Medical Assessment Units and the older patient: a retrospective case-control study
Bin S. Ong A B D , Huong Van Nguyen A B , Mohammad Ilyas C , Irene Boyatzis A B and Vincent J. J. Ngian A BA Medical Assessment Unit and Department of Aged Care, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Eldridge Road, Bankstown, NSW 2200, Australia. Email: huong.nguyen2@sswahs.nsw.gov.au, irene.boyatzis@sswahs.nsw.gov.au, vincent.ngian@sswahs.nsw.gov.au
B University of NSW, Sydney, NSW 2200, Australia.
C Department of Aged Care, Campbelltown Hospital, Therry Road, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia. Email: ilyas42310@hotmail.com
D Corresponding author. Email: bin.ong@sswahs.nsw.gov.au
Australian Health Review 36(3) 331-335 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH11076
Submitted: 17 August 2011 Accepted: 22 December 2011 Published: 27 July 2012
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate the effect of a Medical Assessment Unit (MAU) on older patients.
Methods. Retrospective case-control study of patients 65 years and above admitted to the MAU (study group) and the general medical wards (control group) in Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital from 1 October 2008 to 31 March 2009 with four most common Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) (‘falls and gait disorder’, ‘chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)’, ‘other major respiratory diseases and ‘cellulitis’).
Main outcome measures. Length of stay (LOS) in Emergency Department (ED) and in the hospital, mortality, readmissions within 1 month, and discharge destination.
Results. Eighty-nine patients were studied; 47 in the MAU group and 42 in the non-MAU group. The MAU cohort was significantly older (84.1 ± 7.9 years v. 80.4 ± 7.8 years, respectively, P = 0.03); and had shorter ED LOS (4.9 ± 3.0 h v. 6.5 ± 2.8 h, P = 0.012). Overall hospital LOS did not differ except for patients with ‘cellulitis’, (5.7 ± 4.9 days for MAU cohort v. 14.8 ± 6.8 days for non-MAU cohort, P = 0.022). There was no significant difference in mortality, readmission rate or discharge destination.
Conclusions. The MAU can be an effective service model for older patients. More research is required to confirm this and to define the key elements that are essential for its effectiveness.
What is known about the topic? The Medical Assessment Unit is a model of care that has been developed in response to increasing Emergency Department presentations and rising demand on hospital beds. There has been some evidence that this model of care improves efficiency by reducing Emergency Department length of stay and overall hospital length of stay, but little published data targeting the Aged Care population group, who account for a high proportion of Emergency Department admissions.
What does this paper add? This paper is a case-control study and provides additional evidence on the benefit of the Medical Assessment Unit model in the elderly population, specifically the benefits in the reduction of Emergency Department length of stay and overall hospital length of stay. This paper also assists in identifying key elements essential for the success of the Medical Assessment Unit model.
What are the implications for practitioners? With increasing demand on healthcare, practitioners need to continually redesign how they deliver healthcare to maximise cost efficiency and effectiveness. We believe the Medical Assessment Unit is an effective new model of care. However, more research is required to further refine this model and also identify target patient groups who can most benefit from this model of care.
References
[1] Henley J, Bennett C, Williamson J, Scott I. Internal Medicine Society of Australia and New Zealand (IMSANZ) Medical Assessment and Planning Unit Working Group. Position statement of the IMSANZ. Standards for medical assessment and planning units in public and private hospitals. Sydney: IMSANZ; 2006.[2] McNeill GBS, Brand C, Clark K, Jenkins G, Scott I, Thompson C, et al Optimising care for acute medical patients: the Australasian Medical Assessment Unit survey. Intern Med J 2011; 41 19–26.
| Optimising care for acute medical patients: the Australasian Medical Assessment Unit survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7psVOhtQ%3D%3D&md5=bfc1d43b67fe3292e15dce7894867ce4CAS |
[3] Bennett C. Implementing a medical assessment and planning unit. Internal Medicine Society of Australia and New Zealand (IMSANZ) Newsletter, July 2003. Sydney: IMSANZ
[4] Scale AT. Australasian College of Emergency Medicine national triage scale. Emerg Med 1994; 6: 145–6.
[5] Styrborn K. Early discharge planning for elderly patients in acute hospitals — an intervention study. Scand J Public Health 1995; 23 273–85.
| Early discharge planning for elderly patients in acute hospitals — an intervention study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FnvVCntA%3D%3D&md5=d10989cb46de993e338aeebcc18fc324CAS |
[6] Hardern RP. Acute medicine: the physician’s role. A working party report of the Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom. J Accid Emerg Med 2000; 17 391
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzgs12qtg%3D%3D&md5=6d79ad88d62f13ed2c73b2809af07696CAS |
[7] Armitage M, Raza T. A consultant physician in acute medicine: the Bournemouth Model for managing increasing numbers of medical emergency admissions. Clin Med 2002; 2 331–3.
| 12195861PubMed |
[8] Stewart K, Gordon C. Managing medical emergency admissions. Clin Med 2002; 2 598
| 12528980PubMed |
[9] Hanlon P, Beck S, Robertson G, Henderson M, McQuillan R, Capewell S, et al Coping with the inexorable rise in medical admissions: evaluating a radical reorganisation of acute medical care in a Scottish District General Hospital. Health Bull (Edinb) 1997; 55 176–84.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FjtVKrsw%3D%3D&md5=4e5a768ce035ad3d89c3f1bc9d3a77f1CAS |
[10] McLaren EH, Summerhill LE, Miller WJ, McMurdo ML, Robb CM. Reorganising emergency medical admitting: the Stobhill experience, 1992–1997. Health Bull (Edinb) 1999; 57 108–17.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3osV2msQ%3D%3D&md5=7f203bd5b8e90968c7a2584073bd5a4dCAS |
[11] Moloney ED, Smith D, Bennett K, O’Riordan D, Silke B. Impact of an acute medical admission unit on length of hospital stay, and emergency department ‘wait times’. Q J Med 2005; 98 283–9.
| Impact of an acute medical admission unit on length of hospital stay, and emergency department ‘wait times’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7psVGmsw%3D%3D&md5=2dccd82ae84567d372433e3b8e578f89CAS |
[12] Moloney ED, Bennett K, O’Riordan D, Silke B. Emergency department census of patients awaiting admission following reorganisation of an admissions process. Emerg Med J 2006; 23 363–7.
| Emergency department census of patients awaiting admission following reorganisation of an admissions process.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283ivFOquw%3D%3D&md5=bda444c1512e88aa689effb2fd755d8aCAS | 16627837PubMed |
[13] Moloney ED, Bennett K, Silke B. Factors influencing the costs of emergency medical admissions to an Irish teaching hospital. Eur J Health Econ 2006; 7 123–8.
| Factors influencing the costs of emergency medical admissions to an Irish teaching hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16518616PubMed |
[14] Rooney T, Moloney ED, Bennett K, O’Riordan D, Silke B. Impact of an acute medical admission unit on hospital mortality: a 5-year prospective study. Q J Med 2008; 101(6) 457
[15] Moore S, Gemmell I, Almond S, et al Impact of specialist care on clinical outcomes for medical emergencies. Clin Med 2006; 6 286–93.
| 16826864PubMed |
[16] Moloney ED, Bennett K, Silke B. Effect of an acute medical admission unit on key quality indicators assessed by funnel plots. Postgrad Med J 2007; 83 659–63.
| Effect of an acute medical admission unit on key quality indicators assessed by funnel plots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17916876PubMed |
[17] Grundy E. Mortality and morbidity among the old. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984; 288 663–4.
| Mortality and morbidity among the old.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL2c7ivFehug%3D%3D&md5=3df0b153f442d616761f5012f7ee4c56CAS |
[18] Andrews K, Brocklehurst JC. The implications of demographic changes on resource allocation. R Coll Physicians Lond 1985; 19 109–11.
| 1:STN:280:DyaL2M3htVKrtA%3D%3D&md5=f0fab7de6b40b20b368aea7592abacf3CAS |
[19] Burley LE, Currie CT, Smith RG, Williamson J. Contribution from geriatric medicine within acute medical wards. BMJ 1979; 2(6182) 90–2.
[20] Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Wieland GD, English PA, Sayre JA, Kane RL. Effectiveness of a geriatric evaluation unit. A randomized clinical trial. N Engl J Med 1984; 311 1664–70.
| Effectiveness of a geriatric evaluation unit. A randomized clinical trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL2M%2FmtFCisg%3D%3D&md5=e5d68335e7a95cefc6dfc857d7f822d7CAS | 6390207PubMed |
[21] Abenhaim HA, Khan SR, Raffoul J, et al Program description: a hospitalist-run, medical short stay unit in a teaching hospital. CMAJ 2000; 163 1477–80.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ks1CgsA%3D%3D&md5=326c4d283673e439438202c52a5a649bCAS | 11192657PubMed |
[22] Reid B, Palmer G, Aisbett C. The performance of Australian DRGs. Aust Health Rev 2000; 23 20–3.
| The performance of Australian DRGs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fgs1emsw%3D%3D&md5=b33d02b6afeb34329d0b10d817891560CAS | 11010575PubMed |
