Design of β-Secretase Inhibitors by Introduction of a Mandelyl Moiety in DAPT Analogues
Nicolas Pietrancosta A , Gilles Quéléver A , Younes Laras A , Cédrik Garino A , Stéphane Burlet A and Jean Louis Kraus A BA INSERM U-623, Institut de Biologie du Développement de Marseille (CNRS–INSERM–Université de la Méditerranée), Laboratoire de Chimie Biomoléculaire, Faculté des Sciences de Luminy, case 907, 13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France.
B Corresponding author. Email: kraus@luminy.univ-mrs.fr
Australian Journal of Chemistry 58(8) 585-594 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH05102
Submitted: 21 April 2005 Accepted: 17 June 2005 Published: 31 August 2005
Abstract
We report the synthesis of two series of compounds with 3,5-difluoromandelyl-alanyl or 3,5-difluorophenylacetyl-alanyl backbones coupled to various heterocyclic or peptidic moieties. These two series of compounds were evaluated for their inhibitory properties on β-secretase (BACE-1) enzymatic assay, a target enzyme for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology. We found that both diastereomers obtained from the racemic mixture 7 of the coumarin derivative bearing a mandelyl moiety were the most potent BACE-1 inhibitors studied in this work (IC50 = 1 × 10−6 M). Analysis of the obtained results led to the hypothesis that introduction of a difluoromandelyl residue in place of a difluorophenylacetyl moiety may induce β-secretase inhibitory activity.
Acknowledgments
INSERM and Conseil Régional Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur are greatly acknowledged for financial support (fellowships for N.P. and C.G.). We are grateful to Dr Philippe Pierre and members of his research team (CIML, Inserm-CNRS, Université de la Méditerranée, France) for their assistance when we performed the spectrofluorimetric measurements for the BACE-1 (β-secretase) FRET assays. The authors thank Prof. Keith Dudley (INSERM U-623) for manuscript preparation.
[1]
M. Citron,
Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2004, 25, 92.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
and references therein.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |