Relinquishing or taking control? Community perspectives on barriers and opportunities in advance care planning
Vanette E. J. McLennan A B D , Jennifer H. M. Boddy A B , Michelle G. Daly B and Lesley M. Chenoweth A CA Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia. Email: j.boddy@griffith.edu.au
B School of Human Services and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia. Email: projecthealth@griffith.edu.au
C School of Human Services and Social Work, Griffith University, Logan Campus, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Qld 4131, Australia. Email: l.chenoweth@griffith.edu.au
D Corresponding author. Email: v.mclennan@griffith.edu.au
Australian Health Review 39(5) 528-532 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14152
Submitted: 9 September 2014 Accepted: 26 March 2015 Published: 1 June 2015
Journal Compilation © AHHA 2015
Abstract
Objective This paper reports on the experiences and perspectives of community members in relation to advance healthcare directives and enduring power of attorney, including the factors that encourage or discourage engagement in advance care planning (ACP).
Methods A qualitative methodology was used involving 26 in-depth telephone interviews with community members (mean age 66 years). The aims of the interview question were to gain an understanding of: (1) motivations for engaging in ACP; (2) barriers that prevent people from engaging in ACP; and (3) suggestions for promoting ACP.
Results The findings suggest that: (1) community members lack knowledge about ACP; (2) forms appear inaccessible and complex; (3) community members avoid ACP due to fear, mistrust and concerns over control; and (4) there are misperceptions regarding the relevance of ACP based on age and health.
Conclusions There is unnecessary fear, avoidance and mistrust around ACP activities, largely resulting from misinformation. There is an undoubted need for greater education and support to be offered to individuals and their families regarding ACP, its benefits and its limitations.
What is known about the topic? There is a lack of awareness about ACP in Australia, which is compounded by issues in the accessibility of ACP information, forms and support in completing the often complex documentation. Further, studies have indicated health practitioners tend to avoid assisting patients with ACP decision making and formalisation of their wishes for health care should they lose testamentary capacity.
What does this paper add? This paper contributes further understanding of the experiences and perceptions of people, particularly older Australians, in relation to ACP, including the motivating and discouraging factors for people in the uptake of advance healthcare directives and enduring power of attorney. People felt discomfort and mistrust about ACP, and lacked understanding of its relevance regardless of age or health status. Those who had engaged in ACP, prompted by family members or experiences in, or witnessing, ill health, felt a sense of security in having formalised their wishes.
What are the implications for practitioners? It is now clear that people require improved provision of information and support around ACP-related activities. This support may best be offered by practitioners such as nurses and social workers who are knowledgeable regarding ACP and skilled in counselling. Without discussion of death and dying, and the role of ACP, people will continue to feel a mistrust and avoidance towards formalising their healthcare wishes in advance.
Additional keywords: advance directive, aging, community, death and dying, decision making, end-of-life issues, enduring power of attorney.
References
[1] Brown M, Jarrad S. Putting the powers in place: barriers for people with memory loss in planning for the future. J Law Med 2008; 15 530–7.| 18365520PubMed |
[2] Jeong SY, Higgins I, McMillan M. Experiences with advance care planning: older people and family members’ perspective. Int J Older People Nurs 2011; 6 176–86.
| Experiences with advance care planning: older people and family members’ perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21998863PubMed |
[3] Jeong SY, McMillan M, Higgins I. Gerotranscendence: The phenomenon of advance care planning. J Religion Sprit Aging 2012; 24 146–63.
| Gerotranscendence: The phenomenon of advance care planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Boddy J, Chenoweth L, McLennan V, Daly M. It’s just too hard!: Healthcare practitioner perspectives on barriers to advanced care planning. Aust J Primary Health 2012; 19 38–45.
| It’s just too hard!: Healthcare practitioner perspectives on barriers to advanced care planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Scott IA, Mitchell GK, Reymond EJ, Daly MP. Difficult but necessary conversations: the case for advance care planning. Med J Aust 2013; 199 662–6.
| Difficult but necessary conversations: the case for advance care planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24237095PubMed |
[6] Squires B, Barr F. The development of advance care directives in New South Wales. Aust J Ageing 2005; 24 S30–S35.
| The development of advance care directives in New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Brown M, Grbich C, Maddocks I, Parker D, Roe P, Willis E. Documenting end-of-life decisions in residential aged care facilities in South Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2005; 29 85–90.
| Documenting end-of-life decisions in residential aged care facilities in South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15782878PubMed |
[8] Mitchell G. End-of-life care for patients with cancer. Aust Fam Physician 2014; 43 514–19.
| 25114984PubMed |
[9] Schickedanz A, Schillinger D, Landefeld S, Knight S, Williams BA, Sudore RL. A clinical framework for improving the advance care planning process: start with patients’ self-identified barriers. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57 31–9.
| A clinical framework for improving the advance care planning process: start with patients’ self-identified barriers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19170789PubMed |
[10] Sudore RL, Schickedanz A, Landefeld S, Williams BA, Lindquist K, Pantilat S, Schillinger D. Engagement in multiple steps of the advance care planning process: a descriptive study of diverse older adults. J Am Geriatrics 2008; 56 1006–13.
| Engagement in multiple steps of the advance care planning process: a descriptive study of diverse older adults.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Fried TR, Bullock K, Iannone L, O’Leary JR. Understanding advance care planning as a process of health behaviour change. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57 1547–55.
| Understanding advance care planning as a process of health behaviour change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19682120PubMed |
[12] Cartwright C. End-of-life decision making: practical and ethical issues for health professionals. Australas J Ageing 2000; 19 57–62.
| End-of-life decision making: practical and ethical issues for health professionals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Mitchell G, Nicolson C, McDonald K, Bucetti A. Enhancing palliative care in Australia: the residential aged care setting. Aust J Primary Health 2011; 17 95–101.
| Enhancing palliative care in Australia: the residential aged care setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Johnson YM. The bioethical underpinnings of advance directives. Ethics Soc Welf 2009; 3 32–53.
| The bioethical underpinnings of advance directives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Johnson YM, Stadel VL. Completion of advance directives: do social work preadmission interviews make a difference? Res Soc Work Pract 2007; 17 686–96.
| Completion of advance directives: do social work preadmission interviews make a difference?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Simon J, Murray A, Raffin S. Facilitated advance care planning: what is the patient experience? J Palliat Care 2008; 24 256–87.
| 19227017PubMed |
[17] Martin DK, Emanuel LL, Singer PA. Planning for the end of life. Lancet 2000; 356 1672–6.
| Planning for the end of life.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FltlOruw%3D%3D&md5=14b43958c68fe1790a3b5ab701e72433CAS | 11089839PubMed |
[18] Milligan E, Hamilton P. The prevalence and use of advance health directives (AHD’s) in promoting patient autonomy at end-of-life. In: Proceedings of the Gold Coast Health and Medical Research Conference; 2–3 December 2010; Gold Coast. 2010. Available from: http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/264295/2010-GCHMRC-book-FINAL.pdf [verified 18 April 2012].
[19] Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4th edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2011.
