Demographic indicators of trust in federal, state and local government: implications for Australian health policy makers
Samantha B. Meyer A D , Loreen Mamerow A , Anne W. Taylor B , Julie Henderson C , Paul R. Ward A and John Coveney AA Flinders University, Discipline of Public Health, Health Sciences Building, Registry Road, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia. Email: paul.ward@flinders.edu.au, john.coveney@flinders.edu.au, loreen.mamerow@flinders.edu.au
B Population Research and Outcome Studies, Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Level 3, 122 Frome Street, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. Email: anne.taylor@adelaide.edu.au
C Flinders University, School of Nursing and Midwifery at Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia. Email: julie.henderson@flinders.edu.au
D Corresponding author. Email: samantha.meyer@flinders.edu.au
Australian Health Review 37(1) 11-18 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH11073
Submitted: 04 August 2011 Accepted: 13 May 2012 Published: 2 November 2012
Abstract
Objective. To provide baseline findings regarding Australians’ trust in federal, state and local government.
Methods. A computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) survey was administrated during October to December 2009 to a random sample (n = 1109) across Australia (response rate 41.2%). Binary logistic regression analyses were carried out by means of SPSS.
Results. Age, household size, household income, IRSD and ARIA were found to be significant indicators for trust in federal, state and local government. Trust in state government is lower for older respondents and respondents living in inner and outer regional areas. Trust in local council is lower in respondents living in inner regional areas, respondents living in disadvantaged areas, and respondents in the income bracket of $60 001 to $100 000. Trust in federal government is lower for older respondents and respondents living in disadvantaged areas. Of note is diminished trust in government among older, regional and lower income ($30 001–$60 000) respondents.
Conclusions. Trust in all levels of government was found to be the lowest in population groups that are identified by empirical research and media to have the poorest access to government services. As a consequence, improved access to services for these populations may increase trust in health policy. Increased trust in health governance may in turn, ensure effective dissemination and implementation of health policies and that existing inequities are not perpetuated through distrust of health information and policy initiatives.
What is known about the topic? Evidence suggests that a lack of trust in government and associated programs has significant implications for the implementation and uptake of health services and programs.
What does this paper add? Despite the importance of trust and the acknowledgement that citizen trust is declining, baseline information on Australians’ trust in state, federal and local government has not been published.
What are the implications for practitioners? Findings highlight specific populations where trust in government is found to be low. Given the importance of trust in the acceptance of policy, this paper provides valuable information for policy makers interested in developing trust as a means of increasing public acceptance of policy.
References
[1] Grattan M, Schubert M. Howard’s pitch: you can trust me. The Age. 4 June 2007.[2] Job J. How is trust in the government created? It begins at home, but ends in the parliament. Aust Rev of Public Affairs 2005; 6 1–23.
[3] Peel M. Trusting disadvantaged citizens. In: Braithwaite V, Levi M, editors. Trust and governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1998. p. 315–42.
[4] Luhmann N. Trust and power: Two works by Niklas Luhmann. Brisbane: John Wiley and Sons; 1979.
[5] Misztal BA. Trust in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1996.
[6] Hall MA, Dugan E, Zheung B, Mishra AK. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what IS IT, can it be measured, and does it matter? Milbank Q 2001; 79 613–39.
| Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what IS IT, can it be measured, and does it matter?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FmsVSiuw%3D%3D&md5=c4f56abad00758a68c2258e3b6c5789fCAS | 11789119PubMed |
[7] Gilson L. Trust and the development of health care as a social institution. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56 1453–68.
| Trust and the development of health care as a social institution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12614697PubMed |
[8] Dugan E, Trachtenberg F, Hall MA. Development of abbreviated measures to assess patient trust in a physician, a health insurer, and the medical profession. BMC Health Serv Res 2005; 5
| 16202125PubMed |
[9] Ahern MM, Hendryx MS. Social capital and trust in providers. Soc Sci Med 2003; 57 1195–203.
| Social capital and trust in providers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12899904PubMed |
[10] BBC. Technology and trust. 2002 [updated September 2007]; Available at http://www.open2.net/trust/downloads/docs/techandtrust.pdf [Verified 10 September 2012].
[11] Bluhm LH. Trust, terrorism, and technology. J Bus Ethics 1987; 6 333–41.
| Trust, terrorism, and technology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] Casiday R, Cresswell T, Wilson D, Panter-Brick C. A survey of UK parental attitudes to the MMR vaccine and trust in medical authority. Vaccine 2006; 24 177–84.
| A survey of UK parental attitudes to the MMR vaccine and trust in medical authority.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16157422PubMed |
[13] Crease RP. The paradox of trust in science. Physics World 2004; 18 http://www.stonybrook.edu/trust/documents/CPMarch04.pdf
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVKns7jI&md5=9cebba987f0e2ff97197da245bdac1a0CAS |
[14] di Luzio G. A sociological concept of client trust. Curr Sociol 2006; 54 549–64.
| A sociological concept of client trust.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Govier T. Self-trust, autonomy, and self-esteem. Hypatia 1993; 8 99–120.
| Self-trust, autonomy, and self-esteem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Hardin R. Trust in government. In: Braithwaite V, Levi M, editors. Trust and governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1998.
[17] Masood E. UK panel formed to rebuild trust in government science advice. Nature 1999; 397 458
| UK panel formed to rebuild trust in government science advice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXhtlClu7g%3D&md5=893c7b3fde7627142db2a8de562ad9d4CAS | 10028956PubMed |
[18] Meyer SB, Luong TCN, Ward PR, Tsourtos G, Gill T. Investigating Australian’s trust: findings from a national survey. Int J Social Quality In press.
[19] Turow J, Hennessy M. Internet privacy and institutional trust: insights from a national survey. New Media Soc 2007; 9 300–318.
[20] Barnett J, Cooper H, Senior V. Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science. Risk Anal 2007; 27 921–33.
| Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2snjsVOmtg%3D%3D&md5=c703ea8670fda69cbd28f18aa12095bcCAS | 17958501PubMed |
[21] Levi M. A state of trust. In: Braithwaite V, Levi M, editors. Trust and governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1998. p. 77–101.
[22] Whetten K, Leserman J, Whetten R, Ostermann J. Exploring lack of trust in care providers and the government as a barrier to health service use. Am J Public Health 2006; 96 716–721.
| Exploring lack of trust in care providers and the government as a barrier to health service use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16507725PubMed |
[23] Ward PR, Coates A. “We shed tears, but there is no one there to wipe them up for us”: narratives of (mis)trust in a materially deprived community. Health 2006; 10 283–301.
[24] Coombes R. Public distrusts government health campaigns, experts say. BMJ 2005; 331 70
| Public distrusts government health campaigns, experts say.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16002873PubMed |
[25] Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
[26] Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2005.
[27] Frewer L, Scholderer J, Bredahl L. Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: the mediating role of trust. Risk Anal 2003; 23 1117–33.
| Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: the mediating role of trust.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14641888PubMed |
[28] Frewer LJ, Miles S, Marsh R. The media and genetically modified foods: evidence in support of social amplification of risk. Risk Anal 2002; 22 701–11.
| The media and genetically modified foods: evidence in support of social amplification of risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12224744PubMed |
[29] Bauer M. Distinguishing red and green biotechnology: cultivation effects of the elite press. J Public Opinion 2005; 17 63–89.
| Distinguishing red and green biotechnology: cultivation effects of the elite press.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30] McMahon A, Tappsell L, Williams P, Motion J, Jones SC. Food advertisements containing ‘scientific’ and ‘lay person’ keywords: responses from a sample of female Australian consumers. Nutrition and Dietetics 2010; 67 6–12.
| Food advertisements containing ‘scientific’ and ‘lay person’ keywords: responses from a sample of female Australian consumers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] Meyer SB, Ward PR. Do your patients trust you?: a sociological understanding of the implications of patient mistrust in healthcare professionals. Australas Med J 2008; 1 1–12.
| Do your patients trust you?: a sociological understanding of the implications of patient mistrust in healthcare professionals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Wei Z, Richardson S. Are older workers less productive? A case study of aged care workers in Australia*. Econ Rec 2010; 86 115–23.
| Are older workers less productive? A case study of aged care workers in Australia*.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Minichiello V, Browne J, Kendig H. Perceptions and consequences of ageism: views of older people. Ageing Soc 2000; 20 253–78.
| Perceptions and consequences of ageism: views of older people.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[34] Engels B, Liu G-J. Social exclusion, location and transport disadvantage amongst non-driving seniors in a Melbourne municipality, Australia. Journal of Transport Geography 2011; 984–996.
| Social exclusion, location and transport disadvantage amongst non-driving seniors in a Melbourne municipality, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[35] Mitchell G, Nicholson C, McDonald K, Bucetti A. Enhancing palliative care in rural Australia: the residential aged care setting. Aust J Primary Health 2011; 17 95–101.
| Enhancing palliative care in rural Australia: the residential aged care setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[36] Findlay RA. Interventions to reduce social isolation amongst older people: where is the evidence? Ageing Soc 2003; 23 647–58.
| Interventions to reduce social isolation amongst older people: where is the evidence?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[37] The Australian. Nurses urge more funds for aged care. The Australian [serial on the Internet]. 2010: Available at http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/breaking-news/nurses-urge-more-funds-for-aged-care/story-fn3dxity-1225826180969 [Verified 10 September 2012].
[38] The Australian. Number of government-funded places not taken up by residential aged-care providers and instead diverted to community care providers. The Australian, [serial on the Internet]. 2010: Available at http://www.theaustralian.com.au/politics/plea-for-budget-funds-to-avoid-looming-aged-care-crisis/story-e6frgczf-1225848236473 [Verified 10 September 2012].
[39] Sun H. Kevin Rudd and Justine Elliot to unveil $739m aged care plan2010: Available at http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/kevin-rudd-and-justine-elliot-to-unveil-739m-aged-care-plan/story-e6frf7kx-1225852576316 [Verified 10 September 2012].
[40] Campion V. Combine councils and end this rot. The Daily Telegraph. 28 July 2011.
[41] Peel M. Trusting Disadvantaged Citizens. In V. Braithwaite and M. Levi, editors. Trust and Governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. pp.315–342.
[42] Baum F. Reducing health inequalities requires a new national health research agenda. Health Promot J Austr 2009; 20 163–4.
| 19951247PubMed |
[43] Baum F, Ziersch AM, Zhang G, Osborne K. Do perceived neighbourhood cohesion and safety contribute to neighbourhood differences in health? Health Place 2009; 15 925–34.
| Do perceived neighbourhood cohesion and safety contribute to neighbourhood differences in health?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19403326PubMed |
[44] Mohajer N, Earnest J. Widening the aim of health promotion to include the most disadvantaged: vulnerable adolescents and the social determinants of health. Health Educ Res 2010; 25 387–94.
| Widening the aim of health promotion to include the most disadvantaged: vulnerable adolescents and the social determinants of health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20332180PubMed |
[45] Cresswell A. Rural health ‘short-changed’. The Australian. 18 January 2011.
[46] Hinrichs CC. The practice and politics of food system localization. J Rural Stud 2003; 19 33–45.
| The practice and politics of food system localization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[47] Treccasimedical L. Stress drives out rural GPs. The Advertiser. 15 November 2006.
[48] Rout M. Export ban ‘puts roads in jeopardy’. The Australian. 25 July 2011.
[49] Curtin R, Presser S, Singer E. The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. Public Opin Q 2000; 64 413–28.
| The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fgs1Orug%3D%3D&md5=6bd9b3d98bde06c07016d105fdbd286eCAS | 11171024PubMed |
[50] Curtin R, Presser S, Singer E. Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opin Q 2005; 69 87–8.
| Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[51] Groves RM. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin Q 2006; 70 646–75.
| Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[52] Dal Grande E, Taylor A, Wilson D. Is there a difference in health estimates between people with listed and unlisted telephone numbers? Aust N Z J Public Health 2005; 29 448–56.
| Is there a difference in health estimates between people with listed and unlisted telephone numbers?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16255447PubMed |
[53] Dillman DA, Phelps G, Tortora R, Swift K, Kohrell J, Berck J, et al Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the internet. Soc Sci Res 2009; 38 1–18.
| Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the internet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
