Scoping study into wound management nurse practitioner models of practice
Michelle A. Gibb A D , Helen E. Edwards B and Glenn E. Gardner C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia.
B Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia. Email: h.edwards@qut.edu.au
C Queensland University of Technology and Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Level 3 N Block, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia. Email: ge.gardner@qut.edu.au
D Corresponding author. Email: michelle.gibb@qut.edu.au
Australian Health Review 39(2) 220-227 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14040
Submitted: 21 February 2014 Accepted: 6 October 2014 Published: 11 December 2014
Abstract
Objectives The primary objective of this research was to investigate wound management nurse practitioner (WMNP) models of service for the purposes of identifying parameters of practice and how patient outcomes are measured.
Methods A scoping study was conducted with all authorised WMNPs in Australia from October to December 2012 using survey methodology. A questionnaire was developed to obtain data on the role and practice parameters of authorised WMNPs in Australia. The tool comprised seven sections and included a total of 59 questions. The questionnaire was distributed to all members of the WMNP Online Peer Review Group, to which it was anticipated the majority of WMNPs belonged.
Results Twenty-one WMNPs responded (response rate 87%), with the results based on a subset of respondents who stated that, at the time of the questionnaire, they were employed as a WMNP, therefore yielding a response rate of 71% (n = 15). Most respondents (93%; n = 14) were employed in the public sector, with an average of 64 occasions of service per month. The typical length of a new case consultation was 60 min, with 32 min for follow ups. The most frequently performed activity was wound photography (83%; n = 12), patient, family or carer education (75%; n = 12), Doppler ankle–brachial pressure index assessment (58%; n = 12), conservative sharp wound debridement (58%; n = 12) and counselling (50%; n = 12). The most routinely prescribed medications were local anaesthetics (25%; n = 12) and oral antibiotics (25%; n = 12). Data were routinely collected by 91% of respondents on service-related and wound-related parameters to monitor patient outcomes, to justify and improve health services provided.
Conclusion This study yielded important baseline information on this professional group, including data on patient problems managed, the types of interventions implemented, the resources used to accomplish outcomes and how outcomes are measured.
What is known about the topic? The nurse practitioner (NP) is an established and legitimised entity of health service in Australia, with NPs in a range of specialities. To date, there is a paucity of research on the role and practice parameters of WMNP in the Australian context.
What does this paper add? This paper provides important baseline information on WMNP models of practice in the Australian context, including data on patient problems managed, the types of interventions implemented, the resources used to accomplish outcomes and how outcomes are currently measured. This information will help inform the development of WMNP roles and highlights potential areas of evaluation for WMNP models of care.
What are the implications for practitioners? Measurement of outcomes is essential to demonstrate efficacy of NP service. Yet, there is no way currently to measure these outcomes for WMNP service. Nationally consistent data collection on processes of care and patient outcomes supports ongoing development of the WMNP role.
References
[1] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s health 2012. Australia’s health series no. 13. Catalogue no. AUS 156. Canberra: AIHW; 2012.[2] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Population projections. Canberra: ABS; 2008.
[3] Edwards H, Finlayson K, Courtney M, Graves N, Gibb M, Parker C. Health service pathways for patients with chronic leg ulcers: identifying effective pathways for facilitation of evidence based wound care. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13 86
| Health service pathways for patients with chronic leg ulcers: identifying effective pathways for facilitation of evidence based wound care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23510505PubMed |
[4] Coyer F, Edwards H, Courtney M. Best practice community care for clients with chronic venous leg ulcers: National Institute of Clinical Studies (NICS) report for Phase 1 evidence uptake network. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology; 2005.
[5] Considine J, Fielding K. Sustainable workforce reform: case study of Victorian nurse practitioner roles. Aust Health Rev 2010; 34 297–303.
| Sustainable workforce reform: case study of Victorian nurse practitioner roles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20797361PubMed |
[6] Gardner G, Gardner A, O’Connell J. Using the Donabedian framework to examine the quality and safety of nursing service innovation. J Clin Nurs 2014; 23 145–55.
| Using the Donabedian framework to examine the quality and safety of nursing service innovation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23834585PubMed |
[7] Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council. National competency standards for the nurse practitioner. Dickson, ACT: Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council; 2013.
[8] Australian Nursing Federation. A snapshot of nurse practitioners in Australia. Kingston, ACT: Australian Nursing Federation; 2011.
[9] Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. Annual report 2011/12. Brisbane: Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency; 2012.
[10] Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. Nurse and midwife registrant data: March 2013. Melbourne: Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency; 2013.
[11] Venning P, Durie A, Roland M, Roberts C, Leese B. Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care. BMJ 2000; 320 1048–53.
| Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3islKksg%3D%3D&md5=439607c4c3f21a9b95172173a09ad713CAS | 10764367PubMed |
[12] Gardner G, Gardner A, Middleton S, Della P, Kain V, Doubrovsky A. The work of nurse practitioners. J Adv Nurs 2010; 66 2160–9.
| The work of nurse practitioners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20636472PubMed |
[13] Gardner G, Carryer J, Gardner A, Dunn S. Nurse practitioner competency standards: findings from collaborative Australian and New Zealand research. Int J Nurs Stud 2006; 43 601–10.
| Nurse practitioner competency standards: findings from collaborative Australian and New Zealand research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16257407PubMed |
[14] Harrington J. Nurse practitioners: a safe and competent choice for primary care. Int Nurs Rev 2010; 17 66–7.
[15] Kinnersley P, Anderson E, Parry K, Clement J, Archard L, Turton P. Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting ‘same day’ consultations in primary care. BMJ 2000; 320 1043–8.
| Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting ‘same day’ consultations in primary care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3islKluw%3D%3D&md5=d53916613ddb0ba3d4e61c4207d520d5CAS | 10764366PubMed |
[16] Lenz ER, Mundinger MO, Kane RL, Hopkins SC, Lin SX. Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: two-year follow-up. Med Care Res Rev 2004; 61 332–51.
| Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: two-year follow-up.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15358970PubMed |
[17] MacLellan L, Gardner A, Gardner G. Designing the future in wound care: the role of the nurse practitioner. Primary Intention: Aust J Wound Manage 2002; 10 97–112.
[18] Lowe G. Scope of emergency nurse practitioner practice: where to beyond clinical practice guidelines? Aust J Adv Nurs 2010; 28 74–82.
[19] Queensland Government. Clinical governance for nurse practitioners in Queensland: a guide. Brisbane: Queensland Government; 2011.
[20] Carryer J, Gardner G, Dunn S, Gardner A. The core role of the nurse practitioner: practice, professionalism and clinical leadership. J Clin Nurs 2007; 16 1818–25.
| The core role of the nurse practitioner: practice, professionalism and clinical leadership.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17880470PubMed |
[21] Lowe G, Plummer V, O’Brien AP, Boyd L. Time to clarify: the value of advanced practice nursing roles in health care. J Adv Nurs 2012; 68 677–85.
| Time to clarify: the value of advanced practice nursing roles in health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21790738PubMed |
[22] Middleton S, Gardner A, Gardner G, Della P. The status of Australian nurse practitioners: the second national census. Aust Health Rev 2011; 35 448–54.
| 22126948PubMed |
[23] Gardner A, Gardner G, Middleton S, Della PR. The status of Australian nurse practitioners: the first national census. Aust Health Rev 2009; 33 679–89.
| The status of Australian nurse practitioners: the first national census.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20166918PubMed |
[24] Jenkins ML. Toward national comparable nurse practitioner data: proposed data elements, rationale, and methods. J Biomed Inform 2003; 36 342–50.
| Toward national comparable nurse practitioner data: proposed data elements, rationale, and methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14643730PubMed |
[25] Harding K, Queen D. Wound registries: a new emerging evidence resource. Int Wound J 2011; 8 325
| Wound registries: a new emerging evidence resource.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21749652PubMed |
[26] Keast DH, Bowering CK, Evans AW, Mackean GL, Burrows C, D’Souza L. MEASURE: a proposed assessment framework for developing best practice recommendations for wound assessment. Wound Repair Regen 2004; 12 S1–17.
| MEASURE: a proposed assessment framework for developing best practice recommendations for wound assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15230830PubMed |
[27] Capasso V, Collins J, Griffith C, Lasala CA, Kilroy S, Martin AT, Pedro J, Wood SL. Outcomes of a clinical nurse specialist-initiated wound care education program: using the promoting action on research implementation in health services framework. Clin Nurse Spec 2009; 23 252–7.
| Outcomes of a clinical nurse specialist-initiated wound care education program: using the promoting action on research implementation in health services framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19710571PubMed |
[28] Bale S. The contribution of the wound care nurse in developing a diabetic foot clinic. Br J Clin Govern 2002; 7 22–6.
| The contribution of the wound care nurse in developing a diabetic foot clinic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Cowman S, Gethin G, Clarke E, Moore Z, Craig G, Jordan-O’Brien J, McLain N, Strapp H. An international eDelphi study identifying the research and education priorities in wound management and tissue repair. J Clin Nurs 2012; 21 344–53.
| An international eDelphi study identifying the research and education priorities in wound management and tissue repair.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22151150PubMed |
[30] Appleby SL. Role of the wound ostomy continence nurse in the home care setting: a patient case study. Home Healthc Nurse 2011; 29 169–77.
| Role of the wound ostomy continence nurse in the home care setting: a patient case study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21368628PubMed |
[31] Moffatt C, Franks P, Morison M. Models of service provision. In Morison M, Moffatt C, Franks P, editors. Leg ulcers: a problem-based learning approach. Edinburgh: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. pp. 99–118.
[32] Gardner G, Gardner A, Middleton S, Della P. The nurse practitioner research toolkit. Brisbane: Australian College of Nurse Practitioners; 2009.
[33] Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. Nurse and midwife registrant data: March 2014. Melbourne: Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia; 2014.
[34] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Nursing and midwifery workforce 2011. National health workforce series no. 2. Catalogue no. HWL 48. Canberra: AIHW; 2012.
[35] Gardner A, Gardner G, Middleton S, Della P. The status of Australian nurse practitioners: the first national census. Aust Health Rev 2009; 33 679–89.
| The status of Australian nurse practitioners: the first national census.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20166918PubMed |
[36] Doughty D. Integrating advanced practice and WOC nursing education. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2000; 27 65–8.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzgtVWhtg%3D%3D&md5=ac0cd665d51f0e44d826677ee1c49da2CAS | 10649146PubMed |
[37] Gray M, Ratliff C, Mawyer R. A brief history of advanced practice nursing and its implications for WOC advanced nursing practice. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2000; 27 48–54.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzgtVWhsA%3D%3D&md5=10e4738edfe99c014aaa1f1554e430b6CAS | 10649144PubMed |
[38] Mitchell JR. Development of the advanced practice nurse role in wound management. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2003; 9 1–7.
| Development of the advanced practice nurse role in wound management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[39] Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. Nurse practitioner standards for practice. Melbourne: Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia; 2014.
[40] National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. A healthier future for all Australians: final report of the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. Barton, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009.
[41] Edwards H, Chapman H, Davis LM. Utilization of research evidence by nurses. Nurs Health Sci 2002; 4 89–95.
| Utilization of research evidence by nurses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12153406PubMed |
[42] Squires JE, Hutchinson AM, Bostrom AM, O’Rourke HM, Cobban SJ, Estabrooks CA. To what extent do nurses use research in clinical practice? A systematic review. Implement Sci 2011; 6 21
| To what extent do nurses use research in clinical practice? A systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21414206PubMed |
[43] Bryant J, Boyes A, Jones K, Sanson-Fisher R, Carey M, Fry R. Examining and addressing evidence-practice gaps in cancer care: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2014; 9 37
| Examining and addressing evidence-practice gaps in cancer care: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24666544PubMed |
[44] Barton AJ, Baramee J, Sowers D, Robertson KJ. Articulating the value-added dimension of NP care. Nurse Pract 2003; 28 34–40.
| Articulating the value-added dimension of NP care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14702555PubMed |
[45] Smith E, McGuiness W. Managing venous leg ulcers in the community: personal financial cost to sufferers. Wound Pract Res: Aust J Wound Manage 2010; 18 134–9.
[46] Graham ID, Harrison MB, Moffatt C, Franks P. Leg ulcer care: nursing attitudes and knowledge. Can Nurse 2001; 97 19–24.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387jtVWhsQ%3D%3D&md5=2e4d12dad64b9b85490f8d6f24ca4a12CAS | 11865729PubMed |
[47] Simon DA, Freak L, Kinsella A, Walsh J, Lane C, Groarke L, McCollum C. Community leg ulcer clinics: treatment comparative study in two health authorities. British Medical Journal 1996; 312 1648–1651.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK283ms1yhug%3D%3D&md5=bf4e77c5942fc8b5cf301e64d1861d46CAS | 8664719PubMed |
[48] Centre for International Economics (CIE). The CIE final report. Responsive patient centred care. The economic value and potential of nurse practitioners in Australia. Canberra: CIE; 2013.
[49] Horrocks S, Anderson E, Salisbury C. Systemic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. BMJ 2002; 324 819–23.
| Systemic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11934775PubMed |
[50] Laurant MG, Hermens RP, Braspenning JC, Akkermans RP, Sibbald B, Grol RP. An overview of patients’ preference for, and satisfaction with, care provided by general practitioners and nurse practitioners. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17 2690–8.
| An overview of patients’ preference for, and satisfaction with, care provided by general practitioners and nurse practitioners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18647199PubMed |
[51] Edwards H, Courtney M, Finlayson K, Lindsay E, Lewis C, Shuter P. Chronic venous leg ulcers: effect of a community nursing intervention on pain and healing. Nurs Stand 2005; 19 47–54.
| Chronic venous leg ulcers: effect of a community nursing intervention on pain and healing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16163986PubMed |
[52] Agosta LJ. Patient satisfaction with nurse practitioner-delivered primary healthcare services. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2009; 21 610–17.
| Patient satisfaction with nurse practitioner-delivered primary healthcare services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19900223PubMed |
[53] Edwards H, Courtney M, Finlayson K, Shuter P, Lindsay E. A randomised controlled trial of a community nursing intervention: improved quality of life and healing for clients with chronic leg ulcers. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18 1541–9.
| A randomised controlled trial of a community nursing intervention: improved quality of life and healing for clients with chronic leg ulcers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19490293PubMed |
[54] Finlayson K, Edwards H, Courtney M. The impact of psychosocial factors on adherence to compression therapy to prevent recurrence of venous leg ulcers. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19 1289–97.
| The impact of psychosocial factors on adherence to compression therapy to prevent recurrence of venous leg ulcers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20500338PubMed |
[55] van Offenbeek MAG, Knip M. The organizational and performance effects of nurse practitioner roles. J Adv Nurs 2004; 47 672–81.
| The organizational and performance effects of nurse practitioner roles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[56] Bolton L. Wounds: A compendium of clinical research and practice. Wounds 2012; 24 18–24.
