What a great idea! Someone should evaluate that…
David D. SchmidtSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Edward Ford Building (A27), The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. Email: dsch5166@uni.sydney.edu.au
Australian Health Review 40(3) 270-272 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14215
Submitted: 6 November 2014 Accepted: 15 May 2015 Published: 22 June 2015
Abstract
How often, as clinicians, do we see a really clever idea implemented in the workplace? In rural health in particular, creative work-around solutions are relatively commonplace. However, the evaluation and promotion of these ideas is less so, and this leads to lost opportunities for perpetuating these clever ideas. This paper explores one rural clinician’s experience of what can happen if, instead of appreciating and complementing a great idea, that step of evaluating the great idea is taken. A reflective narrative was created, beginning with a corridor conversation (‘What a great idea! Someone should evaluate that…’), continuing through a formal research project and ending with the impact of that project and the way its findings were communicated and implemented. The narrative outlines the effect of evaluating one great idea at the individual, workplace, organisational, state and national levels. Clinicians are well placed to identify great ideas in practice. Making the decision to evaluate these ideas can lead to personal growth, professional discovery and organisational benefits. With motivation and organisational support, who knows where evaluation may lead?
References
[1] Carthey J. Reinterpreting the hospital corridor: ‘wasted space’ or essential for quality multidisciplinary clinical care? HERD 2008; 2 17–29.| Reinterpreting the hospital corridor: ‘wasted space’ or essential for quality multidisciplinary clinical care?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21161920PubMed |
[2] Mitchell RA. Perceived inhibitors to rural practice among physiotherapy students. Aust J Physiother 1996; 42 47–52.
| Perceived inhibitors to rural practice among physiotherapy students.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Keane S, Lincoln M, Smith T. Retention of allied health professionals in rural New South Wales: a thematic analysis of focus group discussions. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12 175
| Retention of allied health professionals in rural New South Wales: a thematic analysis of focus group discussions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22726758PubMed |
[4] Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 2011; 6 42
| The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21513547PubMed |
[5] Brookfield S. Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1995.
[6] Schmidt D, Dmytryk N. Exploring a public-private partnership new graduate physiotherapy recruitment program: a qualitative study. Aust J Rural Health 2014; 22 334–9.
| Exploring a public-private partnership new graduate physiotherapy recruitment program: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25495629PubMed |
[7] Dunbar JA. Innovation in rural health: sound the trumpet. Aust J Rural Health 2011; 19 109–10.
| Innovation in rural health: sound the trumpet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21605222PubMed |
[8] Smith KB, Humphreys JS, Wilson MGA. Addressing the health disadvantage of rural populations: how does epidemiological evidence inform rural health policies and research? Aust J Rural Health 2008; 16 56–66.
| Addressing the health disadvantage of rural populations: how does epidemiological evidence inform rural health policies and research?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18318846PubMed |
[9] Taylor J, Hughes C, Petkov J, Williams M. Unique issues in research and evaluation in rural and remote locations: is there a place for specific research training? Rural Remote Health 2005; 5 351–62.
| 15921481PubMed |
[10] University of London. Understanding research methods. 2014 Available at: http://www.coursera.org/course/researchmethods [verified 13 March 2015].
[11] Aggarwal R, Gupte N, Kass N, Taylor H, Ali J, Bhan A, Aggarwal A, Sisson SD, Kanchanaraksa S, McKenzie-White J, McGready J, Miotti P, Bollinger RC. A comparison of online versus on-site training in health research methodology: a randomized study. BMC Med Educ 2011; 11 37
| A comparison of online versus on-site training in health research methodology: a randomized study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21682858PubMed |
[12] Wilkes L, Cummings J, McKay N. Developing a culture to facilitate research capacity building for clinical nurse consultants in generalist paediatric practice. Nurs Res Prac 2013; 2013 Article ID 709025
| Developing a culture to facilitate research capacity building for clinical nurse consultants in generalist paediatric practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Dunbar JA. Building capacity for rural and remote research. Aust J Rural Health 2010; 18 133
| Building capacity for rural and remote research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20690906PubMed |
[14] Sarre G, Cooke J. Developing indicators for measuring research capacity development in primary care organizations: a consensus approach using a nominal group technique. Health Soc Care Community 2009; 17 244–53.
| Developing indicators for measuring research capacity development in primary care organizations: a consensus approach using a nominal group technique.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19040697PubMed |
