Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Healthcare Infection Healthcare Infection Society
Official Journal of the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Improved surveillance and mandated use of sharps with engineered sharp injury protections: a national call to action

Cathryn Murphy
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, QLD 4229 and Infection Control Plus, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. Email: cmurp@icp.au.com

Healthcare Infection 13(2) 33-37 https://doi.org/10.1071/HI08019
Published: 18 June 2008

Abstract

Based on the 2435 parenteral exposures sustained by staff reported in 2005 from 170 Australian hospitals, it is possible that an estimated more than 18 500 needle-stick injuries (NSIs) could occur in Australian hospitals each year. These injuries are largely preventable. Each injury causes significant distress to the involved healthcare worker. To reduce the local burden of NSI, administrators and clinicians require incident and organisation-specific information. This information enables targeted prevention strategies, including safety engineered devices, to be implemented. The larger the dataset of NSI information, the better the opportunity to develop appropriate targeted strategies. Unfortunately, the Australian healthcare sector has, to date, largely overlooked the issue of standardising NSI monitoring, with a small 56-hospital, quasi-national surveillance system becoming non-operational in 1998. However, the recent initial enthusiasm the sector has demonstrated for increased patient and healthcare worker safety provides an excellent platform from which to consider possible models that could be adopted for routine monitoring of NSIs and mandated use of safety engineered devices.


References


[1] Mallon DF,  Shearwood W,  Mallal SA,  French MA,  Dawkins RL. Exposure to blood borne infections in health care workers. Med J Aust 1992; 157 592–5.
PubMed | [accessed March 2007].

[6] Whitby M,  McLaws ML,  Slater K. Needlestick injuries in a major teaching hospital: the worthwhile effect of hospital-wide replacement of conventional hollow-bore needles. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36 180–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [accessed 25th May 2008].

[8] Jagger J. Protecting healthcare workers from bloodborne pathogen risk: going global. 34th Annual Meeting of the Association of Professionals in Infection Control (APIC); 2007 June 26; San Jose, CA, USA. Washington, DC: APIC; 2007.

[9] Jagger JC. Are Australia’s healthcare workers stuck with inadequate needle protection? The most direct way to reduce percutaneous injuries is to make devices safer. Med J Aust 2002; 177 405–6.
PubMed | [accessed February 2008].

[14] European Federation of Nurses Associations. Second stage consultation of the social partners on protecting EU healthcare workers from blood-borne infections resulting from needlesticks injuries. London: Health and Safety Executive; 2007 (updated 2008). Available online from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/healthservices/needlesticks/euupdate.htm [accessed April 2008].

[15] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Workbook for designing, implementing, and evaluating a sharps injury prevention program. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003.

[16] Sohn S,  Eagan J,  Sepkowitz KA,  Zuccotti G. Effect of implementing safety-engineered devices on percutaneous injury epidemiology. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004; 25 536–42.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [accessed February 2007].

[21] Richards MJ , Russo PL . Surveillance of hospital-acquired infections in Australia – one nation, many states. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Hospital Infection Society 2007; J Hosp Infect 2007 65 : 174 –81 .

[22] Venier AG,  Vincent A,  L’Heriteau F,  Floret N,  Sénéchal H,  Abiteboul D, et al. Surveillance of occupational blood and body fluid exposures among French healthcare workers in 2004. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28 1196–201.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [accessed February 2007].

[32] Health Protection Agency. Eye of the needle. United Kingdom Surveillance of significant occupational exposure to bloodborne viruses in healthcare workers. London: Health Protection Agency; 2006. Available online from: http://www.camr.org.uk/webc/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1205394781623 [accessed March 2008].

[33] New South Wales Department of Health. Sharps injuries – prevention in the NSW public health system. Sydney: New South Wales Department of Health; 2007. Available online from: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/pd/2007/PD2007_052.html [accessed July 2007].

[34] Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Infection control guidelines for the prevention of transmission of infectious diseases in the health care setting. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; 2004. Available online from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/icg-guidelines-index.htm [accessed March 2008].