Can artificial nest-cavities be used as a management tool to assist the control of Common Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris)?
S. Campbell A D , C. Powell B , R. Parr A , K. Rose A , G. Martin A and A. Woolnough A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Vertebrate Pest Research Section, Department of Agriculture and Food, Forrestfield, WA 6058, Australia.
B Department of Agriculture and Food, Esperance, WA 6450, Australia.
C Current address: Invasive Plants & Animals Branch, Biosecurity Victoria, Department of Primary Industries, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: scampbell@agric.wa.gov.au
Emu 112(3) 255-260 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU11050
Submitted: 7 July 2011 Accepted: 11 April 2012 Published: 17 July 2012
Abstract
Invasive species represent the second greatest threat to biodiversity after habitat loss, and significantly affect agriculture worldwide. The Common Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) is one of the world’s worst invasive species and has established pest populations across the globe, with low-density, highly persecuted populations in Western Australia (WA) since the 1970s. This study examines the ongoing control of low-density populations of Common Starlings in WA. From May 2006 to June 2009 we monitored use by Common Starlings of 180 artificial nest-cavities of three designs, across three habitat types; the artificial cavities were standard wooden nest-boxes, and terracotta pipes orientated vertically or horizontally. During the trial, Common Starlings nested exclusively in wooden nest-boxes in swamps containing predominantly dead trees; they did not nest in the terracotta pipes. Wooden nest-boxes may have helped concentrate breeding Common Starlings in a defined area, thereby assisting control efforts.
Additional keywords: eradication, nest-box, pest control.
References
Aitken, K. E. H., and Martin, K. (2004). Nest cavity availability and selection in aspen-conifer groves in a grassland landscape. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34, 2099–2109.| Nest cavity availability and selection in aspen-conifer groves in a grassland landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Aitken, K. E. H., and Martin, K. (2008). Resource selection plasticity and community responses to experimental reduction of a critical resource. Ecology 89, 971–980.
| Resource selection plasticity and community responses to experimental reduction of a critical resource.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
ANZCCART (2001). ‘Australian and New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching.’ (Department of Environment Biology, University of Adelaide: Adelaide.)
Beyer, G. L., and Goldingay, R. L. (2006). The value of nest boxes in the research and management of Australian hollow-using arboreal marsupials. Wildlife Research 33, 161–174.
| The value of nest boxes in the research and management of Australian hollow-using arboreal marsupials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Coleman, J. D. (1974). The use of artificial nest sites erected for Starlings in Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 1, 349–354.
| The use of artificial nest sites erected for Starlings in Canterbury, New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
De Haven, R. W., and Guarino, J. L. (1969). A nest-box trap for Starlings. Bird Banding 40, 48–50.
| A nest-box trap for Starlings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Feare, C. (1984). ‘The Starling.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)
Goldingay, R. L., Grimson, M. J., and Smith, G. C. (2007). Do Feathertail Gliders show a preference for nest box design? Wildlife Research 34, 484–490.
| Do Feathertail Gliders show a preference for nest box design?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gong, W., Sinden, J., Braysher, M., and Jones, R. (2009). The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia. Report prepared for the Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre Detection and Prevention’s Project, Canberra, ACT.
Grant, J. (1997). ‘The Nestbox Book.’ (Gould League of Victoria Inc.: Melbourne)
Harper, M. J., McCarthy, M. A., and van der Ree, R. (2005). The use of nest boxes in urban natural vegetation remnants by vertebrate fauna. Wildlife Research 32, 509–516.
| The use of nest boxes in urban natural vegetation remnants by vertebrate fauna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkpatrick, W., Payne, R., and Woolnough, A. P. (2007). Captive Starling management. Report on the management of Common Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) kept in aviaries at Eucla and Esperance, Western Australia. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Perth.
Lafleur, N. E., Rubega, M. A., and Elphick, C. S. (2007). Invasive fruits, novel foods, and choice: an investigation of European Starling and American Robin frugivory. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 119, 429–438.
| Invasive fruits, novel foods, and choice: an investigation of European Starling and American Robin frugivory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lombardo, M. P., and Thorpe, P. A. (2010). Local breeding experience and the reproductive performance of Tree Swallows. Journal of Field Ornithology 81, 294–301.
| Local breeding experience and the reproductive performance of Tree Swallows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Long, J. L. (1981). ‘Introduced Birds of the World. The Worldwide History, Distribution and Influence of Birds Introduced to New Environments.’ (Reed: Sydney.)
Low, M., and Pärt, T. (2009). Patterns of mortality for each life-history stage in a population of the endangered New Zealand Stitchbird. Journal of Animal Ecology 78, 761–771.
| Patterns of mortality for each life-history stage in a population of the endangered New Zealand Stitchbird.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lowe, S., Browne, M., Boudjelas, S., and De Poorter, M. (2000). 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species. A selection from the global species database. Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) of the Species Survival Group (SSC), International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Auckland, NZ. Available at http://www.issg.org/worst100_species.html [verified 27 June 2012].
MacLeod, R., Clarke, J., and Cresswell, W. (2008). The starvation–predation risk trade-off, body mass and population status in the Common Starling Sturnus vulgaris. Ibis 150, 199–208.
| The starvation–predation risk trade-off, body mass and population status in the Common Starling Sturnus vulgaris.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pell, A. S., and Tidemann, C. R. (1997). The impact of two exotic hollow-nesting birds on two native parrots in savannah and woodland in eastern Australia. Biological Conservation 79, 145–153.
| The impact of two exotic hollow-nesting birds on two native parrots in savannah and woodland in eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pöysa, H., and Pöysa, S. (2002). Nest-site limitation and density dependence of reproductive output in the Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula: implications for the management of cavity-nesting birds. Journal of Applied Ecology 39, 502–510.
| Nest-site limitation and density dependence of reproductive output in the Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula: implications for the management of cavity-nesting birds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rendell, W. B., and Robertson, R. J. (1994). Cavity-entrance orientation and nest-site use by secondary hole-nesting birds. Journal of Field Ornithology 65, 27–35.
Sedgwick, J. A., and Knopf, F. L. (1990). Habitat relationships and nest site characteristics of cavity-nesting birds in cottonwood floodplains. Journal of Wildlife Management 54, 112–124.
| Habitat relationships and nest site characteristics of cavity-nesting birds in cottonwood floodplains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stewart, P. A. (1972). Prevention of Starlings from lifting shutter on automatic nest-box trap. Bird Banding 43, 214.
| Prevention of Starlings from lifting shutter on automatic nest-box trap.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Strubbe, D., and Matthysen, E. (2009). Establishment success of invasive Ring-necked and Monk Parakeets in Europe. Journal of Biogeography 36, 2264–2278.
| Establishment success of invasive Ring-necked and Monk Parakeets in Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tracey, J., Bomford, M., Hart, Q., Saunders, G., and Sinclair, R. (2007). Managing bird damage to fruit and other horticultural crops . Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, ACT.
Woolnough, A. P., Massam, M. C., Payne, R. L., and Pickles, G. G. (2005). Out on the border: keeping Starlings out of Western Australia. In ‘Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Vertebrate Pest Conference’, 2–6 May 2005, Wellington, New Zealand. pp. 183–189. (Landcare Research: Wellington, New Zealand.)
Woolnough, A. P., Lowe, T. J., and Rose, K. (2006). Can the Judas technique be applied to pest birds? Wildlife Research 33, 449–455.
| Can the Judas technique be applied to pest birds?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |