Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR09070
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 37(1)

Cat-exclusion zones in rural and urban-fringe landscapes: how large would they have to be?

Elizabeth M. Metsers A B , Philip J. Seddon A and Yolanda M. van Heezik A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.

B Corresponding author. Email: liz.metsers@gmail.com

Wildlife Research 37(1) 47-56 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09070
Submitted: 5 June 2009  Accepted: 16 December 2009   Published: 1 March 2010

Abstract

Context. The process of urban sprawl brings the human population and their domestic cats (Felis catus) in close contact with wildlife in areas that were previously remote, including reserves and conservation areas created to protect populations of vulnerable or threatened species. Various mitigation measures have been proposed, including devices designed to hinder cat hunting ability, desexing to reduce wandering and nuisance behaviours, containment at night or at all times and regulations governing cat ownership. Such regulations may aim to reduce cat densities by limiting the number of cats per household, or they may define zones around sensitive conservation areas where cat ownership is prohibited.

Aims. The present study sought to establish the necessary size of cat-exclusion zones in rural and urban-fringe landscapes where vulnerable prey species may also reside.

Methods. With GPS collars, we tracked 38 domestic cats at three sites (one rural, two urban fringe) where small reserves contained threatened lizard species.

Key results. Home ranges (95% kernel density estimates) were considerably larger for cats at the rural site (0.3–69 ha) than at urban-fringe sites (0.35–19 ha at Kaitorete Spit and 0.2–9 ha at Otago Peninsula), and were larger at night than day. Resource selection ratios indicated avoidance of open areas with little cover, such as cultivated areas (farmland), tussock grassland and duneland, whereas sources of cover such as trees and buildings were preferred. Maximum distances moved and large variability between individual cats suggest buffers in rural landscapes would need to be at least 2.4 km wide, whereas those in urban-fringe habitat could be half as large.

Conclusions. Despite significant home-range size differences exhibited by cats living in rural v. urban-fringe habitats, exclusion zones would need to be wide to account for considerable inter-cat variation in movement behaviour.

Implications. The size of an effective cat-exclusion zone should represent the specific landscape, amount of residential development and substantial variability between individual cats.


Acknowledgments

We thank Renaud Mathieu for assistance with spatial analyses, Department of Conservation staff, M. Lettink and L. Frazer for providing contact details of local cat owners, and all the cat owners who participated in the study. The University of Otago provided funding in the form of a University of Otago Research Grant to P. J. S. and PBRF funding to Y. v. H. K. Gerow, and B. Niven kindly provided statistical advice.


References

Alldredge, J. R. , and Griswold, J. (2006). Design and analysis of resource selection studies for categorical resource variables. Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 337–346.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Baird I. , Wahren L. , and Hayward M. (2005). Ban those cats! Resolving wildlife issues in the ACT. In ‘Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Urban Animal Management in Australia’. (Australian Veterinary Committee: Canberra.) Available at http://www.uam.net.au/Publications/ [Verified November 2009].

Baker, P. J. , Bentley, A. J. , Ansell, R. J. , and Harris, S. (2005). Impact of predation by domestic cats Felis catus in an urban area. Mammal Review 35, 302–312.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Barratt D. G. (1995). Movement patterns and prey habits of house cats Felis catus (L.), in Canberra, Australia. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Canberra, Canberra.

Barratt, D. G. (1997a). Home range size, habitat utilisation and movement patterns of suburban and farm cats Felis catus. Ecography 20, 271–280.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Beyer H. L. (2004). ‘Hawth’s Analysis Tools for ArcGIS.’ Available at http://www.spatialecology.com/htools [Verified December 2009].

Biro, Z. , Szemethy, L. , and Heltai, M. (2004). Home range sizes of wildcats (Felis silvestris) and feral domestic cats (Felis silvestris f. catus) in a hilly region of Hungary. Mammalian Biology – Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde 69, 302–310.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bradshaw J. W. S. (1992). ‘The Behaviour of the Domestic Cat.’ (CAB International: Wallingford, UK.)

Brockie B. (2001). ‘When the Cat’s Away, the Rats Will Play. The Dominion.’ (Fairfax Media: Wellington, New Zealand.)

Buttriss R. (2001). No cat zone – City of Kingston. In ‘Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Urban Animal Management in Australia’. (Australian Veterinary Committee: Melbourne.) Available at http://www.uam.net.au/Publications/ [Verified November 2009].

Calver, M. , Thomas, S. , Bradley, S. , and McCutcheon, H. (2007). Reducing the rate of predation on wildlife by pet cats: the efficacy and practicability of collar-mounted pounce protectors. Biological Conservation 137, 341–348.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Fitzgerald B. M. (1988). Diet of domestic cats and their impact on prey populations. In ‘The domestic cat: the biology of its behaviour’. (Eds D. C. Turner and P. Bateson.) pp. 123–145. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Fitzgerald B. M. , and Turner D. C. (2000). Hunting behaviour of domestic cats and their impact on prey populations. In ‘The domestic cat: the biology of its behaviour’. (Eds D. C. Turner and P. Bateson.) pp. 151–175. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Freeman, A. (1997). The conservation status of a coastal duneland lizard fauna at Kaitorete Spit, Canterbury, New Zealand. Herpetofauna 27, 25–30.
Gerow K. (2007). ‘StatsAlive RSTool.’ Available at http://www.statsalive.com/ [Verified December 2009].

Gillies, C. (2001). Advances in New Zealand mammalogy 1990–2000: house cat. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 31, 205–218.
Gillies C. A. , and Cutler A. (2001). ‘A Trial of the Liberator, Leap-activated, Audio Visual Alarm Collar for Cats for Wildlife Protection in Wellington, New Zealand.’ (The Royal Forest & Bird Protection Society: Wellington, New Zealand.)

Gillies C. A. , and Fitzgerald B. M. (2005). Feral cat. In ‘The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals’. (Ed. C. M. King.) pp. 307–326. (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Grayson, J. , Calver, M. , and Styles, I. (2002). Attitudes of suburban Western Australians to proposed cat control legislation. Australian Veterinary Journal 80, 536–543.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | Jewell T. R. (Ed.) (2006). ‘Central Otago lizards.’ (Jewell Publications: Otago.)

Johnson, D. H. (1980). The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61, 65–71.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Kenward R. , South A. B. , and Walls S. S. (2002). ‘Ranges 6: For the Analysis of Tracking and Location Data.’ (Anatrack Ltd: Wareham, UK.)

Kernohan B. J. , Gitzen R. A. , and Millspaugh J. (2001). Analysis of animal space use and movements. In ‘Radio Tracking and Animal Populations’. (Eds J. J. Millspaugh and J. M. Marzluff.) pp. 127–166. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)

King, C. M. , Flux, M. , Innes, J. G. , and Fitzgerald, B. M. (1996). Population biology of small mammals in Pureora Forest Park: 1. Carnivores (Mustela erminea, M. furo, M. nivalis, and Felis catus). New Zealand Journal of Ecology 20, 241–251.
Liberg O. , and Sandell M. (1988). Spatial organisation and reproductive tactics in the domestic cat and other felids. In ‘The domestic cat: the biology of its behaviour’. (Eds D. C. Turner and P. Bateson.) pp. 83–98. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Lilith, M. , Calver, M. C. , Styles, I. , and Garkaklis, M. (2006). Protecting wildlife from predation by owned domestic cats: application of a precautionary approach to the acceptability of proposed cat regulations. Austral Ecology 31, 176–189.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Lilith M. , Calver M. , and Garkaklis M. (2008). Roaming habits of pet cats on the suburban fringe in Perth, Western Australia: what size buffer zone is needed to protect wildlife in reserves? In ‘Pest or guest: the zoology of over abundance’. (Ed. D. Lunney.) pp. 65–72. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Manly B. F. J. , McDonald L. L. , Thomas D. L. , McDonald T. L. , and Erickson W. P. (2002). ‘Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies.’ (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.)

McCarthy S. (2005). Managing impacts of domestic cats in peri-urban reserves. In ‘Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Urban Animal Management in Australia’. (Australian Veterinary Committee: Canberra.) Available at http://www.uam.net.au/Publications/ [Verified November 2009].

Meek, P. D. (2003). Home range of house cats Felis catus living within a National Park. Australian Mammalogy 25, 51–60.
Moore S. (2001). Cat confinement – does it work? In ‘Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Urban Animal Management in Australia’. (Australian Veterinary Committee: Melbourne.) Available at http://www.uam.net.au/Publications/ [Verified November 2009].

Morgan S. A. (2002). Movements and hunting activity of house cats (Felis catus) living around Travis Wetland, Christchurch, New Zealand. M.Sc. Thesis, Lincoln University, New Zealand.

Nelson, S. H. , Evans, A. D. , and Bradbury, R. B. (2005). The efficacy of collar-mounted devices in reducing the rate of predation of wildlife by domestic cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 94, 273–285.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Norbury G. , Reardon J. , and McKinlay B. (2006). ‘Grand and Otago Skink Recovery Plan 2006–2016.’ (Department of Conservation: Dunedin, New Zealand.) Available at http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/conservation/native-animals/reptiles-and-frogs/grand-otago-skink-recovery-plan-draft.pdf [Verified November 2009].

Paton D. C. (1991). Loss of wildlife to domestic cats. In ‘Proceedings of a Workshop on the Impact of Cats on Native Wildlife’. (Ed. C. Potter.) pp. 64–69. (Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service: Canberra.)

Paton D. C. (1993). Impacts of domestic and feral cats on wildlife. In ‘Cat Management Workshop Proceedings 1993’. (Eds G. Siepen and C. Owens.) pp. 9–15. (Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage: Brisbane.)

Pierce R. J. (1987). ‘Predators in the MacKenzie Basin: Their Diet, Population Dynamics, and Impact on Birds in Relation to the Abundance and Availability of Their Main Prey (Rabbits).’ (New Zealand Wildlife Service, Department of Internal Affairs: Wellington, New Zealand.)

Ruxton, G. D. , Thomas, S. , and Wright, J. W. (2002). Bells reduce predation of wildlife by domestic cats (Felis catus). Journal of Zoology 256, 81–83.
Shaw T. (1994). ‘Population size, distribution, home range and translocation of the jewelled gecko, Naultinus gemmeus, at the Every Scientific Reserve, Otago Peninsula. Wildlife Management Reports.’ (University of Otago: Dunedin.)

Silverman B. W. (1986). ‘Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis.’ (Chapman and Hall: London.)

Sims, V. , Evans, K. L. , Newson, S. E. , Tratalos, J. A. , and Gaston, K. J. (2008). Avian assesmblage structure and domestic cat densities in urban environments. Diversity & Distributions 14, 387–399.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Whitaker A. H. (1996). Impact of agricultural development on grand skink (Oligosoma grande) (Reptilia: Scincidae) populations at Macraes Flat, Otago, New Zealand. Science for Conservation Report 33. Department of Conservation, Wellington. Available at http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/science-and-technical/sfc033.pdf [Verified November 2009].

Woods, M. , McDonald, R. A. , and Harris, S. (2003). Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain. Mammal Review 33, 174–188.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |