Increasing the influence of one’s research on policy

References

[1]  Crouch SR. Opportunistic evidence: evidence-based policy in the setting of the Australian Government’s chlamydia screening pilot. Aust Health Rev 2012; 36 57–60.
| Opportunistic evidence: evidence-based policy in the setting of the Australian Government’s chlamydia screening pilot.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Flitcroft K, Gillespie J, Salkeld G, Carter S, Trevena L. Getting evidence into policy: the need for deliberative strategies? Soc Sci Med 2011; 72 1039–46.
| Getting evidence into policy: the need for deliberative strategies?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Commonwealth of Australia. Ahead of the game: Blueprint for the reform of Australian government administration. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010.

[4]  Department of Innovation Industry Science and Research. APS Innovation Action Plan. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2011.

[5]  Glasgow NJ, Marley JE, Kristjanson LJ, Donovan JA, Hall SJ, Harris MF, et al Bringing evidence to bear on policy processes: the challenge of the Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute. Med J Aust 2008; 188 S46–9.

[6]  Caplan N. The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. Am Behav Sci 1979; 22 459–470.
| The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Coombs HC. Royal Commission on Australian Government Administration. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1976.

[8]  Commonwealth of Australia. Senior Executive Service of the Australian Public Service, One APS – One SES. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2005.

[9]  Baumbusch JL, Kirkham SR, Khan KB, McDonald H, Semeniuk P, Tan E, et al Pursuing common agendas: a collaborative model for knowledge translation between research and practice in clinical settings. Res Nurs Health 2008; 31 130–40.
| Pursuing common agendas: a collaborative model for knowledge translation between research and practice in clinical settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Dobbins M, Robeson P, Ciliska D, Hanna S, Cameron R, O’Mara L, et al A description of a knowledge broker role implemented as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating three knowledge translation strategies. Implement Sci 2009; 4 23
| A description of a knowledge broker role implemented as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating three knowledge translation strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Gilson L, Di M. The interface between research and policy: experience from South Africa. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67 748–59.
| The interface between research and policy: experience from South Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Jewell CJ, Bero LA. ‘Developing good taste in evidence’: Facilitators of and hindrances to evidence-informed health policymaking in state government. Milbank Q 2008; 86 177–208.
| ‘Developing good taste in evidence’: Facilitators of and hindrances to evidence-informed health policymaking in state government.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Kothari A, MacLean L, Edwards N, Hobbs A. Indicators at the interface: managing policymaker-researcher collaboration. Knowledge Manag Res Prac 2011; 9 203–14.
| Indicators at the interface: managing policymaker-researcher collaboration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Lavis J, Ross S, Hurley J, Hohenadel J, Stoddart G, Woodward C, et al Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. Milbank Q 2002; 80 125–54.
| Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Lavis JN, Moynihan R, Oxman AD, Paulsen EJ. Evidence-informed health policy 4 – Case descriptions of organizations that support the use of research evidence. Implement Sci 2008; 3

[16]  Lomas J. The in-between world of knowledge brokering. BMJ 2007; 334 129–32.
| The in-between world of knowledge brokering.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Ward V, House A, Hamer S. Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain? Evid Policy 2009; 5 267–79.
| Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Clayton H, Culshaw F. Science into policy: Taking part in the process. Swindon: Natural Environment Research Council; 2011.

[19]  Wiseman J. Dancing with strangers: Understanding the parallel universes of academic researchers and public sector policy makers. Occasional Paper No. 11. Melbourne: Australia and New Zealand School of Government and the State Services Authority of Victoria; 2010.

[20]  Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Glossary of knowledge exchange terms as used by CHSRF. Ottawa: CHSRF. Available from: http://66.240.150.14/glossary/k/view-eng.html [verified 30 January 2013].

[21]  Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A. Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002; 7 239–44.
| Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Moore G, Redman S, Haines M, Todd A. What works to increase the use of research in population health policy and programmes: a review. Evid Policy 2011; 7 277–305.
| What works to increase the use of research in population health policy and programmes: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Mitchell P, Pirkis J, Hall J, Haas M. Partnerships for knowledge exchange in health services research, policy and practice. J Health Serv Res Policy 2009; 14 104–11.
| Partnerships for knowledge exchange in health services research, policy and practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Edwards M. Social science research and public policy: narrowing the divide. Aust J Public Admin 2005; 64 68–74.
| Social science research and public policy: narrowing the divide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[25]  Gibson B. Beyond ‘Two Communities’. In Gibson B, Lin V, eds. Evidenced based health policy: Problems and possibilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. pp. 18–30.

[26]  Parker R, Davies P. Priority driven research in primary health care: how well has the Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute performed in knowledge translation? Intnl Public Health J 2011; 3 167–77.

[27]  Jacobson N, Butterill D, Goering P. Consulting as a strategy for knowledge transfer. Milbank Q. 2005; 83 299–321.
| Consulting as a strategy for knowledge transfer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[28]  Department of Health Victoria. Health Innovation and Reform Council. Melbourne. Melbourne: Department of Health Victoria; 2011. Available online at: http://www.health.vic.gov.au/hirc/ [verified 24 September 2012]

[29]  Kalucy EC, Jackson-Bowers E, McIntyre E, Reed R. The feasibility of determining the impact of primary health care research projects using the Payback Framework. Health Res Policy Syst 2009; 7 11
| The feasibility of determining the impact of primary health care research projects using the Payback Framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[30]  Lavis J, et al SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) Health Research Policy and Systems 2009; 7 p. 1

[31]  Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Reader-friendly writing – 1 : 3 : 25. 2010. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Available from: http://www.cfhi-fcass.ca/Migrated/PDF/CommunicationNotes/cn-1325_e.pdf [verified 30 January 2013].