Feasibility of ambulatory withdrawal management delivered in a NSW drug health service and correlates of completion
Rachel M. Deacon A B C , Susan Hines B , Kenneth Curry B , Maggie Tynan B and Carolyn A. Day AA Discipline of Addiction Medicine, Central Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Drug Health Services, Level 6 KGV Building, Missenden Road, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia. Email: carolyn.day@sydney.edu.au
B Canterbury Drug Health Services, Sydney Local Health District, Corner Tudor Street and Canterbury Road, Campsie, NSW 2209, Australia. Email: susan.hines@email.cs.nsw.gov.au; ken@email.cs.nsw.gov.au; maggie@email.cs.nsw.gov.au
C Corresponding author. Email: rachel.deacon@sydney.edu.au
Australian Health Review 38(2) 186-189 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13014
Submitted: 21 September 2012 Accepted: 12 December 2013 Published: 4 March 2014
Abstract
Objective The aim of the present study was to assess short-term ambulatory withdrawal management (AWM) outcomes at a drug health service (DHS) in Sydney, Australia, in the absence of specific funding.
Methods A clinic file audit review was conducted of patients who commenced AWM at the service during January 2009–June 2011. Successful completion was defined as daily attendance with ≤1 missed day, or transfer onto opioid substitution treatment.
Results Of 110 episodes, 69 (63%) were completed. Median patient age was 35 years (range 18–71 years), and most patients (68%) were male. Patients presented primarily for cannabis (33%) or alcohol (30%) withdrawal, followed by heroin (19%) or other opioids (6%), and benzodiazepines (12%). Completion rates varied from 86% for non-heroin opioids to 31% for benzodiazepines. Older age was associated with increased completion: 76% of those aged >35 years completed compared with 50% of those ≤35 years of age. Only 46% of women who commenced withdrawal management completed compared with 71% of men.
Conclusions Most people commencing AWM at the DHS completed the program, indicating AWM can be performed at public drug and alcohol clinics. Service improvements may help increase completion rates among women and patients withdrawing from benzodiazepines.
What is known about the topic? WM is not a standalone treatment for substance dependence, but is commonly a first attempt at treatment. AWM is often more acceptable to patients, and cheaper, than in-patient services.
What does this paper add? About two-thirds of patients entering an AWM program operating since 2001 continue to complete the program.
What are the implications for practitioners? AWM can be carried out successfully through public drug and alcohol services, although clinic staff support is important.
Additional keywords: ambulatory care, substance abuse treatment centres, substance-related disorders, substance withdrawal syndrome.
References
[1] NSW Health. Drug and alcohol withdrawal clinical practice guidelines: NSW. Sydney: Mental Health and Drug and Alcohol Office, NSW Department of Health; 2008.[2] Blondell RD. Ambulatory detoxification of patients with alcohol dependence. Am Fam Physician 2005; 71 495–502.
| 15712624PubMed |
[3] Lipton DS, Maranda MJ. Detoxification from heroin dependency. Adv Alcohol Subst Abuse 1982; 2 31–55.
| Detoxification from heroin dependency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[4] Gossop M. Medically supervised withdrawal as stand-alone treatment. In Strain EC, Stitzer ML, eds. The treatment of opioid dependence. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2008. pp. 346–62.
[5] Amato L, Minozzi S, Davoli M, Vecchi S, Ferri MM, Mayet S. Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments versus pharmacological treatments for opioid detoxification. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 4 CD005031
| 18843675PubMed |
[6] Gowing LR, Ali RL. The place of detoxification in treatment of opioid dependence. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2006; 19 266–70.
| The place of detoxification in treatment of opioid dependence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16612211PubMed |
[7] Mattick RP, Hall W. Are detoxification programmes effective? Lancet 1996; 347 97–100.
| Are detoxification programmes effective?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK287jtlSgtg%3D%3D&md5=a61a56ebcd54a911f5c4847cd54bf502CAS | 8538351PubMed |
[8] Gossop M, Strang J.. Price, cost and value of opiate detoxification treatments. Reanalysis of data from two randomised trials. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 177 262–6.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvptVyjsA%3D%3D&md5=f729501dd3bc716f19f4bcca443a8f39CAS | 11040889PubMed |
[9] Hayashida M, Alterman AI, McLellan AT, O’Brien CP, Purtill JJ, Volpicelli JR, et al Comparative effectiveness and costs of inpatient and outpatient detoxification of patients with mild-to-moderate alcohol withdrawal syndrome. N Engl J Med 1989; 320 358–65.
| Comparative effectiveness and costs of inpatient and outpatient detoxification of patients with mild-to-moderate alcohol withdrawal syndrome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7ht1akuw%3D%3D&md5=a00f545f10bf6717bc1975ab1d27b972CAS | 2913493PubMed |
[10] Cole SG, Lehman WE, Cole EA, Jones A. Inpatient vs outpatient treatment of alcohol and drug abusers. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1981; 8 329–45.
| Inpatient vs outpatient treatment of alcohol and drug abusers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL387nvFCrsA%3D%3D&md5=f2a1574300c692c8d7c186dcdcbee097CAS | 7041624PubMed |
[11] Day E, Ison J, Strang J. Inpatient versus other settings for detoxification for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 2 CD004580
| 15846721PubMed |
[12] Hayashida M. An overview of outpatient and inpatient detoxification. Alcohol Health Res World 1998; 22 44–6.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FnslOmsg%3D%3D&md5=34b90461ae165af1cd138d39dc94ce17CAS | 15706732PubMed |
[13] Sannibale C, Fucito L, O’Connor D, Curry K. Process evaluation of an out-patient detoxification service. Drug Alcohol Rev 2005; 24 475–81.
| Process evaluation of an out-patient detoxification service.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16361203PubMed |
[14] Lintzeris N, Bell J, Bammer G, Jolley DJ, Rushworth L. A randomized controlled trial of buprenorphine in the management of short-term ambulatory heroin withdrawal. Addiction 2002; 97 1395–404.
| A randomized controlled trial of buprenorphine in the management of short-term ambulatory heroin withdrawal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12410780PubMed |
[15] Digiusto E, Lintzeris N, Breen C, Kimber J, Mattick RP, Bell J, et al Short-term outcomes of five heroin detoxification methods in the Australian NEPOD Project. Addict Behav 2005; 30 443–56.
| Short-term outcomes of five heroin detoxification methods in the Australian NEPOD Project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15718062PubMed |
[16] White R, Alcorn R, Feinmann C. Two methods of community detoxification from opiates: an open-label comparison of lofexidine and buprenorphine. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001; 65 77–83.
| Two methods of community detoxification from opiates: an open-label comparison of lofexidine and buprenorphine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXosFKruro%3D&md5=efbdf260e8d8fbf483f5f18aeae265ebCAS | 11714592PubMed |
[17] Gibson AE, Doran CM, Bell JR, Ryan A, Lintzeris N. A comparison of buprenorphine treatment in clinic and primary care settings: a randomised trial. Med J Aust 2003; 179 38–42.
| 12831383PubMed |
[18] Alterman AI, Hayashida M, O’Brien CP. Treatment response and safety of ambulatory medical detoxication. J Stud Alcohol 1988; 49 160–6.
| 1:STN:280:DyaL1c3gtFWqsA%3D%3D&md5=c1596116382f681431fc1ed7073161a9CAS | 3361908PubMed |
[19] Wiseman EJ, Henderson KL, Briggs LPJ. Outcomes of patients in a VA ambulatory detoxification program. Psychiatr Serv 1997; 48 200–3.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7ntl2rsQ%3D%3D&md5=bc8d313127fb5c549823055ef73c82d6CAS | 9021850PubMed |
[20] Allan C, Smith I, Mellin M. Detoxification from alcohol: A comparison of home detoxification and hospital-based day patient care. Alcohol Alcohol 2000; 35 66–9.
| Detoxification from alcohol: A comparison of home detoxification and hospital-based day patient care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7kvF2nsw%3D%3D&md5=0301235377d8b7a94917607ebb8a4d95CAS | 10684780PubMed |
[21] Soyka M, Horak M. Outpatient alcohol detoxification: implementation efficacy and outcome effectiveness of a model project. Eur Addict Res 2004; 10 180–7.
| Outpatient alcohol detoxification: implementation efficacy and outcome effectiveness of a model project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15367820PubMed |
[22] Day C, Degenhardt L, Hall W. Heroin markets in New South Wales: documenting the heroin shortage. Drug Alcohol Rev 2006; 25 297–305.
| Heroin markets in New South Wales: documenting the heroin shortage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16854654PubMed |
[23] Day CA, Demirkol A, Tynan M, Curry K, Hines S, Lintzeris N, et al Individual versus team-based case-management for clients of opioid treatment services: an initial evaluation of what clients prefer. Drug Alcohol Rev 2012; 31 499–506.
| Individual versus team-based case-management for clients of opioid treatment services: an initial evaluation of what clients prefer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21919976PubMed |
[24] Health NSW. Drug and alcohol treatment services in NSW 2005/06: annual report on the NSW minimum data set. Sydney: NSW Department of Health; 2007.
[25] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Drugs in Australia 2010: tobacco, alcohol and other drugs. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2011.
[26] Degenhardt L, Conroy E, Day C, Gilmour S, Hall W. The impact of a reduction in drug supply on demand for and compliance with treatment for drug dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 2005; 79 129–35.
| The impact of a reduction in drug supply on demand for and compliance with treatment for drug dependence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16002022PubMed |
[27] Greenfield SF, Brooks AJ, Gordon SM, Green CA, Kropp F, McHugh RK, et al Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: a review of the literature. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 86 1–21.
| Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: a review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16759822PubMed |
