Application and implications of Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW) certificate use in acute generalist settings
Scott Lamont A C , Scott Brunero A and Swapnil Sharma BA Prince of Wales Hospital, East Wing Level 1, Edmund Blackett Building, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia. Email: scott.brunero@sesiahs.health.nsw.gov.au
B Prince of Wales Hospital, Room 101, Level 1, Euroa Centre, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia. Email: swapnil.sharma@sesiahs.health.nsw.gov.au
C Corresponding author. Email: Scott.lamont@sesiahs.health.nsw.gov.au
Australian Health Review 40(2) 219-224 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15045
Submitted: 3 March 2015 Accepted: 19 May 2015 Published: 13 July 2015
Abstract
Objective This retrospective study aimed to explore the appropriate application and implications of Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW) (MHA) certificate use in a metropolitan generalist hospital in New South Wales.
Methods A de-identified MHA certificate review was undertaken within acute generalist medical and surgical specialties between June 2012 and May 2013. To assess differences, data were separated into two categories according to whether certificates were completed by psychiatry trainees or generalist medical officers. Analysis of indications for detention was also undertaken and qualitatively matched against legislative criteria.
Results A total of 43 MHA certificates were included in the review, which highlighted missing elements in most certificates. Differences were found when professional consensus by the researchers was used to match documentation to legislative criteria. The researchers disagreed with nine of the 16 indications (mental illness/mental disorder) by the generalist medical officers and only one indication by a psychiatry trainee. Six of the certificates appeared to be related to lack of capacity and need for treatment of medical conditions, thus more related to Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) applications.
Conclusion This study highlights inconsistencies in legislative knowledge and requirements between professional groups. Education and training opportunities have been identified to ensure greater consistency in application of the MHA, preservation of patient rights and avoidance of stigma. MHA use in this setting should be exercised with caution and by appropriately trained individuals.
What is known about the topic? The MHA and its state and territory counterparts provide for the treatment, care and support of people who have a mental illness and the protection of a person’s rights therein. Despite not being intended for application in generalist facilities, mental health legislation is widely used in generalist facilities and certificates are completed by generalist health professionals with limited training in this area of practice.
What does this paper add? This study adds to the limited body of knowledge in relation to MHA detention in acute generalist facilities. Disparate preparation of medical officers in the use of this legislation has been identified, which has potential wider implications for patients beyond immediate care.
What are the implications for practitioners? Inadequate attention to correct completion of MHA certificates and associated documentation could potentially invalidate detention, leaving healthcare professionals and institutions open to litigious claims that restrictive or coercive practices subsequent to the certificate’s completion were technically unlawful. Further, detention under the MHA, albeit temporarily, has potential human rights issues attached and wrongful detention could lead to longstanding issues relating to stigma.
Additional keywords: general hospitals, involuntary detention, mental health certificates, scheduling.
References
[1] United Nations General Assembly. Principles for the protection of persons with mental illness and for the improvement of mental health care. NGO Committee on Education; 1991. Available at http://www.un-documents.net/pppmi.htm [verified 2 February 2011].[2] Staunton P, Chiarella M. Nursing and the Law. 7th ed. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone; 2013.
[3] Wand A, Wand T. ‘Admit voluntary, schedule if tries to leave’: placing Mental Health Acts in the context of mental health law and human rights. Australas Psychiatry 2013; 21 137–40.
| ‘Admit voluntary, schedule if tries to leave’: placing Mental Health Acts in the context of mental health law and human rights.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23426098PubMed |
[4] Schofield C, Holden N. Detention on a general ward: understanding and applying the law. Br J Hosp Med 2007; 68 152–4.
| Detention on a general ward: understanding and applying the law.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s3hsFCjuw%3D%3D&md5=17b5d52e3fa0971ec45e6faf32fdbe09CAS |
[5] Baig BJ, Walker J, Crowe ES, MacHale SM, Aditya H, Potts SG. Knowledge about the Scottish Mental Health Act in a general hospital setting. Scott Med J 2008; 53 15–7.
| Knowledge about the Scottish Mental Health Act in a general hospital setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czotFaitQ%3D%3D&md5=407492dcada20eb06b48d2ce802cb55cCAS | 18549064PubMed |
[6] Kerridge I, Lowe M, Stewart C. Ethics and law for the health professions. 4th ed. Sydney: Federation Press; 2013.
[7] NSW Institute of Psychiatry. Accredited Person Handbook. Parramatta: NSW Institute of Psychiatry; 2009. Available at: http://www.nswiop.nsw.edu.au/images/departments/special/mha/a_p_handbook.pdf. [verified 16 June 2015].
[8] Cutler D, Smith M, Wand T, Green T, Dinh M, Gribble R. Involuntary admissions under the Mental Health Act 2007 (New South Wales): A comparison of patients detained by ambulance officers, medical practitioners and accredited persons in an emergency department. Emerg Med Australas 2013; 25 544–9.
| Involuntary admissions under the Mental Health Act 2007 (New South Wales): A comparison of patients detained by ambulance officers, medical practitioners and accredited persons in an emergency department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24118917PubMed |
[9] Lamont S, Brunero S, Barclay C, Wijeratne C. Evaluation of an electroconvulsive therapy service in a general hospital. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2011; 20 223–9.
| Evaluation of an electroconvulsive therapy service in a general hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21492361PubMed |
[10] Lamont S, Jeon YH, Chiarella M. Assessing patient capacity to consent to treatment: An integrative review of instruments and tools. J Clin Nurs 2013; 22 2387–403.
| Assessing patient capacity to consent to treatment: An integrative review of instruments and tools.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23650907PubMed |
[11] World Health Organisation (WHO). WHO Resource Book on Mental Health: Human Rights and Legislation. Geneva: WHO; 2005. Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/policy/resource_book_MHLeg.pdf.
[12] Lamont S, Jeon YH, Chiarella M. Health care professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviours relating to patient capacity to consent to treatment: an integrative Review. Nurs Ethics 2013; 20 684–707.
| Health care professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviours relating to patient capacity to consent to treatment: an integrative Review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23515254PubMed |
[13] Jackson E, Warner J. How much do doctors know about consent and capacity? J R Soc Med 2002; 95 601–3.
| How much do doctors know about consent and capacity?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12461146PubMed |
[14] Evans K, Warner J, Jackson E. How much do emergency healthcare workers know about capacity and consent? Emerg Med J 2007; 24 391–3.
| How much do emergency healthcare workers know about capacity and consent?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17513532PubMed |
[15] Humphreys M, Ryman A. Knowledge of emergency compulsory detention procedures among general practitioners in Edinburgh: sample survey. BMJ 1996; 312 1462–3.
| Knowledge of emergency compulsory detention procedures among general practitioners in Edinburgh: sample survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK283lslSquw%3D%3D&md5=316f8d05be18403bdf563aae1ced3211CAS | 8664628PubMed |
[16] Humphreys M. Junior psychiatrists and emergency compulsory detention in Scotland. Int J Law Psychiatry 1994; 17 421–9.
| Junior psychiatrists and emergency compulsory detention in Scotland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7pslentQ%3D%3D&md5=7f32917e61534298b604c33f2de0d9cdCAS | 7890475PubMed |
[17] Dawson J, Szmukler G. Fusion of mental health and incapacity legislation. Br J Psychiatry 2006; 188 504–9.
| Fusion of mental health and incapacity legislation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16738339PubMed |
[18] O’Brien AJ. Capacity, consent, and mental health legislation: time for a new standard? Contemp Nurse 2010; 34 237–47.
| Capacity, consent, and mental health legislation: time for a new standard?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20509808PubMed |
[19] Ryan C, Callaghan S, Peisah C. The capacity to refuse psychiatric treatment: A guide to the law for clinicians and tribunal members. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2015; 49 324–33.
| The capacity to refuse psychiatric treatment: A guide to the law for clinicians and tribunal members.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25690742PubMed |
[20] Brunero S, Lamont S. Mental health liaison nursing, taking a capacity building approach. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2010; 46 286–93.
| Mental health liaison nursing, taking a capacity building approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20883435PubMed |
[21] Lamont S, Brunero S. ‘eSimulation’ part 1: development of an interactive multimedia mental health education program for generalist nurses. Collegian 2013; 20 239–47.
| ‘eSimulation’ part 1: development of an interactive multimedia mental health education program for generalist nurses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24596993PubMed |
[22] Lamont S, Brunero S. ‘eSimulation’ part 2: evaluation of an interactive multimedia mental health education program for generalist nurses. Collegian 2014; 21 3–9.
| ‘eSimulation’ part 2: evaluation of an interactive multimedia mental health education program for generalist nurses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24772985PubMed |
[23] Scheff TJ. The labelling theory of mental illness. Am Sociol Rev 1974; 39 444–52.
| The labelling theory of mental illness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE2c3ot1Cltw%3D%3D&md5=730245a8dfc10e239bb2618c6ad26545CAS | 4844995PubMed |
[24] Griffiths K, Nakane Y, Christensen H, Yoshioka K, Jorm A, Nakane H. Stigma in response to mental disorders: a comparison of Australia and Japan. BMC Psychiatry 2006; 6 21
| Stigma in response to mental disorders: a comparison of Australia and Japan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16716231PubMed |
[25] Link BG, Cullen FT, Struening E, Shrout PE, Dohrenwend BP. A modified labelling theory approach to mental disorders: An empirical assessment. Am Sociol Rev 1989; 54 400–23.
| A modified labelling theory approach to mental disorders: An empirical assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[26] Holmboe ES, ed. Practice Audit, Medical Record Review, and Chart-Stimulated Recall. In Holmboe E. S. and Hawkins R. E. (eds): Practical Guide to the Evaluation of Clinical Competence. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2008.
