What is a health emergency? The difference in definition and understanding between patients and health professionals
Amee Morgans A B C and Stephen J. Burgess AA Department of Community and Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, PO Box 527, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.
B Ambulance Victoria, 1 Lakeside Drive, Tally Ho Business Park, Burwood East, VIC 3151, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: amee.morgans@ambulance.vic.gov.au
Australian Health Review 35(3) 284-289 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH10922
Submitted: 18 May 2010 Accepted: 27 October 2010 Published: 25 August 2011
Journal Compilation © AHHA 2011
Abstract
Background. Investigations into ‘inappropriate’ use of emergency health services are limited by the lack of definition of what constitutes a health emergency. Position papers from Australian and international sources emphasise the patient’s right to access emergency healthcare, and the responsibility of emergency health care workers to provide treatment to all patients. However, discordance between the two perspectives remain, with literature labelling patient use of emergency health services as ‘inappropriate’.
Objective. To define a ‘health emergency’ and compare patient and health professionals perspectives.
Method. A sample of 600 emergency department (ED) patients were surveyed about a recent health experience and asked to rate their perceived urgency. This rating was compared to their triage score allocated at the hospital ED.
Results. No significant relationship was found between the two ratings of urgency (P = 0.51).
Conclusions. Differing definitions of a ‘health emergency’ may explain patient help-seeking behaviour when accessing emergency health resources including hospital ED and ambulance services. A new definition of health emergency that encapsulates the health professional and patient perspectives is proposed. An agreed definition of when emergency health resources should be used has the potential to improve emergency health services demand and patient flow issues, and optimise emergency health resource allocation.
What is known about the topic? Although many patients’ access emergency healthcare services in an emergency, many patients’ access emergency healthcare services when their condition is non-urgent, and avoid using emergency health care when their condition requires.
What does this paper add? This paper identifies that health professionals and patients have different perspectives on what constitutes an emergency and when emergency health resources should be used.This paper also provides a review of literature and triage policy papers that identify key differences in the assessment of a health event, and shows that health professionals base their assessment on knowledge and physiological measures, whereas patients used socio-emotional cues to identify medical urgency.
What are the implications for practitioners? Practitioners cannot expect their patients to be able to accurately evaluate the urgency of a health event. An emergency is difficult to define as health conditions are dynamic, and may change in urgency over time, and relative urgency is a continuous variable, rather than a dichotomous ‘health emergency’ v. ‘not a health emergency’.
Additional keywords: emergency health, inappropriate, resource allocation, review, utilisation.
References
[1] Irvin CB, Fox JM. Effect of a state definition of an ‘emergency medical condition’ legislation on medicaid managed care organization reimbursement. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35 283–6.| Effect of a state definition of an ‘emergency medical condition’ legislation on medicaid managed care organization reimbursement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7lsF2luw%3D%3D&md5=95fefe6932028443733cec1c904e0269CAS |
[2] Dent AW, Phillips GA, Chenhall AJ, McGregor LR. The heaviest repeat users of an inner city emergency department are not general practice patients. Emerg Med 2003; 15 322–9.
| The heaviest repeat users of an inner city emergency department are not general practice patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Lee A, Lau FL, Hazlett CB, Kam CW, Wong P, Wong TW, et al Factors associated with non-urgent utilization of Accident and Emergency services: a case-control study in Hong Kong. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51 1075–85.
| Factors associated with non-urgent utilization of Accident and Emergency services: a case-control study in Hong Kong.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvltVCisg%3D%3D&md5=bf48747386b3ee2ba1efc9373757b3d1CAS |
[4] Koziol-McLain J, Price D, Weiss B, Quinn A, Honigman B. Seeking care for nonurgent medical conditions in the emergency department: through the eyes of the patient. J Emerg Nurs 2000; 26 554–63.
| Seeking care for nonurgent medical conditions in the emergency department: through the eyes of the patient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387islCitA%3D%3D&md5=fe331b2593b5d3ae54cbb6e9ab1c43b2CAS |
[5] Sprivulis P. Pilot study of metropolitan emergency department workload complexity. Emerg Med Australas 2004; 16 59–64.
| Pilot study of metropolitan emergency department workload complexity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Sprivulis P, Carey M, Rouse I. Compliance with advice and appropriateness of emergency presentation following contact with the HealthDirect telephone triage. Emerg Med Australas 2004; 16 35–40.
| Compliance with advice and appropriateness of emergency presentation following contact with the HealthDirect telephone triage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Smith E, McDonald S, Wasiak J, Jennings P, MacPherson C, Archer F. The development of a prehospital search filter for the Cochrane Library. J Emerg Prim Health Care 2004; 2 CC990071
[8] LeVasseur S, Charles A, Considine J, Berry D, Orchard T, Woiwood M, et al. Consistency of Triage in Victoria’s Emergency Departments: Literature Review. Melbourne: Department of Human Services and Monash Institute of Health Services Research; 2001.
[9] Kennedy K, Aghababian RV, Gans L, Lewis CP. Triage: techniques and applications in decision making. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 28 136–44.
| Triage: techniques and applications in decision making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK28zit1aluw%3D%3D&md5=29212414d9bb90493cc88840ea676cacCAS |
[10] Johnston CL, Coulthard MG, Schluter PJ, Dick ML. Medical emergencies in general practice in south-east Queensland: prevalence and practice preparedness. Med J Aust 2001; 175 99–103.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrgvFejug%3D%3D&md5=2ea3211a18d32e21e0c410966219b219CAS |
[11] Ramrakha S, Giles A. Take a letter... an audit of GP referrals in south west Sydney. Aust Fam Physician 2001; 30 395–8.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3mtlahsw%3D%3D&md5=5c35e831a26ef0eaf1d15fc78968ed4dCAS |
[12] Clinical Practice Guidelines for Ambulance and MICA Paramedics, Revised Edition. Melbourne: Ambulance Victoria; 2009.
[13] Australasian College of Emergency Medicine Patient’s right to access emergency department care. Emerg Med Australas 2004; 16 256
| Patient’s right to access emergency department care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Policy on the Australasian Triage Scale. Australasian College for Emergency Medicine; 2000. Available at http://www.acem.org.au/media/policies_and_guidelines/P06_Aust_Triage_Scale_-_Nov_2000.pdf [verified 8 June 2011]
[15] Mogielnicki RP, Stevenson KA, Willemain TR. Patient and bystander response to medical emergencies. Med Care 1975; 13 753–62.
| Patient and bystander response to medical emergencies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE28%2FivV2kug%3D%3D&md5=3b4adeb93df2c6098868b0ab05a1c649CAS |
[16] Clark RD, Word LE. Where is the apathetic bystander? Situational characteristics of the emergency. J Pers Soc Psychol 1974; 29 279–87.
| Where is the apathetic bystander? Situational characteristics of the emergency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Gill JM, Riley AW. Nonurgent use of hospital emergency departments: urgency from the patient’s perspective. J Fam Pract 1996; 42 491–6.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK283gsFyhsA%3D%3D&md5=eef026c68437a35c887750795f0835d7CAS |
[18] Veitch C, Crossland L, Hays R. Consumers’ after-hours health care decisions. Comparison between those who did and those who did not seek care in an Australian provincial city. Aust Fam Physician 1999; 28 1078–83.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FmtVWktA%3D%3D&md5=0ffd496113ed00f302e75c13c203032cCAS |
[19] Adams RJ, Smith BJ, Ruffin RE. Factors Associated with hospital admissions and repeat emergency department visits for adults with asthma. Thorax 2000; 55 566–73.
| Factors Associated with hospital admissions and repeat emergency department visits for adults with asthma.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czhs1aiuw%3D%3D&md5=5e20d069894c0bbfe3b034016a415bb9CAS |
[20] Billittier AJ, Moscati R, Janicke D, Lerner EB, Seymour J, Olsson D. A multisite survey of factors contributing to medically unnecessary ambulance transports. Acad Emerg Med 1996; 3 1046–50.
| A multisite survey of factors contributing to medically unnecessary ambulance transports.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FotVKkuw%3D%3D&md5=446bbb43be5694a52b082717f4322994CAS |
[21] Brown AL, Mann NC, Daya M, Goldberg R, Meischke H, Taylor J, et al Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients. Circulation 2000; 102 173–8.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czkvFeqsA%3D%3D&md5=8d698b0fd924aecc96c6fe3909d7855aCAS |
[22] Dracup K, McKinley SM, Moser DK. Australian patients’ delay in response to heart attack symptoms. Med J Aust 1997; 166 233–6.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3jtVygtg%3D%3D&md5=25d137573aa3f6862e5e1f0a83235bcdCAS |
[23] McKinley S, Moser DK, Dracup K. Treatment-seeking behavior for acute myocardial infarction symptoms in North America and Australia. Heart Lung 2000; 29 237–47.
| Treatment-seeking behavior for acute myocardial infarction symptoms in North America and Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvivVantw%3D%3D&md5=19af8010ab0b22314b99f0afdd170ee9CAS |
[24] Derlet RW, Ledesma A. How do prudent laypeople define an emergency medical condition? J Emerg Med 1999; 17 413–8.
| How do prudent laypeople define an emergency medical condition?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3mvVGmsA%3D%3D&md5=2f31903431e514faf3f5aaeb7744f763CAS |
[25] Theinhasu O, Ford J, Hillard JR. Factors related to patients’ decisions to visit the psychiatric emergency service. Psychiatr Serv 1995; 46 1227–8.
[26] Morgans AE, Archer F, Walker T, Thuma E. Barriers to accessing ambulance services in rural Victoria for acute asthma: patient’s and medical professional’s perspectives. Aust J Rural Health 2005; 13 116–20.
| Barriers to accessing ambulance services in rural Victoria for acute asthma: patient’s and medical professional’s perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Knolle LL, McDermott RJ, Ritzel DO. Knowledge of access to and use of the emergency medical services system in a rural Illinois county. Am J Prev Med 1989; 5 164–9.
| 1:STN:280:DyaL1Mzgt1OqsQ%3D%3D&md5=30db19e8e468d421c6e3170f32ff84e6CAS |
[28] MacLean SL, Bayley EW, Cole FL, Bernado L, Lenaghan P, Manton A. The LUNAR project: a description of the population of individuals who seek health care at emergency departments. J Emerg Nurs 1999; 25 269–82.
| The LUNAR project: a description of the population of individuals who seek health care at emergency departments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzlsVSqsQ%3D%3D&md5=2a97a6c34100e58d31831ffc183316fbCAS |
[29] Li J, Galvin HK, Johnson SC. The ‘prudent layperson’ definition of an emergency medical condition. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20 10–3.
| The ‘prudent layperson’ definition of an emergency medical condition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30] Morgans AE, Archer F, Allen FCL. Patient decision making in prehospital health emergencies: determinants and predictors of patient delay. J Emerg Prim Health Care 2008; 6 990295
[31] Lindenskov L, Bronderslev L, Andersen KV. Why do parents of small children visit casualty ward when their children suffer of acute illness? Ugeskr Laeger 2001; 163 1089–92.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3hsFWjtA%3D%3D&md5=6ea680d92a69bfda4f0a924946362c42CAS |
[32] Grilli R, Freemantle N, Minozzi S, Domenighettti G, Finer D. Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; CD000389
| Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
