Trends and disparities in sepsis hospitalisations in Victoria, Australia
Timothy Ore
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
Department of Health and Human Services, Level 20, 50 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia. Email: timothy.ore@dhhs.vic.gov.au
Australian Health Review 40(5) 511-518 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15106
Submitted: 10 June 2015 Accepted: 12 October 2015 Published: 14 December 2015
Abstract
Objective The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with sepsis admitted to hospitals in Victoria, Australia, during the period 2004–14. The data include incidence, severity and mortality.
Methods In all, 44 222 sepsis hospitalisations were identified between 2004–05 and 2013–14 from the Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset. The dataset contains clinical and demographic information on all admissions to acute public and private hospitals. Using the International Classification of Diseases (10th Revision) Australian Modification codes, incidence rates, severity of disease and mortality were calculated.
Results Sepsis hospitalisation rates per 10 000 population increased significantly (P < 0.01) over the period, from 6.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.6–7.8) to 10.0 (95% CI 9.1–11.1), an annual growth rate of 3.8%. The age-standardised in-hospital death rates per 100 000 population grew significantly (P < 0.01) from 9.2 (95% CI 7.8–10.4) in 2004–05 to 13.0 (95% CI 11.7–14.6) in 2013–14, an annual growth rate of 3.1%. Among people under 45 years of age, the 0–4 years age group had the highest hospitalisation rate (3.0 per 10 000 population; 95% CI 2.7–3.4). Nearly half (46.2%) of all sepsis hospitalisations were among patients born overseas, with a rate of 14.5 per 10 000 population (95% CI 12.4–16.2) in that group compared with a rate of 5.9 per 10 000 population (95% CI 5.3–6.7) for patients born in Australia. The age-standardised sepsis hospitalisation rate was 2.6-fold greater in the lowest compared with highest socioeconomic areas (12.7 per 10 000 population (95% CI 11.2–13.8) vs 4.8 per 10 000 population (95% CI 4.1–5.7), respectively).
Conclusion This paper shows a significant upward trend in both sepsis separation rates and in-hospital death rates over the period; unlike sepsis, in-hospital death rates from all diagnoses fell over the same period. The results can be used to stimulate review of clinical practice. Greater understanding of the epidemiology of sepsis could improve care quality and outcomes.
What is known about the topic? Sepsis is associated with high mortality rates and severe sepsis is the most common cause of death in intensive care units (ICU). The last published study of sepsis in Victoria (in 2005) showed a gradual rise in rates; since then, there is little information as to whether there has been any significant improvement in treatment outcomes.
What does this paper add? This paper provides new information by analysing trends and variations in sepsis hospitalisations in Victoria by several demographic groups from 2004–05 to 2013–14.
What are the implications for practitioners? Patients with severe sepsis consume approximately half the ICU resources. Reliable and recent data on the growth of this disease are important for prevention, allocation of resources and to track the effectiveness of care. A key area for intervention is promoting greater adherence to clinical guidelines.
References
[1] Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 840–51.| Severe sepsis and septic shock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtlyis7fF&md5=ebb4203cfb3b7dcc3b3fadee9be8db6eCAS | 23984731PubMed |
[2] Majno G. The ancient riddle of sigma eta psi iota sigma (sepsis). J Infect Dis 1991; 163 937–45.
| The ancient riddle of sigma eta psi iota sigma (sepsis).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3M3htVGqsA%3D%3D&md5=f4a5d3d6ded33fa43fbd7b38be423cd8CAS | 2019770PubMed |
[3] Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet 2010; 376 1339–46.
| Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20934212PubMed |
[4] Oza S, Lawn JE, Hogan DR, Mathers C, Cousens SN. Neonatal cause-of-death estimates for the early and late neonatal periods for 194 countries: 2000–13. Bull World Health Organ 2015; 93 19–28.
| Neonatal cause-of-death estimates for the early and late neonatal periods for 194 countries: 2000–13.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25558104PubMed |
[5] Rivers EP, Ahrens T. Improving outcomes for severe sepsis and septic shock: tools for early identification of at-risk patients and treatment protocol implementation. Crit Care Clin 2008; 24 1–47.
| Improving outcomes for severe sepsis and septic shock: tools for early identification of at-risk patients and treatment protocol implementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] McBean M, Rajamani S. Increasing rates of hospitalisation due to septicaemia in the US elderly population, 1986–1997. J Infect Dis 2001; 183 596–603.
| Increasing rates of hospitalisation due to septicaemia in the US elderly population, 1986–1997.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7lslKnuw%3D%3D&md5=c6dfd395ed28e159adba0d0f4f51d5a5CAS | 11170985PubMed |
[7] Melamed A, Sorvillo FJ. The burden of sepsis-associated mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2005: an analysis of multiple-cause-of-death data. Crit Care 2009; 13 R28
| The burden of sepsis-associated mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2005: an analysis of multiple-cause-of-death data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19250547PubMed |
[8] Lagu T, Rothberg MB, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, Steingrab JS, Lindenauer PK. Hospitalisations, costs and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007. Crit Care Med 2012; 40 754–61.
| 21963582PubMed |
[9] Bochud PY, Calandra T. Pathogenesis of sepsis: new concepts and implications for future treatment. BMJ 2003; 326 262–6.
| Pathogenesis of sepsis: new concepts and implications for future treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhslKks70%3D&md5=0f9c5e22f0580d82223cbbe394721eccCAS | 12560281PubMed |
[10] Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, Geriach H, Moreno R, Carlet J, Le Gall JR, Payen D, Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients Investigators Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 2006; 34 344–53.
| Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16424713PubMed |
[11] Husak L, Marcuzzi A, Herring J, Weng E, Yin L, Capan DD, Cernat G. National analysis of sepsis hospitalisations and factors contributing to sepsis in-hospital mortality in Canada. Healthc Q 2010; 13 35–41.
| National analysis of sepsis hospitalisations and factors contributing to sepsis in-hospital mortality in Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20959728PubMed |
[12] Johnson S, Bonello MR, Li Z, Hilder L, Sullivan EA. Maternal deaths in Australia 2006–2010. Maternal Death Series No. 4. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2014.
[13] Han Y, Carcillo J, Dragotta M, Bills DM, Watson RS, Westerman ME, Orr RA. Early reversal of paediatric-neonatal septic shock by community physicians is associated with improved outcomes. Paediatrics 2003; 112 793–9.
| Early reversal of paediatric-neonatal septic shock by community physicians is associated with improved outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Schlaphach LJ, Aebischer M, Adams M, Natalucci G, Bonhoeffer J, Latzin P, Nette M, Bucher HU, Latal B, Swiss Neonatal Network and Follow-Up Group Impact of sepsis on neurodevelopmental outcome in a Swiss National Cohort of extremely premature infants. Paediatrics 2011; 128 e348–57.
| Impact of sepsis on neurodevelopmental outcome in a Swiss National Cohort of extremely premature infants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, Lemons JA, Donovan EF, Stark AR, Tyson JE, Oh W, Bauer CR, Korons SB, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Stevenson DK, Papile LA, Poole WK. Late onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Paediatrics 2002; 110 285–91.
| Late onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, Lemons JA, Donovan EF, Stark AR, Tyson JE, Oh W, Bauer CR, Korons SB, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Stevenson DK, Papile LA, Poole WK. Changes in pathogens causing early-onset sepsis in very low birth weight infants. N Engl J Med 2002; 347 240–7.
| Changes in pathogens causing early-onset sepsis in very low birth weight infants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12140299PubMed |
[17] Chassin MR, Loeb JM, Schmaltz SP, Wachter RM. Accountability measures: using measurements to promote quality improvement. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 683–8.
| Accountability measures: using measurements to promote quality improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtVaktbvM&md5=cacee1da23554fec419dda6493da7ae7CAS | 20573915PubMed |
[18] Cooke CR, Iwashyna TJ. Improving inpatient care while advancing quality of improvement. JAMA 2014; 312 1397–8.
| Improving inpatient care while advancing quality of improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhvV2ksLjJ&md5=326a2523636669cb3cc3912c3f41e521CAS | 25291572PubMed |
[19] Sundararajan V, MacIsaac CM, Presnell JJ, Cade JF, Visvanathan K. Epidemiology of sepsis in Victoria, Australia. Crit Care Med 2005; 33 71–80.
| Epidemiology of sepsis in Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15644651PubMed |
[20] Dombrovskiy VY, Martin AA, Sunderram J, Paz HL. Rapid increase in hospitalisation and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: a trend analysis from 1993 to 2003. Crit Care Med 2007; 35 1244–50.
| Rapid increase in hospitalisation and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: a trend analysis from 1993 to 2003.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17414736PubMed |
[21] Elixhauser A, Friedman B, Stranges E. Septicemia in US hospitals, 2009. Statistical brief. No.122. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011.
[22] Evans TW, Smithies M. Organ dysfunction. BMJ 1999; 318 1606
| Organ dysfunction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3pt1KnsQ%3D%3D&md5=28d7749cb85d3dca78031faf14fe96c9CAS | 10364125PubMed |
[23] Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, Langa KM. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. JAMA 2010; 304 1787–94.
| Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtlKitLnN&md5=55a32871409b80eb144ef7f109841638CAS | 20978258PubMed |
[24] Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 to 2000. N Engl J Med 2003; 348 1546–54.
| The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 to 2000.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12700374PubMed |
[25] Acosta CD, Kurinczuk JJ, Lucas DN, Tuffnell DJ, Sellers S, Knight M, United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System Severe maternal sepsis in the UK, 2011–2012: a national case-control study. PLoS Med 2014; 11 e1001672
| Severe maternal sepsis in the UK, 2011–2012: a national case-control study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25003759PubMed |
[26] Siegel JS, Swanson DA, editors. The methods and materials of demography, 2nd edn. Boston: Elsevier; 2004.
[27] Wang HE, Devereaux RS, Yealy DM, Safford MM, Howard G. National variation in United States sepsis mortality: a descriptive study. Int J Health Geogr 2010; 9 9
| National variation in United States sepsis mortality: a descriptive study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20156361PubMed |
[28] Howard VJ, Cushman M, Pulley L, Gomez CR, Go RC, Prineas RJ, Graham A, Moy CS, Graham G. The reasons for geographic and racial differences in stoke study: objectives and design. Neuroepidemiology 2005; 25 135–43.
| The reasons for geographic and racial differences in stoke study: objectives and design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15990444PubMed |
[29] Perry HM, Roccella EJ. Conference report on stroke mortality in the South Eastern United States. Hypertension 1998; 31 1206–15.
| Conference report on stroke mortality in the South Eastern United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3otlCmsg%3D%3D&md5=eb6f3a7723b56a508d7e4a5006f519b5CAS | 9622131PubMed |
[30] Howard G. Why do we have a stroke belt in the south eastern United States? A review of unlikely and uninvestigated potential causes. Am J Med Sci 1999; 317 160–7.
| Why do we have a stroke belt in the south eastern United States? A review of unlikely and uninvestigated potential causes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7pvVOrug%3D%3D&md5=8d88458eab51d9e68e30754db0e2c766CAS | 10100689PubMed |
[31] Howard G, Evans GW, Pearce K, Howard VJ, Bell RA, Mayer EJ, Burke GL. Is the stroke belt disappearing? An analysis of racial, temporal, and age effects. Stroke 1995; 26 1153–8.
| Is the stroke belt disappearing? An analysis of racial, temporal, and age effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzivVSqtQ%3D%3D&md5=5d75baa0b19eb90c14bfd712eb33febeCAS | 7604406PubMed |
[32] Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 2001; 29 1303–10.
| Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome and associated costs of care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvgs12gtg%3D%3D&md5=5f459099d1df96330635f45882e7544bCAS | 11445675PubMed |
[33] Wichmann MW, Inthorn D, Andress HJ, Schildberg FW. Incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in surgical intensive care patients: the influence of patient gender on disease process and outcome. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26 167–72.
| Incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in surgical intensive care patients: the influence of patient gender on disease process and outcome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ksVyqsg%3D%3D&md5=bcadba4791928dccf9be56d72eed04f5CAS | 10784304PubMed |
[34] Dombbrovskiy VY, Martin AA, Sunderram J, Paz HL. Facing the challenge: decreasing case fatality rates in severe sepsis despite increasing hospitalisation. Crit Care Med 2005; 33 2555–62.
| Facing the challenge: decreasing case fatality rates in severe sepsis despite increasing hospitalisation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[35] Esper AM, Moss M, Lewis CA, Nisbet R, Mannino DM, Martin GS. The role of infection and comorbidity: factors that influence disparities in sepsis. Crit Care Med 2006; 34 2576–82.
| The role of infection and comorbidity: factors that influence disparities in sepsis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16915108PubMed |
[36] Davis JS, Cheng AC, McMillan M, Humphrey AB, Stephens DP, Anstey NM. Sepsis in the tropical Top End of Australia’s Northern Territory: disease burden and impact on Indigenous Australians. Med J Aust 2011; 194 519–24.
| 21644899PubMed |
[37] Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. JAMA 2014; 311 1308–16.
| Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXmtVaqsL0%3D&md5=dd361f481e5d20b41e88d53df7d3b784CAS | 24638143PubMed |
[38] Shahin J, Harrison DA, Rowan KM. Relation between volume and outcome for patients with severe sepsis in United Kingdom: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2012; 344 e3394
| Relation between volume and outcome for patients with severe sepsis in United Kingdom: retrospective cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22645208PubMed |
[39] Levy MM, Dellinger RP, Townsend SR, Lindie-Zwirbie WT, Marshall JC, Bion J, Schorr C, Artigas SA, Ramsay G, Beale R, Parker MM, Gerlach H, Reinhark K, Silva E, Harvey M, Regan S, Angus DC. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 2010; 38 367–74.
| The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20035219PubMed |
[40] Carlhed R, Bojestig M, Wallentin L, Lindstrom G, Peterson A, Aberg C, Lindahl B, QUICC Study Group. Improved adherence to Swedish national guidelines for acute myocardial infarction: the Quality Improvement in Coronary Care (QUICC) study. Am Heart J 2006; 152 1175–81.
| 17161072PubMed |
[41] Oertle M, Baj R. Understanding non-adherence in chronic heart failure: a mixed-method case study. Qua Saf Health Care 2010; 19 e37
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M%2FhslKgug%3D%3D&md5=36d4e64f6bf0c5d15c78ba6d2bc340a1CAS |
[42] Dambrava PG, Torres A, Valles X, Mensa J, Marcos MA, Penarroja G, Camps M, Estruch R, Sanchez M, Menendez R, Niederman MS. Adherence to guidelines’ empirical antibiotic recommendations and community-acquired pneumonia outcome. Eur Respir J 2008; 32 892–901.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cnjsVCnsw%3D%3D&md5=9b3b39f74450f8f0aa81b28ccd7134dfCAS | 18550608PubMed |
[43] Miller RR, Dong L, Nelson NC, Brown SM, Kuttler KG, Probst DR, Allen TL, Clemmer TP, Intermountain Healthcare Intensive Medicine Clinical Program Multicenter implementation of a severe sepsis and septic shock treatment bundle. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188 77–82.
| Multicenter implementation of a severe sepsis and septic shock treatment bundle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23631750PubMed |
[44] Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, Suppes R, Feinstein D, Zanotti S, Taiberg L, Gurka D, Kumar A, Cheang M. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006; 34 1589–96.
| Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16625125PubMed |
[45] Harbarth S, Garbino J, Pugin J, Romand JA, Lew D, Pittet D. Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy and its effect on survival in a clinical trial of immunomodulating therapy of severe sepsis. Am J Med 2003; 115 529–35.
| Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy and its effect on survival in a clinical trial of immunomodulating therapy of severe sepsis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14599631PubMed |
[46] World Health Organization (WHO). Every newborn: an action plan to end preventable deaths. Geneva: WHO; 2014. Available at: http://www.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/127938/1/9789241507448_eng/pdf [verified October 2015].
[47] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Causes of death, Australia 2011. Cataloge No. 3303.0. Canberra: ABS; 2013.
[48] Kuehn BM. Guideline promotes early, aggressive sepsis treatment to boost survival. JAMA 2013; 309 969–70.
| Guideline promotes early, aggressive sepsis treatment to boost survival.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXlsVehsb0%3D&md5=073b09783c4a17d5e119ada5ba25c26eCAS | 23483148PubMed |
[49] Iannuzzi A.. Rural repetition. Med J Aust Insight 2012;
[50] Paul R, Neumann MI, Monuteaux MC, Melendez E. Adherence to PALS Sepsis Guidelines and hospital length of stay. Paediatrics 2012; 130 e273–80.
| Adherence to PALS Sepsis Guidelines and hospital length of stay.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
