Orthopaedic podiatry triage: process outcomes of a skill mix initiative
Lyndon J. Homeming A D , Pim Kuipers B and Aneel Nihal CA Orthopaedic Podiatry Triage Clinic, Logan Hospital, Metro South Health Service District, Queensland Health, Armstrong & Loganlea Roads, Meadowbrook, QLD 4131, Australia.
B Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Queensland Health & Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, QLD, Australia. Email: pim_kuipers@health.qld.gov.au
C Sub Specialty Foot & Ankle Surgery, Suite 2.06 Pindara Specialist Suite, 29 Carrara Street, Benowa, Gold Coast, QLD 4217, Australia. Email: gcfootandankle@gmail.com
D Corresponding author. Email: lyndon_homeming@health.qld.gov.au
Australian Health Review 36(4) 457-460 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH11102
Submitted: 25 October 2011 Accepted: 5 March 2012 Published: 10 September 2012
Abstract
Background. The Orthopaedic Podiatry Triage Clinic (OPodTC) is a ‘skill mix’ model of care developed in Queensland Health to address the problem of lengthy waiting times for orthopaedic surgery on foot and ankle pathologies. It is based on the recognition that many orthopaedic surgery referrals can be identified early and treated conservatively with podiatry, averting the need for more costly and invasive surgical interventions. The model is collaborative and relies on screening and triage by the podiatrist, rather than delegation by the orthopaedic surgeon.
Methods. Screening and triage through OPodTC was trialled at three Queensland Health hospital facilities during 2009 and 2010 to improve service timeliness. Patients identified by the OPodTC podiatrist as suitable for conservative management were provided with non-surgical podiatry interventions and discharged if appropriate. Those identified as still requiring surgical intervention after the benefit of interim conservative treatment provided by the podiatrist (or who chose to remain on the list) were returned to their previous place on the orthopaedic waiting list. This paper presents a summary and description of waiting list changes in association with this trial.
Results. The OPodTC intervention resulted in a reduction in the non-urgent category of the waiting list across the three hospitals of between 23.3% and 49.7%. Indications from wait-list service data demonstrated increased timeliness and improved patient flow, which are core goals of these skill mix initiatives.
Conclusions. This study highlights the potential of screening and triage functions in the skill mix debate. In this example, conservative treatment options were considered first, suitable patients did not have to wait long periods to receive timely and appropriate interventions, and those for whom surgery was indicated, were provided with a more targeted service.
What is known about the topic? Shifting and delegation of tasks is a key issue in current global debate on models of care. Discussion regarding the mix and shifting of tasks in podiatry and orthopaedic surgery has been limited in Australia, and the appropriate measurement of outcomes and processes is a point for discussion.
What does this paper add? This paper describes such an initiative in podiatry and orthopaedic surgery. It describes a skill mix initiative based on triage and screening rather than delegation. It reflects benefits of including waiting lists as a process measure.
What are the implications for practitioners? Support for triage-oriented skill mix collaboration in Podiatry and Orthopaedic Surgery.
References
[1] WHO. Task shifting to tackle health worker shortages. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007.[2] Hooker RS. The future of the physician assistant movement. Med J Aust 2011; 192 116
[3] WHO. Task shifting: rational redistribution of tasks among health workforce teams: global recommendations and guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2008.
[4] Rana T, Bradley E, Nolan P. Survey of psychiatrists’ views of nurse prescribing. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2009; 16 257–62.
| Survey of psychiatrists’ views of nurse prescribing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M3htlWmuw%3D%3D&md5=9393b83d0d04f2fe2ee69ded8467770fCAS | 19291154PubMed |
[5] Campbell JA. Designing a podiatry service to meet the needs of the population: a service simulation. Aust Health Rev 2007; 31 63–72.
| Designing a podiatry service to meet the needs of the population: a service simulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17266489PubMed |
[6] Comans TA, Clark MJ, Cartmill L, Ash S, Sheppard LA. How do allied health professionals evaluate new models of care? What are we measuring and why? J Healthc Qual 2011; 33 19–28.
| How do allied health professionals evaluate new models of care? What are we measuring and why?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21733021PubMed |
[7] Vernon W, Borthwick A, Walker J. The management of foot problems in the older person through podiatry services. Rev Clin Geront 2011; 21 331–339.
| The management of foot problems in the older person through podiatry services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Menz HB, Gilheany MF, Landorf KB. Foot and ankle surgery in Australia: a descriptive analysis of the Medicare Benefits Schedule database, 1997–2006. J Foot Ankle Res 2008; 1 10
| Foot and ankle surgery in Australia: a descriptive analysis of the Medicare Benefits Schedule database, 1997–2006.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18822169PubMed |
[9] Roddy E, Muller S, Thomas E. Onset and persistence of disabling foot pain in community-dwelling older adults over a 3-year period: a prospective cohort study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2011; 66 474–80.
| Onset and persistence of disabling foot pain in community-dwelling older adults over a 3-year period: a prospective cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21106703PubMed |
[10] AHWI. Exploring solutions to better meet demand for foot and ankle surgical services. Report for the Department of Human Services, Victoria June 2009. Melbourne: Australian Health Workforce Institute, 2009.
[11] Lavery LA, Hunt NA, Lafontaine J, Baxter CL, Ndip A, Boulton AJ. Diabetic foot prevention: a neglected opportunity in high-risk patients. Diabetes Care 2010; 33 1460–2.
| Diabetic foot prevention: a neglected opportunity in high-risk patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20424223PubMed |
[12] Moulik PK, Mtonga R, Gill GV. Amputation and mortality in new-onset diabetic foot ulcers stratified by etiology. Diabetes Care 2003; 26 491–4.
| Amputation and mortality in new-onset diabetic foot ulcers stratified by etiology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12547887PubMed |
[13] Rymaszewski LA, Sharma S, McGill PE, Murdoch A, Freeman S, Loh T. A team approach to musculo-skeletal disorders. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2005; 87 174–80.
| A team approach to musculo-skeletal disorders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3mtVOitQ%3D%3D&md5=91fb68549e94031f1ce2664537cfaae7CAS | 15901377PubMed |
[14] Parroy S. Joint effects: the impact of allied health professionals on orthopaedic and musculoskeletal service change in Scotland. Edinburgh: The Practice Development Unit, NHS Quality Improvement 2005.
[15] Lee DK, Mulder GD. Foot and ankle surgery: considerations for the geriatric patient. J Am Board Fam Med 2009; 22 316–24.
| Foot and ankle surgery: considerations for the geriatric patient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19429738PubMed |
[16] Torkki M, Malmivaara A, Seitsalo S, Hoikka V, Laippala P, Paavolainen P. Surgery vs orthosis vs watchful waiting for hallux valgus: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 285 2474–80.
| Surgery vs orthosis vs watchful waiting for hallux valgus: a randomized controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ptlOrtw%3D%3D&md5=167ca32821728c31d8e01693c3910aa1CAS | 11368700PubMed |
[17] Desmeules F, Dionne CE, Belzile E, Bourbonnais R, Fremont P. Waiting for total knee replacement surgery: factors associated with pain, stiffness, function and quality of life. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009; 10 52
| Waiting for total knee replacement surgery: factors associated with pain, stiffness, function and quality of life.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19457252PubMed |
[18] Tuominen U, Blom M, Hirvonen J, Seitsalo S, Lehto M, Paavolainen P, et al The effect of co-morbidities on health-related quality of life in patients placed on the waiting list for total joint replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007; 5 16
| The effect of co-morbidities on health-related quality of life in patients placed on the waiting list for total joint replacement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17362498PubMed |
[19] Queensland Health. Elective surgery services implementation standard #QH-IMP-342–1. 2011. Available at http://www.health.qld.gov.au/qhpolicy/docs/imp/qh-imp-342-1.pdf [verified 13 February 2012).
