Daily diary study of adult men’s and women’s event-level sexual motivations and sexual behaviour
Devon J. Hensel A B E , Fei He C , Jarek Harezlak D and J. Dennis Fortenberry A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Pediatrics, Section of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 West 10th Street, Room 1001, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
B Department of Sociology, Indiana University Purdue University-Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
C Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
D Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
E Corresponding author. Email: djhensel@iu.edu
Sexual Health 14(2) 147-154 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH16109
Submitted: 3 June 2016 Accepted: 14 September 2016 Published: 25 November 2016
Abstract
Background: Understanding people’s sexual motivations has long been of public health and health promotion interest. We used daily diaries to examine how adult men’s and women’s event-specific affective sexual motivations were linked to the types and combinations of sexual behaviours chosen in a given sexual event. Methods: Adult men (n = 156) and women (n = 192) completed thrice-daily electronic diaries assessing individual- and partner-specific attributes and non-coital or coital sexual behaviours. Sexual motivations were: interest in sex, feeling in love with partner, wanted to have sex and partner wanted to have sex. The outcome variable was: sexual behaviour type (no sex, one vaginal sex event, one vaginal sex event + any other sex types, multiple vaginal sex events, any other sex types). Mixed-effect multinomial logistic regression modelled the influence of each sexual motivation on sexual behaviour type (Stata; all p < 0.05). ‘No sex’ was the referent in all models; all models controlled for gender. Results: Participants contributed 14 856 total partner-associated diary entries. Most (54%; women: 56.5%, men: 51.2%) were associated with no sex; when sex occurred, the most common behaviour type was one vaginal sex event (13.1%) for women and other sex types (16.4%) for men. Wanting to have sex or perceiving a partner wanted to have sex were the strongest predictors of sexual behaviour type, and were associated with a greater number of reported sexual behaviours. Conclusions: Event-specific sexual motivations are associated with the choice to have sex, and with variation in the chosen sexual behaviours.
References
[1] Meston C, Buss D. Why humans have sex. Arch Sex Behav 2007; 36 477–507.| Why humans have sex.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[2] Stephenson KR, Ahrold TK, Meston CM. The association between sexual motives and sexual satisfaction: gender differences and categorical comparisons. Arch Sex Behav 2011; 40 607–18.
| The association between sexual motives and sexual satisfaction: gender differences and categorical comparisons.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[3] Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston 1970; 467 58
[4] Browning JR, Hatfield E, Kessler D, Levine T. Sexual motives, gender, and sexual behavior. Arch Sex Behav 2000; 29 135–53.
| Sexual motives, gender, and sexual behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvgtVehsA%3D%3D&md5=89d833c609cde549f9ea68fe3c67e40cCAS |
[5] Cooper ML, Shapiro CM, Powers AM. Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: a functional perspective. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 75 1528–58.
| Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: a functional perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7htlSqtg%3D%3D&md5=e0f7d1ee0a5e281bf265363c50872976CAS |
[6] Leigh BC. Reasons for having and avoiding sex: gender, sexual orientation, and relationship to sexual behavior. J Sex Res 1989; 26 199–209.
| Reasons for having and avoiding sex: gender, sexual orientation, and relationship to sexual behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Katz BP, Fortenberry JD, Zimet GD, Blythe MJ, Orr DP. Partner-specific relationship characteristics and condom use among young people with sexually transmitted diseases. J Sex Res 2000; 37 69–75.
| Partner-specific relationship characteristics and condom use among young people with sexually transmitted diseases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Christopher FS, Cate RM. Factors involved in premarital sexual decision‐making. J Sex Res 1984; 20 363–76.
| Factors involved in premarital sexual decision‐making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Deardorff J, Suleiman AB, Dal Santo TS, Flythe M, Gurdin JB, Eyre SL. Motivations for sex among low-income African American young women. Health Educ Behav 2013; 40 646–50.
| Motivations for sex among low-income African American young women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Greiling H, Buss DM. Women’s sexual strategies: the hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Pers Individ Dif 2000; 28 929–63.
| Women’s sexual strategies: the hidden dimension of extra-pair mating.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Buss D. The evolution of desire: strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books; 2003.
[12] Basson R. The female sexual response: a different model. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26 51–65.
| The female sexual response: a different model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7lslGjtw%3D%3D&md5=227b835f6ddd06893931ee8eaf337bc4CAS |
[13] Impett EA, Peplau LA, Gable SL. Approach and avoidance sexual motives: implications for personal and interpersonal well‐being. Pers Relatsh 2005; 12 465–82.
| Approach and avoidance sexual motives: implications for personal and interpersonal well‐being.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[14] Ozer EJ, Dolcini MM, Harper GW. Adolescents’ reasons for having sex: gender differences. J Adolesc Health 2003; 33 317–9.
| Adolescents’ reasons for having sex: gender differences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Patrick ME, Maggs JL, Abar CC. Reasons to have sex, personal goals, and sexual behavior during the transition to college. J Sex Res 2007; 44 240–9.
| Reasons to have sex, personal goals, and sexual behavior during the transition to college.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[16] Patrick ME, Maggs JL, Cooper ML, Lee CM. Measurement of motivations for and against sexual behavior. Assessment 2011; 18 502–16.
| Measurement of motivations for and against sexual behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[17] Patrick ME, Lee CM. Sexual motivations and engagement in sexual behavior during the transition to college. Arch Sex Behav 2010; 39 674–81.
| Sexual motivations and engagement in sexual behavior during the transition to college.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Hill CA, Preston LK. Individual differences in the experience of sexual motivation: theory and measurement of dispositional sexual motives. J Sex Res 1996; 33 27–45.
| Individual differences in the experience of sexual motivation: theory and measurement of dispositional sexual motives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Carroll JL, Volk KD, Hyde JS. Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse. Arch Sex Behav 1985; 14 131–9.
| Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL2M7pvVemtw%3D%3D&md5=48fb285ff8d3bad637b9c20fa096fe9fCAS |
[20] Treger S, Sprecher S, Hatfield E, Erber R. Women’s sexuality in close relationships. The essential handbook of women’s sexuality . Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO; 2013: 47–68.
[21] de Visser RO, Smith A. Which intention? Whose intention? Condom use and theories of individual decision making. Psychol Health Med 2004; 9 193–204.
| Which intention? Whose intention? Condom use and theories of individual decision making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Herbenick D, Reece M, Schick V, Sanders SA, Dodge B, Fortenberry JD. An event-level analysis of the sexual characteristics and composition among adults ages 18 to 59: results from a national probability sample in the United States. J Sex Med 2010; 7 346–61.
| An event-level analysis of the sexual characteristics and composition among adults ages 18 to 59: results from a national probability sample in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Richters J, de Visser R, Rissel C, Smith A. Sexual practices at last heterosexual encounter and occurrence of orgasm in a national survey. J Sex Res 2006; 43 217–26.
| Sexual practices at last heterosexual encounter and occurrence of orgasm in a national survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] Shain RN, Piper JM, Newton ER, Perdue ST, Ramos R, Champion JD, Guerra FA. A randomized, controlled trial of a behavioral intervention to prevent sexually transmitted disease among minority women. N Engl J Med 1999; 340 93–100.
| A randomized, controlled trial of a behavioral intervention to prevent sexually transmitted disease among minority women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FptFSqsQ%3D%3D&md5=f9c0030a5c025b2139a49c68be95d075CAS |
[25] Kamb ML, Fishbein M, Douglas JM, Rhodes F, Rogers J, Bolan G, Zenilman J, Hoxworth T, Malotte CK, Iatesta M, Kent C, Lentz A, Graziano S, Byers RH, Peterman TA. Efficacy of risk-reduction counseling to prevent Human Immunodeficiency Virus and sexually transmitted diseases. JAMA 1998; 280 1161–7.
| Efficacy of risk-reduction counseling to prevent Human Immunodeficiency Virus and sexually transmitted diseases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvkvFantA%3D%3D&md5=f5cc16aa3b83e3327187078494795934CAS |
[26] Hensel DJ, Fortenberry JD, Orr DP. Variations in coital and noncoital sexual repertoire among adolescent women. J Adolesc Health 2008; 42 170–6.
| Variations in coital and noncoital sexual repertoire among adolescent women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The social organization of sexuality: sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2000.
[28] Simon W, Gagnon JH. Sexual scripts: origins, influences and changes. Qual Sociol 2003; 26 491–7.
| Sexual scripts: origins, influences and changes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Gagnon JH, Simon W. A sexual scripting approach. In: Geer JH, O’Donoghue WT, eds. Theories of Human Sexuality. New York, NY: Plenum; 1987:363-383.
[30] Gagnon JH. The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. Annu Rev Sex Res 1990; 1 1–43.
[31] Epstein M, Calzo JP, Smiler AP, Ward LM. “Anything from making out to having sex”: men’s negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. J Sex Res 2009; 46 414–24.
| “Anything from making out to having sex”: men’s negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Kimmel MS. Masculinity as homophobia: fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In: Harper SR, Harris III F, eds. College Men and Masculinities: Theory, Research, and Implications for Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2010: 23-31.
[33] Vannier SA, O’Sullivan LF. Who gives and who gets: why, when, and with whom young people engage in oral sex. J Youth Adolesc 2012; 40 1–11.
[34] Crawford M, Popp D. Sexual double standards: a review and methodological critique of two decades of research. J Sex Res 2003; 40 13–26.
| Sexual double standards: a review and methodological critique of two decades of research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[35] Crawford M, Unger RK. Women and gender: a feminist psychology, 4th edn. New York: McGraw Hill; 2004.
[36] Sanchez DT, Fetterolf JC, Rudman LA. Eroticizing inequality in the United States: the consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. J Sex Res 2012; 49 168–83.
| Eroticizing inequality in the United States: the consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[37] Flood M. Male and female sluts. Aust Fem Stud 2013; 28 95–107.
| Male and female sluts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[38] Elder WB, Brooks GR, Morrow SL. Sexual self-schemas of heterosexual men. Psychol Men Masc 2012; 13 166–79.
| Sexual self-schemas of heterosexual men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[39] Anderson E, Adams A, Rivers I. “I kiss them because I love them”: the emergence of heterosexual men kissing in British institutes of education. Arch Sex Behav 2012; 41 421–30.
| “I kiss them because I love them”: the emergence of heterosexual men kissing in British institutes of education.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[40] Giordano PC, Longmore MA, Manning WD. Gender and the meanings of adolescent romantic relationships: a focus on boys. Am Sociol Rev 2006; 71 260–87.
| Gender and the meanings of adolescent romantic relationships: a focus on boys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[41] Smiler AP. “I wanted to get to know her better”: adolescent boys’ dating motives, masculinity ideology, and sexual behavior. J Adolesc 2008; 31 17–32.
| “I wanted to get to know her better”: adolescent boys’ dating motives, masculinity ideology, and sexual behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[42] Maynard E, Carballo-Diéguez A, Ventuneac A, Exner T, Mayer K. Women’s experiences with anal sex: motivations and implications for STD prevention. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2009; 41 142–9.
| Women’s experiences with anal sex: motivations and implications for STD prevention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[43] Weaver SA, Herold ES. Casual sex and women: measurement and motivational issues. J Psychol Human Sex 2000; 12 23–41.
| Casual sex and women: measurement and motivational issues.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[44] Carvalheira AA Brotto LA Leal I
[45] Hatfield E, Luckhurst C, Rapson RL. Sexual motives: cultural, evolutionary, and social psychological perspectives. Sex Cult 2010; 14 173–90.
| Sexual motives: cultural, evolutionary, and social psychological perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[46] Wood JR, Milhausen RR, Jeffrey NK. Why have sex? Reasons for having sex among lesbian, bisexual, queer, and questioning women in romantic relationships. Can J Hum Sex 2014; 23 75–88.
| Why have sex? Reasons for having sex among lesbian, bisexual, queer, and questioning women in romantic relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[47] Hoffman V, Bolton R. Reasons for having sex and sexual risk-taking: a study of heterosexual male STD clinic patients. AIDS Care 1997; 9 285–96.
| Reasons for having sex and sexual risk-taking: a study of heterosexual male STD clinic patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2svjs1WltQ%3D%3D&md5=75302b5f697a5325def6042e92dba894CAS |
[48] Armstrong EA, England P, Fogarty ACK. Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. Am Sociol Rev 2012; 77 435–62.
| Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[49] Michael RT, Gagnon JH, Laumann EO, Kolata G. Sex in America: a definitive survey . New York: Little Brown; 1994.
[50] Lyons HA, Manning WD, Longmore MA, Giordano PC. Young adult casual sexual behavior: life course specific motivations and consequences. Sociol Perspect 2014; 57 79–101.
| Young adult casual sexual behavior: life course specific motivations and consequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[51] Parker TS, Blackburn KM, Perry MS, Hawks JM. Sexting as an intervention: relationship satisfaction and motivation considerations. Am J Fam Ther 2013; 41 1–12.
| Sexting as an intervention: relationship satisfaction and motivation considerations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[52] Drouin M, Tobin E. Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: relations with attachment and sexual motivations. Comput Human Behav 2014; 31 412–8.
| Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: relations with attachment and sexual motivations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[53] Herbenick D, Reece M, Hensel DJ, Sanders SA, Jozkowski K, Fortenberry JD. Association of lubricant use with women’s sexual pleasure, sexual satisfaction, and genital symptoms: a prospective daily diary study. J Sex Med 2011; 8 202–12.
| Association of lubricant use with women’s sexual pleasure, sexual satisfaction, and genital symptoms: a prospective daily diary study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[54] Muise A, Impett EA, Desmarais S. Getting it on versus getting it over with sexual motivation, desire, and satisfaction in intimate bonds. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2013; 39 1320–32.
| Getting it on versus getting it over with sexual motivation, desire, and satisfaction in intimate bonds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[55] Rubin H, Campbell L. Day-to-day changes in intimacy predict heightened relationship passion, sexual occurrence, and sexual satisfaction: a dyadic diary analysis. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 2012; 3 224–31.
| Day-to-day changes in intimacy predict heightened relationship passion, sexual occurrence, and sexual satisfaction: a dyadic diary analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[56] Hensel DJ, Fortenberry JD, Orr DP. Factors associated with event level anal sex and condom use during anal sex among adolescent women. J Adolesc Health 2010; 46 232–7.
| Factors associated with event level anal sex and condom use during anal sex among adolescent women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[57] Hensel DJ, Fortenberry JD, Orr DP. Situational and relational factors associated with coitus during vaginal bleeding among adolescent women. J Sex Res 2007; 44 269–77.
| Situational and relational factors associated with coitus during vaginal bleeding among adolescent women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[58] Fortenberry JD, Temkit MH, Tu W, Graham CA, Katz BP, Orr DP. Daily mood, partner support, sexual interest, and sexual activity among adolescent women. Health Psychol 2005; 24 252–7.
| Daily mood, partner support, sexual interest, and sexual activity among adolescent women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[59] Fortenberry JD, Hensel DJ. The association of sexual interest and sexual behaviors among adolescent women: a daily diary perspective. Horm Behav 2011; 59 739–44.
| The association of sexual interest and sexual behaviors among adolescent women: a daily diary perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[60] Hensel DJ, Fortenberry JD, Harezlak J, Craig D. The feasibility of cell phone based electronic diaries for STI/HIV research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12 1–12.
[61] Shiffman S, Stone A, Hufford M. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2008; 4 1–32.
| Ecological momentary assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[62] Hufford M. Special methodological challenges and opportunities in ecological momentary assessment. In Stone AA, Shiffman S, Atienza A, Nebeling L, editors. The science of real-time data capture: self-reports in health research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. pp. 54–75.
[63] Stata. College Station, TX.: StataCorp LP; 2012.
[64] Baumeister RF, Twenge JM. Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Rev Gen Psychol 2002; 6 166–203.
| Cultural suppression of female sexuality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[65] Masters NT, Casey E, Wells EA, Morrison DM. Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active men and women: continuity and change. J Sex Res 2013; 50 409–20.
[66] Hensel DJ, Stupiansky NW, Herbenick D, Dodge B, Reece M. Sexual pleasure during condom-protected vaginal sex among heterosexual men. J Sex Med 2012; 9 1272–6.
| Sexual pleasure during condom-protected vaginal sex among heterosexual men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[67] Murray SH, Milhausen RR. Sexual desire and relationship duration in young men and women. J Sex Marital Ther 2012; 38 28–40.
| Sexual desire and relationship duration in young men and women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
