Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of pharmacy students’ rural placement program: preparation for interprofessional practice

H. Khalil A C , A. Leversha A B and J. Walker A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Monash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Rural Health, PO Box 925, Moe, Vic. 3825, Australia. Email: judi.walker@monash.edu

B Monash University, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia. Email: anne.leversha@monash.edu

C Corresponding author. Email: hanan.khalil@monash.edu

Australian Health Review 39(1) 85-88 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14121
Submitted: 27 August 2014  Accepted: 15 September 2014   Published: 27 November 2014

Abstract

Objective To date, there are few data on pharmacy-specific placement programs and their impact on students’ work after graduation. The present study evaluated an innovative rural pharmacy placement program targeted at influencing students to work and live in rural areas after graduation. A secondary aim of the study was to explore the students’ intentions to come back and practice in rural areas as a result of their involvement in the rural pharmacy program.

Methods A questionnaire was distributed, by hand, to a total of 58 third and fourth (final) year pharmacy students undertaking their rural placement in the Gippsland region, in rural Victoria in 2011 and 2012.

Results Fifty-seven responses were returned (response rate = 98%). Students stated that understanding pharmacy practice from a rural perspective, visits to rural health professionals and sites and the attitude of their preceptors were essential to their satisfaction with their rural placements. A significant number of students (72%) intend to seek employment in rural areas if opportunities arise as a result of their increased rural awareness. The key components for a successful rural placement program were described by the surveyed students as social awareness, recognising job opportunities and interprofessional learning.

Conclusion The evaluation of the rural placement program revealed that students valued their visits to rural sites and their interaction with other rural health professionals the most.

What is known about the topic? Rural undergraduate student programs have been initiated as a result of several Australian government strategies to address shortages in rural health workforce. Subsequently, various rural placement programs have been integral parts of several disciplines, including medicine, dentistry, nursing, occupational therapy and pharmacy among others. To date, there are few data on pharmacy-specific placement programs and their impact on students’ work after graduation

What does this paper add? The rural pharmacy program is important in influencing students’ perceptions and interest in a career in rural areas. The key components for a successful rural placement program were described by the surveyed students as social awareness, recognising job opportunities and interprofessional learning.

What are the implications for practitioners? Interprofessional learning and collaboration are inevitable due to the shortage of health professionals and the move towards holistic management of patients in healthcare settings. The development of an interprofessional rural education that combines rural medical and pharmacy students together highlights the importance of an interprofessional approach to preparing students to work in rural areas.

Additional keyword: Gippsland.


References

[1]  Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2011 census of population and housing. OCCP-4 Digit Level by RA. Canberra: ABS; 2011.

[2]  Smith JD, White C, Roufeil L, Veitch C, Pont L, Patel B, Battye K, Luetsch K, Mitchell C. A national study into the rural and remote pharmacist workforce. Rural Remote Health 2013; 13 3–7.

[3]  Bayley SA, Magin PJ, Sweatman JM, Regan CM. Effects of compulsory rural vocational training for Australian general practitioners: a qualitative study. Aust Health Rev 2011; 35 81–5.
Effects of compulsory rural vocational training for Australian general practitioners: a qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21367336PubMed |

[4]  Birden HH, Wilson I. Rural placements are effective for teaching medicine in Australia: evaluation of a cohort of students studying in rural placements. Rural Remote Health 2012; 12 1–3.

[5]  Lee YH, Barnard A, Owen C. Initial evaluation of rural programs at the Australian National University: understanding the effects of rural programs on intentions for rural and remote medical practice. Rural Remote Health 2011; 11 4–7.

[6]  Peach HG. Rural placement programs. Rural Remote Health 2011; 11 1–2.

[7]  Walker JH, DeWitt DE, Pallant JF, Cunningham CE. Rural origin plus a rural clinical school placement is a significant predictor of medical students’ intentions to practice rurally: a multi-university study. Rural Remote Health 2012; 12 1908
| 22239835PubMed |

[8]  Deaville JA, Wynn-Jones J, Hays RB, Coventry PJ, McKinley RK, Randall-Smith J. Perceptions of UK medical students on rural clinical placements. Rural Remote Health 2009; 9 1165
| 19522554PubMed |

[9]  Johnson GE, Blinkhorn AS. Student opinions on a rural placement program in New South Wales, Australia. Rural Remote Health 2011; 11 1703
| 21609133PubMed |

[10]  Taylor SJ, Maharaj P, Williams K, Sheldrake C. Pharmacy students’ intention to practise in a rural setting: measuring the impact of a rural curriculum, rural campus and rural placement on a predominantly metropolitan student cohort. Aust J Rural Health 2009; 17 305–9.
Pharmacy students’ intention to practise in a rural setting: measuring the impact of a rural curriculum, rural campus and rural placement on a predominantly metropolitan student cohort.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19930196PubMed |

[11]  Khalil H, Leversha A. Rural pharmacy workforce challenges: a qualitative study. Austr Pharmacist 2010; 29 256–60.

[12]  Khalil H. Pharmacy practice in rural Gippsland. J Pharm Pract Res 2009; 39 327–34.

[13]  Webster S, Lopez V, Allnut J, Clague L, Jones D, Bennett P.. Undergraduate nursing students’ experiences in a rural clinical placement. Aust J Rural Health 2010; 18 194–8.
Undergraduate nursing students’ experiences in a rural clinical placement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21040080PubMed |

[14]  Williamson MI, Wilson R, McKechnie R, Ross J. Does the positive influence of an undergraduate rural placement persist into postgraduate years? Rural Remote Health 2012; 12 2011
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38jjtFSntw%3D%3D&md5=c12620562e93d8668a34e298affffdd7CAS | 22713111PubMed |

[15]  Soliman SR, MacDowell M, Schriever AE, Glasser M, Schoen MD. An interprofessional rural health education program. Am J Pharm Educ 2012; 76 199–206.
An interprofessional rural health education program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23275664PubMed |

[16]  O’Connor SK, Reichard JS, Thrasher KA, Joyner PU. Prospective student pharmacist interest in a rural pharmacy curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ 2012; 76 105–10.
Prospective student pharmacist interest in a rural pharmacy curriculum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22919081PubMed |

[17]  McNair R, Store N, Sims J, Curtis C. Australian evidence for interprofessional education contributing to effective teamwork preparation and interest in rural practice. J Interprof Care 2005; 19 579–94.
Australian evidence for interprofessional education contributing to effective teamwork preparation and interest in rural practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16373214PubMed |