Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Incremental cost-effectiveness of trauma service improvements for road trauma casualties: experience of an Australian major trauma centre

Michael M. Dinh A B E , Kendall J. Bein A , Delia Hendrie C , Belinda Gabbe D , Christopher M. Byrne A and Rebecca Ivers B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Trauma Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia. Email: kendall.bein@sswahs.nsw.gov.au; chrismbyrne@hotmail.com

B Injury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney Medical School, 321 Kent Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia. Email: rivers@georgeinstitute.org.au

C Centre for Population Health Research, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia. Email: D.V.Hendrie@curtin.edu.au

D Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia. Email: belinda.gabbe@monash.edu

E Corresponding author. Email: michael.dinh@sswahs.nsw.gov.au

Australian Health Review 40(4) 385-390 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14205
Submitted: 11 November 2014  Accepted: 31 July 2015   Published: 14 September 2015

Abstract

Objective The aim of the present study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of trauma service funding enhancements at an inner city major trauma centre.

Methods The present study was a cost-effectiveness analysis using retrospective trauma registry data of all major trauma patients (injury severity score >15) presenting after road trauma between 2001 and 2012. The primary outcome was cost per life year gained associated with the intervention period (2007–12) compared with the pre-intervention period (2001–06). Incremental costs were represented by all trauma-related funding enhancements undertaken between 2007 and 2010. Risk adjustment for years of life lost was conducted using zero-inflated negative binomial regression modelling. All costs were expressed in 2012 Australian dollar values.

Results In all, 876 patients were identified during the study period. The incremental cost of trauma enhancements between 2007 and 2012 totalled $7.91 million, of which $2.86 million (36%) was attributable to road trauma patients. After adjustment for important covariates, the odds of in-hospital mortality reduced by around half (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27, 0.82; P = 0.01). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was A$7600 per life year gained (95% CI A$5524, $19 333).

Conclusion Trauma service funding enhancements that enabled a quality improvement program at a single major trauma centre were found to be cost-effective based on current international and Australian standards.

What is known about this topic? Trauma quality improvement programs have been implemented across most designated trauma hospitals in an effort to improve hospital care processes and outcomes for injured patients. These involve a combination of education and training, the use of audit and key performance indicators.

What does this paper add? A trauma quality improvement program initiated at an Australian Major Trauma Centre was found to be cost-effective over 12 years with respect to years of life saved in road trauma patients.

What are the implications for practitioners? The results suggest that adequate resourcing of trauma centres to enable quality improvement programs may be a cost-effective measure to reduce in-hospital mortality following road trauma.


References

[1]  Juillard CJ, Mock C, Goosen J, Joshipura M, Civil I. Establishing an evidence base for trauma quality improvement: a collaborative WHO–IATSIC review. World J Surg 2009; 33 1075–86.
Establishing an evidence base for trauma quality improvement: a collaborative WHO–IATSIC review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19290573PubMed |

[2]  Stelfox HT, Bobranska-Artiuch B, Nathens A, Straus SE. Quality indicators for evaluating trauma care: a scoping review. Arch Surg 2010; 145 286–95.
Quality indicators for evaluating trauma care: a scoping review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20231631PubMed |

[3]  Newgard CD, Fildes JJ, Wu L, Hemmila MR, Burd RS, Neal M, Mann NC, Shafi S, Clark DE, Goble S, Nathens AB. Methodology and analytic rationale for the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216 147–57.
Methodology and analytic rationale for the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23062519PubMed |

[4]  Ursic C, Curtis K, Zou Y, Black D. Improved trauma patient outcomes after implementation of a dedicated trauma admitting service. Injury 2009; 40 99–103.
Improved trauma patient outcomes after implementation of a dedicated trauma admitting service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19117562PubMed |

[5]  Wong TH, Lumsdaine W, Hardy BM, Lee K, Balogh ZJ. The impact of specialist trauma service on major trauma mortality. J Trauma 2013; 74 780–4.
The impact of specialist trauma service on major trauma mortality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  DiRusso S, Holly C, Kamath R, Cuff S, Sullivan T, Scharf H, Tully T, Nealon P, Savino JA. Preparation and achievement of American College of Surgeons Level I trauma verification raises hospital performance and improves patient outcome. J Trauma 2001; 51 294–300.
Preparation and achievement of American College of Surgeons Level I trauma verification raises hospital performance and improves patient outcome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvks1Krtw%3D%3D&md5=d538a84f17db092045f47ad010a655c4CAS | 11493787PubMed |

[7]  Simons R, Eliopoulos V, Laflamme D, Brown DR. Impact on process of trauma care delivery 1 year after the introduction of a trauma program in a provincial trauma center. J Trauma 1999; 46 811–6.
Impact on process of trauma care delivery 1 year after the introduction of a trauma program in a provincial trauma center.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3mvVOiuw%3D%3D&md5=6a892ae8fa9092cc18718bd59e75156cCAS | 10338397PubMed |

[8]  Sarkar B, Brunsvold ME, Cherry-Bukoweic JR, Hemmila MR, Park PK, Raghavendran K, Wahl WL, Wang SC, Napolitano LM. American College of Surgeons’ Committee on Trauma Performance Improvement and Patient Safety program: maximal impact in a mature trauma center. J Trauma 2011; 71 1447–54.
American College of Surgeons’ Committee on Trauma Performance Improvement and Patient Safety program: maximal impact in a mature trauma center.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22071936PubMed |

[9]  Celso B, Tepas J, Langland-Orban B, Pracht E, Papa L, Lottenberg L, Flint L. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems. J Trauma 2006; 60 371–8.
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16508498PubMed |

[10]  Cameron PA, Gabbe BJ, Cooper J, Walker T, Judson R, McNeil J. A state-wide system of trauma care in Victoria. Effect on patient survival. Med J Aust 2008; 189 546–51.
| 19012550PubMed |

[11]  MacKenzie EJ, Weir S, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Wang W, Scharfstein DO, Salkever DS. The value of trauma center care. J Trauma 2010; 69 1–10.
The value of trauma center care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20622572PubMed |

[12]  Graham JD, Corso PS, Morris JM, Segui-Gomez M, Weinstein MC. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of clinical and public health measures. Annu Rev Public Health 1998; 19 125–52.
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of clinical and public health measures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3nsVGnuw%3D%3D&md5=7513bc96889631747dda28a85516ed30CAS | 9611615PubMed |

[13]  Curtis KA, Mitchell RJ, Chong SS, Balogh ZJ, Reed DJ, Clark PT, D’Armours S, Black DA, Langcake ME, Taylor CB, McDougall P, Cameron PA. Injury trends and mortality in adult patients with major trauma in New South Wales. Med J Aust 2012; 197 233–7.
Injury trends and mortality in adult patients with major trauma in New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22900875PubMed |

[14]  Gennarelli TA, Wodzin E. The Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005. Update 2008. Des Plaines, IL: American Association for Automotive Medicine; 2008.

[15]  Dinh MM, Bein KJ, Gabbe BJ, Byrne CM, Petchell J, Lo S, Ivers R. A trauma quality improvement programme associated with improved patient outcomes: 21 years of experience at an Australian major trauma centre. Injury 2014; 45 830–4.
A trauma quality improvement programme associated with improved patient outcomes: 21 years of experience at an Australian major trauma centre.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24290523PubMed |

[16]  Lawton LD, Roncal S, Leonard E, Stack A, Dinh MM, Byrne CM, Petchell J. The utility of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) clinical shock grading in assessment of trauma. Emerg Med J 2014; 31 384–9.
The utility of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) clinical shock grading in assessment of trauma.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23513233PubMed |

[17]  Australian Bureau of Statistics. Life tables, states, territories and Australia, 2009–11. 2012. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3302.0.55.001 [verified 8 August 2013].

[18]  Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Guidelines for preparing submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2013. Available at: http://www.pbs.gov.au/info/general/about-this-site [verified August 2015].

[19]  Lord D, Washington SP, Ivan JN. Poisson, Poisson-gamma and zero-inflated regression models of motor vehicle crashes: balancing statistical fit and theory. Accid Anal Prev 2005; 37 35–46.
Poisson, Poisson-gamma and zero-inflated regression models of motor vehicle crashes: balancing statistical fit and theory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15607273PubMed |

[20]  Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 1988; 260 1743–8.
The quality of care. How can it be assessed?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL1czhslajsA%3D%3D&md5=de31a9818bc3d7d57a36c1ffde0b089aCAS | 3045356PubMed |

[21]  Tengs TO, Adams ME, Pliskin JS, Safran DG, Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Graham JD. Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Anal 1995; 15 369–90.
Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzislyhtA%3D%3D&md5=dcd7e87d22ffdf56b112eba07c8f0cd0CAS | 7604170PubMed |

[22]  Chisholm D, Naci H, Hyder AA, Tran NT, Peden M. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to combat road traffic injuries in sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: mathematical modelling study. BMJ 2012; 344 e612
Cost-effectiveness of strategies to combat road traffic injuries in sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: mathematical modelling study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22389340PubMed |

[23]  National Trauma Research Institute. Australian quality improvement program. 2012. Available at: http://www.ntri.org.au/quality-improvement/austqip/objectives [verified 1 August 2013].

[24]  Livingston DH, Tripp T, Biggs C, Lavery RF. A fate worse than death? Long term outcome of trauma patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit. J Trauma 2009; 67 341–8.
A fate worse than death? Long term outcome of trauma patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19667888PubMed |

[25]  Grosse SD. Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2008; 8 165–78.
Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20528406PubMed |

[26]  National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Measuring effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. The QALY. 2010. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/newsroom/features/measuringeffectivenessandcosteffectivenesstheqaly.jsp [verified August 2015].

[27]  World Health Organization. Cost-effectiveness thresholds. 2013. Available at: http://www.who.int/choice/costs/CER_thresholds/en/ [verified August 2015].

[28]  George B, Harris A, Mitchell A. Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996). Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19 1103–9.
Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mnpt1yitQ%3D%3D&md5=5e3f1e3ee1fdd3cc5080f045e69a8615CAS | 11735677PubMed |