Time spent on daytime direct care activities by personal carers in two Australian residential aged care facilities: a time–motion study
Siyu Qian A , Ping Yu A C , David M. Hailey A , Zhenyu Zhang A , Pamela J. Davy B and Mark I. Nelson BA School of Information Systems and Technology, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. Email: sq992@uowmail.edu.au; dhailey@ozemail.com.au; zhenyu52@hotmail.com
B School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. Email: pjd@uow.edu.au; mnelson@uow.edu.au
C Corresponding author. Email: ping@uow.edu.au
Australian Health Review 38(2) 230-237 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13161
Submitted: 17 August 2013 Accepted: 18 December 2013 Published: 31 March 2014
Abstract
Objective To examine the time, frequency and duration of each direct care activity conducted by personal carers in Australian residential aged care homes.
Methods A time–motion study was conducted to observe 46 personal carers at two high-care houses in two facilities (14 days at Site 1 and 16 days at Site 2). Twenty-three direct care activities were classified into eight categories for analysis.
Results Overall, a personal carer spent approximately 45% of their time on direct care, corresponding to 3.5 h in an 8-h daytime shift. The two sites had similar ratios of personal carers to residents, and each resident received 30 min of direct care. No significant differences between the two sites were found in the time spent on oral communication, personal hygiene and continence activities. Personal carers at Site 1 spent significantly less time on toileting and mobility activities than those at Site 2, but more time on lunch activity. Although oral communication took the longest time (2 h), it occurred concurrently with other activities (e.g. dressing) for 1.5 h.
Conclusions The findings provide information that may assist decision makers in managing the operation of high-care residential aged care facilities, such as planning for task allocation and staffing.
What is known about the topic? Overall, 30%–45% of the care staff’s time is spent on direct care in residential aged care facilities.
What does this paper add? This paper adds knowledge about how much time is required to conduct each direct care activity and the frequency and duration of conducting these activities to meet residents’ day-to-day care needs in two high-care houses in two aged care facilities.
What are the implications for practitioners? On average, a resident with high-care needs requires 30 min direct care. There may exist a basic minimum desirable ratio of personal carers to residents in high-care facilities. Residents’ toileting needs are high after meals. Communication with residents represents an essential role in providing care.
Additional keywords: activity, long-term care, nursing home, observation, personal care.
References
[1] Productivity Commission. Economic implications of an ageing Australia. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2005.[2] Martin B, King D. Who cares for older Australians? A picture of the residential and community based aged care workforce, 2007. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2008.
[3] Richardson S, Martin B. The care of older Australians: a picture of the residential aged care workforce. Adelaide: The National Institute of Labour Studies, Flinders University; 2004.
[4] Urden LD, Roode JI. Work sampling. A decision-making tool for determining resources and work redesign. J Nurs Adm 1997; 27 34–41.
| Work sampling. A decision-making tool for determining resources and work redesign.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9300013PubMed |
[5] Thomson MS, Gruneir A, Lee M, Baril J, Field TS, Gurwitz JH, et al Nursing time devoted to medication administration in long-term care: clinical, safety, and resource implications. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57 266–72.
| Nursing time devoted to medication administration in long-term care: clinical, safety, and resource implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19170782PubMed |
[6] Munyisia EN, Yu P, Hailey D. How nursing staff spend their time on activities in a nursing home: an observational study. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67 1908–17.
| How nursing staff spend their time on activities in a nursing home: an observational study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21466577PubMed |
[7] Cornell P, Herrin-Griffith D, Keim C, Petschonek S, Sanders AM, D’Mello S, et al Transforming nursing workflow, part 1: The chaotic nature of nurse activities. J Nurs Adm 2010; 40 366–73.
| Transforming nursing workflow, part 1: The chaotic nature of nurse activities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20798619PubMed |
[8] Poulos CJ, Gazibarich BM, Eagar K. Supporting work practices, improving patient flow and monitoring performance using a clinical information management system. Aust Health Rev 2007; 31 79–85.
| Supporting work practices, improving patient flow and monitoring performance using a clinical information management system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Abbey M, Chaboyer W, Mitchell M. Understanding the work of intensive care nurses: a time and motion study. Aust Crit Care 2012; 25 13–22.
| Understanding the work of intensive care nurses: a time and motion study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21937236PubMed |
[10] Anupindi R, Chopra S, Deshmukh SD, Van Mieghem JA, Zemel E. Managing business process flows. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2011.
[11] Womack JP, Miller D. Going lean in health care. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2005.
[12] Kim CS, Spahlinger DA, Kin JM, Billi JE. Lean health care: what can hospitals learn from a world-class automaker? J Hosp Med 2006; 1 191–9.
| Lean health care: what can hospitals learn from a world-class automaker?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17219493PubMed |
[13] Westbrook JI, Ampt A. Design, application and testing of the work observation method by activity timing (wombat) to measure clinicians’ patterns of work and communication. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 S25–33.
| Design, application and testing of the work observation method by activity timing (wombat) to measure clinicians’ patterns of work and communication.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18951838PubMed |
[14] Munyisia EN, Yu P, Hailey D. Development and testing of a work measurement tool to assess caregivers’ activities in residential aged care facilities. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160 1226–30.
| Development and testing of a work measurement tool to assess caregivers’ activities in residential aged care facilities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Qian SY, Yu P, Zhang ZY, Hailey D, Davy P, Nelson M. The work pattern of personal care workers in two australian nursing homes: a time–motion study. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12 305
| The work pattern of personal care workers in two australian nursing homes: a time–motion study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22953995PubMed |
[16] Luttenberger K, Graessel E. Recording care time in nursing homes: development and validation of the ‘rud-foca’ (resource utilization in dementia–formal care). Int Psychogeriatr 2010; 22 1291–300.
| Recording care time in nursing homes: development and validation of the ‘rud-foca’ (resource utilization in dementia–formal care).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20478097PubMed |
[17] Kobayashi N, Yamamoto M. Impact of the stage of dementia on the time required for bathing-related care: a pilot study in a japanese nursing home. Int J Nurs Stud 2004; 41 767–74.
| Impact of the stage of dementia on the time required for bathing-related care: a pilot study in a japanese nursing home.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15288799PubMed |
[18] Thorsell K, Nordström B, Fagerström L, Sivberg B. Time in care for older people living in nursing homes. Nursing Research and Practice 2010; 2010 148435
| Time in care for older people living in nursing homes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21994810PubMed |
[19] Gilbreth FB. Motion study a method for increasing the efficiency of the workman. London: Constable and Company; 1911.
[20] Productivity Commission. Trends in aged care services. Canberra: Productivity Commision; 2008.
[21] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Residential aged care in Australia 2010–11: a statistical overview. Canberra: AIHW; 2012.
[22] Pelletier D, Duffield C. Work sampling: valuable methodology to define nursing practice patterns. Nurs Health Sci 2003; 5 31–8.
| Work sampling: valuable methodology to define nursing practice patterns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12603719PubMed |
[23] Productivity Commission. Caring for older Australians. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra; 2011.
[24] Bowers BJ, Esmond S, Jacobson N. The relationship between staffing and quality in long-term care facilities: exploring the views of nurse aides. J Nurs Care Qual 2000; 14 55–64.
| The relationship between staffing and quality in long-term care facilities: exploring the views of nurse aides.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10881450PubMed |
[25] Finkler SA, Knickman JR, Hendrickson G, Lipkin MJ, Thompson WG. A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research. Health Serv Res 1993; 28 577–97.
| 8270422PubMed |
[26] Ampt A, Westbrook J, Creswick N, Mallock N. A comparison of self-reported and observational work sampling techniques for measuring time in nursing tasks. J Health Serv Res Policy 2007; 12 18–24.
| A comparison of self-reported and observational work sampling techniques for measuring time in nursing tasks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17244393PubMed |
[27] Schnelle JF, Ouslander JG, Simmons SF. Direct observations of nursing home care quality: does care change when observed? J Am Med Dir Assoc 2006; 7 541–4.
| Direct observations of nursing home care quality: does care change when observed?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17095417PubMed |
