Structured social relationships: a review of volunteer home visiting programs for parents of young children
Fiona Byrne A C D , Rebekah Grace B , Jaimie Tredoux A C and Lynn Kemp A C D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Centre for Health Equity Training Research and Evaluation (CHETRE), part of the Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
B Children and Families Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. Email: rebekah.grace@mq.edu.au
C Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia. Email: jaimie.tredoux@sswahs.nsw.gov.au
D Corresponding authors. Email: f.byrne@westernsydney.edu.au; lynn.kemp@westernsydney.edu.au
Australian Health Review 40(3) 262-269 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15057
Submitted: 19 March 2015 Accepted: 27 July 2015 Published: 12 October 2015
Abstract
Objective The aims of the present paper were to: (1) review the research literature that contributes to an understanding of the role of volunteer home visiting programs in supporting the health and well being of families with young children; and (2) propose a conceptual model outlining service pathways for families in need of additional support.
Methods An integrative literature review method was used, with a mix of electronic and manual search methods for the period January 1980–January 2014. Forty-five studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria for review and were coded according to themes developed a priori.
Results There is little formal research that has examined the effectiveness of volunteer home visiting programs for supporting family health and well being. The available research suggests that volunteer home visiting programs provide socioemotional support through structured social relationships; however, there is limited empirical evidence to explicate the factors that contribute to these outcomes.
Conclusion In recognition of the importance of peer support for new parents, the not-for-profit sector has been involved in providing volunteer home visiting services to families for decades. However, the body of research to support this work is characterised by methodological limitations, and rigorous evidence is limited. What is clear anecdotally and qualitatively from the existing research is that parents who are in need of additional support value engagement with a community volunteer. These structured social relationships appear to fulfil a service need within the community, helping build bridges to support social networks, and thus complementing professional services and relationships. Overall, structured social relationships in the form of volunteer home visiting programs appear to provide an important pathway to support family health and well being. Findings from the existing research are mixed and often characterised by methodological limitations, pointing to a need for further rigorous research.
What is known about the topic? Volunteer family support programs have been an important part of the service landscape for vulnerable families, both nationally and internationally, for many years. Anecdotal reports suggest that this is a valued form of support that increases a sense of community connectedness and breaks down barriers for families in accessing other community support services.
What does this paper add? This paper proposes a model identifying broad service pathways impacting on family health and well being that takes into account the importance of structured social relationships and social connectedness.
What are the implications for practitioners? The proposed model may encourage discussion by practitioners and organisations interested in models of support for families who are socially isolated and/or in need of assistance to access and engage with services within the community.
References
[1] McCain M, Mustard JF. Reversing the real brain drain: early years study: final report. Toronto: Ontario Children’s Secretariat; 1999.[2] Shonkoff JP, Phillips DA, editors. From neurons to neighborhoods: the science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
[3] Olds DL, Sadler L, Kitzman H. Programs for parents of infants and toddlers: recent evidence from randomized trials. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2007; 48 355–91.
| Programs for parents of infants and toddlers: recent evidence from randomized trials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17355402PubMed |
[4] Dingwall RWJ. Collectivism, regionalism and feminism: health visiting and British social policy 1850–1975. J Soc Policy 1977; 6 291–315.
| Collectivism, regionalism and feminism: health visiting and British social policy 1850–1975.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Davies C. The health visitor as mother’s friend: a woman’s place in public health, 1900–14. Soc Hist Med 1988; 1 39–59.
| The health visitor as mother’s friend: a woman’s place in public health, 1900–14.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Billingham K, Morrell J, Billingham C. Reflections on the history of health visiting. Br J Community Health Nursing 1996; 1 386–92.
| Reflections on the history of health visiting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Donelan-McCall N, Eckenrode J, Olds DL. Home visiting for the prevention of child maltreatment: lessons learned during the past 20 years. Pediatr Clin North Am 2009; 56 389–403.
| Home visiting for the prevention of child maltreatment: lessons learned during the past 20 years.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19358923PubMed |
[8] Moran P, Ghate D, van der Merwe A. What works in parenting support? A review of the international evidence. London: Department of Education and Skills; 2004.
[9] World Health Organization (WHO). The Ottawa charter for health promotion. Geneva: WHO; 1986.
[10] National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). A guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. Canberra: NHMRC; 1998.
[11] Johnson Z, Howell F, Molloy B. Community mothers’ programme: randomised controlled trial of non-professional intervention in parenting. BMJ 1993; 306 1449–52.
| Community mothers’ programme: randomised controlled trial of non-professional intervention in parenting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3pvFahuw%3D%3D&md5=17f306613895360175b85ee574fad030CAS | 8518642PubMed |
[12] Johnson Z, Molloy B, Scallan E, Fitzpatrick P, Rooney B, Keegan T, Byrne P. Community mothers programme: seven year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of non-professional intervention in parenting. J Public Health Med 2000; 22 337–42.
| Community mothers programme: seven year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of non-professional intervention in parenting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FotVemtQ%3D%3D&md5=ca7608d920d40ab32f83a8c6387ca322CAS | 11077907PubMed |
[13] Molloy B. Still going strong: a tracer study of the community mothers programme, Dublin, Ireland. The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation; 2002.
[14] Hanrahan-Cahuzak MH. Mum to mum: an evaluation of a community based health promotion programme for first-time mothers in The Netherlands. Wageningen: Wageningen University; 2002.
[15] Asscher JJ, Hermanns JMA, Dekovic M. Effectiveness of the Home-Start parenting support program: behavioral outcomes for parents and children. Infant Ment Health J 2008; 29 95–113.
| Effectiveness of the Home-Start parenting support program: behavioral outcomes for parents and children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Barnet B, Duggan AK, Devoe M, Burrell L. The effect of volunteer home visitation for adolescent mothers on parenting and mental health outcomes: a randomized trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002; 156 1216–22.
| The effect of volunteer home visitation for adolescent mothers on parenting and mental health outcomes: a randomized trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12444833PubMed |
[17] Asscher JJ, Dekovic M, Prinzie P, Hermanns JMA. Assessing change in families following the Home-Start parenting program: clinical significance and predictors of change. Fam Relat 2008; 57 351–64.
| Assessing change in families following the Home-Start parenting program: clinical significance and predictors of change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Madden J, Ohara J, Levenstein P. Home again: effects of the mother–child home program on mother and child. Child Dev 1984; 55 636–47.
| Home again: effects of the mother–child home program on mother and child.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL2c3gslSlug%3D%3D&md5=17e66fff02c7190f0fceafa0a21ef999CAS | 6723452PubMed |
[19] Paul CL, Sansonfisher RW, Redman S, Carter S. Preventing accidental injury to young-children in the home using volunteers. Health Promot Int 1994; 9 241–8.
| Preventing accidental injury to young-children in the home using volunteers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[20] Kelleher L, Johnson M. An evaluation of a volunteer-support program for families at risk. Public Health Nurs 2004; 21 297–305.
| An evaluation of a volunteer-support program for families at risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15260834PubMed |
[21] Kelleher L. Home visitation: report of the evaluation of the Cottage Community Care Pilot Project, March 1994–March 1997. Campbelltown, NSW: Faculty of Health, University of Western Sydney; 1997.
[22] Rainey J, Murphy G. Preventive home visiting. Austr Child Family Welfare 1983; 8 13–18.
[23] Haber MG, Cohen JL, Lucas T, Baltes BB. The relationship between self-reported received and perceived social support: a meta-analytic review. Am J Community Psychol 2007; 39 133–44.
| The relationship between self-reported received and perceived social support: a meta-analytic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17308966PubMed |
[24] Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51 843–57.
| From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gvFehuw%3D%3D&md5=b40ebb18a66068772861abc0e98f5964CAS | 10972429PubMed |
[25] House JS, Umberson D, Landis KR. Structures and processes of social support. Annu Rev Sociol 1988; 14 293–318.
| Structures and processes of social support.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Balaji AB, Claussen AH, Smith DC, Visser SN, Morales MJ, Perou R. Social support networks and maternal mental health and well-being. J Womens Health 2007; 16 1386–96.
| Social support networks and maternal mental health and well-being.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Thoits PA. Social support as coping assistance. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986; 54 416–23.
| Social support as coping assistance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL28zgsFagug%3D%3D&md5=d806231b19574918d5721dee4b108477CAS | 3745593PubMed |
[28] Kawachi I, Berkman LF. Social ties and mental health. J Urban Health 2001; 78 458–67.
| Social ties and mental health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrhsl2quw%3D%3D&md5=7af06513e813029f29264ca28f57afe7CAS | 11564849PubMed |
[29] World Health Organization (WHO) Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Commission on Social Determinants of Health final report. Geneva: Commission on Social Determinants of Health, WHO; 2008.
[30] US Department of Health and Human Services. Home visiting evidence of effectiveness. Available at: http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov [verified 20 May 2015].
[31] National Institute of Heath and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Antenatal and postnatal mental health: the NICE guideline on clinical management and service guidance. NICE Clinical Guideline 192. London: NICE; 2014. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg192 [verified 26 March 15].
[32] Letourneau N, Stewart M, Dennis CL, Hegadoren K, Duffett-Leger L, Watson B. Effect of home-based peer support on maternal–infant interactions among women with postpartum depression: a randomized, controlled trial. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2011; 20 345–57.
| Effect of home-based peer support on maternal–infant interactions among women with postpartum depression: a randomized, controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21385294PubMed |
[33] Scheiwe A, Hardy R, Watt RG. Four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of a social support intervention on infant feeding practices. Matern Child Nutr 2010; 6 328–37.
| Four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of a social support intervention on infant feeding practices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21050387PubMed |
[34] Watt RG, Tull KI, Hardy R, Wiggins M, Kelly Y, Molloy B, Dowler E, Apps J, McGlone P. Effectiveness of a social support intervention on infant feeding practices: Randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009; 63 156–62.
| Effectiveness of a social support intervention on infant feeding practices: Randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M%2FmvFClsg%3D%3D&md5=bcc65e105789afe79664d10de6dd9232CAS | 19141661PubMed |
[35] Deković M, Asscher JJ, Hermanns J, Reitz E, Prinzie P, van den Akker AL. Tracing changes in families who participated in the Home-Start parenting program: parental sense of competence as mechanism of change. Prev Sci 2010; 11 263–74.
| Tracing changes in families who participated in the Home-Start parenting program: parental sense of competence as mechanism of change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20101464PubMed |
[36] Barnes J, Senior R, MacPherson K. The utility of volunteer home-visiting support to prevent maternal depression in the first year of life. Child Care Health Dev 2009; 35 807–16.
| The utility of volunteer home-visiting support to prevent maternal depression in the first year of life.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MnptlymtA%3D%3D&md5=3e6c80cd75018d4b47148d5c2f1deaacCAS | 19719770PubMed |
[37] Asscher JJ, Hermanns JMA, Dekovic M, Reitz E. Predicting the effectiveness of the Home-Start parenting support program. Child Youth Serv Rev 2007; 29 247–63.
| Predicting the effectiveness of the Home-Start parenting support program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[38] McAuley C, Knapp M, Beecham J, McCurry N, Sleed M. Young families under stress: outcomes and costs of homestart support. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2004.
[39] Fitzpatrick P, Molloy B, Johnson Z. Community mothers’ programme: extension to the travelling community in Ireland. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997; 51 299–303.
| Community mothers’ programme: extension to the travelling community in Ireland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2szntlSjtw%3D%3D&md5=8b2f44e02b2e65ef7bf98d88021de182CAS | 9229060PubMed |
[40] Boger RP, Richter R, Kurnetz R, Haas B. Perinatal positive parenting: a follow-up evaluation. Infant Ment Health J 1986; 7 132–45.
| Perinatal positive parenting: a follow-up evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[41] Small R, Taft AJ, Brown SJ. The power of social connection and support in improving health: lessons from social support interventions with childbearing women. BMC Public Health 2011; 11 S4
| The power of social connection and support in improving health: lessons from social support interventions with childbearing women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22168441PubMed |
[42] Benevolent Society. Evaluation of the Benevolent Society’s volunteer home visiting program. Sydney: Benevolent Society; 2009. Available at: http://www.benevolent.org.au/~/media/FDE5AEBBF9B825415EA6438C4140D2C3.ashx [verified 7 January 2015].
[43] Everingham C. The trusted confidante: a model for supporting parents: pilot program results. Callaghan, NSW: School of Humanities and Social Science, The University of Newcastle; 2006. Available at: http://www.Home-Start.org.uk/about/HS_Australia_-_Trusted_confidante_research.doc [verified 18 November 2008].
[44] Zannettino L, Ruys M. An evaluation of the Salisbury North volunteer home visiting program: a research report. Magill, SA: University of South Australia for Good Beginnings Australia; 2006.
[45] Chapman L, Raouzaiou A, Moseley J. Sure start Taunton 2005: Evaluation of the Home-Start Taunton Deane scheme. Somerset: Home-Start; 2005. Available at: http://www.somerset.nhs.uk/communityevaluation/pdf/sstaunton_homestart.pdf [verified 28 July 2008].
[46] Paris R, Dubus N. Staying connected while nurturing an infant: a challenge of new motherhood. Fam Relat 2005; 54 72–83.
| Staying connected while nurturing an infant: a challenge of new motherhood.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[47] Black M, Kemp L, Samson V. Karitane volunteer home visiting program evaluation. Liverpool: Centre for Health Equity Training Research and Evaluation; 2004.
[48] Downie J, Clark K, Clemenston K. Volunteerism: ‘community mothers’ in action. Contemp Nurse 2004; 18 188–98.
| 15729811PubMed |
[49] Benevolent Society. 2002-03 annual report First Five Years, Macarthur. Paddington, NSW: Benevolent Society; 2003.
[50] Montague M. The Solemates Pilot program: a volunteer family visiting program of Parenting Australia, 2001–2003: Final evaluation report. Richmond, Vic.: Jesuit Social Services; 2003. Available from: http://archive.jss.org.au/programmes/pdfs/final_report.pdf [verified August 2015].
[51] Frost N, Johnson L, Stein M, Wallis L. Negotiated friendship: Home-Start and the delivery of family support. Leicester: Home-Start UK; 1996.
[52] Frost N, Johnson L, Stein M, Wallis L. Home-start and the delivery of family support. Child Soc 2000; 14 328–42.
| Home-start and the delivery of family support.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[53] Hiatt SW, Michalek P, Younge P, Miyoshi T, Fryer E. Characteristics of volunteers and families in a neonatal home visitation project: the Kempe Community Caring Program. Child Abuse Negl 2000; 24 85–97.
| Characteristics of volunteers and families in a neonatal home visitation project: the Kempe Community Caring Program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7itlCjug%3D%3D&md5=3fab89303c4296a741667721e8e33e1eCAS | 10660012PubMed |
[54] Schmied V, Barclay L. Karitane parent support program evaluation. Sydney: Centre for Family Health and Midwifery, University of Technology Sydney; 2000.
[55] Taggart AV, Short SD, Barclay L. ‘She has made me feel human again’: an evaluation of a volunteer home-based visiting project for mothers. Health Soc Care Community 2000; 8 1–8.
| ‘She has made me feel human again’: an evaluation of a volunteer home-based visiting project for mothers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11560668PubMed |
[56] Terpstra L, van Dijke A. Home-start between childhood and maturity: a programme evaluation. Utrecht: NIZW Uitgeverij; 1999.
[57] Scott D. ‘Arranged friendships’: the final report on the Brotherhood of St Laurence ‘Family Friends’ pilot program. Brotherhood of St Laurence; 1997. Available from: http://bsl.intersearch.com.au/jspui/retrieve/16132/Scott-D_Arranged-friendships_The-final-report-on-the-brotherhood-of-st-laurence-family-and-friends-pilot-program_1997.pdf. [verified August 2015].
[58] Bagilhole B. Kith not kin: the effects on women as givers and receivers of voluntary care in Britain. Eur J Womens Stud 1996; 3 39–54.
| Kith not kin: the effects on women as givers and receivers of voluntary care in Britain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[59] Bagilhole B. Tea and sympathy or teetering on social work? An investigation of the blurring of the boundaries between voluntary and professional care. Soc Policy Adm 1996; 30 189–205.
| Tea and sympathy or teetering on social work? An investigation of the blurring of the boundaries between voluntary and professional care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[60] Elix J, Lambert J. Consultancy evaluation of Home-Start Australia schemes. Fairlight, NSW: Community Solutions; 1995.
[61] Hiatt SW. ‘We don’t just kiss you good-bye!’ Home visitor program prevents child abuse. Disch Plann Update 1994; 14 13–7.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7lsFOhtg%3D%3D&md5=8d506ff9542e04062f7a736a8a4e5742CAS | 10131859PubMed |
[62] Gibbons J, Thorpe S. Can voluntary support projects help vulnerable families: the work of Home-Start. Br J Soc Work 1989; 19 189–202.
| Can voluntary support projects help vulnerable families: the work of Home-Start.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[63] Lines DR. The effectiveness of parent aides in the tertiary prevention of child abuse in South Australia. Child Abuse Negl 1987; 11 507–12.
| The effectiveness of parent aides in the tertiary prevention of child abuse in South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL1c7gvV2ruw%3D%3D&md5=507b560006feb35b74ef1b6f4316ff2eCAS | 3427511PubMed |
[64] Brown GW. Joining two social institutions to counter rural Alaskan child abuse. Child Abuse Negl 1985; 9 383–8.
| Joining two social institutions to counter rural Alaskan child abuse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL28%2Fisleksg%3D%3D&md5=942148f191b5db2a41aeb009eb39bff0CAS | 4052845PubMed |
[65] Pound A, Mills M. A pilot evaluation of ‘Newpin’: a home-visiting and befriending scheme in South London. Association of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Newsletter 1985; 7 13–15.
[66] Halpern R, Covey L. Community support for adolescent parents and their children: the Parent-to-Parent program in Vermont. J Prim Prev 1983; 3 160–73.
| Community support for adolescent parents and their children: the Parent-to-Parent program in Vermont.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24276647PubMed |
[67] Van der Eyken W. Homestart: a four year evaluation. Leicester: Homestart UK; 1982.
[68] Schwarz R, Begg P. The mums’ chums project. Aust Child Family Welfare 1980; 5 18–21.
[69] Hermanns JMA, Asscher JJ, Zijlstra BJH, Hoffenaar PJ, Dekovič M. Long-term changes in parenting and child behavior after the Home-Start family support program. Child Youth Serv Rev 2013; 35 678–84.
| Long-term changes in parenting and child behavior after the Home-Start family support program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[70] Cox AD, Pound A, Mills M, Puckering C, Owen AL. Evaluation of a home visiting and befriending scheme for young mothers: Newpin. J R Soc Med 1991; 84 217–20.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK3M3isF2rtw%3D%3D&md5=c4875c40dd85f20e3f28fdcef847c815CAS | 2027148PubMed |
[71] Oakley A, Mauthner M, Rajan L, Turner H. Supporting vulnerable families: an evaluation of Newpin. Health Visit 1995; 68 188–91.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3ntVChtA%3D%3D&md5=217e1ce3f1f6f19c38802b4457cbc84cCAS | 7751146PubMed |
[72] Barnes J, MacPherson K, Senior R. The impact on parenting and the home environment of early support to mothers with new babies. J Child Serv 2006; 1 4–20.
| The impact on parenting and the home environment of early support to mothers with new babies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
