Conditions affecting oxide quantification in unknown tropical soils via handheld X-ray fluorescence spectrometer
M. L. T. Santana A , B. T. Ribeiro A B , S. H. G. Silva A , G. C. Poggere A , L. R. G. Guilherme A and N. Curi AA Department of Soil Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, 37200-000, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.
B Corresponding author. Email: brunoribeiro@dcs.ufla.br
Soil Research 56(6) 648-655 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR18099
Submitted: 19 April 2018 Accepted: 29 June 2018 Published: 23 August 2018
Abstract
Soil chemical characterisation has been accurately performed worldwide using portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF), contributing to fast, low-cost and environmentally-friendly soil analyses. However, many factors can influence the pXRF performance. Thus, this work was carried out to assess the oxides (SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, TiO2 and P2O5) in tropical soils via pXRF, evaluating the effects of soil packing prior to analysis and the soil matrix. The packing of soil samples was performed using X-ray thin-film and common, low-cost plastic bags. Different soil matrices were obtained by grouping of samples according to the Munsell colour system. The obtained results were compared with a conventional method employed for the determination of soil oxides. In addition, the pXRF measurements made on either sieved soil samples or directly on the soil profile were compared. The P2O5 content was below the detection limit of pXRF (0.05 g kg−1). The Fe2O3 and TiO2 contents of several tropical soils were accurately determined via pXRF using air-dried and sieved samples. This result was not observed for SiO2 and Al2O3. For Fe2O3, a good correlation (R2 = 0.91) was obtained between pXRF measurements made on sieved soil samples and directly on the soil profile. The packing of soil samples using plastic bags did not negatively influence the pXRF performance.
Additional keywords: proximal sensors, soil oxides, spectroscopy-based method.
References
Curi N, Franzmeier DP (1984) Toposequence of Oxisols from the central plateau of Brazil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48, 341–346.| Toposequence of Oxisols from the central plateau of Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Curi N, Franzmeier DP (1987) Effect of parent rocks on chemical and mineralogical properties of some Oxisols in Brazil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51, 153–158.
| Effect of parent rocks on chemical and mineralogical properties of some Oxisols in Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Curi N, Kämpf N (2012) Caracterização do solo. In ‘Pedologia: Fundamentos’. (Eds JC Ker, N Curi, CE Schaefer, PV Torrado) pp. 147–170. (Viçosa: SBCS)
Curi N, Lima JM, Andrade H, Gualberto V (1990) Geomorfologia, física, química e mineralogia dos principais solos da região de Lavras (MG). Ciência e Prática is Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 14, 297–307.
EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária) (1997) ‘Manual de métodos de análise de solo.’ (EMPBRAPA – CNPS)
EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária) (2011) ‘Manual de métodos de análise de solo.’ 2nd edn. (EMPBRAPA – CNPS)
EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária) (2013) ‘Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos.’ (EMPBRAPA – SPI)
EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) (2017) ‘Manual de métodos de análise de solo.’
Gazley MF, Fisher LA (2014). A review of the reliability and validity of portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (pXRF) data. In ‘Mineral resource and ore reserve estimation’. (Ed. AC Edwards) pp. 69–82. (The AusIMM Guide to Good Practice)
Hu W, Huang B, Tian K, Holm PE, Zhang Y (2017) Heavy metals in intensive greenhouse vegetable production systems along Yellow Sea of China: levels, transfer and health risk. Chemosphere 167, 82–90.
| Heavy metals in intensive greenhouse vegetable production systems along Yellow Sea of China: levels, transfer and health risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
IUSS Working Group WRB (2014) ‘World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International Soil Classification System for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps.’ World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. (FAO: Rome)
Kalnicky D, Singhvi R (2001) Field portable analysis of environmental samples. Journal of Hazardous Materials 83, 93–122.
| Field portable analysis of environmental samples.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kilbride C, Poole J, Hutchings TR (2006) A comparison of Cu, Pb, As, Cd, Zn, Fe, Ni and Mn determined by acid extraction/ICP-OES and ex situ field portable X-ray fluorescence analyses. Environmental Pollution 143, 16–23.
| A comparison of Cu, Pb, As, Cd, Zn, Fe, Ni and Mn determined by acid extraction/ICP-OES and ex situ field portable X-ray fluorescence analyses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Maruyama Y, Ogawa K, Okada T, Kato M (2008) Laboratory experiments of particle size effect in X-ray fluorescence and implications to remote X-ray spectrometry of lunar regolith surface. Earth, Planets, and Space 60, 293–297.
| Laboratory experiments of particle size effect in X-ray fluorescence and implications to remote X-ray spectrometry of lunar regolith surface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ribeiro BT, Silva SHG, Silva EH, Guilherme LRG (2017) Portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) applications in tropical soil science. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 41, 245–254.
| Portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) applications in tropical soil science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ribeiro BT, Weindorf DC, Silva BM, Tassinari D, Amarante LC, Curi N, Guilherme LRG (2018) The influence of soil moisture on oxide determination in tropical soils via portable X-ray fluorescence. Soil Science Society of America Journal
| The influence of soil moisture on oxide determination in tropical soils via portable X-ray fluorescence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rouillon M, Taylor MP (2016) Can field portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) produce high quality data for application in environmental contamination research? Environmental Pollution 214, 255–264.
| Can field portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) produce high quality data for application in environmental contamination research?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sharma A, Weindorf DC, Man T, Aldabaa AAA, Chakraborty S (2014) Characterizing soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 3. Soil reaction (pH). Geoderma 232–234, 141–147.
| Characterizing soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 3. Soil reaction (pH).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sharma A, Weindorf DC, Wang D, Chakraborty S (2015) Characterizing soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 4. Cation exchange capacity (CEC). Geoderma 239–240, 130–134.
| Characterizing soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 4. Cation exchange capacity (CEC).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Silva SHG, Silva EA, Poggere GC, Guilherme LRG, Curi N (2018) Tropical soils characterization at low cost and time using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF): effects of different sample preparation methods. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 42, 80–92.
| Tropical soils characterization at low cost and time using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF): effects of different sample preparation methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Soil Survey Staff (2014) ‘Keys to soil taxonomy.’ (USDA-NRCS)
Stockmann U, Jang HJ, Minasny B, McBratney AB (2016a) The effect of soil moisture and texture on Fe concentration using portable X-Ray fluorescence spectrometers. In ‘Digital soil morphometrics’. (Eds AE Hartemink, B Minasny) pp. 63–71. (Springer International Publishing)
Stockmann U, Cattle SR, Minasny B, McBratney AB (2016b) Utilizing portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for in-field investigation of pedogenesis. Catena 139, 220–231.
| Utilizing portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for in-field investigation of pedogenesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
US EPA (2007) Method 6200: Field portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for the determination of elemental concentrations in soil and sediment. US EPA. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/ documents/6200.pdf (accessed 8 June 2018).
Vettori L (1969) Métodos de análises de solo. Ministério da Agricultura No. 7, Rio de Janeiro.
Weindorf DC, Bakr N, Zhu Y (2014) Advances in portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) for environmental, pedological, and agronomic applications. Advances in Agronomy 128, 1–45.
| Advances in portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) for environmental, pedological, and agronomic applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhu Y, Weindorf DC, Zhang W (2011) Characterizing soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 1. Soil texture. Geoderma 167–168, 167–177.
| Characterizing soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 1. Soil texture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |