Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Single large or several small marine reserves for the Caribbean spiny lobster?


Marine and Freshwater Research 52(8) 1605 - 1614
Published: 25 January 2002

Abstract

The ‘SLOSS’ debate—Single Large Or Several Small protected areas—remains unresolved. We used a heuristic model based on population dynamics of Caribbean spiny lobster in Exuma Sound, Bahamas, to compare impacts of regional reserve designs that configured 20% of available coastal habitat as either a randomly located single large reserve or a network of six small, randomly located reserves on three performance indicators (fishery yield, larval production, population growth rate) for a hypothetical overexploited lobster population. Two additional management strategies were considered: one reduced effort by 20% (without protected areas), and one did nothing. Effects were evaluated for two levels of hydrodynamic variability. In general, performance indicators ranked the management strategies, independent of hydrodynamic variability, from best to worst in the order (1) single large reserve (2) several small reserves (3) reduced effort (4) no management action, but differences were not always significant. Therefore, for the model regional system investigated here, a single large reserve is preferable to several small ones. We propose that this conservation strategy is most suitable at the regional scale (~100s of kilometres) and that such single, large regional reserves would function most effectively within a broadscale (~1000s of kilometres) reserve network, barring local catastrophes.

https://doi.org/10.1071/MF01179

© CSIRO 2002

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions