Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR10029
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 37(8)

Ex-post compensation payments for wolf predation on livestock in Italy: a tool for conservation?

Luigi Boitani A C , Paolo Ciucci A and Elisabetta Raganella-Pelliccioni B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie, Sapienza Università di Roma, Viale dell’Università, 32, 00185 Roma, Italy.

B Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e Ricerca Ambientale, Via Ca Fornacetta 9, 40064 Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy.

C Corresponding author. Email: luigi.boitani@uniroma1.it

Wildlife Research 37(8) 722-730 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR10029
Submitted: 19 February 2010  Accepted: 25 August 2010   Published: 22 December 2010

Abstract

Context. Compensation programs have become a common tool to mitigate conflicts between farmers and large predators; however, their effectiveness is based on a series of assumptions that should be carefully and continuously assessed within an adaptive management framework. Ex-post compensation programs were adopted in Italy as a financial incentive to aid wolf conservation since the 1970s; however, their implementation has never been monitored nor actively managed in the past 35 years, during which time a remarkable recovery of wolf population and range expansion into more human-dominated landscapes has taken place.

Aims. We hereby report on wolf-damage compensation programs in Italy and discuss their conservation value.

Methods. We used data on wolf-damage compensation that we compiled at the national scale for the period 1991–95. Although not recent, these were unfortunately the only available data at the national scale, and were instrumental in supporting our discussion on compensation programs, as these are increasingly becoming a politically and economically sensitive issue.

Key results. From 1991 to 1995, annual compensation costs represented on average 86% of the alleged losses to farmers, and averaged €1 825  440 (±169 760 s.d.), or about €5150 (±750) per wolf per year. Compensation costs varied markedly from region to region, although local differences were hardly explainable in terms of wolf densities and their trends at the regional scale. On the contrary, they appeared largely affected by inconsistencies in rules and procedures of regional compensation schemes.

Conclusions. In the light of persistently high occurrence of wolf–livestock conflict, and widespread illegal killing of wolves, we argue that compensation programs in Italy currently provide no evidence of being a functional and cost-effective conservation tool. However, lack of monitoring of compensation costs in Italy at all institutional levels, including non-government organisations (NGOs), reveals that compensation policies are not being evaluated, nor is their effectiveness being assessed.

Implications. We contend this is an unwise and unsustainable strategy to reduce the conflict, especially in the light of the recent increase in wolf numbers and, most importantly, a marked change in livestock husbandry practices. By emphasising the need for a thorough revision of the compensation schemes adopted for wolf conservation in Italy, we advocate new and theoretically sound solutions to current compensation policies.

Additional keywords: compensation programs, large carnivores, wolf, wolf–livestock conflicts.


References

Bangs E. E. , Fritts S. H. , Harms D. R. , Fontaine J. A. , Jimenez M. D. , Brewster W. G. , and Niemeyer C. C. (1995). Control of endangered gray wolves in Montana. In ‘Ecology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World: Proceedings of the Second North American Symposium on Wolves’. (Eds L. N. Carbyn, S. H. Fritts and D. R. Seip.) pp. 127–134. Occasional Publication number 35. (Canadian Circumpolar Institute: Edmonton, Alberta.)

Bangs, E. E. , Fritts, S. H. , Fontaine, J. A. , Smith, D. W. , Murphy, K. M. , Mack, C. M. , and Niemeyer, C. C. (1998). Status of the gray wolf restoration in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26, 785–798.
Blanco J. C. , Cuesta L. , and Reig S. (1990). El lobo en España: una vision global. In ‘El Lobo (Canis lupus) en España. Situacion, Problematica y Apuntes Sobre su Ecologia’. (Eds J. C. Blanco, L. Cuesta and S. Reig.) pp. 69–93. (Ministero de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentacion, Icona: Madrid.)

Boitani L. (1982). Wolf management in intensively used areas of Italy. In ‘Wolves of the World. Perspectives of Behavior, Ecology and Conservation’. (Eds F. H. Harrington and P. C. Paquet.) pp. 158–172. (Noyes Publications: Park Ridge, NJ.)

Boitani, L. (1992). Wolf research and conservation in Italy. Biological Conservation 61, 125–132.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Boitani L. (1995). Ecological and cultural diversities in the evolution of wolf–human relationships. In ‘Ecology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World: Proceedings of the Second North American Symposium on Wolves’. (Eds L. N. Carbyn, S. H. Fritts and D. R. Seip.) pp. 3–11. Occasional Publication number 35. (Canadian Circumpolar Institute: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.)

Boitani, L. (2000). Action Plan for the European Wolves. Nature and Environment (Strasbourg, France) 113, 1–86.
Boitani L. (2003). Wolf conservation and recovery. In ‘Wolves. Behaviour, Ecology and Conservation’. (Eds L. D. Mech and L. Boitani.) pp. 317–340. (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.)

Boitani, L. , and Fabbri, M. L. (1983). Censimento dei cani in Italia con particolare riguardo al fenomeno del randagismo. Ricerche Biologia della Selvaggina 73, 1–42.
Boitani L. , and Ciucci P. (1993). Wolves in Italy: critical issues for their conservation. In ‘Wolf in Europe: Status and Perspectives’. (Eds C. Promberger and W. Schroder.) pp. 75–90. (Wildbiologische Gesel: Munchen, Oberammergau, Germany.)

Boitani L. , and Ciucci P. (1996). ‘Programma di Ricerca e Gestione del Lupo in Toscana: Relazione Finale.’ (Dipartimento Agricoltura e Foreste, Regione Toscana, Firenze, Italy.) [In Italian].

Breitenmoser, U. (1998). Large predators in the Alps: the rise and fall of man’s competitors. Biological Conservation 83, 279–289.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ciucci P. , and Boitani L. (1998 b). Il lupo. Elementi di biologia, gestione, ricerca., Documenti Tecnici dell’Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica 23. INFS, Bologna, Italy.

Ciucci, P. , and Boitani, L. (2005). Wolf-livestock conflict in Italy: knowledge, research and conservation. Biologia e Conservazione della Fauna (INFS, Bologna) 115, 26–51.[In Italian, with abstract in English].
Fernández A. , Fernández J. M. , and Palomero G. (1990). El lobo an Cantabria. In ‘El lobo (Canis lupus) en España. Situacion, problematica y apuntes sobre su ecologia’. (Eds J. C. Blanco, L. Cuesta and S. Reig.) pp. 33–44. (Ministero de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentacion, Icona: Madrid.)

Ferraro, P. J. , and Kiss, A. (2002). Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science. New Series 298, 1718–1719.
|  CAS | Fourli M. (1999). Compensation for damage caused by bears and wolves in the European Union: experiences from the LIFE – Nature projects. Report to Directorate General XI of the European Commission, Bruxelles, Belgium.

Fritts S. H. (1982). Wolf depredation on livestock in Minnesota. Resource Publication 145. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.

Fritts S. H. , Paul W. J. , Mech L. D. , and Scott D. P. (1992). Trends and management of wolf–livestock conflicts in Minnesota. Resource Publications 181. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.

Fritts S. H. , Stephenson R. O. , Hayes R. D. , and Boitani L. (2003). Wolves and humans. In ‘Wolves. Behaviour, Ecology and Conservation’. (Eds L. D. Mech and L. Boitani.) pp. 289–316. (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.)

Guacci C. (1985). Il lupo nel Molise. In ‘Atti del Convegno Nazionale Gruppo Lupo Italia’. (Ed. G. Boscagli.) pp. 97–104. (Università di Camerino: Camerino, Italy.)

Gusset, M. , Maddock, A. H. , Gunther, G. J. , Szykman, M. , Slotow, R. , Walters, M. , and Somers, M. J. (2008). Conflicting human interests over the re-introduction of endangered wild dogs in South Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 17, 83–101.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Kaczensky P. (1996). ‘Carnivores and Sheep Farming in Norway. Large Carnivore–Livestock Conflicts in Europe.’ (Wildbiologische Gesellschaft: Munchen, Germany.)

Linnell J. , and Brøseth H. (2003). Compensation for large carnivore depredation of domestic sheep 1994–2001. In ‘Carnivore Damage Prevention News 6’. (Eds C. Angst, J.-M. Landry, J. Linnell and U. Breitenmooser.) pp. 11–13. Available at www.lcie.org [accessed 3 February 2010].

Linnell J. D. , Smith M. E. , Odden J. , Kaczensky P. , and Swenson J. (1996). Carnivores and sheep farming in Norway. 4. Strategies for the reduction of carnivores–livestock conflicts: a review. NINA Oppdragsmelding 443 (Norvegian Institute of Nature Conservation: Trondheim, Norway.)

Lovari, S. , Sforzi, A. , Scala, C. , and Fico, R. (2007). Mortality parameters of the wolf in Italy: does the wolf keep himself from the door? Journal of Zoology 272, 117–124.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Nyhus P. J. , Osofsky S. A. , Ferraro P. , Madden F. , and Fischer H. (2005). Bearing the costs of human–wildlife conflict: the challenges of compensation schemes. In ‘People and Wildlife, Conflict or Coexistence?’. (Eds R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood and A. Rabinowitz.) pp. 107–121. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Ostrom E. (1990). ‘Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Parsons, D. R. (1998). ‘Green fire’ returns to the Southwest: reintroduction of the Mexican wolf. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26, 799–807.
Savelli B. , Antonelli F. , and Boitani L. (1998). The impact of livestock support on carnivore conservation. A report to the Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe. Istituto Ecologia Applicata, Roma, Italy. Available at www.lcie.org [accessed 3 February 2010].

Schröder W. , and Promberger C. (1993). Wolf conservation strategy for Europe. In ‘Wolf in Europe: Status and Perspectives’. (Eds C. Promberger and W. Schroder.) pp. 2–7. (Wildbiologische Gesellschaft, Munchen: Oberammergau, Germany.)

Schwerdtner, K. , and Gruber, B. (2007). A conceptual framework for damage compensation schemes. Biological Conservation 134, 354–360.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sokal R. R. , and Rohlf F. J. (1995). ‘Biometry.’ 3rd edn. (W. H. Freeman and Co.: New York.)

Stone S. (2009). Compensation and non-lethal deterrent programs: building tolerance for wolf restoration in the Rockies. In ‘A New Era for Wolves and People: Wolf Recovery, Human Attitudes, and Policy’. (Eds M. Musiani, L. Boitani and P. C. Paquet.) pp.141–160. (University of Calgary Press: Calgary, Canada.)

Swenson J. E. , and Andren H. (2005). A tale of two countries: large carnivore depredation and compensation schemes in Sweden and Norway. In ‘People and Wildlife, Conflict or Coexistence?’. (Eds R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood and A. Rabinowitz.) pp. 323–339. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Telleria, J. L. , and Saez-Royuela, C. (1989). Ecologia de una poblacion iberica de lobos (Canis lupus). Donana Acta Vertebrata 16, 105–122.


Treves, A. , and Karanth, K. U. (2003). Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conservation Biology 17, 1491–1499.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Treves, A. , Jurewicz, R. R. , Naughton-Treves, L. , Rose, R. A. , Willing, R. C. , and Wydeven, A. P. (2002). Wolf depredation on domestic animals in Wisconsin, 1976–2000. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30, 231–241.


Tropini, A. (2005). The impact of predators on livestock in the province of Cuneo (Italy). Biologia e Conservazione della Fauna (INFS, Bologna) 115, 102–115.[In Italian, with abstract in English].


Van Eerden, M. R. (1990). The solution of goose damage problems in the Netherlands, with special reference to compensation schemes. The Ibis 132, 253–261.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woodroffe, R. , Frank, L. G. , Lindsey, P. A. , Ole Ranah, S. M. K. , and Romañach, S. (2007). Livestock husbandry as a tool for carnivore conservation in Africa’s community rangelands: a case control study. Biodiversity and Conservation 16, 1245–1260.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zabel, A. , and Holm-Müller, K. (2008). Conservation performance payments for carnivore conservation in Sweden. Conservation Biology 22, 247–251.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

Zabel, A. , and Roe, B. (2009). Optimal design of pro-conservation incentives. Ecological Economics 69, 126–134.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |