Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander preferences for healthcare settings: effective use of design images in survey research
Michele Haynes A B F , Timothy O’Rourke C , Daphne Nash D , Bernard Baffour A E , Sue York A , Carys Chainey A , Georgia Betros A and Paul Memmott A DA Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Long Pocket Precinct, 80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia. Email: susan.york@uq.edu.au; c.chainey@uq.edu.au; georgia.betros@gmail.com
B Institute for Learning Sciences and Teacher Education, Australian Catholic University, 229 Elizabeth Street, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia.
C School of Architecture, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. Email: t.orourke@uq.edu.au
D Aboriginal Environments Research Centre, School of Architecture, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. Email: d.nash@uq.edu.au; p.memmott@uq.edu.au
E School of Demography, The Australian National University, 9 Fellows Road, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.Email: bernard.baffour@anu.edu.au
F Corresponding author. Email: michele.haynes@acu.edu.au
Australian Health Review 44(2) 222-227 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH18196
Submitted: 23 September 2018 Accepted: 9 December 2018 Published: 23 April 2019
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to develop an effective digital survey instrument incorporating images to investigate Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander preferences for health clinics and hospitals, design of healthcare settings and the differences between inner regional and remote locations.
Methods Design-related constructs developed from qualitative interviews informed the construction of healthcare setting images. These images were embedded in an online survey instrument to elicit data on design preferences and an area-based recruitment strategy ensured participation by Indigenous Australians from three Queensland locations. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the odds of preference for a healthcare setting design by location.
Results Statistical analysis of data from 602 participants showed a preference for health care at an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clinic. The odds of preference for an in-patient room with a two- versus single-bed design was greater for participants with less education, and lower for participants with a long-term health problem.
Conclusions The multidisciplinary approach to developing an online survey instrument with images and the willingness of Indigenous people of all ages to engage with the images demonstrated the effectiveness of this method in providing robust evidence for the design of culturally appropriate healthcare spaces for Indigenous users.
What is known about the topic? Evidence-based research influences the design of healthcare buildings, yet the field currently provides negligible evidence on cross-cultural perceptions or experiences of conventional modern hospitals and clinics. Although recent healthcare buildings show signs of acknowledging Indigenous users, general principles in the Australian Health Facility Guidelines give limited specific information about how cultural requirements may translate into architectural design.
What does this paper add? The multidisciplinary approach to research design has enabled the development of healthcare design-related constructs from consultation with Indigenous people, the presentation of these constructs as images and the inclusion of these images for comparison and selection in a digital survey instrument. Combined with a culturally appropriate recruitment strategy, this survey provides evidence from a large sample of the Indigenous population. Selected results from analyses of survey responses show the capacity of the methodological approach to address broader questions about Indigenous preferences for healthcare settings by location, age and sex.
What are the implications for practitioners? A focus on individual preferences related to healthcare clinics and the combined significance of design and setting can give practitioners a better understanding of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s preferences and suggest ways to reduce the incidence of poor engagement with healthcare services.
Additional keywords: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health, cultural safety, healthcare architecture, survey design.
References
[1] Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council (AHMAC). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health performance framework 2017 report. Canberra: AHMAC; 2017.[2] Grant E, Greenop K. Affirming and reaffirming Indigenous presence: contemporary Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community, public and institutional architecture in Australia. In: Grant E, Greenop K, Refiti A, Glenn D, editors. The handbook of contemporary Indigenous architecture. Singapore: Springer; 2018. pp. 57–105.
[3] Australasian Health Infrastructure Alliance (AHIA). Australian health facility guidelines. Sydney: AHIA; 2016.
[4] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s health 2016. Canberra: AIHW; 2016.
[5] Taylor K, Guerin P. Health care and Indigenous Australians: cultural safety in practice. 1st edn. Melbourne: Elizabeth Vella on behalf of Palgrave Macmillan; 2010.
[6] Fredericks BL. There is nothing that ‘identifies me to that place’: Aboriginal women’s perceptions of health spaces and places. Cult Stud Rev 2009; 15 46–61.
[7] Department of Families Housing Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA). National Indigenous housing guide: improving the living environment for safety, health and sustainability. Canberra: FaHCSIA; 2012.
[8] Memmott P, Chambers C. Take 2: housing design in Indigenous Australia. Canberra: The Royal Australian Institute of Architects; 2003.
[9] Ross H. Just for living: Aboriginal perceptions of housing in northwest Australia. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press; 1987.
[10] Johnston E. Royal Commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody, national report. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1991.
[11] Grant E. Approaches to the design and provision of prison accommodation and facilities for Australian Indigenous prisoners after the Royal Commission into aboriginal deaths in custody. Aust Indigen Law Rev 2013; 17 47–55.
[12] Devlin AS, Arneill AB. Health care environments and patient outcomes: a review of the literature. Environ Behav 2003; 35 665–94.
| Health care environments and patient outcomes: a review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[13] Ulrich RS. Effects of interior design on wellness: theory and recent scientific research. J Health Care Inter Des 1991; 3 97–109.
| 10123973PubMed |
[14] Verderber S. Dimensions of person–window transactions in the hospital environment. Environ Behav 1986; 18 450–66.
| Dimensions of person–window transactions in the hospital environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Ulrich RS. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 1984; 224 420–1.
| View through a window may influence recovery from surgery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 6143402PubMed |
[16] Rollins JA. Arousing curiosity: when hospital art transcends. HERD 2011; 4 72–94.
| 21866505PubMed |
[17] Ulrich RS, Zimring C, Zhu X, DuBose J, Seo HB, Choi YS, Quan X, Joseph A. A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. HERD 2008; 1 61–125.
| 21161908PubMed |
[18] Cunha M, Silva N. Hospital noise and patients’ wellbeing. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2015; 171 246–51.
| Hospital noise and patients’ wellbeing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Duckett S, Griffiths K. Perils of place: identifying hotspots of health inequalities. Carlton: Grattan Institute; 2016. Available at: https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/874-Perils-of-Place.pdf [verified 15 February 2019].
[20] Productivity Commision. Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage: key indicators 2016. Canberra: Australian Government Productivity Commission; 2016.
[21] Thomson DM, McEwan JA. An application of the repertory grid method to investigate consumer perceptions of foods. Appetite 1988; 10 181–93.
| An application of the repertory grid method to investigate consumer perceptions of foods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 3214144PubMed |
[22] Hudson R. Images of the retailing environment: an example of the use of the repertory grid methodology. Environ Behav 1974; 6 470–94.
| Images of the retailing environment: an example of the use of the repertory grid methodology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Tomico O, Karapanos E, Levy P, Mizutani N, Yamanaka T. The repertory grid technique as a method for the study of cultural differences. Int J Des 2009; 3 55–63.
[24] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia’s health 2014. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.
[25] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Enumerated Persons, Place of Usual Residence, Census of Population and Housing 2011, TableBuilder. Findings based on use of ABS TableBuilder data. Canberra: ABS; 2011.
[26] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Enumerated Persons, Place of Usual Residence, Census of Population and Housing 2016, TableBuilder. Findings based on use of ABS TableBuilder data. Canberra: ABS; 2016.
[27] Bureau of Health Information (BHI). Patient perspectives: hospital care for Aboriginal people. Sydney: BHI; 2016.
