46.
| Rapid-response teams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXptFGnurc%3D&md5=dc739cef1a5931275e39f3c8019fce03CAS |
[6] Lee A, Bishop G, Hillman KM, Daffurn K. The medical emergency team. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1995; 23 183–6.
| 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXot1amsrc%3D&md5=f425cde0ba20fbaeccda9be45775d319CAS |
[7] DeVita MA, Braithwaite RS, Mahidhara R, Stuart S, Foriada M, Simmons RL. Use of the medical emergency team responses to reduce hospital cardiopulmonary arrests. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13 251–4.
| Use of the medical emergency team responses to reduce hospital cardiopulmonary arrests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czos1ersw%3D%3D&md5=66e8b9dd8ff6ed64957a7f23c9ff1381CAS |
[8] Bellomo R, Goldsmith D, Uchino S, Buckmaster J, Hart GK, Opdam H, Silvester W, Doolan L, Gutteridge G. A prospective before-and-after trial of a medical emergency team. Med J Aust 2003; 179 283–7.
[9] Buist M, Moore GE, Bernard SA, Waxman BP, Anderson JN, Nguyen TV. Effects of a medical emergency team on reduction of incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrests in hospital: preliminary study. BMJ 2002; 324 387–90.
| Effects of a medical emergency team on reduction of incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrests in hospital: preliminary study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Casamento AJ, Dunlop C, Jones DA, Duke G. Improving the documentation of medical emergency team reviews. Crit Care Resusc 2008; 10 24–9.
[11] Jones DA, Dunbar NJ, Bellomo R. Clinical deterioration in hospital inpatients: the need for another paradigm shift. Med J Aust 2012; 196 97–100.
| Clinical deterioration in hospital inpatients: the need for another paradigm shift.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Considine J, Currey J. Ensuring a proactive, evidence-based, patient safety approach to patient assessment. J Clin Nurs 2015; 24 300–7.
| Ensuring a proactive, evidence-based, patient safety approach to patient assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Bellomo R, Goldsmith D, Uchino S. Prospective controlled trial of effect of medical emergency team on postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Crit Care Med 2004; 32 916–21.
| Prospective controlled trial of effect of medical emergency team on postoperative morbidity and mortality rates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Galhotra S, Scholle CC, Dew MA, Mininni NC, Clermont G, DeVita MA. Medical emergency teams: a strategy for improving patient care and nursing work environments. J Adv Nurs 2006; 55 180–7.
| Medical emergency teams: a strategy for improving patient care and nursing work environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Parr MJA, Hadfield JH, Flabouris A, Bishop G, Hillman K. The medical emergency team: 12 month analysis of reasons for activation, immediate outcome and not-for-resuscitation orders. Resuscitation 2001; 50 39–44.
| The medical emergency team: 12 month analysis of reasons for activation, immediate outcome and not-for-resuscitation orders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnnt1Ojuw%3D%3D&md5=e90e8a3519c271d0eb009d32142be9d7CAS |
[16] Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). NSQHS standards hospital accreditation workbook. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2012. Available at: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications/nsqhs-standards-hospital-accreditation-workbook-october-2012/ [verified 1 October 2016].
[17] Walt G, Gilson L. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy Plan 1994; 9 353–70.
| Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7jtVShsQ%3D%3D&md5=f7cd2ea663a3a74092a63e6e301f5a15CAS |
[18] Fossum M, Hughes L, Manias E, Bennett P, Dunning T, Hutchinson A, Considine J, Botti M, Duke MM, Bucknall T. Comparison of medication policies to guide nursing practice across seven Victorian health services. Aust Health Rev 2016; 40 526–32.
| Comparison of medication policies to guide nursing practice across seven Victorian health services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Luxford K, Lees A, editors. REACH toolkit . Sydney: Clinical Excellence Commission; 2013. Available at: http://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/quality-improvement/people-and-culture/person-centred-care/partnering-with-patients/reach [verified 4 October 2016].
[20] Clinical Excellence Commission. REACH – patient and family escalation. Sydney: NSW Health, Clinical Excellence Commission. Available at: http://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/quality-improvement/people-and-culture/person-centred-care/partnering-with-patients/pwp-reach [verified 6 October 2016].
[21] Mitchell I. Patient and carer activation. In: 12th International Conference on Rapid Response Systems and Medical Emergency Teams; 2–3 May 2016; Melbourne: Australia; 2016. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJATRKXLTfo [verified 1 May 2017].
[22] Cardona‐Morrell M, Prgomet M, Turner R, Nicholson M, Hillman K. Effectiveness of continuous or intermittent vital signs monitoring in preventing adverse events on general wards: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Clin Pract 2016; 70 806–24.
| Effectiveness of continuous or intermittent vital signs monitoring in preventing adverse events on general wards: a systematic review and meta‐analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2szmsVGgtA%3D%3D&md5=e077376ff62719f42a9dbf5774d85b99CAS |
[23] Cretikos MA, Bellomo R, Hillman K, Chen J, Finfer S, Flabouris A. Respiratory rate: the neglected vital sign. Med J Aust 2008; 188 657–9.
[24] Bleyer AJ, Vidya S, Russell GB, Jones CM, Sujata L, Daeihagh P, Hire D. Longitudinal analysis of one million vital signs in patients in an academic medical center. Resuscitation 2011; 82 1387–92.
| Longitudinal analysis of one million vital signs in patients in an academic medical center.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[25] Goldhill DR, McNarry AF. Physiological abnormalities in early warning scores are related to mortality in adult inpatients. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92 882–4.
| Physiological abnormalities in early warning scores are related to mortality in adult inpatients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3otFOiuw%3D%3D&md5=9e2c6fdcf19150fdf2ac6563dd4f00f6CAS |
[26] Buist M, Bernard S, Nguyen TV, Moore G, Anderson J. Association between clinically abnormal observations and subsequent in-hospital mortality: a prospective study Resuscitation 2004; 62 137–41.
| Association between clinically abnormal observations and subsequent in-hospital mortality: a prospective studyCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Santiano N, Young L, Hillman K, Parr M, Jayasinghe S, Baramy LS, Stevenson J, Heath T, Chan C, Claire M, Hanger G. Analysis of medical emergency team calls comparing subjective to ‘objective’ call criteria. Resuscitation 2009; 80 44–9.
| Analysis of medical emergency team calls comparing subjective to ‘objective’ call criteria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] Douw G, van Zanten AR, van der Hoeven JG, Schoonhoven L. Nurses’ ‘worry’ as predictor of deteriorating surgical ward patients: a prospective cohort study of the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score. Int J Nurs Stud 2016; 59 134–40.
| Nurses’ ‘worry’ as predictor of deteriorating surgical ward patients: a prospective cohort study of the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-Score.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Gill FJ, Leslie GD, Marshall AP. Family initiated escalation of care for the deteriorating patient in hospital: family centred care or just ‘box ticking’. Aust Crit Care 2016; 29 195–200.
| Family initiated escalation of care for the deteriorating patient in hospital: family centred care or just ‘box ticking’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
