Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Resource barriers to the facilitation of organ and tissue donation reported by Australian emergency clinicians

Claudia H. Marck A B H , George A. Jelinek A C , Sandra L. Neate D E , Bernadine M. Dwyer F , Bernadette B. Hickey E G and Tracey J. Weiland A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Emergency Practice Innovation Centre, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, 35 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, VIC. 3065, Australia. Email: george.jelinek@gmail.com, tracey.weiland@svhm.org.au

B Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

C Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC. 3010, Australia.

D Emergency Department, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, VIC. 3065, Australia. Email: sandra.neate@svhm.org.au

E Organ and Tissue Donation Department, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, VIC. 3065, Australia.

F Organ and Tissue Authority, Level 2, 19-21 Argyle Place South, Carlton, VIC. 3053, Australia. Email: bdwyer@redcrossblood.org.au

G Intensive Care Unit, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, VIC. 3065, Australia. Email: bernadette.hickey@svhm.org.au

H Corresponding author. Email: claudia.marck@svhm.org.au

Australian Health Review 37(1) 60-65 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH11121
Submitted: 5 December 2011  Accepted: 13 May 2012   Published: 2 November 2012

Abstract

Objective. To explore emergency department clinicians’ perceived resource barriers to facilitating organ and tissue donation (OTD).

Methods. A cross-sectional national online survey of Australian emergency department (ED) clinicians.

Results. ED clinicians reported a range of resource barriers that hinder the facilitation of OTD, most notably a lack of time to discuss OTD with a patient’s family (74.6%). Those reporting more resource barriers had been less involved in OTD-related tasks. For example, those reporting a lack of time to assess a patient’s suitability to be a potential donor had less experience with OTD-related tasks in the last calendar year than did those who reported that they often or always have enough time for this (P < 0.01). In addition, ED clinicians working in DonateLife network hospitals were more involved in OTD-related tasks (P < 0.01) and reported fewer resource shortages in the ED and the hospital overall.

Conclusions. Resource shortages hinder the facilitation of OTD in the ED and are related to decreased involvement in OTD-related tasks. In addition, ED clinicians working in DonateLife hospitals are more involved in OTD-related tasks and report fewer resource shortages overall. Addressing resource shortages and extending the DonateLife network could benefit OTD rates initiated from the ED.

What is known about the topic? Increasing the rate of organ and tissue donation (OTD) has become progressively more urgent as waiting lists for organs and tissues are growing globally. Recently a missed potential donor pool was recognised in emergency departments (EDs) and the Organ and Tissue Authority implemented a ‘clinical trigger’ tool to aid with the identification of potential donors in EDs. However, many Australian studies have reported worsening ED overcrowding and resource shortages in recent years with an adverse effect on patient care and satisfaction as well as on ED clinicians’ work-related stress and satisfaction. International literature has identified that certain resource barriers hinder the facilitation of organ and tissue in EDs. However, there is currently no literature available on how resource barriers in Australian EDs affect the facilitation of OTD.

What does this paper add? Our study shows that Australian ED clinicians perceive a range of resource barriers that hinder the facilitation of OTD, most notably a lack of time to discuss OTD with a patient’s family or to identify potential donors. We also found that those reporting more resource barriers had been less involved in OTD-related tasks in the last calendar year. In addition, those that work in hospitals that are part of the DonateLife network, and thus have dedicated staff available for OTD-related tasks, were more involved in OTD-related tasks and reported fewer resource shortages in the ED and the hospital overall.

What are the implications for practitioners? To maximize the number of potential donors recognised and referred from the ED, it may be important to decrease the resource barriers identified in this study. Notably, the presence of specialist OTD staff, a function of being part of a DonateLife network hospital, may result in a decreased perception of resource barriers in the ED and more engagement with OTD-related tasks by ED clinicians.


References

[1]  Australia and New Zealand Organ Donation Registry. Organ waiting list data. [28–11–2011]; Available from: http://www.anzdata.org.au/anzod/v1/indexanzod.html [Verified 28 November 2011].

[2]  Australia and New Zealand Organ Donation Registry. Summary of Organ Donation statistics. Available from: http://www.anzdata.org.au/anzod/v1/indexanzod.html [Verified 28 November 2011].

[3]  Australia and New Zealand Organ Donation Registry. Australia and New Zealand Organ Donation Registry 2011 report, 2011. Available from: http://www.anzdata.org.au/anzod/ANZODReport/2011/ANZOD2011.pdf [Verified 17 September 2012].

[4]  Schnitzler MA, Lentine KL, Burroughs TE. The cost effectiveness of deceased organ donation. Transplantation 2005; 80 1636–7.
The cost effectiveness of deceased organ donation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16371937PubMed |

[5]  Schnitzler MA, Whiting JF, Brennan DC, Lentine KL, Desai NM, Chapman W, et al The life-years saved by a deceased organ donor. Am J Transplant 2005; 5 2289–96.
The life-years saved by a deceased organ donor.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16095511PubMed |

[6]  Prakoso E, Verran D, Dilworth P, Kyd G, Tang P, Tse C, et al Increasing liver transplantation waiting list mortality: a report from the Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Sydney. Intern Med J 2010; 40 619–25.
Increasing liver transplantation waiting list mortality: a report from the Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Sydney.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cfisFKisg%3D%3D&md5=e335497732575bdebef4482d00f7140dCAS | 20840212PubMed |

[7]  Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine. Annual report 2009/2010. Available from www.vifm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/AR-2009-2010.pdf [Verified 28 November 2011].

[8]  Louise Greene Consulting for The National Health and Medical Research Council National Institute of Clinical Studies. Review of the National Organ Donation Collaborative, interim report, 2009. Available from: http://www.donatelife.gov.au/Media/docs/National%20Organ%20Donor%20Collabotative%20Interim%20Review-04666ca4-19d1-4b6b-86b9-b2939b04b08b-0.pdf [Verified 17 September 2012].

[9]  Siminoff LA, Gordon N, Hewlett J, Arnold RM. Factors influencing families’ consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. JAMA 2001; 286 71–7.
Factors influencing families’ consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvgtFeqsw%3D%3D&md5=22a7b595fcc3b970100191631baddf96CAS | 11434829PubMed |

[10]  Aubrey P, Arber S, Tyler M. The organ donor crisis: the missed organ donor potential from the accident and emergency departments. Transplant Proc 2008; 40 1008–11.
The organ donor crisis: the missed organ donor potential from the accident and emergency departments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czos1Ortw%3D%3D&md5=85bd080482996a26d14fa3460fa6617cCAS | 18555101PubMed |

[11]  Michael GE, O’Connor RE. The importance of emergency medicine in organ donation: successful donation is more likely when potential donors are referred from the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16 850–8.
The importance of emergency medicine in organ donation: successful donation is more likely when potential donors are referred from the emergency department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19673710PubMed |

[12]  Opdam HI, Silvester W. Identifying the potential organ donor: an audit of hospital deaths. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30 1390–7.
Identifying the potential organ donor: an audit of hospital deaths.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15024567PubMed |

[13]  Opdam HI, Silvester W. Potential for organ donation in Victoria: an audit of hospital deaths. Med J Aust 2006; 185 250–4.
| 16948619PubMed |

[14]  Harris A, Sharma A. Access block and overcrowding in emergency departments: an empirical analysis. Emerg Med J 2010; 27 508–11.
Access block and overcrowding in emergency departments: an empirical analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20584950PubMed |

[15]  Sprivulis PC, Da Silva JA, Jacobs IG, Frazer AR, Jelinek GA. The association between hospital overcrowding and mortality among patients admitted via Western Australian emergency departments. Med J Aust 2006; 184 208–12.
| 16515429PubMed |

[16]  Forero R, Hillman K. Access block and overcrowding: a literature review. Prepared for the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM): Simpson Centre for Health Services Research South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, 2008.

[17]  Australian Healthcare Associates. Organ and Tissue Donation Reform Package, mid-point implementation review report, 2011. Available from: http://www.donatelife.gov.au/media/docs/The_Authority/Mid-point_Implementation_Review_Final_Report.pdf

[18]  Marck CH, Weiland TJ, Neate SN, Hickey BB, Jelinek GA. Assessing barriers to organ and tissue donation in emergency departments. Final Report: St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne; 2012. Available from: http://donatelifeforum.com.au/downloads/The_ABODE_study.pdf [Verified 17 September 2012].

[19]  Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986; 35 382–386.
Determination and quantification of content validity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL2s%2FktVyisw%3D%3D&md5=79ed8941695a6485dbc70e5a5ff1ce71CAS | 3640358PubMed |

[20]  SurveyMonkey. SurveyMonkey.com, LLC Available from: www.surveymonkey.com

[21]  Raosoft. Sample size calculator. Available from: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html [Verified 17 September 2012].

[22]  Fatovich DM, Nagree Y, Sprivulis P. Access block causes emergency department overcrowding and ambulance diversion in Perth, Western Australia. Emerg Med J 2005; 22 351–4.
Access block causes emergency department overcrowding and ambulance diversion in Perth, Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3gvVOktw%3D%3D&md5=f73d07f24d89778f21a567989d511715CAS | 15843704PubMed |

[23]  Jelinek GA, Marck CH, Weiland TJ, Neate SL, Hickey BB. Organ and tissue donation-related attitudes, education and practices of emergency department clinicians in Australia. Emerg Med Australas 2012; 24
Organ and tissue donation-related attitudes, education and practices of emergency department clinicians in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XktlOmtrw%3D&md5=3dbfcb4a5da0994e8c9d8894d564324eCAS | 23039291PubMed |

[24]  Wight J, Jakubovic M, Walters S, Maheswaran R, White P, Lennon V. Variation in cadaveric organ donor rates in the UK. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19 963–8.
Variation in cadaveric organ donor rates in the UK.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15031356PubMed |

[25]  Fabre J, Murphy P, Matesanz R. Presumed consent: a distraction in the quest for increasing rates of organ donation. BMJ 2010; 341 c4973
Presumed consent: a distraction in the quest for increasing rates of organ donation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20959281PubMed |

[26]  Matesanz R. Factors influencing the adaptation of the Spanish Model of organ donation. Transpl Int 2003; 16 736–41.
Factors influencing the adaptation of the Spanish Model of organ donation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12844215PubMed |

[27]  Kohn R, Rubenfeld GD, Levy MM, Ubel PA, Halpern SD. Rule of rescue or the good of the many? An analysis of physicians’ and nurses’ preferences for allocating ICU beds. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37 1210–7.
Rule of rescue or the good of the many? An analysis of physicians’ and nurses’ preferences for allocating ICU beds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21647719PubMed |

[28]  Mountain D. Introduction of a 4-hour rule in Western Australian emergency departments. Emerg Med Australas 2010; 22 374–8.
Introduction of a 4-hour rule in Western Australian emergency departments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21040480PubMed |

[29]  Sivakumar SWT, Gerdtz MF, Knott J, Jelinek GA. Mental health related learning needs of clinicians working in Australian emergency departments: A nationwide survey of self-reported confidence and knowledge. Emerg Med Australas 2011; 23 697–711.
Mental health related learning needs of clinicians working in Australian emergency departments: A nationwide survey of self-reported confidence and knowledge.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[30]  Wong R, Jelinek GA, Weiland TJ. Emergency clinicians’ attitudes and decisions in patient scenarios involving advance directives. Emerg Med J 2012; 29 720–724.
Emergency clinicians’ attitudes and decisions in patient scenarios involving advance directives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22011972PubMed |