Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

The efficient price: an opportunity for funding reform

Jonathan Karnon A G , David I. Ben-Tovim B , Clarabelle T. Pham A , Orla Caffrey C , Paul H. Hakendorf B , Maria Crotty D and Paddy A. Phillips E F
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A University of Adelaide, Discipline of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia. Email: clarabelle.pham@adelaide.edu.au

B Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide Health Service and Flinders University, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia. Email: david.ben-tovim@health.sa.gov.au; paul.hakendorf@health.sa.gov.au

C University of Birmingham, Health Economics Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. Email: o.caffrey@bham.ac.uk

D Flinders University, Repatriation General Hospital, Daws Road, Daw Park, SA 5041, Australia. Email: maria.crotty@health.sa.gov.au

E SA Health, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. Email: paddy.phillips@health.sa.gov.au

F Department of Medicine, Flinders University, Hindmarsh Square, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.

G Corresponding author. Email: jonathan.karnon@adelaide.edu.au

Australian Health Review 35(4) 501-506 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH10966
Submitted: 8 September 2010  Accepted: 17 March 2011   Published: 9 November 2011

Journal Compilation © AHHA 2011

Abstract

Objective. Proposed Australian healthcare reforms describe a move towards partial Commonwealth funding of public hospitals, whereby hospitals will be paid an ‘efficient price’ for each separation, incorporating both the costs and benefits of services. This paper describes a potential approach to setting the efficient price using risk adjusted cost-effectiveness (RAC-E) analysis.

Methods. RAC-E analysis uses a decision analytic framework to estimate lifetime costs and survival for individual patients, which are standardised by comparing observed and expected values. Analysis of standardised costs and effects at different hospitals identifies efficient hospitals, from which efficient prices can be defined.

Results. A RAC-E analysis of services for stroke patients at the four main public hospitals in South Australia demonstrates the need to account for costs and benefits in identifying efficient hospitals. The hospital with the best patient outcomes incurred additional costs relative to less effective hospitals. If an investment of AU$14 760 to gain an additional life year in stroke patients is deemed to be a cost-effective use of resources, then the most effective hospital is also the most efficient hospital.

Conclusions. The applied RAC-E analysis demonstrates a framework for comparing the economic efficiency of care provided at different hospitals, which provides a basis for defining the efficient price and appropriate funding incentives to achieve better patient outcomes.

What is known about the topic? The efficient price is a recently introduced concept used in the context of the recent healthcare reforms produced by the Australian government. The stated objective in setting nationally efficient prices for public hospital services is to ‘strike an appropriate balance between reasonable access, clinical safety, efficiency and fiscal considerations’. There has been no explicit discussion to date about specific processes for estimating the efficient price.

What does this paper add? This paper introduces risk adjusted cost-effectiveness (RAC-E) analysis as a framework for identifying hospitals that achieve the best balance between costs and outcomes in the provision of services for specific diagnostic groups, and hence provides the basis for estimating efficient prices.

What are the implications for practitioners? The efficient price will determine a significant proportion of funding for public hospitals. Practitioners need to be aware of the rationale and potential consequences of the efficient price, and to be sure that the method used to estimate the efficient price is robust and transparent.


References

[1]  Council of Australian Governments Meeting 19–20 April 2010, Canberra Communiqué. COAG; 2010. Available at http://www.coag.gov.au/coag_meeting_outcomes/2010-04-19/docs/communique_20_April_2010.pdf [verified 1 November 2011].

[2]  Duckett SJ. Casemix funding for acute hospital inpatient services in Australia. Med J Aust 1998; 169 S17–21.

[3]  Duckett SJ. The development of Australian refined diagnosis related groups: the Australian inpatient casemix classification. Casemix Quarterly 2000; 2 115–20.

[4]  PricewaterhouseCoopers, The review of the AR-DRG classification system development process. Department of Health and Ageing; 2009. Available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/Casemix-1/$File/Final_Report_November_2009.pdf [verified 19 October 2011].

[5]  van Hout BA, Al M, Gordon GS, Rutten FFH. Costs, effects and C/E-ratios alongside a clinical trial. Health Econ 1994; 3 309–19.
Costs, effects and C/E-ratios alongside a clinical trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7ivVelsg%3D%3D&md5=8aa74bf1dc0fd104ec7759d2b63f5ec1CAS |

[6]  A national health and hospitals network for Australia’s future: delivering the reforms. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010. Available at http://www.yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourHealth/publishing.nsf/Content/DeliveringTheReforms/$FILE/DeliveringTheReforms.pdf [verified 19 October 2011].

[7]  Karnon J, Brennan A, Akehurst RL. Decision modeling to inform decision making: seeing the wood for the trees. Med Decis Making 2010; 30 E20–2.
Decision modeling to inform decision making: seeing the wood for the trees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Sendi P, Gafni A, Birch S. Ethical economics and cost-effectiveness analysis: is it ethical to ignore opportunity costs. Working Paper 02–05. Basel, Switzerland: Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology; 2005. Available at http://www.ceb-institute.org/uploads/media/WP-02-05.pdf [verified 19 October 2011].