Register      Login
Australian Mammalogy Australian Mammalogy Society
Journal of the Australian Mammal Society

Articles citing this paper

More haste, less speed: pilot study suggests camera trap detection zone could be more important than trigger speed to maximise species detections

Bronwyn A. Fancourt A D , Mark Sweaney B and Don B. Fletcher C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Woodlands and Wetlands Trust, PO Box 58, Fyshwick, ACT 2609, Australia. Present address: Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

B ACT Parks and Conservation Service, Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, 66–68 Grimwade Street, Mitchell, ACT 2911, Australia.

C Conservation Research, Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, PO Box 158, Canberra City, ACT 2601, Australia. Present address: 15 Wandoo Street, O’Connor, ACT 2602, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: Bronwyn.Fancourt@daf.qld.gov.au

Australian Mammalogy 40(1) 118-121 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM17004
Submitted: 3 February 2017  Accepted: 30 March 2017   Published: 30 May 2017



17 articles found in Crossref database.

Comparison of spotlighting and trapping in population surveys of the squirrel glider
Goldingay Ross L., Taylor Brendan D.
Australian Mammalogy. 2021 44(2). p.208
Optimising camera trap height and model increases detection and individual identification rates for a small mammal, the numbat (
Seidlitz Anke, Bryant Kate A., Armstrong Nicola J., Calver Michael, Wayne Adrian F.
Australian Mammalogy. 2020 43(2). p.226
Camera trap flash-type does not influence the behaviour of feral cats (Felis catus)
Taggart Patrick L., Peacock David E., Fancourt Bronwyn A.
Australian Mammalogy. 2020 42(2). p.220
Evidence of significantly higher island feral cat abundance compared with the adjacent mainland
Taggart Patrick L., Fancourt Bronwyn A., Bengsen Andrew J., Peacock David E., Hodgens Patrick, Read John L., McAllister Milton M., Caraguel Charles G. B.
Wildlife Research. 2019 46(5). p.378
Two Methods of Monitoring Cats at a Landscape-Scale
Lohr Cheryl A., Nilsson Kristen, Johnson Ashleigh, Hamilton Neil, Onus Mike, Algar Dave
Animals. 2021 11(12). p.3562
Towards a best‐practices guide for camera trapping: assessing differences among camera trap models and settings under field conditions
Palencia P., Vicente J., Soriguer R. C., Acevedo P.
Journal of Zoology. 2022 316(3). p.197
The influence of bait and camera type on detection of a spectrum of medium-sized Australian mammals
Goldingay Ross L., Vernes Karl
Australian Mammalogy. 2024 46(2).
Field assessment of the risk of feral cat baits to nontarget species in eastern Australia
Fancourt Bronwyn A., Zirbel Christine, Cremasco Peter, Elsworth Peter, Harry Glen, Gentle Matthew N.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2022 18(1). p.224
Spot the difference: optimising camera trap use to detect and identify individuals of a medium-sized carnivorous marsupial
Taylor Melissa C., Wayne Adrian F., Armstrong Nicola J., Calver Michael C., Bryant Kate A., Goldingay Ross
Australian Mammalogy. 2024 46(2).
Camera traps are an effective method for identifying individuals and determining the sex of spotted-tailed quolls (Dasyurus maculatus gracilis)
Rowland Jesse, Hoskin Conrad J., Burnett Scott
Australian Mammalogy. 2020 42(3). p.349
Sign surveys can be more efficient and cost effective than driven transects and camera trapping: a comparison of detection methods for a small elusive mammal, the numbat (
Seidlitz Anke, Bryant Kate A., Armstrong Nicola J., Calver Michael C., Wayne Adrian F.
Wildlife Research. 2021 48(6). p.491
Optimising camera trap surveys for the Carpentarian Pseudantechinus (Pseudantechinus mimulus) in northwest Queensland
Barnes Jarrad C., Sanders Mark G., Burnett Scott E.
Austral Ecology. 2023 48(2). p.233
Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison
Hofmeester Tim R., Cromsigt Joris P. G. M., Odden John, Andrén Henrik, Kindberg Jonas, Linnell John D. C.
Ecology and Evolution. 2019 9(4). p.2320
Animal detections increase by using a wide-angle camera trap model but not by periodically repositioning camera traps within study sites
Seidlitz Anke, Bryant Kate A., Armstrong Nicola J., Wayne Adrian F.
Pacific Conservation Biology. 2021 28(1). p.25
The importance of species-specific survey designs: prey camera trap surveys significantly underestimate the detectability of endangered spotted-tailed quolls
Henderson T., Fancourt B. A., Ballard G., Goldingay Ross
Australian Mammalogy. 2022 44(3). p.380
The effect of camera orientation on the detectability of wildlife: a case study from north‐western Australia
Moore Harry A., Valentine Leonie E., Dunlop Judy A., Nimmo Dale G., Rowcliffe Marcus, Caravaggi Anthony
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. 2020 6(4). p.546
Elucidating Patterns in the Occurrence of Threatened Ground-Dwelling Marsupials Using Camera-Traps
Claridge , Paull , Welbourne
Animals. 2019 9(11). p.913

Committee on Publication Ethics


Abstract Export Citation