Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Continuity of care in the post partum period: general practitioner experiences with communication

Wendy E. Brodribb A B , Benjamin L. Mitchell A and Mieke L. Van Driel A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Discipline of General Practice, The University of Queensland, Level 8, Health Sciences Building, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, Qld 4029, Australia. Email: b.mitchell@uq.edu.au; m.vandriel@uq.edu.au

B Corresponding author. Email: w.brodribb@uq.edu.au

Australian Health Review 40(5) 484-489 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15144
Submitted: 5 August 2015  Accepted: 6 November 2015   Published: 18 December 2015

Abstract

Objectives Informational and management continuity of care assists in providing a seamless transition for women and infants from tertiary or secondary to primary care during the post partum period. Few studies have evaluated the interaction between different aspects of the health system following a woman’s discharge from hospital after the birth of her infant. The present study describes how general practitioners (GPs) experience communications with hospitals and other post partum care providers relevant to continuity of care.

Methods In the present cross-sectional study, a 52-item questionnaire adapted from a previously used survey was mailed to 932 GPs in southern Queensland, Australia, between February and July 2013. Questionnaire items included participant demographics, the timeliness and usability of discharge summaries, communication with other post partum care providers and consultation practices.

Results The response rate was 17.4%. Nearly one-quarter of participants never or rarely received a hospital discharge summary in a timely manner and most considered the summaries somewhat useful. Few GPs (14.3%) had contact with or received information from domiciliary midwives who conducted post partum home visits. A higher proportion (38%) had some communication with a Child and Family Health nurse in the month before the survey.

Conclusions Information flow from hospital to general practice and between other post partum care providers is less than ideal and may affect ongoing care for mothers and infants, especially those at risk. Knowledge exchange between healthcare services and initiatives to improve information sharing needs to be developed and implemented.

What is already known on this topic? Transitions from tertiary or secondary care to primary care and between primary care providers are often times of vulnerability for patients, including women and infants in the post partum period. There is little information documenting communications between different maternity services and GPs that facilitate ongoing care.

What does this paper add? There are significant gaps in the exchange of information about post partum women and infants from hospitals to GPs and a lack of communication between GPs and other post partum care providers, such as domiciliary midwives and Child and Family Health nurses.

What are the implications for practitioners? Improvements in the timeliness, presentation and content of hospital discharge summaries, as well as enhancing channels of communication, collaboration, cooperation and information sharing between providers of community post partum care, are necessary if mothers are to receive the best care possible.

Additional keywords: general practice, postnatal, primary care.


References

[1]  Shin DW, Cho J, Yang HK, Park JJ, Lee H, Kim H, Oh J, Hwang S, Cho B, Guallar E. Impact of continuity of care on mortality and health care costs: a nationwide cohort study in Korea. Ann Fam Med 2014; 12 534–41.
Impact of continuity of care on mortality and health care costs: a nationwide cohort study in Korea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25384815PubMed |

[2]  Hansen AH, Halvorsen PA, Aaraas IJ, Førde OH. Continuity of GP care is related to reduced specialist healthcare use: a cross-sectional survey. Br J Gen Pract 2013; 63 482–9.
Continuity of GP care is related to reduced specialist healthcare use: a cross-sectional survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23834885PubMed |

[3]  Leleu H, Minvielle E. Relationship between longitudinal continuity of primay care and likelihood of death: analysis of national insurance data. PLoS One 2013; 8 e71669
Relationship between longitudinal continuity of primay care and likelihood of death: analysis of national insurance data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtlKls7jI&md5=4393411c5eeb6c2e1762f1ec9b143b96CAS | 23990970PubMed |

[4]  Salisbury C, Sampson F, Ridd M, Montgomery AA. How should continuity of care in primary health care be assessed? Br J Gen Pract 2009; 59 e134–41.
How should continuity of care in primary health care be assessed?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19341548PubMed |

[5]  Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Standards of general practice. 4th edn. Melbourne: Royal Australian College of General Practitioners; 2013.

[6]  Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003; 327 1219–21.
Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14630762PubMed |

[7]  Abrashkin KA, Cho HJ, Torgalkar S, Markoff B. Improving transitions of care from hospital to home: what works? Mt Sinai J Med 2012; 79 535–44.
Improving transitions of care from hospital to home: what works?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22976359PubMed |

[8]  Sandall J, Soltani H, Gate S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus othermodels of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 8 CD004667
| 23963739PubMed |

[9]  Prosser S, Miller Y, Armanasco A, Hennegan J, Porter J, Thompson R. Findings from the Having a Baby in Queensland Survey. Brisbane: Queensland Centre for Mothers & Babies, The University of Queensland; 2012.

[10]  Zadoroznyj M, Brodribb W, Falconer L, Pearce L, Northam C, Kruske S. A qualitative study of pharmacy nurse providers of community based post-birth care in Queensland, Australia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13 144
A qualitative study of pharmacy nurse providers of community based post-birth care in Queensland, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23837569PubMed |

[11]  Psaila K, Schmied V, Fowler C, Kruske S. Discontinuities between maternity and child and family health services: health professional’s perceptions. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14 4
Discontinuities between maternity and child and family health services: health professional’s perceptions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24387686PubMed |

[12]  Homer CSE, Henry K, Schmied V, Kemp L, Leap N, Briggs C. ‘It looks good on paper’: transitions of care between midwives and child and family health nurses in New South Wales. Women Birth 2009; 22 64–72.
‘It looks good on paper’: transitions of care between midwives and child and family health nurses in New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Schmied V, Homer C, Fowler C, Psaila K, Barclay L, Wilson I, Kemp L, Fasher M, Kruske S. Implementing a national approach to universal child and family health services in Australia: professionals’ views of the challenges and opportunities. Health Soc Care Community 2015; 23 159–70.
Implementing a national approach to universal child and family health services in Australia: professionals’ views of the challenges and opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25440982PubMed |

[14]  Fenwick J, Butt J, Dhaliwal S, Hauck Y, Schmied V. Western Australian women’s perceptions of the style and quality of midwifery postnatal care in hospital and at home. Women Birth 2010; 23 10–21.
Western Australian women’s perceptions of the style and quality of midwifery postnatal care in hospital and at home.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19632912PubMed |

[15]  Rowe J, Barnes M, Sutherns S. Supporting maternal transition: continuity, coaching and control. J Perinat Educ 2013; 22 145–55.
Supporting maternal transition: continuity, coaching and control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24868126PubMed |

[16]  Brodribb WE, Zadoroznyj M, Dane AC. The views of mothers and GPs about postpartum care in Australian general practice. BMC Fam Pract 2013; 14 139
The views of mothers and GPs about postpartum care in Australian general practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Mbwili-Muleya C, Gunn J, Jenkins M. General practitioners: their contact with maternal and child health nurses in postnatal care. J Paediatr Child Health 2000; 36 159–63.
General practitioners: their contact with maternal and child health nurses in postnatal care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3itl2qsw%3D%3D&md5=c5066783f988e041938586405bdefbb5CAS | 10760015PubMed |

[18]  Gunn J. The role of the general practitioner in postnatal care: an early intervention study. PhD Thesis, The University of Melbourne; 1997.

[19]  Department of Health. GP workforce statistics 1984–85 to 2011–12. Canberra: Department of Health; 2012. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/General+Practice+Statistics-1 [verified 7 November 2013].

[20]  Hopcroft D, Calvelry J. What primary care wants from hospital electronic discharge summaries: a North/West Auckland perspective. NZ Fam Phys 2008; 35 101–6.

[21]  Russell P, Hewage U, Thompson C. Method for improving the quality of discharge summaries written by a general medical team. Intern Med 2014; 44 298–301.
Method for improving the quality of discharge summaries written by a general medical team.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2crjtVyquw%3D%3D&md5=cbe055c94a89c4bd7b2820a3b2605a40CAS |

[22]  Brodribb WE, Mitchell BL, van Driel ML. Postpartum consultations in Australian general practice. Aust J Primary Health 2015;
Postpartum consultations in Australian general practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Belleli E, Naccarella L, Pirotta MV. Communication at the interface between hospitals and primary care. Aust Fam Physician 2013; 42 886–90.
| 24324993PubMed |

[24]  Psaila K, Kruske S, Fowler C, Homer C, Schmied V. Smoothing out the transition of care between maternity and child and family health services: perspectives of child and family health nurses and midwives’. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14 151
Smoothing out the transition of care between maternity and child and family health services: perspectives of child and family health nurses and midwives’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24766674PubMed |

[25]  Jenkinson B, Young K, Kruske S. Maternity services and the discharge process: a review of practice in Queensland. Women Birth 2014; 27 114–20.
Maternity services and the discharge process: a review of practice in Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24373729PubMed |

[26]  Schmied V, Fowler C, Rossiter C, Homer C, Kruske S. Nature and frequency of services provided by child and family health nurses in Australia: results of a national survey. Aust Health Rev 2014; 38 177–85.
| 24589385PubMed |

[27]  Paul SP, Gupta R. Greater co-operation between GPs and health visitors is needed for a successful child health surveillance programme. J Fam Health Care 2011; 21 21
| 22432385PubMed |

[28]  Parkinson A, Jorm L, Douglas KA, Gee A, Sargent GM, Lujic S, McRae IS. Recruiting general practitioners for surveys: reflections on the difficulties and some lessons learned Aust J Primary Health 2015; 21 254–8.
Recruiting general practitioners for surveys: reflections on the difficulties and some lessons learnedCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |