Clinicians’ perceptions of decision making regarding discharge from public hospitals to in-patient rehabilitation following trauma
Lara A. Kimmel A B J , Anne E. Holland C , Natasha Lannin C , Elton R. Edwards A D , Richard S. Page E F , Andrew Bucknill G H , Raphael Hau I and Belinda J. Gabbe AA Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Vic. 3004, Australia. Email: ere@bigpond.net.au; belinda.gabbe@monash.edu
B Department of Physiotherapy, The Alfred, Commercial Road, Prahran, Vic. 3181, Australia.
C School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Vic. 3086, Australia. Email: A.holland@latrobe.edu.au; N.lannin@latrobe.edu.au
D Department of Orthopaedics, The Alfred, Commercial Road, Prahran, Vic. 3181, Australia.
E Department of Orthopaedics, Barwon Health and St John of God, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia. Email: richardpage@geelongortho.com.au
F School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia.
G Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic. 3050, Australia. Email: a.bucknill@mh.org.au
H Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3050, Australia.
I Department of Orthopaedics, Northern Hospital, Epping, Vic. 3076, Australia. Email: raphael.hau@hotmail.com
J Corresponding author. Email: L.kimmel@alfred.org.au
Australian Health Review 41(2) 192-200 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16031
Submitted: 5 December 2015 Accepted: 23 March 2016 Published: 5 May 2016
Abstract
Objective The aim of the present study was to investigate the perceptions of consultant surgeons, allied health clinicians and rehabilitation consultants regarding discharge destination decision making from the acute hospital following trauma.
Methods A qualitative study was performed using individual in-depth interviews of clinicians in Victoria (Australia) between April 2013 and September 2014. Thematic analysis was used to derive important themes. Case studies provided quantitative information to enhance the information gained via interviews.
Results Thirteen rehabilitation consultants, eight consultant surgeons and 13 allied health clinicians were interviewed. Key themes that emerged included the importance of financial considerations as drivers of decision making and the perceived lack of involvement of medical staff in decisions regarding discharge destination following trauma. Other themes included the lack of consistency of factors thought to be important drivers of discharge and the difficulty in acting on trauma patients’ requests in terms of discharge destination. Importantly, as the complexity of the patient increases in terms of acquired brain injury, the options for rehabilitation become scarcer.
Conclusions The information gained in the present study highlights the large variation in discharge practises between and within clinical groups. Further consultation with stakeholders involved in the care of trauma patients, as well as government bodies involved in hospital funding, is needed to derive a more consistent approach to discharge destination decision making.
What is known about the topic? Little is known about the drivers for referral to, or acceptance at, in-patient rehabilitation following acute hospital care for traumatic injury in Victoria, Australia, including who makes these decisions of behalf of patients and how these decisions are made.
What does this paper add? This paper provides information regarding the perceptions of acute hospital consultant surgeons and allied health, as well as rehabilitation clinicians, in terms of discharge destination decision making from the acute hospital following trauma. The use of case studies further highlights differences between, and within, these specialities with regard to this decision making. This research also highlights the importance of financial considerations as drivers of decision making, and the lack of consistency of the factors thought to be important drivers of discharge between these different clinical groupings.
What are the implications for practitioners? This research shows that financial factors are significant drivers of discharge destination decision making for trauma patients. The present study highlights opportunities to engage with stakeholders (acute care, rehabilitation, administration, government and patients) to develop more consistent discharge processes that optimise the use of rehabilitation resources for those patients who could benefit from in-patient rehabilitation.
References
[1] Williamson OD, Epi GD, Gabbe BJ, Physio B, Cameron PA, Edwards ER, Richardson MD, Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcome Registry Project Group Predictors of moderate or severe pain 6 months after orthopaedic injury: a prospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23 139–44.| Predictors of moderate or severe pain 6 months after orthopaedic injury: a prospective cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19169107PubMed |
[2] Holtslag HR, Post MW, Lindeman E, Van der Werken C. Long-term functional health status of severely injured patients. Injury 2007; 38 280–9.
| Long-term functional health status of severely injured patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s7gslyiuw%3D%3D&md5=db46b4036d9663783b45577ec391eb8bCAS | 17250834PubMed |
[3] Holbrook TL, Anderson JP, Sieber WJ, Browner D, Hoyt DB. Outcome after major trauma: 12-month and 18-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. J Trauma 1999; 46 765–73.
| Outcome after major trauma: 12-month and 18-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3mvVOitg%3D%3D&md5=0aa5b8312929334eb20fe35030cb346dCAS | 10338392PubMed |
[4] Jourdan C, Bayen E, Bosserelle V, Azerad S, Genet F, Fermanian C, Aegerter P, Pradat-Diehl P, Weiss J-J, Azouvi P. Referral to rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: results from the PariS-TBI Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; 27 35–44.
| Referral to rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: results from the PariS-TBI Study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22460612PubMed |
[5] Wrigley JM, Yoels WC, Webb CR, Fine PR. Social and physical factors in the referral of people with traumatic brain injuries to rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75 149–55.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7ksFejuw%3D%3D&md5=3ba5452479bc0db147da2e876723e1bdCAS | 8311670PubMed |
[6] Australian Trauma Registry. Available at: http://ntri.org.au/img/aust-trauma-registry-inaugural-report.pdf [verified 11 January 2006].
[7] Curtis K, Lam M, Mitchell R, Black D, Taylor C, Dickson C, Jan S, Palmer CS, Langcake M, Myburgh J. Acute costs and predictors of higher treatment costs of trauma in New South Wales, Australia. Injury 2014; 45 279–84.
| Acute costs and predictors of higher treatment costs of trauma in New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23092784PubMed |
[8] Khan F, Amatya B, Hoffman K. Systematic review of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with multiple trauma. Br J Surg 2012; 99 88–96.
| Systematic review of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with multiple trauma.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22441861PubMed |
[9] Foster M, Tilse C. Referral to rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: a model for understanding inequities in access. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56 2201–10.
| Referral to rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: a model for understanding inequities in access.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12697208PubMed |
[10] Unsworth CA. Selection for rehabilitation: acute care discharge patterns for stroke and orthopaedic patients. Int J Rehabil Res 2001; 24 103–14.
| Selection for rehabilitation: acute care discharge patterns for stroke and orthopaedic patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzmtFSitw%3D%3D&md5=3928f7263c50060add319e0cde369ce5CAS | 11421386PubMed |
[11] Foster M, Tilse C, Fleming J. Referral to rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: practitioners and the process of decision-making. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59 1867–78.
| Referral to rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: practitioners and the process of decision-making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15312921PubMed |
[12] Levack WM, Kayes NM, Fadyl JK. Experience of recovery and outcome following traumatic brain injury: a metasynthesis of qualitative research. Disabil Rehabil 2010; 32 986–99.
| Experience of recovery and outcome following traumatic brain injury: a metasynthesis of qualitative research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20450406PubMed |
[13] Poulos CJ, Eagar K. Determining appropriateness for rehabilitation or other subacute care: is there a role for utilisation review? Aust New Zealand Health Policy 2007; 4 3
| Determining appropriateness for rehabilitation or other subacute care: is there a role for utilisation review?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17352832PubMed |
[14] Kimmel LA, Holland AE, Edwards ER, Cameron PA, De Steiger R, Page RS, Gabbe B. Discharge destination following lower limb fracture: development of a prediction model to assist with decision making. Injury 2012; 43 829–34.
| Discharge destination following lower limb fracture: development of a prediction model to assist with decision making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22077990PubMed |
[15] Australian Government. Australia’s hospitals 2013–14: at a glance. Canberra: AIHW; 2015. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129551440 [verified 11 January 2016].
[16] Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.
[17] Pope CM, Qualitative N. Research in health care. 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2006.
[18] Australian Government Department of Health. Guidelines for recognition of private hospital-based rehabilitation services (the guidelines). 2013 Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-phicirculars2013-32a [verified 21 January 2016].
[19] Beckett K, Earthy S, Sleney J, Barnes J, Kellezi B, Barker M, Clarkson J, Coffey F, Elder G, Kendrick D, The Impact of Injuries Study Group Providing effective trauma care: the potential for service provider views to enhance the quality of care (qualitative study nested within a multicentre longitudinal quantitative study). BMJ Open 2014; 4 e005668
| Providing effective trauma care: the potential for service provider views to enhance the quality of care (qualitative study nested within a multicentre longitudinal quantitative study).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25005598PubMed |
[20] Duckett SJ. Casemix funding for acute hospital inpatient services in Australia. Med J Aust 1998; 169 S17–21.
| 9830405PubMed |
[21] SA Health. South Australia Statewide Rehabilitation Service Plan 2009–2017. Available at: http://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/97db9d0042632bfebce5beb44d317729/serviceplan09-17-clinicalnetworks-sahealth-0911.443pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=97db9d0042632bfebce5beb44d317729.
[22] Mitus AJ. Mitus AJ. The birth of InterQual: evidence-based decision support criteria that helped change healthcare. Prof Case Manag 2008; 13 228–33.
| Mitus AJ. The birth of InterQual: evidence-based decision support criteria that helped change healthcare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18636008PubMed |
[23] Kimmel LA, Holland AE, Simpson PM, Edwards ER, Gabbe BJ. Validating a simple discharge planning tool following hospital admission for an isolated lower limb fracture. Phys Ther 2014; 94 1005–13.
| Validating a simple discharge planning tool following hospital admission for an isolated lower limb fracture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24742705PubMed |
[24] Niemeijer GC, Trip A, Ahaus KT, Does RJ, Wendt KW. Quality in trauma care: improving the discharge procedure of patients by means of Lean Six Sigma. J Trauma 2010; 69 614–19.
| Quality in trauma care: improving the discharge procedure of patients by means of Lean Six Sigma.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20838134PubMed |
[25] Australian Government. Development of nationally consistent subacute and non-acute admitted patient care data definitions and guidelines. 2013. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArrea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129543218 [verified 11 January 2016].
[26] Victorian Government. Fees and charges for acute health services in Victoria. 2016. Available at: http://health.vic.gov.au/feesman/fees5.htm#Acute_admitted_patients [verified 4 April 2016].
[27] Australian Bureau of Statistics. Health care delivery and financing. 2012 [updated 11 November 2015]. Available at: www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/1301.0~2012~Main%20Features~Health%20care%20delivery%20and%20financing~235 [verified 11 January 2016].
[28] Brody BA. Justice in the allocation of public resources to disabled citizens. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69 333–6.
| 1:STN:280:DyaL1c3gvVOgsQ%3D%3D&md5=c6293c5399a46948ac860fbe2dfd6254CAS | 2966618PubMed |
[29] Nirula R, Nirula G, Gentilello LM. Inequity of rehabilitation services after traumatic injury. J Trauma 2009; 66 255–9.
| Inequity of rehabilitation services after traumatic injury.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19131836PubMed |
[30] Gabbe BJ, Sleney JS, Gosling CM, Wilson K, Hart MJ, Sutherland AM, Christie N. Patient perspectives of care in a regionalised trauma system: lessons from the Victorian State Trauma System. Med J Aust 2013; 198 149–52.
| Patient perspectives of care in a regionalised trauma system: lessons from the Victorian State Trauma System.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23418695PubMed |
[31] Ta’eed G, Skilbeck CE, Slatyer M. Which factors determine who is referred for community rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury? Brain Impair 2013; 14 222–34.
| Which factors determine who is referred for community rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Tobis JS, Puri KB, Sheridan J. Rehabilitation of the severely brain-injured patient. Scand J Rehabil Med 1982; 14 83–8.
| 1:STN:280:DyaL383kvFKqtg%3D%3D&md5=1b119a13ac746a9ab301982712df2c77CAS | 7100833PubMed |
[33] Tuel SM, Presty SK, Meythaler JM, Heinemann AW, Katz RT. Functional improvement in severe head injury after readmission for rehabilitation. Brain Inj 1992; 6 363–72.
| Functional improvement in severe head injury after readmission for rehabilitation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK38zks1ajtA%3D%3D&md5=fb6f45a036e60059689dac583a939bb7CAS | 1638270PubMed |
