Acute rehospitalisation during the first 3 months of in-patient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury
Nalinda Andraweera A B C and Richard Seemann BA Hampstead Rehabilitation Centre, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5085, Australia.
B ABI Rehabilitation, Auckland, New Zealand. Email: richard.seemann@abi-rehab.co.nz
C Corresponding author. Email: Nalinda.Andraweera@health.sa.gov.au
Australian Health Review 40(1) 114-117 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15062
Submitted: 29 November 2014 Accepted: 10 May 2015 Published: 13 July 2015
Abstract
Objective Unplanned re-admission to acute care hospitals during in-patient rehabilitation causes disruption to the rehabilitation program and increases the cost of health care. The aims of the present study were to identify the frequency, reasons and duration of disruption to rehabilitation because of acute re-admissions during the first 3 months of in-patient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to investigate the correlation between the duration of acute rehospitalisation and the discharge functional independence measure (FIM) score.
Methods A retrospective study was conducted on patients admitted for in-patient rehabilitation following TBI to a rehabilitation hospital in Auckland, New Zealand, between January 2009 and August 2013. Data on duration and reasons for acute rehospitalisation, as well as admission and discharge FIM scores, were obtained from electronic patient records. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between the duration of acute rehospitalisation and the discharge FIM score.
Results Of the 628 patients admitted for brain injury rehabilitation, 71 (11.3%) required acute rehospitalisation within the first 3 months. The main reasons for acute rehospitalisation were preventable medical causes (43.8%), including urinary tract infections, respiratory tract infections and coronary artery disease. Of the acute re-admissions, 76.6% were within the first month of admission to the rehabilitation centre and 46.6% needed in-patient treatment in the acute care hospital for >5 days. There was a moderately strong negative correlation between the duration of stay in the acute care hospital and the discharge FIM score (r = – 0.412; P = 0.0005).
Conclusion A significant number of patients admitted for in-patient rehabilitation following TBI require acute rehospitalisation due to preventable medical causes. Because the duration of acute rehospitalisation has a negative impact on rehabilitation functional gain, preventive measures and surveillance need to be further investigated and optimised.
What is known about the topic? The incidence of acute rehospitalisation of patients in the community following brain injury rehabilitation is 20%–25%, with approximately half the re-admissions being for elective reasons, including orthopaedic and reconstructive surgery.
What does this paper add? Unplanned acute rehospitalisation during first 3 months of in-patient rehabilitation following TBI is due to preventable causes and results in lower FIM scores on discharge.
What are the implications for practitioners? An uninterrupted rehabilitation programme is vital for achieving functional outcomes.
References
[1] Hammond FM, Horn SD, Smout RJ, Chen D, DeJong G, Sceiza W, Jha A, Ballard PH, Bloomgarden J. Acute rehospitalizations during inpatient rehabilitation for spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94 S98–105.| Acute rehospitalizations during inpatient rehabilitation for spinal cord injury.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23527777PubMed |
[2] DeJong G, Tian W, Hsieh CH, Junn C, Karam C, Ballard PH, Smout RJ, Horn SD, Zanca JM, Heinemann AW, Hammond FM, Backus D. Rehospitalization in the first year of traumatic spinal cord injury after discharge from medical rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94 S87–97.
| Rehospitalization in the first year of traumatic spinal cord injury after discharge from medical rehabilitation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23527776PubMed |
[3] Hammond FM, Lieberman J, Smout RJ, Horn SD, Dijkers MP, Backus D. Missed therapy time during inpatient rehabilitation for spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94 S106–14.
| Missed therapy time during inpatient rehabilitation for spinal cord injury.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23527767PubMed |
[4] Cardenas DD, Hoffman JM, Kirshblum S, McKinley W. Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: a multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85 1757–63.
| Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: a multicenter analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15520970PubMed |
[5] Ottenbacher KJ, Graham JE, Ottenbacher AJ, Lee J, Al Snih S, Karmarkar A, Reistetter T, Ostir GV. Hospital readmission in persons with stroke following postacute inpatient rehabilitation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2012; 67 875–81.
| Hospital readmission in persons with stroke following postacute inpatient rehabilitation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38vltlyksQ%3D%3D&md5=952834afd816eea5e9ea0a2d182bf7daCAS | 22389457PubMed |
[6] Hoyer EH, Needham DM, Miller J, Deutschendorf A, Friedman M, Brotman DJ. Functional status impairment is associated with unplanned readmissions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94 1951–8.
| Functional status impairment is associated with unplanned readmissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23810355PubMed |
[7] Cifu DX, Kreutzer JS, Marwitz JH, Miller M, Ming Hsu G, Seel RT, Englander J, High WE. Cifu DX, Kreutzer JS, Marwitz JH, Miller M, Ming Hsu G, Seel RT, Englander J, High WE. Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80 85–90.
| Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7ht1GrsQ%3D%3D&md5=b21490096be1eff0011e6cfb8a6dd4b0CAS | 9915377PubMed |
[8] Marwitz JH, Cifu DX, Englander J, High WM. A multi-center analysis of rehospitalizations five years after brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2001; 16 307–17.
| A multi-center analysis of rehospitalizations five years after brain injury.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvht1WqsQ%3D%3D&md5=89a1f470749e1e43fffccaa05369cd9aCAS | 11461654PubMed |
[9] Humphreys I, Wood RL, Phillips CJ, Macey S. The costs of traumatic brain injury: a literature review. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2013; 5 281–7.
| The costs of traumatic brain injury: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23836998PubMed |
[10] Thornhill S, Teasdale GM, Murray GD, McEwen J, Roy CW, Penny KI. Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2000; 320 1631–5.
| Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: prospective cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czhsVaquw%3D%3D&md5=8b311defbc7d4fe2c53c5e32448ec0a4CAS | 10856063PubMed |
[11] Foy CM, Somers JS. Increase in functional abilities following a residential educational and neurorehabilitation programme in young adults with acquired brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2013; 32 671–8.
| 23648622PubMed |
[12] Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77 1226–32.
| The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7jtVGnsg%3D%3D&md5=92db35f8b42461fe8c7996164fb083a0CAS | 8976303PubMed |
[13] Ottenbacher KJ, Smith PM, Illig SB, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Length of stay and hospital readmission for persons with disabilities. Am J Public Health 2000; 90 1920–3.
| Length of stay and hospital readmission for persons with disabilities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FntFygtw%3D%3D&md5=0d000cf78f4e9a853652035353a1a7d9CAS | 11111267PubMed |
